1
|
Murphy KR, Nandi T, Kop B, Osada T, Lueckel M, N'Djin WA, Caulfield KA, Fomenko A, Siebner HR, Ugawa Y, Verhagen L, Bestmann S, Martin E, Butts Pauly K, Fouragnan E, Bergmann TO. A practical guide to transcranial ultrasonic stimulation from the IFCN-endorsed ITRUSST consortium. Clin Neurophysiol 2025; 171:192-226. [PMID: 39933226 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2025.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Revised: 01/05/2025] [Accepted: 01/09/2025] [Indexed: 02/13/2025]
Abstract
Low-intensity Transcranial Ultrasonic Stimulation (TUS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique enabling cortical and deep brain targeting with unprecedented spatial accuracy. Given the high rate of adoption by new users with varying levels of expertise and interdisciplinary backgrounds, practical guidelines are needed to ensure state-of-the-art TUS application and reproducible outcomes. Therefore, the International Transcranial Ultrasonic Stimulation Safety and Standards (ITRUSST) consortium has formed a subcommittee, endorsed by the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN), to develop recommendations for best practices in human TUS applications. The practical guide presented here provides a brief introduction into ultrasound physics and sonication parameters. It explains the requirements of TUS lab equipment and transducer selection and discusses experimental design and procedures alongside potential confounds and control conditions. Finally, the guide elaborates on essential steps of application planning for stimulation safety and efficacy, as well as considerations when combining TUS with neuroimaging, electrophysiology, or other brain stimulation techniques. We hope that this practical guide to TUS will assist both novice and experienced users in planning and conducting high-quality studies and provide a solid foundation for further advancements in this promising field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith R Murphy
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Tulika Nandi
- Neuroimaging Center, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany; Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Benjamin Kop
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Takahiro Osada
- Department of Neurophysiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Maximilian Lueckel
- Neuroimaging Center, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany; Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany
| | - W Apoutou N'Djin
- LabTAU, INSERM, Centre Léon Bérard, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, F-69003 Lyon, France
| | - Kevin A Caulfield
- Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Anton Fomenko
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Hartwig R Siebner
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark; Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Yoshikazu Ugawa
- Department of Human Neurophysiology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Lennart Verhagen
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Sven Bestmann
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neuroscience, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK
| | - Eleanor Martin
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK; Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Kim Butts Pauly
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Elsa Fouragnan
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Til Ole Bergmann
- Neuroimaging Center, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany; Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Osada T, Nakajima K, Shirokoshi T, Ogawa A, Oka S, Kamagata K, Aoki S, Oshima Y, Tanaka S, Konishi S. Multiple insular-prefrontal pathways underlie perception to execution during response inhibition in humans. Nat Commun 2024; 15:10380. [PMID: 39627197 PMCID: PMC11615282 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54564-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 11/12/2024] [Indexed: 12/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Inhibiting prepotent responses in the face of external stop signals requires complex information processing, from perceptual to control processing. However, the cerebral circuits underlying these processes remain elusive. In this study, we used neuroimaging and brain stimulation to investigate the interplay between human brain regions during response inhibition at the whole-brain level. Magnetic resonance imaging suggested a sequential four-step processing pathway: initiating from the primary visual cortex (V1), progressing to the dorsal anterior insula (daINS), then involving two essential regions in the inferior frontal cortex (IFC), namely the ventral posterior IFC (vpIFC) and anterior IFC (aIFC), and reaching the basal ganglia (BG)/primary motor cortex (M1). A combination of ultrasound stimulation and time-resolved magnetic stimulation elucidated the causal influence of daINS on vpIFC and the unidirectional dependence of aIFC on vpIFC. These results unveil asymmetric pathways in the insular-prefrontal cortex and outline the macroscopic cerebral circuits for response inhibition: V1→daINS→vpIFC/aIFC→BG/M1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takahiro Osada
- Department of Neurophysiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Koji Nakajima
- Department of Neurophysiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Tokyo School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomohiko Shirokoshi
- Department of Neurophysiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Tokyo School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akitoshi Ogawa
- Department of Neurophysiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Oka
- Department of Neurophysiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koji Kamagata
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shigeki Aoki
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasushi Oshima
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Tokyo School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sakae Tanaka
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Tokyo School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Seiki Konishi
- Department of Neurophysiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
- Research Institute for Diseases of Old Age, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
- Sportology Center, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
