Neurosensory assessments of migraine

Methodology of the INVestigating traIning assoCiated blasT pAthology (INVICTA) study

BACKGROUND

Subconcussive blast exposure during military training has been the subject of both anecdotal concerns and reports in the medical literature, but prior studies have often been small and have used inconsistent methods.

METHODS

This paper presents the methodology employed in INVestigating traIning assoCiated blasT pAthology (INVICTA) to assess a wide range of aspects of brain function, including immediate and delayed recall, gait and balance, audiologic and oculomotor function, cerebral blood flow, brain electrical activity and neuroimaging and blood biomarkers.

RESULTS

A number of the methods employed in INVICTA are relatively easy to reproducibly utilize, and can be completed efficiently, while other measures require greater technical expertise, take longer to complete, or may have logistical challenges.

CONCLUSIONS

This presentation of methods used to assess the impact of blast exposure on the brain is intended to facilitate greater uniformity of data collection in this setting, which would enable comparison between different types of blast exposure and environmental circumstances, as well as to facilitate meta-analyses and syntheses across studies.

Nonlinear age effects in tactile processing from early childhood to adulthood

BACKGROUND

Tactile processing plays a pivotal role in the early stages of human development; however, little is known about tactile function in young children. An understanding of how tactile processing changes with age from early childhood to adulthood is fundamental in understanding altered tactile experiences in neurodevelopmental disorders, such as autism spectrum disorder.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 142 children and adults aged 3-23 years completed a vibrotactile testing battery consisting of 5 tasks, which rely on different cortical and cognitive mechanisms. The battery was designed to be suitable for testing in young children to investigate how tactile processing changes from early childhood to adulthood.

RESULTS

Our results suggest a pattern of rapid, age-related changes in tactile processing toward lower discrimination thresholds (lower discrimination thresholds = greater sensitivity) across early childhood, though we acknowledge limitations with cross-sectional data. Differences in the rate of change across tasks were observed, with tactile performance reaching adult-like levels at a younger age on some tasks compared to others.

CONCLUSIONS

While it is known that early childhood is a period of profound development including tactile processing, our data provides evidence for subtle differences in the developmental rate of the various underlying cortical, physical, and cognitive processes. Further, we are the first to show the feasibility of vibrotactile testing in early childhood (<6 years). The results of this work provide estimates of age-related differences in performance, which could have important implications as a reference for investigating altered tactile processing in developmental disorders.

Preliminary Evidence for the Clinical Utility of Tactile Somatosensory Assessments of Sport-Related mTBI

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical utility of tactile somatosensory assessments to assist clinicians in diagnosing sport-related mild traumatic brain injury (SR-mTBI), classifying recovery trajectory based on performance at initial clinical assessment, and determining if neurophysiological recovery coincided with clinical recovery.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Prospective cohort study with normative controls.

METHODS

At admission (n = 79) and discharge (n = 45/79), SR-mTBI patients completed the SCAT-5 symptom scale, along with the following three components from the Cortical Metrics Brain Gauge somatosensory assessment (BG-SA): temporal order judgement (TOJ), TOJ with confounding condition (TOJc), and duration discrimination (DUR). To assist SR-mTBI diagnosis on admission, BG-SA performance was used in logistic regression to discriminate cases belonging to the SR-mTBI sample or a healthy reference sample (pooled BG-SA data for healthy participants in previous studies). Decision trees evaluated how accurately BG-SA performance classified SR-mTBI recovery trajectories.

RESULTS

BG-SA TOJ, TOJc, and DUR poorly discriminated between cases belonging to the SR-mTBI sample or a healthy reference sample (0.54-0.70 AUC, 47.46-64.71 PPV, 48.48-61.11 NPV). The BG-SA evaluated did not accurately classify SR-mTBI recovery trajectories (> 14-day resolution 48%, ≤14-day resolution 54%, lost to referral/follow-up 45%). Mann-Whitney U tests revealed differences in BG-SA TOJc performance between SR-mTBI participants and the healthy reference sample at initial clinical assessment and at clinical recovery (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

BG-SA TOJ, TOJc, and DUR appear to have limited clinical utility to assist clinicians with diagnosing SR-mTBI or predicting recovery trajectories under ecologically valid conditions. Neurophysiological abnormalities persisted beyond clinical recovery given abnormal BG-SA TOJc performance observed when SR-mTBI patients achieved clinical recovery.

