Adjuvant chemotherapy in 2005: Standards and beyond

Image-guided tumour biopsies in a prospective molecular triage study (MOSCATO-01): What are the real risks?

PURPOSE

To evaluate efficacy, complications and preprocedural risk factors for percutaneous image-guided core needle biopsy of malignant tumours for genomic tumour analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Procedural data for core biopsies performed at a single centre for the MOSCATO-01 clinical trial were prospectively recorded between December 2011 and March 2016. Data assessed included patient demographics, tumour characteristics, procedural outcomes and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 877 biopsies were performed under computed tomography (38.4%) or ultrasound guidance (61.6%) for tumours in the liver (n = 363), lungs (n = 229), lymph nodes (n = 138), bones (n = 15) and other miscellaneous sites (n = 124). Each biopsy harvested a mean 4.4 samples [1-15], with adequate tumour yield for genomic analysis in 95.3% of cases. Procedural complications occurred in 89 cases (10.1%), with minor grade I complications in 59 (66.3%); grade II in 16 (18%) and grade III in 14 (15.7%). No grade IV complications and no procedure-related death occurred. The most common complications were pneumothorax (51/89, 57.3%), haemorrhage (24/89, 27%) and pain (8/89, 8.9%). Predictive factors for complications by univariate analysis included biopsied organ (lung vs other), sample number, prone position, lesion size, lesion depth and biopsy approach. By multivariate analysis, only pulmonary biopsy was a significant risk factor (odds ratio = 27.23 [4.93-242.76], p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous image-guided core needle biopsy in cancer patients provides an effective method to obtain molecular screening samples, with an overall low complication rate. Lung mass biopsies present a higher risk of complication, although complications are manageable by minimally invasive techniques without prolonged sequelae.

Economic issues involved in integrating genomic testing into clinical care: the case of genomic testing to guide decision-making about chemotherapy for breast cancer patients

The use of taxanes to treat node-positive (N+) breast cancer patients is associated with heterogeneous benefits as well as with morbidity and financial costs. This study aimed to assess the economic impact of using gene expression profiling to guide decision-making about chemotherapy, and to discuss the coverage/reimbursement issues involved. Retrospective data on 246 patients included in a randomised trial (PACS01) were analyzed. Tumours were genotyped using DNA microarrays (189-gene signature), and patients were classified depending on whether or not they were likely to benefit from chemotherapy regimens without taxanes. Standard anthracyclines plus taxane chemotherapy (strategy AT) was compared with the innovative strategy based on genomic testing (GEN). Statistical analyses involved bootstrap methods and sensitivity analyses. The AT and GEN strategies yielded similar 5-year metastasis-free survival rates. In comparison with AT, GEN was cost-effective when genomic testing costs were less than 2,090€. With genomic testing costs higher than 2,919€, AT was cost-effective. Considering a 30% decrease in the price of docetaxel (the patent rights being about to expire), GEN was cost-effective if the cost of genomic testing was in the 0€-1,139€, range; whereas AT was cost-effective if genomic testing costs were higher than 1,891€. The use of gene expression profiling to guide decision-making about chemotherapy for N+ breast cancer patients is potentially cost-effective. Since genomic testing and the drugs targeted in these tests yield greater well-being than the sum of those resulting from separate use, questions arise about how to deal with extra well-being in decision-making about coverage/reimbursement.

Major changes in chemotherapy regimens administered to breast cancer patients during 2000-2008 in the Netherlands

