Lowering the pivot point of sural neurofasciocutaneous flaps to reconstruct deep electrical burn wounds in the distal foot

How Safe Is Reverse Sural Flap?: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue reconstruction of the lower third of the leg, the ankle, and the foot is challenging for reconstructive surgeons. The options for reconstruction are limited. Reverse sural flap is relatively easy to perform and considered a good option for reconstruction. The complication rates are variable in studies. This study aims to systemically review all available articles based on reverse sural flap focusing on complications of the flap. The overall complication of the flap helps to better understand the reliability of the flap.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar to identify cases of reverse sural artery flap.

RESULTS

A pooled analysis of 89 articles was performed, which yielded 2575 patients (2592 flaps) over a period of 19 years. Most of the cases were performed in Asian countries (1540 flaps, 59.4%) with the majority being performed in China (746 flaps, 28.8%). The most common cause for reverse sural flap surgery was trauma/postsurgical (1785/2592) followed by burn/scarring. Flap complications were recorded in 653 of 2592 flaps (25.20%). The most common complication was partial flap loss, which was recorded in 204 flaps (7.85%) followed by venous congestion (79 flaps, 3.05%). Complete flap loss was observed only in 66 participants (2.5% of all the flaps performed).

CONCLUSIONS

Reverse sural flap is reliable flap for the reconstruction of lower leg, ankle, and foot. It can give a comparable outcome as free flap when meticulously performed and, in many cases, a better result.

Distally Based Sural Fasciocutaneous Flaps for Reconstructing Soft Tissue Defects Proximal and Distal to the Tarsometatarsal Joints: A Comparative Analysis

Distally based sural fasciocutaneous (DBSF) flaps are widely used for reconstructing soft tissue defects of the foot. The purpose of this paper was to compare the clinical efficacy of the use of flaps to repair defects in areas proximal and distal to the level of the tarsometatarsal joints in a relatively large number of patients and to analyze the effects of factors on the risk of developing partial necrosis of the flaps. Between April 2001 and December 2019, a total of 355 DBSF flaps were utilized to cover soft tissue defects in the foot. According to the furthest location of the defects reconstructed with the flaps, the flaps were divided into the proximal foot group (n = 260) and the distal foot group (n = 95). The partial necrosis rates, their influencing factors, and the clinical outcomes of the procedure were compared between the two groups. In the proximal foot group, the partial necrosis rate (6.2%, 16 of 260) was significantly lower than that in the distal foot group (14.7%, 14 of 95) (P < .05). The proportion of successful coverage of the defects using the flaps alone or in combination with a simple salvage treatment was comparable between the groups (P > .05). The ratio of unfavorable conditions in the distal foot group was higher than that in the proximal foot group (P < .05). DBSF flaps can be effectively utilized to repair defects in the proximal and distal areas of the foot. The use of a DBSF flap to repair defects in the proximal areas of the foot is superior to the use of DBSF flaps for repairing defects in the distal areas of the foot in terms of reliable survival of the flap.

Distally Based Perforator-Plus Sural Neurocutaneous Flap with High or Low Pivot Point: Anatomical Considerations and a Retrospective Study of a Clinical Series of 378 Flaps

BACKGROUND

 This study is to describe the distribution of natural true anastomoses associated with the distally based perforator-plus sural neurocutaneous flap (sural flap), summarize our experience in the flap with high pivot point, and compare the outcomes between the flaps with high and low pivot points.

METHODS

 Five amputated lower limbs were perfused, and the integuments were radiographed. We retrospectively analyzed 378 flaps, which were divided into two groups: pivot points located ≤8.0 cm (low pivot point group) and >8.0 cm (high pivot point group) proximal to the tip of the lateral malleolus. Partial necrosis rates were compared between two groups.

RESULTS

 The arterial chain surrounding the sural nerve was linked by true anastomoses from the intermalleolar line to popliteal crease. True anastomoses existed among peroneal perforators and between these perforators and the arterial chain. There were 93 flaps with high pivot point and 285 flaps with low pivot point. Partial necrosis rates were 16 and 9.1% in the high and low pivot point group (p = 0.059), respectively.

CONCLUSION

 True anastomosis connections among peroneal perforators and the whole arterial chain around sural nerve enable the sural flap to survive with a greater length. The sural flap with high pivot point is a good option for reconstructing soft-tissue defects in the middle and distal leg, ankle, and foot, particularly when the lowest peroneal perforator presents damage, greater distance to the defects, discontinuity with the donor site, or anatomical variation.

Distally based peroneal artery perforator-plus fasciocutaneous flap in the reconstruction of soft tissue defects over the distal forefoot: a retrospectively analyzed clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Distally based peroneal artery perforator-plus fasciocutaneous (DPAPF) flaps are widely used for reconstructing soft-tissue defects of the lower extremity. However, reports on the reconstruction of the defects over the distal forefoot using the DPAPF flaps are scarce. Herein, we describe our experience on the reconstruction of these defects using DPAPF flaps in a considerable sample size.

METHODS

Between February 2005 and August 2019, a total of 56 DPAPF flaps in 56 patients were used to reconstruct soft-tissue defects in the forefoot. In order to reduce the length of fascial pedicle and the total length of the DPAPF flaps, the ankles were fixed in dorsiflexion using a Kirschner wire before designing the flaps. The flaps were elevated by the anterograde-retrograde approach. Patient factors and flap factors were compared between the "survival" and "partial necrosis" groups.