An Experimental Animal Model that Parallels Neurosensory Assessments of Concussion

INTRODUCTION

Tactile-based quantitative sensory assessments have proven successful in differentiating concussed vs. non-concussed individuals. One potential advantage of this methodology is that an experimental animal model can be used to obtain neurophysiological recordings of the neural activity in the somatosensory cortex evoked in response to the same tactile stimuli that are used in human sensory assessments and establish parallels between various metrics of stimulus-evoked cortical activity and perception of the stimulus attributes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Stimulus-evoked neural activity was recorded via extracellular microelectrodes in rat primary somatosensory cortex (S1) in response to vibrotactile stimuli that are used in two particular human sensory assessments (reaction time (RT) and amplitude discrimination). Experiments were conducted on healthy control and brain-injured (BI) rats.

RESULTS

Similar to the effects of mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBI) on human neurosensory assessments, comparable experimentally induced brain injuries in rats resulted in the following: (1) elevation of S1 responsivity to vibrotactile stimulation that depended nonlinearly on stimulus amplitude, significantly reducing its capacity to discriminate between stimuli of different amplitudes; (2) 50% reduction in S1 signal-to-noise ratios, which can be expected to contribute to elevation of RT in BI rats; and (3) 60% increase in intertrial variability of S1 responses to vibrotactile stimulation, which can be expected to contribute to elevation of RT variability in BI rats.

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrate suggestive similarities between neurophysiological observations made in the experimental rat mTBI model and observations made in post-concussion individuals with regard to three sensory assessment metrics (amplitude discrimination, RT, and RT variability). This is the first successful model that demonstrates that perceptual metrics obtained from human individuals are impacted by mTBI in a manner consistent with neurophysiological observations obtained from rat S1.

Chronic Neurophysiological Effects of Repeated Head Trauma in Retired Australian Male Sport Athletes

Aim: This study investigated the somatosensory and corticomotor physiology of retired contact sport athletes with a history of repeated concussion/subconcussion head trauma. Methods: Retired male athletes with a history of playing contact sports and repeated head trauma (n = 122) were divided into two groups: those who expressed concerns regarding their mental and cognitive health ("symptomatic": n = 83), and those who did not express any ongoing concerns ("asymptomatic": n = 39). Both groups were compared to age-matched male controls (n = 50) with no history of concussions or participation in contact sports, an absence of self-reported cognitive, or mood impairments. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and vibrotactile stimulation were used to assess corticomotor and somatosensory pathways respectively. TMS and vibrotactile stimulation were correlated to self-reported responses using the Fatigue and Related Symptom Survey. Linear regression was used to associate concussion history with TMS, somatosensory variables. Results: Significant differences were found in symptom survey scores between all groups (p < 0.001). TMS showed significant differences between the "symptomatic" and control groups for intracortical inhibition and paired pulse TMS measures. Somatosensory measures showed significant differences for reaction time (p < 0.01) and reaction time variability (p < 0.01) between the "symptomatic" group to the "asymptomatic" and control groups. For other somatosensory measures, the "symptomatic" measures showed differences to the "control" group. Correlations showed significant associations between severity of symptom reporting with TMS and somatosensory measure, and regression revealed the number of concussions reported was shown to have significant relationships to increased intracortical inhibition and poorer somatosensory performance. Conclusion: This study shows that retired contact sport athletes expressing chronic symptoms showed significant pathophysiology compared to those with no ongoing concerns and non-concussed controls. Further, there is a linear dose-response relationship between number of reported concussions and abnormal neurophysiology. Neurophysiological assessments such as TMS and somatosensory measures represent useful and objective biomarkers to assess cortical impairments and progression of neuropsychological impairment in individuals with a history of repeated head trauma.

Changes in peripheral and central sensitization in patients undergoing occipital nerve stimulation

Introduction

Central sensitization and impaired conditioned pain modulation (CPM) response have been reported to contribute to migraine progression. Migraine patients can present with allodynia possibly attributed to increased sensitivity of peripheral ends of nociceptors with both peripheral and central sensitization. Occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) works by stimulating the distal branches of C1, C2 and C3 possibly altering the nociceptive traffic to the trigemino-cervical complex, brainstem and supranuclear connections.