There is little information available on the patterns of chemotherapy regimens administered in daily practice to patients with early stage and metastatic or recurrent breast cancer. To determine the trends in type of chemotherapy regimens used in breast cancer patients, newly diagnosed breast cancer patients in the period 2000-2008 who received chemotherapy were identified from the Eindhoven Cancer Registry (ECR) and linked to the PHARMO RLS, including data on, e.g., in- and outpatient drug use. Chemotherapy regimens were classified based on the received combinations and sequences. Trends in the distribution of adjuvant chemotherapy regimens (for early-stage breast cancer) and palliative chemotherapy regimens (for metastatic or recurrent breast cancer) were determined and stratified by Her2/neu status when possible. In this study, 422 patients diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer received adjuvant chemotherapy. The use of CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil) decreased from 90% in 2000 to almost none since 2005. Administration of regimens that included anthracyclines increased from 4% in 2000 to 96% in 2005, but decreased to 68% in 2008. The use of trastuzumab- and taxane-containing regimens (with or without anthracyclines) increased from 2005 onwards to 24% and 34%, respectively, in 2008. Among the 82 breast cancer patients who received palliative chemotherapy at diagnosis or after breast cancer recurrence, the use of CMF and anthracyclines (without taxanes) decreased, while the use of taxanes (with or without anthracyclines) increased (26% in 2008). Trastuzumab was used as palliative chemotherapy from 2003 onwards, with 22% of the metastatic breast cancer patients receiving trastuzumab-containing regimens in 2008, and bevacizumab was administered since 2007 with 19% of the patients receiving bevacizumab-containing regimens in 2008. In conclusion, major changes have taken place in the chemotherapeutic treatment of patients with early and recurrent breast cancer. These changes reflect the key findings from large clinical trials, as incorporated in the Dutch guidelines.

Quality-adjusted survival analysis of first-line treatment of hormone-receptor-positive HER2+ metastatic breast cancer with letrozole alone or in combination with lapatinib

AIM

Compare first-line lapatinib plus letrozole (L + Let) versus letrozole monotherapy (Let) in hormone-receptor-positive HER2 + metastatic breast cancer, employing Q-TWiST (quality-adjusted time without symptoms and toxicity) analysis to account for differences in progression times, with offsets for the impact of adverse events during the treatment period.

METHODS

The area under survival curves for each treatment group was partitioned into distinct health states of varying utility: toxicity (TOX), time without toxicity or disease progression (TWiST), and the period following disease progression until death or end of follow-up (REL). The utility-weighted sum of the mean health state durations was derived for each group. The threshold utility analysis evaluates how varying utility values across the states affects Q-TWiST differences between groups, although the method is limited by not varying utilities within each health state.

RESULTS

The primary analysis population was the HER2 + subgroup (n = 219). There was no significant difference between treatments in mean duration of grade 3/4 adverse events prior to progression (L + Let = 1.95 weeks; Let = 2.14 weeks; P = 0.90). Using utility weights of 0.5 for TOX and REL, L + Let was favored for quality-adjusted survival by 8.8 weeks (P = 0.09). The Q-TWiST difference between treatment groups ranged from 8 to 9.5 weeks, favoring combination therapy for all hypothetical utility levels, but none of the comparisons were statistically significant at P = 0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences were found between L + Let versus Let in mean duration of severe adverse events. Quality-adjusted survival was favored for the combination treatment arm for all utility levels examined when toxicity was defined by grade 3/4 AEs, but differences between groups were not statistically significant.

Gene expression profile predicts outcome after anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer

Prognosis of early beast cancer is heterogeneous. Today, no histoclinical or biological factor predictive for clinical outcome after adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy (CT) has been validated and introduced in routine use. Using DNA microarrays, we searched for a gene expression signature associated with metastatic relapse after adjuvant anthracycline-based CT without taxane. We profiled a multicentric series of 595 breast cancers including 498 treated with such adjuvant CT. The identification of the prognostic signature was done using a metagene-based supervised approach in a learning set of 323 patients. The signature was then tested on an independent validation set comprising 175 similarly treated patients, 128 of them from the PACS01 prospective clinical trial. We identified a 3-metagene predictor of metastatic relapse in the learning set, and confirmed its independent prognostic impact in the validation set. In multivariate analysis, the predictor outperformed the individual current prognostic factors, as well as the Nottingham Prognostic Index-based classifier, both in the learning and the validation sets, and added independent prognostic information. Among the patients treated with adjuvant anthracycline-based CT, with a median follow-up of 68 months, the 5-year metastasis-free survival was 82% in the "good-prognosis" group and 56% in the "poor-prognosis" group. Our predictor refines the prediction of metastasis-free survival after adjuvant anthracycline-based CT and might help tailoring adjuvant CT regimens.

