|
1
|
Fabi A, Rossi A, Mocini E, Cardinali L, Bonavolontà V, Cenci C, Magno S, Barberi V, Moretti A, Besharat ZM, Iolascon G, Baldari C, Ferretti E, Botticelli A, Paris I, Scambia G, Migliaccio S. An Integrated Care Approach to Improve Well-Being in Breast Cancer Patients. Curr Oncol Rep 2024; 26:346-358. [PMID: 38400984 PMCID: PMC11021235 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01500-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer (BC) treatment has recently been revolutionized by the introduction of newer targeted agents, that helped tailoring therapies around the single patient. Along with increased survival rates, a careful evaluation of diet, lifestyle habits, physical activity, emotional and psychological experiences linked to the treatment journey, is now mandatory. However, a true proposal for an omnicomprehensive and "integrative" approach is still lacking in literature. METHODS A scientific board of internationally recognized specialists throughout different disciplines designed a shared proposal of holistic approach for BC patients. RESULTS A narrative review, containing information on BC treatment, endocrinological and diet aspects, physical activity, rehabilitation, integrative medicine, and digital narrative medicine, was developed. CONCLUSIONS In the context of a patient-centered care, BC treatment cannot be separated from a patient's long-term follow-up and care, and an organized interdisciplinary collaboration is the future in this disease's cure, to make sure that our patients will live longer and better. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT05893368: New Model for Integrating Person-based Care (PbC) in the Treatment of Advanced HER2-negative Breast Cancer (PERGIQUAL). Registration date: 29th May 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Fabi
- Precision Medicine Unit in Senology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
| | - Alessandro Rossi
- Precision Medicine Unit in Senology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University Foro Italico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Edoardo Mocini
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University Sapienza of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Ludovica Cardinali
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University Sapienza of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Bone Metabolic Diseases Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Valerio Bonavolontà
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Science, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | | | - Stefano Magno
- Center for Integrative Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Vittoria Barberi
- Medical Oncology 1, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Antimo Moretti
- Multidisciplinary Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Caserta, Italy
| | | | - Giovanni Iolascon
- Multidisciplinary Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Caserta, Italy
| | - Carlo Baldari
- Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, eCampus University, Rome, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Ferretti
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University Sapienza of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Botticelli
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Ida Paris
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Migliaccio
- Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University Foro Italico of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University Sapienza of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Campbell EK, Campbell TM, Culakova E, Blanchard L, Wixom N, Guido JJ, Fetten J, Huston A, Shayne M, Janelsins MC, Mustian KM, Moore RG, Peppone LJ. A whole food, plant-based randomized controlled trial in metastatic breast cancer: feasibility, nutrient, and patient-reported outcomes. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024:10.1007/s10549-024-07284-z. [PMID: 38553649 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07284-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Quality of life (QOL) is among the most important outcomes for women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), and it predicts survival. QOL is negatively impacted by cognitive impairment, fatigue, and weight gain. We assessed whether a whole food, plant-based (WFPB) diet-promoting weight loss is feasible and might improve QOL. METHODS Women with MBC on stable systemic treatments were randomized 2:1 to 1) WFPB dietary intervention (n = 21) or 2) usual care (n = 11) for 8 weeks. Participants attended weekly education visits and consumed an ad libitum WFPB diet (3 prepared meals/day provided). Patient-reported outcomes and 3-day food records were assessed at baseline and 8 weeks. The effects of WFPB diet on changes in outcomes were assessed by analysis of covariance model controlling for baseline. RESULTS 20 intervention and 10 control participants completed the trial. Intervention participants were highly adherent to the WFPB diet (94.3 % total calories on-plan). Intervention group nutrient intakes changed significantly including dietary fat (35.8 % to 20.4 % percent calories from fat, p < 0.001) and fiber content (12.7 to 30.8 g fiber/1000 kcal, p < 0.001). Perceived cognitive function (FACT-Cog total + 16.1; 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 0.8-31.7; p = 0.040) and emotional well-being (FACT-B emotional well-being subscale + 2.3; CI = 0.5-4.1; p = 0.016) improved in the WFPB versus the control group. Fatigue, measured by the BFI, improved within the WFPB group for fatigue severity (M = 4.7 ± 2.5[SD] to 3.7 ± 2.3, p = 0.047) and fatigue at its worst (5.8 ± 2.8 to 4.4 ± 2.4, p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS Significant dietary changes in this population are feasible and may improve QOL by improving treatment-related symptoms. Additional study is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03045289. Registered 7 February 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin K Campbell
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, 265 Crittenden Blvd, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.