Aims

This observational study explores peripheral and central sensitization in patients undergoing percutaneous ONS.

Methods

Following local regulatory approval, 13 patients undergoing ONS with dual Octrode 90 cm leads and rechargeable implantable pulse generator (IPG) (St Jude) were recruited to have quantitative sensory testing (QST) pre- and post-procedure 2 weeks, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months.

Results

Patients with intractable migraine demonstrated impaired CPM (mean baseline pressure pain thresholds (PPTs): 61.98 kPa vs 48.01 kPa cuff inflated) prior to ONS, reverting to an efficient CPM response within 2 weeks following ONS implant (68.9 kPa vs 104.5 kPa cuff inflated) and continuing positively over the next 12 months. In contrast, no statistical difference was observed in PPTs.

Conclusion

This is the first reported observation highlighting the effects on central sensitization following ONS. A consistent and sustained improvement in CPM was observed in contrast to PPT's where there was no difference. Normalisation of the CPM response following ONS indicates that the treatment may reduce central sensitization in the migraine population.

An Accurate Measure of Reaction Time can Provide Objective Metrics of Concussion

There have been numerous reports of neurological assessments of post-concussed athletes and many deploy some type of reaction time assessment. However, most of the assessment tools currently deployed rely on consumer-grade computer systems to collect this data. In a previous report, we demonstrated the inaccuracies that typical computer systems introduce to hardware and software to collect these metrics with robotics (Holden et al, 2020). In that same report, we described the accuracy of a tactile based reaction time test (administered with the Brain Gauge) as approximately 0.3 msec and discussed the shortcoming of other methods for collecting reaction time. The latency errors introduced with those alternative methods were reported as high as 400 msec and the system variabilities could be as high as 80 msec, and these values are several orders of magnitude above the control values previously reported for reaction time (200-220msec) and reaction time variability (10-20 msec). In this report, we examined the reaction time and reaction time variability from 396 concussed individuals and found that there were significant differences in the reaction time metrics obtained from concussed and non-concussed individuals for 14-21 days post-concussion. A survey of the literature did not reveal comparable sensitivity in reaction time testing in concussion studies using alternative methods. This finding was consistent with the prediction put forth by Holden and colleagues with robotics testing of the consumer grade computer systems that are commonly utilized by researchers conducting reaction time testing on concussed individuals. The significant difference in fidelity between the methods commonly used by concussion researchers is attributed to the differences in accuracy of the measures deployed and/or the increases in biological fidelity introduced by tactile based reaction times over visually administered reaction time tests. Additionally, while most of the commonly used computerized testing assessment tools require a pre-season baseline test to predict a neurological insult, the tactile based methods reported in this paper did not utilize any baselines for comparisons. The reaction time data reported was one test of a battery of tests administered to the population studied, and this is the first of a series of papers that will examine each of those tests independently.  

The Brain Gauge: a novel tool for assessing brain health

Background. A large number of neurological disorders (neurodegenerative, neurodevelopmental or trauma induced) are difficult to diagnose or assess, thus limiting treatment efficacy.  Existing solutions and products for this need are costly, extremely slow, often invasive, and in many cases fail to definitively (and quantitatively) diagnose or assess treatment.  Advances. For the past decade, we have been developing what we consider to be an innovative low-cost sensory testing device (the Brain Gauge) that non-invasively assesses the central nervous system (CNS).  The objective has been to develop an inexpensive, highly accurate, simple to use device to assess brain health in all environments: in the clinic, at home, at work, on the battlefield or sports field.  The device is non-invasive, generates no harmful radiation, requires no chemicals nor exposure to dangerous substances.  The device does not require expensive disposables and does not involve the use of samples that require physical processing in a central laboratory.  Tests can be administered in a matter of minutes and do not require expert oversight.  The most recent versions of the technology are easily portable; the device is the size and shape of a computer mouse.  As such, the technology is particularly well suited to non-drug, non-radiation based alternative and in-home care.  The device and methods have been used in numerous studies of neurological cohorts that are often considered difficult to diagnose or assess objectively. Based on over a decade of studies (currently an ontological database of over 10,000 subjects and over 60 peer reviewed publications), the system can be used to enable clinicians to have a much better view of a patient’s CNS health status.  The diagnostic system delivers a battery of sensory based (tactile) tests that are conducted rapidly – much like an eye exam with verbal feedback – and the tests were  designed to be predominantly impacted by specific mechanisms of CNS information processing.  Because of the broad diversity of the questions addressed by the different metrics, combining the metrics allows for the generation of a unique individual CNS profile that appears to be very sensitive to neurological status. Outlook.  A review of the development of the system and the application of the method in basic and clinical research is provided to give readers an insight into why the methods were developed, how the methods work and what the methods can be optimally utilized for. The methods provide an objective means for clinicians and researchers to track brain health, and examples of case studies of tracking recovery from concussion as well as response to treatments are provided.

