[Time perspective and quality of life in rectal cancer patients: An exploratory study]

Dignity and time perspective: A pilot explorative study in cancer patients

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the possible correlation between emotional distress linked to dignity and dysfunctional temporal orientations in the oncological context.

METHODS

We conducted an exploratory study between December 2020 and February 2021, referring to a sample of 107 patients in active treatment for solid tumors belonging to the Oncology Department of the Fondazione Poliambulanza (Brescia, Italy). We administered two self-report questionnaires: the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI-IT) (Italian version, Grassi L, Costantini A, Caruso R, et al. (2017) Dignity and psychosocial-related variables in advanced and nonadvanced cancer patients by using the patient dignity inventory-Italian version. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 53(2), 279-287), as a measure of perceived level of dignity, and the Italian version of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory scale (ZTPI) (Zimbardo PG and Boyd JN (2009) Il paradosso del tempo. La nuova psicologia del tempo che cambierà la tua vita. Milano: Mondadori), as a measure of the experiential dimensions of time, such as past, present, and future.

RESULTS

From the PDI-IT emerged that our sample reported high levels of physical and psychological distress. Furthermore, we founded higher distress in patients under 55 years (p = 0.04) and lower distress in retired patients (p = 0.01). The ZTPI showed in our patients prevailing orientations to the past-positive (39.3%) and the future (37.4%). We noticed a gender difference: men were mainly oriented to the future while women to the past-positive. Moreover, married subjects reported a prevalent orientation to past-positive and the future. Finally, data analysis found moderate positive correlation between the "Negative Past" dimension of ZTPI and high levels of physical (r = 0.203, p = 0.03) and psychological distress (r = 236, p = 0.01).

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

In our experience in oncology, dignity and time perspective play a central role as indicators of the quality of care. Our study shows the importance of a treatment path that integrates the constructs of Dignity and Time Perspective to favor a better psychological adaptation.

Methodological Investigation of Time Perspective Scoring and Quality of Life among Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis

Achieving and maintaining a high quality of life following the diagnosis of chronic illness has a positive impact on the experience of illness, including delayed disease progression and fewer relapses. Time perspective has shown promising relationships with quality of life, though studies using the construct in samples with chronic illness are sparse and methodologically heterogeneous. Participants (n = 123) were diagnosed with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis at least five years prior to enrollment and were beginning a new disease modifying therapy (DMT). The Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI) and the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQoL-100) assessment were administered at baseline and the WHOQoL-100 was administered six-weeks after starting the new DMT. This study investigated the utility of three common methods of scoring and interpreting ZTPI (balanced vs. deviation-from-balanced, categorical, and continuous scores) to predict change in quality of life. Independent sample t-tests revealed no difference in quality of life for balanced vs. deviation-from-balanced. One-way ANOVA revealed no difference in quality of life across time perspective categories. Linear regression analysis found that past-negative scores predicted decreases in all quality of life domains as well as overall score while present hedonistic scores predicted increases in psychological and overall quality of life.

The rhythm of chemotherapy and cancer patients' time perspectives

Background

While it is well known that illnesses such as cancer modify the experience of time, the impact of the rhythm and length of treatment on patients' time perspectives remains unknown.

Methods

A short version of Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory and Transcendental Future Perspective Questionnaire as well as a demographic questionnaire on a convenience sample of 259 patients (66.8% female, mean age 52.36) with various cancers and undergoing chemotherapy with different frequencies (1, 2, 3 weeks) and mean time in treatment 23.4 months.

Results

The temporal perspectives mean scores of cancer patients are: positive past 3.69, negative past 3.13, present hedonism 3.08, future 3.77, transcendental future 3.40. Patients tend only slightly to lose faith alongside the course of oncological treatment regardless of their age (ρ =  - 0.210, p < 0.01). The frequency of chemotherapy mildly differentiates temporal perspectives of patients regarding present hedonism and transcendental future: a weekly treatment is more disturbing than the triweekly one and no treatment in terms of hedonism, while patients not in chemo score significantly higher in transcendental future than patients in biweekly and triweekly chemo.

Conclusions

The variations of treatment rhythm are less significant than predicted, although still relevant. Since most sociodemographic variables are of no relevance, cancer experience likely unifies temporal perspectives among people of different backgrounds.