| | - Thomas M Campbell
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Eva Culakova
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Control, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Lisa Blanchard
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Nellie Wixom
- Clinical Research Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Joseph J Guido
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Control, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - James Fetten
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Westchester, NY, USA
| | - Alissa Huston
- Department of Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Michelle Shayne
- Department of Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Michelle C Janelsins
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Control, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Karen M Mustian
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Control, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Richard G Moore
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Luke J Peppone
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Control, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Ionescu (Miron) AI, Atasiei DI, Ionescu RT, Ultimescu F, Barnonschi AA, Anghel AV, Anghel CA, Antone-Iordache IL, Mitre R, Bobolocu AM, Zamfir A, Lișcu HD, Coniac S, Șandru F. Prediction of Subclinical and Clinical Multiple Organ Failure Dysfunction in Breast Cancer Patients-A Review Using AI Tools. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:381. [PMID: 38254870 PMCID: PMC11154446 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Revised: 01/07/2024] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
This review explores the interconnection between precursor lesions of breast cancer (typical ductal hyperplasia, atypical ductal/lobular hyperplasia) and the subclinical of multiple organ failure syndrome, both representing early stages marked by alterations preceding clinical symptoms, undetectable through conventional diagnostic methods. Addressing the question "Why patients with breast cancer exhibit a tendency to deteriorate", this study investigates the biological progression from a subclinical multiple organ failure syndrome, characterized by insidious but indisputable lesions, to an acute (clinical) state resembling a cascade akin to a waterfall or domino effect, often culminating in the patient's demise. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases in October 2023, employing keywords such as "MODS", "SIRS", "sepsis", "pathophysiology of MODS", "MODS in cancer patients", "multiple organ failure", "risk factors", "cancer", "ICU", "quality of life", and "breast cancer". Supplementary references were extracted from the retrieved articles. This study emphasizes the importance of early identification and prevention of the multiple organ failure cascade at the inception of the malignant state, aiming to enhance the quality of life and extend survival. This pursuit contributes to a deeper understanding of risk factors and viable therapeutic options. Despite the existence of the subclinical multiple organ failure syndrome, current diagnostic methodologies remain inadequate, prompting consideration of AI as an increasingly crucial tool for early identification in the diagnostic process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreea-Iuliana Ionescu (Miron)
- Department of Oncological Radiotherapy and Medical Imaging, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (A.-I.I.); (A.-A.B.); (A.-V.A.); (C.-A.A.); (I.-L.A.-I.); (R.M.); (A.M.B.); (A.Z.); (H.-D.L.)
- Department of Medical Oncology, Colțea Clinical Hospital, 030167 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Dimitrie-Ionut Atasiei
- Department of Oncological Radiotherapy and Medical Imaging, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (A.-I.I.); (A.-A.B.); (A.-V.A.); (C.-A.A.); (I.-L.A.-I.); (R.M.); (A.M.B.); (A.Z.); (H.-D.L.)
| | - Radu-Tudor Ionescu
- Department of Computer Science, University of Bucharest, 010041 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Flavia Ultimescu
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Oncology “Prof. Dr. Alexandru Trestioreanu”, 022328 Bucharest, Romania;
- Department of Pathological Anatomy, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Andrei-Alexandru Barnonschi
- Department of Oncological Radiotherapy and Medical Imaging, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (A.-I.I.); (A.-A.B.); (A.-V.A.); (C.-A.A.); (I.-L.A.-I.); (R.M.); (A.M.B.); (A.Z.); (H.-D.L.)
| | - Alexandra-Valentina Anghel
- Department of Oncological Radiotherapy and Medical Imaging, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (A.-I.I.); (A.-A.B.); (A.-V.A.); (C.-A.A.); (I.-L.A.-I.); (R.M.); (A.M.B.); (A.Z.); (H.-D.L.)