- Advanced Research Institute for Health Science, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kop BR, Shamli Oghli Y, Grippe TC, Nandi T, Lefkes J, Meijer SW, Farboud S, Engels M, Hamani M, Null M, Radetz A, Hassan U, Darmani G, Chetverikov A, den Ouden HEM, Bergmann TO, Chen R, Verhagen L. Auditory confounds can drive online effects of transcranial ultrasonic stimulation in humans. eLife 2024; 12:RP88762. [PMID: 39190585 PMCID: PMC11349300 DOI: 10.7554/elife.88762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Transcranial ultrasonic stimulation (TUS) is rapidly emerging as a promising non-invasive neuromodulation technique. TUS is already well-established in animal models, providing foundations to now optimize neuromodulatory efficacy for human applications. Across multiple studies, one promising protocol, pulsed at 1000 Hz, has consistently resulted in motor cortical inhibition in humans (Fomenko et al., 2020). At the same time, a parallel research line has highlighted the potentially confounding influence of peripheral auditory stimulation arising from TUS pulsing at audible frequencies. In this study, we disentangle direct neuromodulatory and indirect auditory contributions to motor inhibitory effects of TUS. To this end, we include tightly matched control conditions across four experiments, one preregistered, conducted independently at three institutions. We employed a combined transcranial ultrasonic and magnetic stimulation paradigm, where TMS-elicited motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) served as an index of corticospinal excitability. First, we replicated motor inhibitory effects of TUS but showed through both tight controls and manipulation of stimulation intensity, duration, and auditory masking conditions that this inhibition was driven by peripheral auditory stimulation, not direct neuromodulation. Furthermore, we consider neuromodulation beyond driving overall excitation/inhibition and show preliminary evidence of how TUS might interact with ongoing neural dynamics instead. Primarily, this study highlights the substantial shortcomings in accounting for the auditory confound in prior TUS-TMS work where only a flip-over sham and no active control was used. The field must critically reevaluate previous findings given the demonstrated impact of peripheral confounds. Furthermore, rigorous experimental design via (in)active control conditions is required to make substantiated claims in future TUS studies. Only when direct effects are disentangled from those driven by peripheral confounds can TUS fully realize its potential for research and clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin R Kop
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour; Radboud University NijmegenNijmegenNetherlands
| | - Yazan Shamli Oghli
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network; University of TorontoTorontoCanada
| | - Talyta C Grippe
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network; University of TorontoTorontoCanada
| | - Tulika Nandi
- Neuroimaging Center; Johannes-Gutenberg University Medical Center MainzMainzGermany
| | - Judith Lefkes
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour; Radboud University NijmegenNijmegenNetherlands
| | - Sjoerd W Meijer
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour; Radboud University NijmegenNijmegenNetherlands
| | - Soha Farboud
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour; Radboud University NijmegenNijmegenNetherlands
| | - Marwan Engels
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour; Radboud University NijmegenNijmegenNetherlands
| | - Michelle Hamani
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network; University of TorontoTorontoCanada
| | - Melissa Null
- Neuroimaging Center; Johannes-Gutenberg University Medical Center MainzMainzGermany
| | - Angela Radetz
- Neuroimaging Center; Johannes-Gutenberg University Medical Center MainzMainzGermany
| | - Umair Hassan
- Neuroimaging Center; Johannes-Gutenberg University Medical Center MainzMainzGermany
| | - Ghazaleh Darmani
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network; University of TorontoTorontoCanada
| | - Andrey Chetverikov
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour; Radboud University NijmegenNijmegenNetherlands
- Department of Psychosocial Science, Faculty of Psychology, University of BergenBergenNorway
| | - Hanneke EM den Ouden
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour; Radboud University NijmegenNijmegenNetherlands
| | - Til Ole Bergmann
- Neuroimaging Center; Johannes-Gutenberg University Medical Center MainzMainzGermany
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research MainzMainzGermany
| | - Robert Chen
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network; University of TorontoTorontoCanada
| | - Lennart Verhagen
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour; Radboud University NijmegenNijmegenNetherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Osada T, Konishi S. Noninvasive intervention by transcranial ultrasound stimulation: Modulation of neural circuits and its clinical perspectives. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2024; 78:273-281. [PMID: 38505983 PMCID: PMC11488602 DOI: 10.1111/pcn.13663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
Low-intensity focused transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS) is an emerging noninvasive technique capable of stimulating both the cerebral cortex and deep brain structures with high spatial precision. This method is recognized for its potential to comprehensively perturb various brain regions, enabling the modulation of neural circuits, in a manner not achievable through conventional magnetic or electrical brain stimulation techniques. The underlying mechanisms of neuromodulation are based on a phenomenon where mechanical waves of ultrasound kinetically interact with neurons, specifically affecting neuronal membranes and mechanosensitive channels. This interaction induces alterations in the excitability of neurons within the stimulated region. In this review, we briefly present the fundamental principles of ultrasound physics and the physiological mechanisms of TUS neuromodulation. We explain the experimental apparatus and procedures for TUS in humans. Due to the focality, the integration of various methods, including magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance-guided neuronavigation systems, is important to perform TUS experiments for precise targeting. We then review the current state of the literature on TUS neuromodulation, with a particular focus on human subjects, targeting both the cerebral cortex and deep subcortical structures. Finally, we outline future perspectives of TUS in clinical applications in psychiatric and neurological fields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takahiro Osada
- Department of NeurophysiologyJuntendo University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Seiki Konishi
- Department of NeurophysiologyJuntendo University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
- Research Institute for Diseases of Old AgeJuntendo University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
- Sportology CenterJuntendo University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
- Advanced Research Institute for Health ScienceJuntendo University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| |
Collapse
|