Changes in cellular immunity during chemotherapy for primary breast cancer with anthracycline regimens

Anthracyclines are the most widely used anticancer agents for breast cancer, of which doxorubicin and epirubicin have been reported to have equal efficacy. Unfortunately, the integrity of the immune system of breast cancer patients is severely affected by chemotherapy. This study compared the effect of combination chemotherapy with epirubicin (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide (FEC)) and doxorubicin (5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide (FDC)) regimens on subsets of the immune cells of patients with primary malignant breast tumors. Our aim was to determine the best regimen that produces the least degree of myelosuppression. Blood from 80 breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy (40 FEC and 40 FDC) was taken before chemotherapy and after every cycle (3 weeks) for 6 cycles. Blood was also taken from 40 normal healthy donors who served as normal control. Subsets of lymphocytes T-helper cells (CD3(+)CD4(+)), T-cytotoxic cells (CD3(+) CD8(+)), B-cells (CD19(+) CD20(+)) and NK cells (CD16(+)/CD56(+)CD3(-)) were analyzed by flow cytometry (FacsCalibur, BD) using monoclonal antibodies (Multitest, BD). All patients in the FEC and FDC groups suffered from myelosuppressive side effects. Both regimens led to an increase in the counts of monocytes but decreased polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs) and lymphocytes. Percentages of T-cytotoxic cells and NK cells were increased, but the percentage of B-cells was dramatically decreased. The phagocytic and intracellular killing ability of PMNs were also suppressed (p<0.01). No significant difference was found between the epirubicin-based regimen and doxorubicin-based regimen with regard to numbers of immune cells, percentages of lymphocytes subsets, Th/CTL ratio, engulfment and killing abilities of PMNs. In conclusion, we found that the epirubicin-based regimen is not superior to the doxorubicin-based regimen with respect to their toxicity of the immune cells, Th/CTL ratio and PMN count and functions. Moreover, both FEC and FDC regimens appear to conserve the cell-mediated immunity response needed for fighting against cancer cells.

Dose variation and regimen modification of adjuvant chemotherapy in daily practice affect survival of stage I-II and operable stage III Taiwanese breast cancer patients

To assess the effect of a non-standard dose and regimen of adjuvant chemotherapy on the clinical outcome in stage I-II and operable stage III Taiwanese breast cancer patients. Variables studied included treatment variation (regimen and dose of adjuvant therapy), lymph node status, tumor size, histologic grade, and hormone receptor status. Cox's multivariate regression analyses were used to select prognostic factors significant for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). In the multivariate analysis, lymph node-positive, a tumor size greater than 5 cm, grade III, hormone receptor-negative status, and non-standard adjuvant chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for DFS and/or OS. Node-positive patients treated with standard adjuvant chemotherapy had a significantly better DFS (HR=0.6; P=0.032) and OS (HR=0.54; P=0.025) than those treated with non-standard adjuvant chemotherapy. Breast cancer patients receiving standard adjuvant chemotherapy have a better DFS and OS than those receiving non-standard adjuvant chemotherapy.

Preclinical toxicity, toxicokinetics, and antitumoral efficacy studies of DTS-201, a tumor-selective peptidic prodrug of doxorubicin

PURPOSE

There is a clear clinical need for cytotoxic drugs with a lower systemic toxicity. DTS-201 (CPI-0004Na) is a peptidic prodrug of doxorubicin that shows an improved therapeutic index in experimental models. The purpose of the current study was to complete its preclinical characterization before initiation of phase I clinical trials.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The preclinical development program consisted of a detailed assessment of the general and cardiac toxicity profiles of DTS-201 in mice, rats, and dogs, together with mass balance and antitumoral efficacy studies in rodents. Neprilysin and thimet oligopeptidase expression, two enzymatic activators of DTS-201, was also characterized in human breast and prostate tumor biopsies.