| | - Cătălin-Alexandru Anghel
- Department of Oncological Radiotherapy and Medical Imaging, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (A.-I.I.); (A.-A.B.); (A.-V.A.); (C.-A.A.); (I.-L.A.-I.); (R.M.); (A.M.B.); (A.Z.); (H.-D.L.)
| | - Ionuț-Lucian Antone-Iordache
- Department of Oncological Radiotherapy and Medical Imaging, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (A.-I.I.); (A.-A.B.); (A.-V.A.); (C.-A.A.); (I.-L.A.-I.); (R.M.); (A.M.B.); (A.Z.); (H.-D.L.)
| | - Ruxandra Mitre
- Department of Oncological Radiotherapy and Medical Imaging, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (A.-I.I.); (A.-A.B.); (A.-V.A.); (C.-A.A.); (I.-L.A.-I.); (R.M.); (A.M.B.); (A.Z.); (H.-D.L.)
- Department of Medical Oncology, Colțea Clinical Hospital, 030167 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Alexandra Maria Bobolocu
- Department of Oncological Radiotherapy and Medical Imaging, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (A.-I.I.); (A.-A.B.); (A.-V.A.); (C.-A.A.); (I.-L.A.-I.); (R.M.); (A.M.B.); (A.Z.); (H.-D.L.)
| | - Andreea Zamfir
- Department of Oncological Radiotherapy and Medical Imaging, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (A.-I.I.); (A.-A.B.); (A.-V.A.); (C.-A.A.); (I.-L.A.-I.); (R.M.); (A.M.B.); (A.Z.); (H.-D.L.)
| | - Horia-Dan Lișcu
- Department of Oncological Radiotherapy and Medical Imaging, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (A.-I.I.); (A.-A.B.); (A.-V.A.); (C.-A.A.); (I.-L.A.-I.); (R.M.); (A.M.B.); (A.Z.); (H.-D.L.)
- Department of Radiotherapy, Colțea Clinical Hospital, 030167 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Simona Coniac
- Department of Medical Oncology, Colțea Clinical Hospital, 030167 Bucharest, Romania;
- Department of Endocrinology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Florica Șandru
- Department of Dermatovenerology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania;
- Department of Dermatology, Elias University Emergency Hospital, 011461 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Vecoso LVZ, Silva MT, Livinalli A, Barreto JOM, Galvao TF. Patients' perspectives on the relevance of biosimilars' outcomes in oncology: qualitative study with nominal group technique. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:722. [PMID: 38008777 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08184-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/12/2023] [Indexed: 11/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to rate the importance of outcomes from a systematic review about biosimilars in oncology from patients' perspective. METHODS This is a qualitative research with nominal group technique. Patients with cancer were selected by convenience sampling and invited for two mediated virtual meetings in 2022. Twelve outcomes from a systematic review on biosimilars for oncology developed following a protocol were explained in plain language to participants who classified them as critical, important, or not important according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. We employed Iramuteq software for lexical categorization of the meeting transcripts, and content analysis for interpretation. RESULTS Five women participated (three had metastatic cancer, one non-metastatic, one recurrent). Six outcomes were classified as critical: duration of response, progression-free survival, pathological complete response, overall survival, severe adverse events, and quality of life; three as important: mortality, event-free survival, and objective response; and three as non-important: neutralizing anti-drug antibody, any adverse event, and non-neutralizing anti-drug antibody. Duration of response, pathological complete response, severe adverse events, and quality of life were considered secondary in the review protocol, but critical by the patients. The main themes influencing the importance classification were related to the disease (progression and control) and treatment (recognition and healthcare setting). CONCLUSION Patients rated most outcomes as critical or important, some of them previously regarded as secondary by the researchers, which reinforces the need to include stakeholders' perspectives in oncology research. Aspects of the disease progression and treatment effects influenced participants' judgment on outcomes' relevance.
