Prophylactic breast irradiation reduces background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on MRI: A secondary analysis

Background parenchymal enhancement and uptake as breast cancer imaging biomarkers: A state-of-the-art review

Within the past decade, background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) and background parenchymal uptake (BPU) have emerged as novel imaging-derived biomarkers in the diagnosis and treatment monitoring of breast cancer. Growing evidence supports the role of breast parenchyma vascularity and metabolic activity as probable risk factors for breast cancer development. Furthermore, in the presence of a newly-diagnosed breast cancer, added clinically-relevant data was surprisingly found in the respective imaging properties of the non-affected contralateral breast. Evaluation of the contralateral BPE and BPU have been found to be especially instrumental in predicting the prognosis of a patient with breast cancer and even anticipating their response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Simultaneously, further research has found a link between these two biomarkers, even though they represent different physical properties. The aim of this review is to provide an up to date summary of the current clinical applications of BPE and BPU as breast cancer imaging biomarkers with the hope that it propels their further usage in clinical practice.

MRI of the Lactating Breast: Computer-Aided Diagnosis False Positive Rates and Background Parenchymal Enhancement Kinetic Features

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To investigate the application of computer-added diagnosis (CAD) in dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI of the healthy lactating breast, focusing on false-positive rates and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) coloring patterns in comparison with breast cancer features in non-lactating patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study population was composed of 58 healthy lactating patients and control groups of 113 healthy premenopausal non-lactating patients and 55 premenopausal non-lactating patients with newly-diagnosed breast cancer. Patients were scanned on 1.5-T MRI using conventional DCE protocol. A retrospective analysis of DCE-derived CAD properties was conducted using a commercial software that is regularly utilized in our routine radiological work-up. Qualitative morphological characterization and automatically-obtained quantitative parametric measurements of the BPE-induced CAD coloring were categorized and subgroups' trends and differences between the lactating and cancer cohorts were statistically assessed.

RESULTS

CAD false-positive coloring was found in the majority of lactating cases (87%). Lactation BPE coloring was characteristically non-mass enhancement (NME)-like shaped (87%), bilateral (79%) and symmetric (64%), whereas, unilateral coloring was associated with prior irradiation (p <0.0001). Inter-individual variability in CAD appearance of both scoring-grade and kinetic-curve dominance was found among the lactating cohort. When compared with healthy non-lactating controls, CAD false positive probability was significantly increased [Odds ratio 40.2, p <0001], while in comparison with the breast cancer cohort, CAD features were mostly inconclusive, even though increased size parameters were significantly associated with lactation-BPE (p <0.00001).

CONCLUSION

BPE was identified as a common source for false-positive CAD coloring on breast DCE-MRI among lactating population. Despite several typical characteristics, overlapping features with breast malignancy warrant a careful evaluation and clinical correlation in all cases with suspected lactation induced CAD coloring.

Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Breast MRI: Assessment and Clinical Implications

Purpose of Review

To present recent literature regarding the assessment and clinical implications of background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI.

Recent Findings

The qualitative assessment of BPE remains variable within the literature, as well as in clinical practice. Several different quantitative approaches have been investigated in recent years, most commonly region of interest-based and segmentation-based assessments. However, quantitative assessment has not become standard in clinical practice to date. Numerous studies have demonstrated a clear association between higher BPE and future breast cancer risk. While higher BPE does not appear to significantly impact cancer detection, it may result in a higher abnormal interpretation rate. BPE is also likely a marker of pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with decreases in BPE during and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy correlated with pCR. In contrast, pre-treatment BPE does not appear to be predictive of pCR. The association between BPE and prognosis is less clear, with heterogeneous results in the literature.

Summary

Assessment of BPE continues to evolve, with heterogeneity in approaches to both qualitative and quantitative assessment. The level of BPE has important clinical implications, with associations with future breast cancer risk and treatment response. BPE may also be an imaging marker of prognosis, but future research is needed on this topic.

Contralateral risk-reducing local therapy in breast cancer patients with BRCA1/2 mutations: systemic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Unilateral breast cancer (UBC) patients with germline pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants have a higher risk of developing contralateral breast cancer (CBC) and need contralateral risk-reducing local treatments, including contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy (CRRM) and prophylactic irradiation (CPI). The aim of our study was to systematically explore the efficacy of CRRM and CPI in reducing CBC risk and increasing survival.

METHODS

A search was done, and eligible randomized trials and cohort studies should include and compare UBC patients with germline pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants who have and have not received contralateral risk-reducing local treatment. Random-effects meta-analysis was used in this study. Primary outcomes of the studies included overall survival (OS) and the incidence of contralateral breast cancer (CBC), and secondary outcomes included breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS).

RESULTS

A total of five studies with 1769 UBC patients with germline pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants were enrolled in our meta-analysis. CRRM was correlated with a lower risk of CBC in UBC patients with germline pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants (summary RR = 0.07; 95%CI 0.03-0.13, I2 = 3%), a significantly increased OS (summary RR, 1.15; 95%CI 1.04-1.26, I2 = 26%) and a significantly increased BCSS (summary RR, 1.18; 95%CI 1.07-1.31, I2 = 64%) compared with surveillance. CPI also decreased the risk of CBC (RR 0.02; 95%CI 0.05-0.88) but did not significantly improve OS (RR 0.97; 95%CI 0.90-1.05) and BCSS (RR 0.97; 95%CI 0.90-1.05) compared with surveillance.

CONCLUSIONS

CRRM reduces CBC risk and increases OS and BCSS in UBC patients with germline pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants, and could be offered as a risk-reducing local treatment. For those who oppose CRRM, CPI could be offered for CBC-risk reduction, while its survival benefit is still uncertain.