RESULTS

The target organs of DTS-201 toxicity in rodents and dogs are typically those of doxorubicin, albeit at much higher doses. Importantly, chronic treatment with DTS-201 proved to be significantly less cardiotoxic than with doxorubicin at doses up to 8-fold higher in rats. The mass balance study showed that [14C] DTS-201 does not accumulate in the body after intravenous administration. The improved therapeutic index of DTS-201 compared with free doxorubicin was confirmed in three tumor xenograft models of prostate, breast, and lung cancer. Neprilysin and/or thimet oligopeptidase are expressed in all experimental human tumor types thus far tested as well as in a large majority of human breast and prostate tumor biopsies.

CONCLUSION

DTS-201 gave promising results in terms of general toxicity, cardiovascular tolerance, and in vivo efficacy in xenograft mouse models compared with free doxorubicin. Taken together, these results and the confirmation of the presence of activating enzymes in human tumor biopsies provide a strong rationale for a phase I clinical study in cancer patients.

Current status of the taxanes as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer

Adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer reduces the risks of recurrence and death in many subsets of patients. The quest for better regimens, defined as both more effective and less toxic has led to numerous clinical trials testing the taxanes in the adjuvant setting. These trials are generally positive but do not clearly identify a single best or ideal regimen for all patients. This paper reviews the available data in this area of clinical research.

Guidelines for the adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer: Past, present and future recommendations

Treatment guidelines are useful tools that enable physicians to integrate the latest clinical research into their practices. The large volume of rapidly evolving clinical data in breast cancer has been summarised and incorporated into treatment recommendations by well-known and reliable institutions, including the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, the American Society for Clinical Oncology, the European Society for Medical Oncology and the St. Gallen International Consensus Panel. Adjuvant therapy is a key component of breast cancer treatment, and many of the current consensus guidelines now recognise the important role of the aromatase inhibitors as an alternative to or in sequence after tamoxifen, hitherto the standard adjuvant treatment of choice for receptor-positive women. Data from ongoing trials such as the Breast International Group 1-98 trial and those still in the accrual phase will be forthcoming and will likely result in a further refinement of treatment recommendations over the course of the next few years. Despite the availability of such guidelines, however, there is evidence that adherence to and implementation of treatment recommendations is less than optimal. Further research is needed to determine more effective means of disseminating those clinical recommendations that can have a significant impact on treatment strategies and ultimately improve outcomes in breast cancer.

Possible involvement of CCT5, RGS3, and YKT6 genes up-regulated in p53-mutated tumors in resistance to docetaxel in human breast cancers

BACKGROUND

Present study was aimed to investigate the relationship of p53 mutation status with response to docetaxel in breast cancers. In addition, attempts were made to identify the genes differentially expressed between p53-wild and p53-mutated breast tumors and to study their relationship with response to docetaxel.

METHODS

Mutational analysis of p53 was done in 50 breast tumor samples obtained from primary breast cancer patients (n = 33) and locally recurrent breast cancer patients (n = 17) before docetaxel therapy. Response to docetaxel was evaluated clinically. Gene expression profiling (n = 2,412) was conducted by adapter-tagged competitive-PCR in 186 tumor samples, which were also analyzed in their p53 mutational status in order to identify the differentially expressed genes according to p53 mutation status and their relationship with response to docetaxel.

RESULTS

Response rate of p53-mutated tumors (44%) was lower than that of p53-wild tumors (62%) though there was no statistical significance (P = 0.23). Of 2412 genes, mRNA expression of 13 genes was significantly different between p53-wild and p53-mutated tumors. Of these 13 genes, mRNA expression of CCT5, RGS3, and YKT6 was significantly up-regulated in p53-mutated tumors and associated with a low response rate to docetaxel. Treatment of MCF-7 cells with siRNA specific for CCT5, RGS3, or YKT6 resulted in a significant enhancement of docetaxel-induced apoptosis.

CONCLUSIONS

CCT5, RGS3, and YKT6 mRNA expressions, which are up-regulated in p53-mutated breast tumors, might be implicated in resistance to docetaxel and clinically useful in identifying the subset of breast cancer patients who may or may not benefit from docetaxel treatment.