Hepatic resection in breast cancer metastases: should it be considered standard treatment?

The impact of liver resection on survival for patients with metastatic breast cancer - A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

There is uncertainty surrounding the role of resection as an option for curative treatment of breast cancer with liver metastases (BCLM).

AIM

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the role of liver resection for BCLM.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed as per PRISMA guidelines. Hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) and standard error was obtained from each study and expressed using the generic inverse variance method, with a corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). OS outcomes at 1- 3- and 5-years were expressed as dichotomous variables and pooled as odds ratios (OR) using the Mantel-Haenszel method.

RESULTS

Nine studies with 1732 patients were included. Of these, 24.5% underwent surgical resection of BCLM (424/1732) and 75.5% did not (1308/1732). Overall, OS was significantly better among those who underwent surgery versus controls (HR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.59-0.80, P < 0.00001). Mortality rates were significantly reduced at 1-year (7.5% (10/134) vs 20.3% (79/390), OR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.08-0.74, P = 0.010) and 5-years (54.0% (190/352) vs 75.3% (940/1249), OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.25-0.87, P = 0.020) respectively for those undergoing surgery versus controls. Mortality rates at 3 years after surgery were lower than the control group (19.1% (29/152) vs 53.0% (222/419)), however this failed to achieve statistical significance at meta-analysis (OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.09-1.12, P = 0.070).

CONCLUSION

Liver resection may be considered at multidisciplinary meetings for those with BCLM and offers a potentially curative option. However, judicious patient selection is crucial prior to making decisions in relation to resection of BCLM.

Tamoxifen therapy benefit predictive signature combining with prognostic signature in surgical-only ER-positive breast cancer

Tamoxifen treatment is important assistant for estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer (BRCA) after resection. This study aimed to identify signatures for predicting the prognosis of patients with BRCA after tamoxifen treatment. Data of gene-specific DNA methylation (DM), as well as the corresponding clinical data for the patients with BRCA, were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas and followed by systematic bioinformatics analyses. After mapping these DM CPG sites onto genes, we finally obtained 352 relapse-free survival (RFS) associated DM genes, with which 61,776 gene pairs were combined, including 1,614 gene pairs related to RFS. An 11 gene-pair signature was identified to cluster the 189 patients with BRCA into the surgical low-risk group (136 patients) and high-risk group (53 patients). Then, we further identified a tamoxifen-predictive signature that could classify surgical high-risk patients with significant differences on RFS. Combining surgical-only prognostic signature and tamoxifen-predictive signature, patients were clustered into surgical-only low-risk group, tamoxifen nonbenefit group, and tamoxifen benefit group. In conclusion, we identified that the gene pair PDHA2-APRT could serve as a potential prognostic biomarker for patients with BRCA after tamoxifen treatment.

The role of liver resection in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review examining the survival impact

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 10% of breast cancer patients will present with solid organ metastases, while up to 30% will develop metastatic disease during their treatment course. Liver metastases are usually treated with systemic chemotherapy. Although colorectal liver metastases are routinely resected, this is not yet the standard of care for breast cancer-related liver metastases. This review examines the evidence for resection of breast cancer-related liver metastases.

METHODS

A systematic review identified 25 articles for inclusion, 12 papers concerning patients with isolated liver metastases, and 13 papers concerning patients with extrahepatic metastases. Data from 1080 patients were included.

RESULTS

Two hundred eighty patients underwent hepatic resections for breast cancer-associated metastases with no extrahepatic metastases. Reported 5-year survival ranged from 24.6 to 78%. Median overall survival ranged from 29.5 to 116 months. For patients with oligometastatic disease undergoing resection, 5-year survival ranged from 21 to 57%, with median overall survival ranging from 32 to 58 months. Reported 30-day morbidity ranged from 14 to 42% for isolated and multiple metastases.

CONCLUSION

Hepatic resection can be considered in the management of breast cancer patients with isolated liver metastases as well as those with oligometastatic disease.

Hepatic Resection or Ablation for Isolated Breast Cancer Liver Metastasis: A Case-control Study With Comparison to Medically Treated Patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of surgical treatment for patients with isolated breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM).

BACKGROUND

Single-arm retrospective studies have shown promising results associated with surgery for isolated BCLM; however, this treatment remains controversial and its role is not well-defined.