Quantification of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury via Cortical Metrics: Analytical Methods

Mild traumatic brain injuries are difficult to diagnose or assess with commonly used diagnostic methods. However, the functional state of cerebral cortical networks can be rapidly and effectively probed by measuring tactile-based sensory percepts (called cortical metrics), which are designed to exercise various components of cortical machinery. In this study, such cortical metrics were obtained from 52 college students before and after they experienced sports-related concussions by delivering vibrotactile stimuli to the index and middle fingertips. Performance on four of the sensory test protocols is described: reaction time, amplitude discrimination, temporal order judgment, and duration discrimination. The collected test performance data were analyzed using methods of uni- and multivariate statistics, receiver operated characteristic (ROC) curves, and discriminant analysis. While individual cortical metrics vary extensively in their ability to discriminate between control and concussed subjects, their combined discriminative performance greatly exceeds that of any individual metric, achieving cross-validated 93.0% sensitivity, 92.3% specificity, 93.0% positive predictive value, and 92.3% negative predictive value. The cortical metrics vector can be used to track an individual's recovery from concussion. The study thus establishes that cortical metrics can be used effectively as a quantitative indicator of central nervous system health status.

Neurophysiological abnormalities in individuals with persistent post-concussion symptoms

Concussion injury results in a rapid onset of transient neurological impairment that can resolve quickly, or sometimes evolve over time, but usually resolve within seven to 10 days. However, a small but noticeable cohort (~10%) of individuals continues to experience persistent lingering effects, particularly fatigue, recognized as post-concussion symptoms (PCS). This study explored neurophysiological mechanisms in people with persistent PCS. Studies involved using self-report post-concussion fatigue scale, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and somatosensory stimulation in those with diagnosed PCS (n = 20; 36.1 ± 14.0 yr., 4 female; mean time post-concussion 15.4 ± 7.6 months) to fully recovered individuals (n = 20; 33.8 ± 6.6 yr., 2 female; post-concussion 12.9 ± 6.6 months) and healthy controls (n = 20; 37.7 ± 8.0 yr., 3 female). PCS participants demonstrated a significantly higher self-report fatigue (score: PCS 20.2 [95% CI 17.4-22.9], Recovered 6.2 [3.1-9.3], Control 2.75 [0.6-4.8]). PCS participants showed a worsening of reaction time (F_2,57 = 4.214; p = 0.020) and increased reaction time variability (F_2,57 = 5.505; p = 0.007). Somatosensory differences were observed for amplitude discrimination (F_2,57 = 5.166; p = 0.009), temporal order judgment (F_2,57 = 4.606; p = 0.014) and duration discrimination (F_2,57 = 6.081; p = 0.004). Increased intracortical inhibition in TMS single pulse suprathreshold stimulation (110%: F_2,57 = 6.842; p = 0.002; 130%: F_2,57 = 4.900; p = 0.011; 150%: F_2,57 = 4.638; p = 0.014; 170%: F_2,57 = 9.845; p < 0.001) and paired pulse protocols was also seen (SICI: F_2,57 = 23.390; p < 0.001, and LICI: F_2,57 = 21.603; p < 0.001). Using non-invasive stimulation techniques, this novel study showed increased cortical inhibition and compromised central information processing, suggesting neural mechanisms underpinning ongoing fatigue, allowing for potential clinical rehabilitation strategies.