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Campbell EK, Campbell TM, Culakova E, Blanchard LM, Wixom N, Guido J, Fetten J, Huston A, Shayne M, Janelsins M, Mustian K, Moore RG, Peppone LJ. A Whole Food, Plant-Based Randomized Controlled Trial in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Feasibility, Nutrient, and Patient-Reported Outcomes. RESEARCH SQUARE 2023:rs.3.rs-3606685. [PMID: 38045318 PMCID: PMC10690314 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3606685/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Quality of life (QOL) is among the most important outcomes for women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and it predicts survival. QOL is negatively impacted by cognitive impairment, fatigue, and weight gain. We assessed whether a whole food, plant-based (WFPB) diet promoting weight loss is feasible and might improve QOL. Methods Women with MBC on stable systemic treatments were randomized 2:1 to 1) WFPB dietary intervention (n = 21) or 2) usual care (n = 11) for 8 weeks. Participants attended weekly education visits and consumed an ad libitum WFPB diet (3 prepared meals/day provided). Patient-reported outcomes and 3-day food records were assessed at baseline and 8 weeks. The effects of WFPB diet on changes in outcomes were assessed by analysis of covariance model controlling for baseline. Results 20 intervention and 10 control participants completed the trial. Intervention participants were highly adherent to the WFPB diet (94.3% total calories on-plan). Intervention group nutrient intakes changed significantly including dietary fat (35.8-20.4% percent calories from fat, p < 0.001) and fiber content (22.1 to 40.8 grams fiber/1000 kcal, p < 0.001). Perceived cognitive function (FACT-Cog total + 16.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.8-31.7; p = 0.040) and emotional well-being (FACT-B emotional well-being subscale + 2.3; CI = 0.5-4.1; p = 0.016) improved in the WFPB versus the control group. Fatigue, measured by the BFI, improved within the WFPB group for fatigue severity (M = 4.7 ± 2.5[SD] to 3.7 ± 2.3, p = 0.047) and fatigue at its worst (5.8 ± 2.8 to 4.4 ± 2.4, p = 0.011). Conclusions Significant dietary changes in this population are feasible and may improve QOL by improving treatment-related symptoms. Additional study is warranted. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03045289. Registered 7 February 2017.
Collapse
|
|
6
|
Zhang M, He X, Wu J, Xie F. Differences between physician and patient preferences for cancer treatments: a systematic review. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:1126. [PMID: 37980466 PMCID: PMC10657542 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11598-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared decision-making is useful to facilitate cancer treatment decisions. However, it is difficult to make treatment decisions when physician and patient preferences are different. This review aimed to summarize and compare the preferences for cancer treatments between physicians and patients. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Scopus. Studies elicited and compared preferences for cancer treatments between physicians and patients were included. Information about the study design and preference measuring attributes or questions were extracted. The available relative rank of every attribute in discrete choice experiment (DCE) studies and answers to preference measuring questions in non-DCE studies were summarized followed by a narrative synthesis to reflect the preference differences. RESULTS Of 12,959 studies identified, 8290 were included in the title and abstract screening and 48 were included in the full text screening. Included 37 studies measured the preferences from six treatment-related aspects: health benefit, adverse effects, treatment process, cost, impact on quality of life, and provider qualification. The trade-off between health benefit and adverse effects was the main focus of the included studies. DCE studies showed patients gave a higher rank on health benefit and treatment process, while physicians gave a higher rank on adverse effects. Non-DCE studies suggested that patients were willing to take a higher risk of adverse effects or lower health benefit than physicians when accepting a treatment. CONCLUSIONS Physicians and patients had important preference differences for cancer treatment. More sufficient communication is needed in cancer treatment decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengqian Zhang
- School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, No 92 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, CO, 300072, China
- Center for Social Science Survey and Data, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiaoning He
- School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, No 92 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, CO, 300072, China.
- Center for Social Science Survey and Data, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
| | - Jing Wu
- School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, No 92 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, CO, 300072, China.
