Individualized beta-band oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex enhances corticomuscular coherence and corticospinal excitability in healthy individuals

Exploring the Prospects of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES) as a Therapeutic Intervention for Post-Stroke Motor Recovery: A Narrative Review

INTRODUCTION

Stroke survivors often have motor impairments and related functional deficits. Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES) is a rapidly evolving field that offers a wide range of capabilities for modulating brain function, and it is safe and inexpensive. It has the potential for widespread use for post-stroke motor recovery. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS), Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS), and Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation (tRNS) are three recognized tES techniques that have gained substantial attention in recent years but have different mechanisms of action. tDCS has been widely used in stroke motor rehabilitation, while applications of tACS and tRNS are very limited. The tDCS protocols could vary significantly, and outcomes are heterogeneous.

PURPOSE

the current review attempted to explore the mechanisms underlying commonly employed tES techniques and evaluate their prospective advantages and challenges for their applications in motor recovery after stroke.

CONCLUSION

tDCS could depolarize and hyperpolarize the potentials of cortical motor neurons, while tACS and tRNS could target specific brain rhythms and entrain neural networks. Despite the extensive use of tDCS, the complexity of neural networks calls for more sophisticated modifications like tACS and tRNS.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation in non-human primates: A systematic review

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is widely employed as a tool to investigate and treat brain diseases. However, little is known about the direct effects of TMS on the brain. Non-human primates (NHPs) are a valuable translational model to investigate how TMS affects brain circuits given their neurophysiological similarity with humans and their capacity to perform complex tasks that approach human behavior. This systematic review aimed to identify studies using TMS in NHPs as well as to assess their methodological quality through a modified reference checklist. The results show high heterogeneity and superficiality in the studies regarding the report of the TMS parameters, which have not improved over the years. This checklist can be used for future TMS studies with NHPs to ensure transparency and critical appraisal. The use of the checklist would improve methodological soundness and interpretation of the studies, facilitating the translation of the findings to humans. The review also discusses how advancements in the field can elucidate the effects of TMS in the brain.

Task-dependent alteration of beta-band intermuscular coherence is associated with ipsilateral corticospinal tract excitability

Beta-band (15-30 Hz) synchronization between the EMG signals of active limb muscles can serve as a non-invasive assay of corticospinal tract integrity. Tasks engaging a single limb often primarily utilize one corticospinal pathway, although bilateral neural circuits can participate in goal-directed actions involving multi-muscle coordination and utilization of feedback. Suboptimal utilization of such circuits after CNS injury can result in unintended mirror movements and activation of pathological synergies. Accordingly, it is important to understand how the actions of one limb (e.g., a less-affected limb after strokes) influence the opposite corticospinal pathway for the rehabilitation target. Certain unimanual actions decrease the excitability of the "unengaged" corticospinal tract, presumably to prevent mirror movement, but there is no direct way to predict the extent to which this will occur. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that task-dependent changes in beta-band drives to muscles of one hand will inversely correlate with changes in the opposite corticospinal tract excitability. Ten participants completed spring pinching tasks known to induce differential 15-30 Hz drive to muscles. During compressions, transcranial magnetic stimulation single pulses to the ipsilateral M1 were delivered to generate motor-evoked potentials in the unengaged hand. The task-induced changes in ipsilateral corticospinal excitability were inversely correlated with associated changes in EMG-EMG coherence of the task hand. These results demonstrate a novel connection between intermuscular coherence and the excitability of the "unengaged" corticospinal tract and provide a springboard for further mechanistic studies of unimanual tasks of varying difficulty and their effects on neural pathways relevant to rehabilitation.

Personalized Frequency Modulated Transcranial Electrical Stimulation for Associative Memory Enhancement

Associative memory (AM) is the ability to remember the relationship between previously unrelated items. AM is significantly affected by normal aging and neurodegenerative conditions, thus there is a growing interest in applying non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques for AM enhancement. A growing body of studies identifies posterior parietal cortex (PPC) as the most promising cortical target for both transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) to modulate a cortico-hippocampal network that underlines AM. In that sense, theta frequency oscillatory tES protocols, targeted towards the hallmark oscillatory activity within the cortico-hippocampal network, are increasingly coming to prominence. To increase precision and effectiveness, the need for EEG guided individualization of the tES protocols is proposed. Here, we present the study protocol in which two types of personalized oscillatory tES–transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation (otDCS), both frequency-modulated to the individual theta-band frequency (ITF), are compared to the non-oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and to the sham stimulation. The study has cross-over design with four tES conditions (tACS, otDCS, tDCS, sham), and the comprehensive set of neurophysiological (resting state EEG and AM-evoked EEG) and behavioral outcomes, including AM tasks (short-term associative memory, face–word, face–object, object-location), as well as measures of other cognitive functions (cognitive control, verbal fluency, and working memory).