METHODS

A review of 2150 patients with BCLM who underwent treatment in a single institution was conducted, and 167 (8%) patients with isolated BCLM were identified. A case-control study was conducted to compare outcomes in patients with isolated BCLM who underwent surgery and/or ablation to patients who underwent conventional medical therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 167 patients were included (surgery/ablation: 69; medical: 98), with a median follow-up for survivors of 73 months. Patients in the surgical cohort more frequently had estrogen receptor-positive tumors and received adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for their primary breast tumor. The hepatic tumor burden was less and the interval from breast cancer diagnosis to BCLM was significantly longer (53 vs 30 months) in the surgical cohort. Patients undergoing surgical treatment had a median recurrence-free interval of 28.5 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 19-38) with 10 patients (15%) recurrence free after 5 years. There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between the surgical and medical cohorts (median OS: 50 vs 45 months; 5-year OS: 38% vs 39%).

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatic resection and/or ablation was not associated with a survival advantage. However, significant recurrence-free intervals can be accomplished with surgical treatment. Surgical intervention might be considered in highly selected patients with the goal of providing time off of systemic chemotherapy.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Liver Metastasis

Liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is becoming the gold standard in liver metastasis detection and treatment response assessment. The most sensitive magnetic resonance sequences are diffusion-weighted images and hepatobiliary phase images after Gd-EOB-DTPA. Peripheral ring enhancement, diffusion restriction, and hypointensity on hepatobiliary phase images are hallmarks of liver metastases. In patients with normal ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), and positron emission tomography (PET)-CT findings and high clinical suspicion of metastasis, MRI should be performed for diagnosis of unseen metastasis. In melanoma, colon cancer, and neuroendocrine tumor metastases, MRI allows confident diagnosis of treatment-related changes in liver and enables differential diagnosis from primary liver tumors. Focal nodular hyperplasia-like nodules in patients who received platinum-based chemotherapy, hypersteatosis, and focal fat can mimic metastasis. In cancer patients with fatty liver, MRI should be preferred to CT. Although the first-line imaging for metastases is CT, MRI can be used as a problem-solving method. MRI may be used as the first-line method in patients who would undergo curative surgery or metastatectomy. Current limitation of MRI is low sensitivity for metastasis smaller than 3mm. MRI fingerprinting, glucoCEST MRI, and PET-MRI may allow simpler and more sensitive diagnosis of liver metastasis.

The role of liver-directed surgery in patients with hepatic metastasis from primary breast cancer: a multi-institutional analysis

BACKGROUND

Data on surgical management of breast liver metastasis are limited. We sought to determine the safety and long-term outcome of patients undergoing hepatic resection of breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM).

METHODS

Using a multi-institutional, international database, 131 patients who underwent surgery for BCLM between 1980 and 2014 were identified. Clinicopathologic and outcome data were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Median tumor size of the primary breast cancer was 2.5 cm (IQR: 2.0-3.2); 58 (59.8%) patients had primary tumor nodal metastasis. The median time from diagnosis of breast cancer to metastasectomy was 34 months (IQR: 16.8-61.3). The mean size of the largest liver lesion was 3.0 cm (2.0-5.0); half of patients (52.0%) had a solitary metastasis. An R0 resection was achieved in most cases (90.8%). Postoperative morbidity and mortality were 22.8% and 0%, respectively. Median and 3-year overall-survival was 53.4 months and 75.2%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, positive surgical margin (HR 3.57, 95% CI 1.40-9.16; p = 0.008) and diameter of the BCLM (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.06; p = 0.002) remained associated with worse OS.

DISCUSSION

In selected patients, resection of breast cancer liver metastases can be done safely and a subset of patients may derive a relatively long survival, especially from a margin negative resection.

Surgery for liver metastases from breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Liver metastases from breast cancer (BCLM) confer poor survival. Liver resection in BCLM patients has been increasingly employed.

AIM

We undertook a systematic review to evaluate the role of hepatic resection in patients with breast cancer metastatic to the liver.

MATERIALS & METHODS

In total, 36 studies were overviewed. Patient populations, characteristics, morbidity, mortality and survival were documented.

RESULTS

Median overall survival was 41 months. Major morbidity was rare while 30-day postoperative mortality was near nil.

CONCLUSION

Liver surgery for BCLM can be performed with low mortality, acceptable morbidity and promising survival benefit in carefully selected patients.

Yttrium-90 radioembolization stops progression of targeted breast cancer liver metastases after failed chemotherapy