RESULTS

Overall, 47 flaps had survived completely in one stage. Partial necrosis developed in nine flaps, with only one remnant defect covered using a local flap. By fixing the ankles in dorsiflexion, the length of the fascial pedicle was reduced approximately 2.35 ± 0.58 cm, the total length of the flap was simultaneously shortened by the same amount as the length of the fascial pedicle. The width of the fascia pedicle varied from 3.0 cm to 6.0 cm. The fascial pedicle width > 4 cm was found in 21 flaps. The partial necrosis rate of the DPAPF flaps with the top edge located in the 8th zone was significantly lower than that in the 9th zone (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The DPAPF flaps can be effectively used to reconstruct the defects over the distal forefoot because of convenient harvest and reliability. By fixing the ankle in dorsiflexion with Kirschner wire and widening the fascial pedicle appropriately, the top edge and LWR of the flaps will be decreased, and thus the procedures are helpful for the flaps survival.

Comparison of Reverse Sural Artery Flap Healing for Traumatic Injuries Above and Below the Ankle Joint

The reverse sural artery (RSA) flap is popular among trauma surgeons to cover the distal third of the leg to the foot. However, flaps that inset in the foot seem to have a high necrosis rate. This study compared the healing of RSA flaps performed for defects proximal to the ankle versus defects distal to the ankle. Patient data were collected retrospectively between January 2005 and December 2009. Eighty-five patients with the lower leg, ankle, and traumatic foot injuries were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 (49 patients) had RSA flap cover for soft tissue and bony defect proximal and up to the ankle joint line, and group 2 (36 patients) had RSA flap cover distal to the ankle joint line. The time to healing and type of healing were compared between the groups. The demographics between the 2 groups were similar. The successful RSA flap healing rate was 65% in group 1 (32 of 49) and 42% in group 2 (15 of 36). The average time to flap healing between the groups was similar (p = .16). Group 1 had predominantly primary healing compared with group 2 (p = .03). Group 2 had a higher reoperation rate for wound necrosis, which was significant (p = .001). The success of the RSA flap is higher when used for proximal to ankle joint line defects. Surgeons should be aware of the chances of flap necrosis when undertaking RSA flap cover distal to the ankle joint line.

Early Reconstruction of Distal Leg and Foot in Acute High-Voltage Electrical Burn: Does Location of Pedicle in the Zone of Injury Affect the Outcome of Distally Based Sural Flap?

BACKGROUND

Distally based fasciocutaneous sural flap is popular in the reconstruction of distal leg and foot burns. However, utilization of this technique in high-voltage electrical injury has been challenging.

AIMS

The present study aimed to compare the outcome of early aggressive debridement and coverage of contact point of acute high-voltage electrical injury using distally based fasciocutaneous sural flap between high-risk and low-risk patients defined by the anatomic proximity of the flap pedicle to the zone of injury.

METHODS

A total of 51 patients with contact point of high-voltage electrical burn (HVEB) in distal leg and foot undergoing distally based fasciocutaneous sural flap were included in this prospective clinical study. In 28 patients, the flap pedicle was not involved in the contact point of high-voltage electrical injury (low risk/control group), whereas in 21 patients, it was located inside the zone of injury (high-risk/case group). Patients were followed up for a median of 21 months (range, 12-44 months).

RESULTS

Wound dimensions to be covered were relatively similar between the 2 groups. Complications of flap survival (primary outcome) and other minor early and late complications (secondary outcome) did not significantly differ between the 2 groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Provided that early and completed debridements of contact points of HVEB were achieved, distally based sural flap is feasible and there is reliable coverage in HVEB even in patients with flap pedicle located in vicinity of the zone of injury.

Reconstruction of the Foot and Ankle Using Pedicled or Free Flaps: Perioperative Flap Survival Analysis

Objective

The purpose of this study is to determine the correlation between non-technical risk factors and the perioperative flap survival rate and to evaluate the choice of skin flap for the reconstruction of foot and ankle.

Methods

This was a clinical retrospective study. Nine variables were identified. The Kaplan-Meier method coupled with a log-rank test and a Cox regression model was used to predict the risk factors that influence the perioperative flap survival rate. The relationship between postoperative wound infection and risk factors was also analyzed using a logistic regression model.

Results

The overall flap survival rate was 85.42%. The necrosis rates of free flaps and pedicled flaps were 5.26% and 20.69%, respectively. According to the Cox regression model, flap type (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.592; 95% confidence interval [CI] (1.606, 4.184); P < 0.001) and postoperative wound infection (HR = 0.266; 95% CI (0.134, 0.529); P < 0.001) were found to be statistically significant risk factors associated with flap necrosis. Based on the logistic regression model, preoperative wound bed inflammation (odds ratio [OR] = 11.371,95% CI (3.117, 41.478), P < 0.001) was a statistically significant risk factor for postoperative wound infection.

Conclusion

Flap type and postoperative wound infection were both independent risk factors influencing the flap survival rate in the foot and ankle. However, postoperative wound infection was a risk factor for the pedicled flap but not for the free flap. Microvascular anastomosis is a major cause of free flap necrosis. To reconstruct complex or wide soft tissue defects of the foot or ankle, free flaps are safer and more reliable than pedicled flaps and should thus be the primary choice.