Contributions of Nociresponsive Area 3a to Normal and Abnormal Somatosensory Perception

Traditionally, cytoarchitectonic area 3a of primary somatosensory cortex (SI) has been regarded as a proprioceptive relay to motor cortex. However, neuronal spike-train recordings and optical intrinsic signal imaging, obtained from nonhuman sensorimotor cortex, show that neuronal activity in some of the cortical columns in area 3a can be readily triggered by a C-nociceptor afferent drive. These findings indicate that area 3a is a critical link in cerebral cortical encoding of secondary/slow pain. Also, area 3a contributes to abnormal pain processing in the presence of activity-dependent reversal of gamma-aminobutyric acid A receptor-mediated inhibition. Accordingly, abnormal processing within area 3a may contribute mechanistically to generation of clinical pain conditions. PERSPECTIVE: Optical imaging and neurophysiological mapping of area 3a of SI has revealed substantial driving from unmyelinated cutaneous nociceptors, complementing input to areas 3b and 1 of SI from myelinated nociceptors and non-nociceptors. These and related findings force a reconsideration of mechanisms for SI processing of pain.

Stimulating somatosensory psychophysics: a double-blind, sham-controlled study of the neurobiological mechanisms of tDCS

The neuromodulation technique transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is thought to produce its effects on behavior by altering cortical excitability. Although the mechanisms underlying the observed effects are thought to rely on the balance of excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission, the physiological principles of the technique are not completely understood. In this study, we examine the influence of tDCS on vibrotactile adaptation, using a simple amplitude discrimination paradigm that has been shown to exhibit modifications in performance due to changes in inhibitory neurotransmission. Double-blind tDCS (Anodal/Sham) of 1 mA was delivered for 600 s to electrodes positioned in a somatosensory/contralateral orbit montage. Stimulation was applied as part of a pre/post design, between blocks of the behavioral tasks. In accordance with previous work, results obtained before the application of tDCS indicated that amplitude discrimination thresholds were significantly worsened during adaptation trials, compared to those achieved at baseline. However, tDCS failed to modify amplitude discrimination performance. Using a Bayesian approach, this finding was revealed to constitute substantial evidence for the null hypothesis. The failure of DC stimulation to alter vibrotactile adaptation thresholds is discussed in the context of several factors that may have confounded the induction of changes in cortical plasticity.

Percept of the duration of a vibrotactile stimulus is altered by changing its amplitude

There have been numerous studies conducted on time perception. However, very few of these have involved tactile stimuli to assess a subject’s capacity for duration discrimination. Previous optical imaging studies in non-human primates demonstrated that increasing the duration of a vibrotactile stimulus resulted in a consistently longer and more well defined evoked SI cortical response. Additionally, and perhaps more interestingly, increasing the amplitude of a vibrotactile stimulus not only evoked a larger magnitude optical intrinsic signal (OIS), but the return to baseline of the evoked response was much longer in duration for larger amplitude stimuli. This led the authors to hypothesize that the magnitude of a vibrotactile stimulus could influence the perception of its duration. In order to test this hypothesis, subjects were asked to compare two sets of vibrotactile stimuli. When vibrotactile stimuli differed only in duration, subjects typically had a difference limen (DL) of approximately 13%, and this followed Weber’s Law for standards between 500 and 1500 ms, as increasing the value of the standard yielded a proportional increase in DL. However, the percept of duration was impacted by variations in amplitude of the vibrotactile stimuli. Specifically, increasing the amplitude of the standard stimulus had the effect of increasing the DL, while increasing the amplitude of the test stimulus had the effect of decreasing the DL. A pilot study, conducted on individuals who were concussed, found that increasing the amplitude of the standard did not have an impact on the DL of this group of individuals. Since this effect did not parallel what was predicted from the optical imaging findings in somatosensory cortex of non-human primates, the authors suggest that this particular measure or observation could be sensitive to neuroinflammation and that neuron-glial interactions, impacted by concussion, could have the effect of ignoring, or not integrating, the increased amplitude.