- Center for Social Science Survey and Data, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
| | - Feng Xie
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
|
7
|
Obst CS, Seifert R. Critical analysis of the prescription and evaluation of protein kinase inhibitors for oncology in Germany. NAUNYN-SCHMIEDEBERG'S ARCHIVES OF PHARMACOLOGY 2023; 396:2529-2543. [PMID: 37014400 PMCID: PMC10497443 DOI: 10.1007/s00210-023-02475-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023]
Abstract
The prices of oncology drugs have been rising progressively in recent years. Despite accounting for only a small share of prescriptions, oncology drugs are the most expensive drugs on the market. However, the association between drug price and clinical benefit often remains questionable. Therefore, we set out to analyze the development of prescription and benefit assessment of protein kinase inhibitors. We identified 20 protein kinase inhibitors with oncological indications that were newly approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) between 2015 and 2019, based on the Arzneiverordnungsreport (AVR, Drug Prescription Report). For these 20 drugs, the number of prescriptions, sales, defined daily dose (DDD), and DDD costs were identified for the year of approval and for 2020, respectively, based on data from the Wissenschaftliches Institut der Ortskrankenkassen (WIdO, Scientific Institute of the General Local Health Insurance Fund, AOK). Moreover, the additional benefit assessments by the Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss (GBA, Federal Joint Committee) were considered for each drug. It is shown that the share of a drug in prescriptions, sales, and DDD does not correlate with the clinical benefit of the drug as measured by the additional benefit assessment by the GBA. Lastly, the advertisement pattern of protein kinase inhibitors in a representative oncology journal does not correlate with drug benefit. In conclusion, the immense costs of oncology drugs are therefore largely caused by drugs for which no additional benefit has been proven by the GBA. In order to ensure the long-term stability of health care systems, price-regulation measures are urgently needed, especially for drugs whose additional benefit has not been proven.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caecilia S Obst
- Institute of Pharmacology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Roland Seifert
- Institute of Pharmacology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
|
8
|
Jiang S, Meng Q, Ji F, Yin Y, Liu X, Shi W, Lyu Y. A bibliometric analysis of metastatic breast cancer: two-decade report (2002-2022). Front Oncol 2023; 13:1229222. [PMID: 37692861 PMCID: PMC10484517 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1229222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background MBC is a lethal form of breast cancer that arises when cancer cells invade other organs or tissues. The treatment of MBC needs personalized approaches based on the tumor and patient characteristics. The purpose of this paper is to analyze MBC studies from 2002 to 2022 using bibliometrics and to investigate its current situation, main contributors, core journals, highly cited papers, and topic evolution. Materials and methods We retrieved data from Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC). Bibliometric analysis of the included literatures mainly used the following tools: the function of "analyze results" and "citation report" in WoS, Microsoft excel 2021, CiteSpace v.6.1. R6, VOSviewer v.1.6.18, BICOMB v.2.04 and gCLUTO v.1.0. Results We found 12,653 articles on MBC research published in 1, 802 journals by 69, 753 authors from 118 countries. The annual output and citation of MBC articles showed a rising trend over time. The United States was the most influential country in MBC research. The most cited journal in this field was The Journal of Clinical Oncology. And the most cited article was by Slamon DJ. The co-word analysis of keywords divides MBC into six research clusters. The hormone receptor-positive MBC and liquid biopsy of MBC are the frontiers research trends. "CDK4/6 inhibitor" had the highest burst strength. Conclusion Our bibliometric analysis offers a comprehensive overview of MBC research in the past two decades. It shows the current situation, main contributors, core journals, highly cited papers, and topic evolution of this field. Our study can assist researchers and practitioners to comprehend the development and trends of MBC research and to discover potential directions for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siyuan Jiang
- Department of Thyroid Breast Surgery, Xi’an NO.3 Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Northwest University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Qingjie Meng
- Department of Thyroid Breast Surgery, Xi’an NO.3 Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Northwest University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Fuqing Ji
- Department of Thyroid Breast Surgery, Xi’an NO.3 Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Northwest University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Yulong Yin
- Department of Thyroid Breast Surgery, Xi’an NO.3 Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Northwest University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Xianghua Liu
- Department of Thyroid Breast Surgery, Xi’an NO.3 Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Northwest University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Wenzhen Shi
- Clinical Medical Research Center, the Affiliated Hospital of Northwest University, Xi’an No.3 Hospital, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
- Xi’an Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Diseases, the Affiliated Hospital of Northwest University, Xi’an No.3 Hospital, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Yonggang Lyu
- Department of Thyroid Breast Surgery, Xi’an NO.3 Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Northwest University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
|
9
|