PURPOSE

To determine, in an open-label, retrospective report, the safety and effectiveness of locoregional therapy with yttrium-90 ((90)Y) radioembolization for patients with progressing breast cancer liver metastases (BCLMs) despite multi-agent chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-five patients with progressing BCLMs and stable extrahepatic disease were treated with radioembolization at a single institution. Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was performed to evaluate clinical and biochemical toxicities, tumor response, overall survival (OS), and time to progression. Radiologic response assessments included Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors in primary index lesions and metabolic activity on positron emission tomography (PET). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The mortality rate at 30 days was 4% (n = 3). Clinical toxicity and hyperbilirubinemia of grade 3 or worse occurred in 7.6% (n = 5) and 5.9% of patients (n = 4), respectively. Partial response (PR) was seen in 35.3% of patients (n = 24), stable disease (SD) in 63.2% (n = 43), and progressive disease in 1.5% (n = 1). PET imaging was available in 25 patients, and 21 (84%) had a complete response, PR, or SD. The median OS was 6.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.0-9.2 mo). The hazard ratio (HR) for OS on multivariate analysis was 0.39 (95% CI, 0.23-0.66) for tumor burden less than 25% compared with greater burden. Elevated bilirubin levels were shown to reduce OS. The HR for hepatic progression was 0.22 (95% CI, 0.05-0.98) for solitary versus multifocal disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Locoregional therapy with (90)Y radioembolization is safe and stops or delays the progression of targeted chemorefractory BCLMs. Adverse prognosticators were identified.

Tumor growth kinetics versus RECIST to assess response to locoregional therapy in breast cancer liver metastases

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of our study was to evaluate changes in growth kinetics of breast cancer liver metastasis in response to locoregional therapy and compare them to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant retrospective study was Institutional Review Board approved. Thirty-four chemorefractory breast cancer liver metastases from 21 patients treated with yttrium-90 ((90)Y) were evaluated. Pre- and posttreatment computed tomography (CT) scans were used to calculate tumor growth kinetics. The growth parameter analyzed was reciprocal of doubling time (RDT). RDT range for stable disease (SD) was defined by the measurement error rate. A negative RDT below the SD range defined response and was categorized as either partial response (PR) or complete response, whereas a positive RDT value above the SD range indicated progressive disease (PD). Comparison was made to tumor response classification according to percentage change in the lesion's maximal diameter per RECIST. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman plot, Wilcoxon signed rank test, and Student t test were used for analysis. Significance was set at 0.05.

RESULTS

RDT range for SD ranged from -0.46 to +2.17. Six lesions with PR based on RECIST showed PR based on their volumetric growth rate (mean RDT of -17.3 ± 2.6). Similarly, one lesion with PD according to RECIST was categorized as PD based on its growth kinetics (RDT of 10.2). However, 14 (51.85%) lesions classified as SD by RECIST had PR according to growth kinetics (mean RDT of -7.8), six (22.22%) lesions were categorized as SD (mean RDT of 0.8), whereas seven (25.93%) lesions showed PD (mean RDT of 4.5). Growth kinetic parameters were significantly different for lesions with PR when compared to lesions with PD (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with breast cancer liver metastases undergoing locoregional therapy, RECIST categorization may not be an accurate reflection of treatment response.

Prognostic factors related to surgical outcome of liver metastases of breast cancer

PURPOSE

The role of hepatectomy for patients with liver metastases of breast cancer (LMBC) remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to share our experience with hepatic resection in a relatively unselected group of patients with LMBC and analyse the prognostic factors and indications for surgery.

METHODS

In 2000 to 2006, 42 female patients with a mean age of 58.2 years (range, 39 to 69 years) with LMBC diagnosed by means of abdominal ultrasound, computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging in the hospital. They were considered for surgery because of limited comorbidities, presence of seven or fewer liver tumors and absence of (or limited and stable) extrahepatic disease on preoperative imaging. Patients' demographics, metastatic characteristics as well as clinical and operative parameters were being studied. Overall actuarial 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were calculated since the hepatic resection onwards using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Metastatic tumor size of ≤4 cm (p=0.03), R0 resection (p=0.02), negative portal lymph nodes (p=0.01), response to chemotherapy (p=0.02), and positive hormone receptor status (p=0.03) were associated with better survival outcomes on univariate analysis. However, it did not show survival benefits on multivariate analysis. The disease-free survival and overall survival are 29.40 and 43 months, respectively. The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 84.61%, 64.11%, and 38.45%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Selected patients with isolated LMBC may benefit from surgical management; although, indications remain unclear and the risks may outweigh the benefits in patients with a generally poor prognosis. Improvements in preoperative staging and progressive application of new multimodality treatments will be the key to improved survival rates in this severe disease. The careful selection of patients is associated with a satisfactory long-term survival rate.

Radiofrequency ablation in the management of liver metastases from breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

Systemic chemotherapy remains the standard treatment for patients with breast cancer hepatic metastases. Resection of metastases has survival advantages in a small percentage of selected patients. Radiofrequency ablation has been used in small numbers of selected patients. This small series was undertaken to review our experience with radiofrequency ablation in the management of patients with breast cancer hepatic metastases.

CONCLUSION

Radiofrequency ablation of breast cancer hepatic metastases is safe and may be used to control hepatic deposits in patients with stable or no extrahepatic disease.