Vibrotactile discriminative capacity is impacted in a digit-specific manner with concurrent unattended hand stimulation

A number of perceptual and neurophysiological studies have investigated the effects of delivering unilateral versus bilateral tactile sensory stimulation. While a number of studies indicate that perceptual discrimination degrades with opposite-hand stimulation, there have been no reports that examined the digit specificity of cross-hemispheric interactions to discriminative capabilities. The purpose of this study was to determine whether unattended hand (UH) stimulation significantly degraded or improved amplitude discriminative capacity on the attended hand (AH) in a digit-specific manner. The methods are based on a sensory perceptual task (vibrotactile amplitude discriminative capacity on the tips of the fingers D2 and D3 of the left hand) in the absence and presence of conditioning stimuli delivered to D2 and D3 of the right hand. Non-specific equal-amplitude stimulation to D2 and D3 of the UH significantly worsened amplitude discrimination (AD) performance, while delivering unequal-amplitude stimuli to D2 and D3 of the UH worsened task performance only under the condition in which the unattended stimuli failed to appropriately match the stimulus parameters on the AH. Additionally, delivering single-site stimuli to D2 or D3 of the UH resulted in degraded performance on the AD task when the stimulus amplitude did not match the amplitude of the stimulus applied to homologous digits of the AH. The findings demonstrate that there is a reduction in performance under conditions where UH stimulation least matched stimulation applied to the AH, while there was little or no change in performance when stimulus conditions on the homologous digit(s) of the contralateral sites were similar. Results suggest that bilateral interactions influence perception in a context-dependent manner that is digit specific.

Continuous theta-burst stimulation modulates tactile synchronization

Background

Temporal order judgement (TOJ) is the ability to detect the order of occurrence of two sequentially delivered stimuli. Previous research has shown that TOJ in the presence of synchronized periodic conditioning stimuli impairs TOJ performance, and this phenomenon is suggested to be mediated by GABAergic interneurons that cause perceptual binding across the two skin sites. Application of continuous theta-burst repetitive TMS (cTBS) over primary somatosensory cortex (SI) alters temporal and spatial tactile perception. The purpose of this study was to examine TOJ perception in the presence and absence of synchronized periodic conditioning stimuli before and after cTBS applied over left-hemisphere SI. A TOJ task was administered on the right index and middle finger (D2 and D3) in two separate sessions in the presence and absence of conditioning stimuli (a background low amplitude sinusoidal vibration).

Results

CTBS reduced the impact of the conditioning stimuli on TOJ performance for up to 18 minutes following stimulation while sham cTBS did not affect TOJ performance. In contrast, the TOJ task performed in the absence of synchronized conditioning stimulation was unaltered following cTBS.

Conclusion

We conclude that cTBS suppresses inhibitory networks in SI that mediate perceptual binding during TOJ synchronization. CTBS offers one method to suppress cortical excitability in the cortex and potentially benefit clinical populations with altered inhibitory cortical circuits. Additionally, TOJ measures with conditioning stimuli may provide an avenue to assess sensory processing in neurologically impaired patient populations.

A vibrotactile behavioral battery for investigating somatosensory processing in children and adults

The cortical dynamics of somatosensory processing can be investigated using vibrotactile psychophysics. It has been suggested that different vibrotactile paradigms target different cortical mechanisms, and a number of recent studies have established links between somatosensory cortical function and measurable aspects of behavior. The relationship between cortical mechanisms and sensory function is particularly relevant with respect to developmental disorders in which altered inhibitory processing has been postulated, such as in ASD and ADHD. In this study, a vibrotactile battery consisting of nine tasks (incorporating reaction time, detection threshold, and amplitude- and frequency discrimination) was applied to a cohort of healthy adults and a cohort of typically developing children to assess the feasibility of such a vibrotactile battery in both cohorts, and the performance between children and adults was compared. These results showed that children and adults were both able to perform these tasks with a similar performance, although the children were slightly less sensitive in frequency discrimination. Performance within different task-groups clustered together in adults, providing further evidence that these tasks tap into different cortical mechanisms, which is also discussed. This clustering was not observed in children, which may be potentially indicative of development and a greater variability. In conclusion, in this study, we showed that both children and adults were able to perform an extensive vibrotactile battery, and we showed the feasibility of applying this battery to other (e.g., neurodevelopmental) cohorts to probe different cortical mechanisms.