Cardoso F, McCartney A, Ponti A, Marotti L, Vrieling C, Eniu A, Sousa B, Ripamonti C, Travado L, Spitz S, Jolly E, Curigliano G, Penault-Llorca F, Lecouvet F, Rubio IT, Biganzoli L. European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists/Advanced Breast Cancer Global Alliance quality indicators for metastatic breast cancer care. Eur J Cancer 2023; 187:105-113. [PMID: 37146504 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.03.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Improvement in the care of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) can only occur if the adequate quality of care is implemented and verified, including access to multidisciplinary, specialised care given in accordance with high-quality guidelines. To this purpose, European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists and the Advanced Breast Cancer Global Alliance joined efforts to develop the first set of quality indicators (QI) specifically for MBC that should be routinely measured and evaluated to ensure that breast cancer centres meet the required standards. METHODS A working group of multidisciplinary European experts in breast cancer met to discuss each identified QI, reporting the definition, the minimum and target standard for breast cancer centres to achieve, and the motivation for selection. The level of evidence was determined according to the short version of the United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality classification. RESULTS QI to measure access to and involvement in multidisciplinary and supportive care, appropriate pathological characterisation of disease, systemic therapies and radiotherapy were developed with the consensus of the working group. CONCLUSIONS This is the first effort of a multistep project that aims to have QI for MBC routinely measured and evaluated to ensure that breast cancer centres achieve mandated standards in the care of patients with metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatima Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation and ABC Global Alliance, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Amelia McCartney
- "Sandro Pitigliani" Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital of Prato, Prato, Italy; School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Antonio Ponti
- CPO Piemonte, Turin and European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA), Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenza Marotti
- European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA), Florence, Italy
| | - Conny Vrieling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hirslanden Clinique des Grangettes, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alexandru Eniu
- Oncology Pole, Hôpital Riviera-Chablais, Vaud-Valais, Switzerland; European School of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Berta Sousa
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Luzia Travado
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Sabine Spitz
- EUPATI Austria and Europa Donna Austria, Vienna, Austria
| | - Eva Jolly
- Cancer Theme, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Frederic Lecouvet
- Department of Radiology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Isabel T Rubio
- Breast Surgical Unit, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Laura Biganzoli
- "Sandro Pitigliani" Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital of Prato, Prato, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
|
10
|
Heidary Z, Ghaemi M, Hossein Rashidi B, Kohandel Gargari O, Montazeri A. Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review of the Qualitative Studies. Cancer Control 2023; 30:10732748231168318. [PMID: 37082898 DOI: 10.1177/10732748231168318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/22/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Quality of life (QoL) in breast cancer patients is still an important topic. Despite numerous quantitative scales, qualitative studies can help to in-depth understand the QoL of breast cancer patients. The purpose of this systematic review was to integrate qualitative studies on the QoL of women with breast cancer. METHODS A literature search was performed in electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from January 1, 2010 until June 28, 2022 to find out qualitative studies assessing breast cancer patient's QoL. Two authors independently evaluated methodological quality according to the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) checklist. Data were extracted and reported by themes for cancer-free women and patients with metastatic cancer separately. RESULTS In all, 1565 citations were retrieved. After removing 1387 duplicate and irrelevant papers, the full texts of 27 articles were reviewed and finally, 9 were eligible for evaluation. In quality checking of the citations, all articles gained the required quality score. After examining and merging similar topics, nine major themes were extracted. Physical, spiritual, and psychological aspects of QoL were the common issues in cancer-free women (before and after the COVID-19 pandemic) and patients with metastatic cancer. Perception of cancer and social life were the other main concerns in cancer-free women, whereas, in metastatic patients' overall survival and planning for the future and their children's life was the focus of interest. Women with metastatic disease showed more vulnerability in coping compared to cancer-free women. CONCLUSION This review provides an opportunity to have a closer look into the several domains of QoL in women with breast cancer. In-depth information provided by this review might help to develop interventions for patients and their families to support women to cope much better with their life challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zohreh Heidary
- Vali-E-Asr Reproductive Health Research Center, Family Health Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Marjan Ghaemi
- Vali-E-Asr Reproductive Health Research Center, Family Health Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Batool Hossein Rashidi
- Vali-E-Asr Reproductive Health Research Center, Family Health Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Ali Montazeri
- Health Metric Research Center, Iranian Institute for Health Sciences Research, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|