The importance of overlap: A retrospective analysis of electrical field maps, alcohol cue-reactivity patterns, and treatment outcomes for alcohol use disorder

Targeting VMPFC-amygdala circuit with TMS in substance use disorder: A mechanistic framework

The ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC), located along the medial aspect of the frontal area, plays a critical role in regulating arousal/emotions. Its intricate connections with subcortical structures, including the striatum and amygdala, highlight the VMPFC's importance in the neurocircuitry of addiction. Due to these features, the VMPFC is considered a promising target for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in substance use disorders (SUD). By the end of 2023, all 21 studies targeting VMPFC for SUD used anatomical landmarks (e.g., Fp1/Fp2 in the EEG system) to define coil location with a fixed orientation. Nevertheless, one-size-fits-all TMS over VMPFC has yielded variable outcomes. Here, we suggested a pipeline based on a tailored TMS targeting framework aimed at optimally modulating the VMPFC-amygdala circuit on an individual basis. We collected MRI data from 60 participants with methamphetamine use disorders (MUDs). We examined the variability in TMS target location based on task-based functional connectivity between VMPFC and amygdala using psychophysiological interaction (PPI) analysis. Electric fields (EF) were calculated for fixed vs. optimized location (Fp1/Fp2 vs. individualized maximal PPI), orientation (AF7/AF8 vs. optimized algorithm) and intensity (constant vs. adjusted) to maximize target engagement. In our pipeline, the left medial amygdala, identified as the brain region with the highest (0.31 ± 0.29) fMRI drug cue reactivity, was selected as the subcortical seed region. The voxel with the most positive amygdala-VMPFC PPI connectivity in each participant was considered the individualized TMS target (MNI-coordinates: [12.6, 64.23, -0.8] ± [13.64, 3.50, 11.01]). This individualized VMPFC-amygdala connectivity significantly correlated with VAS craving after cue exposure (R = 0.27, p = 0.03). Coil orientation was optimized to increase EF strength over the targeted circuit (0.99 ± 0.21 V/m vs. the fixed approach: Fp1: 0.56 ± 0.22 and Fp2: 0.78 ± 0.25 V/m) and TMS intensity was harmonized across the population. This study highlights the potential of an individualized VMPFC targeting framework to enhance treatment outcomes for addiction, specifically modulating the personalized VMPFC-amygdala circuit.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Medial Prefrontal Cortex Theta Burst Stimulation for Cocaine Use Disorder: A Three-Month Feasibility and Brain Target-Engagement Study

BACKGROUND

Cue-induced craving precipitates relapse in drug and alcohol use disorders. Theta burst stimulation (TBS) to the left frontal pole of the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) has previously been shown to reduce drinking and brain reactivity to alcohol cues. This randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled target-engagement study aimed to assess whether TBS has similar effects in individuals with cocaine use disorder (CUD).

METHODS

Thirty-three participants in intensive outpatient treatment received either real or sham TBS over 10 sessions across 3 weeks (36,000 pulses total; continuous TBS, 110% resting motor threshold, 3600 pulses/session). TBS was administered on days of behavioral counseling. Twenty-five individuals completed all 10 TBS sessions. Brain reactivity to cocaine cues was measured using fMRI at baseline, 1-month, 2-months, and 3-months.

RESULTS

Cocaine abstinence during the 3-month follow-up period was greater in the real TBS group (1-month: 92.0%, 2-month: 100.0%, 3-month: 85.0%) compared to sham (1-month: 66.6%, 2-month: 66.6%, 3-month: 66.6%), though not statistically significant [1-month: 6.00, p=0.14; 2-month OR=:14.30, p=0.09, and 3-month OR=2.75, p=0.30]. However, there was a significant effect on cocaine cue reactivity (treatment effect: F1,365= 8.92, p=0.003; time*treatment interaction: F3,365=12.88, p<0.001). Real TBS reduced cocaine cue reactivity in the MPFC (F3,72=5.46, p=0.02) overall, and in the anterior cingulate (F3,72=3.03, p=0.04), and insula (F3,72=3.60, p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

This early-stage trial demonstrates TBS to the MPFC reduces brain reactivity to cocaine cues in key nodes of the Salience Network in treatment-seeking cocaine users. Future, well-powered trials are warranted to evaluate clinical efficacy outcomes.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the rehabilitation of patients with addiction: current status and future prospects

INTRODUCTION

Substance use disorders (SUDs) are severe conditions that remain extremely challenging to treat in clinical practice. With high rates of non-response to current treatment options and several SUDs with no approved interventions, novel therapies are needed. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can non-invasively modulate the neurocircuitry of brain-based disorders, and investigation into its therapeutic potential for SUDs is growing rapidly.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we summarize the clinical research to date evaluating its safety and efficacy for various SUDs. We highlight the investigations comparing different stimulation parameters to present our current understanding on optimal stimulation parameters. Additionally, we cover key research avenues in the use of neuroimaging to guide treatment, cue-induction paradigms, and adjunctive or combination treatments that may optimize outcomes.

EXPERT OPINION

Evidence of rTMS as an effective treatment for certain SUDs has emerged and is preliminary for others. There are a growing number of studies showing benefit and meta-analyses suggesting that rTMS can significantly reduce substance craving and consumption. However, the optimal approach has not been determined, and there is a great deal of heterogeneity in rTMS protocols and mixed outcomes. Further research into strategies for enhancing precision will be crucial in moving the field forward.

Parameter Space and Potential for Biomarker Development in 25 Years of fMRI Drug Cue Reactivity: A Systematic Review

Importance

In the last 25 years, functional magnetic resonance imaging drug cue reactivity (FDCR) studies have characterized some core aspects in the neurobiology of drug addiction. However, no FDCR-derived biomarkers have been approved for treatment development or clinical adoption. Traversing this translational gap requires a systematic assessment of the FDCR literature evidence, its heterogeneity, and an evaluation of possible clinical uses of FDCR-derived biomarkers.

Objective

To summarize the state of the field of FDCR, assess their potential for biomarker development, and outline a clear process for biomarker qualification to guide future research and validation efforts.

Evidence Review

The PubMed and Medline databases were searched for every original FDCR investigation published from database inception until December 2022. Collected data covered study design, participant characteristics, FDCR task design, and whether each study provided evidence that might potentially help develop susceptibility, diagnostic, response, prognostic, predictive, or severity biomarkers for 1 or more addictive disorders.

Findings

There were 415 FDCR studies published between 1998 and 2022. Most focused on nicotine (122 [29.6%]), alcohol (120 [29.2%]), or cocaine (46 [11.1%]), and most used visual cues (354 [85.3%]). Together, these studies recruited 19 311 participants, including 13 812 individuals with past or current substance use disorders. Most studies could potentially support biomarker development, including diagnostic (143 [32.7%]), treatment response (141 [32.3%]), severity (84 [19.2%]), prognostic (30 [6.9%]), predictive (25 [5.7%]), monitoring (12 [2.7%]), and susceptibility (2 [0.5%]) biomarkers. A total of 155 interventional studies used FDCR, mostly to investigate pharmacological (67 [43.2%]) or cognitive/behavioral (51 [32.9%]) interventions; 141 studies used FDCR as a response measure, of which 125 (88.7%) reported significant interventional FDCR alterations; and 25 studies used FDCR as an intervention outcome predictor, with 24 (96%) finding significant associations between FDCR markers and treatment outcomes.

Conclusions and Relevance

Based on this systematic review and the proposed biomarker development framework, there is a pathway for the development and regulatory qualification of FDCR-based biomarkers of addiction and recovery. Further validation could support the use of FDCR-derived measures, potentially accelerating treatment development and improving diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive clinical judgments.

Converging Evidence for Frontopolar Cortex as a Target for Neuromodulation in Addiction Treatment

Noninvasive brain stimulation technologies such as transcranial electrical and magnetic stimulation (tES and TMS) are emerging neuromodulation therapies that are being used to target the neural substrates of substance use disorders. By the end of 2022, 205 trials of tES or TMS in the treatment of substance use disorders had been published, with heterogeneous results, and there is still no consensus on the optimal target brain region. Recent work may help clarify where and how to apply stimulation, owing to expanding databases of neuroimaging studies, new systematic reviews, and improved methods for causal brain mapping. Whereas most previous clinical trials targeted the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, accumulating data highlight the frontopolar cortex as a promising therapeutic target for transcranial brain stimulation in substance use disorders. This approach is supported by converging multimodal evidence, including lesion-based maps, functional MRI-based maps, tES studies, TMS studies, and dose-response relationships. This review highlights the importance of targeting the frontopolar area and tailoring the treatment according to interindividual variations in brain state and trait and electric field distribution patterns. This converging evidence supports the potential for treatment optimization through context, target, dose, and timing dimensions to improve clinical outcomes of transcranial brain stimulation in people with substance use disorders in future clinical trials.