Validation of the Brazilian version of the Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief (BSHS-B-Br)

The Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI): Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties for Brazilian adults after a burn injury

OBJECTIVES

To translate, cross-culturally adapt, validate, verify the reliability and estimate the minimal detectable change (MDC) of the UEFI to Brazilian Portuguese (UEFI-Br) for burns.

METHODS

The study was carried out with 131 Brazilian burn cases at two time points, at discharge and at the first outpatient follow-up (15-21 days after discharge) in a Burn Treatment Center. The adaptation process of the UEFI was based on international recommendations. The Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief-Br (BSHS-B-Br) was also applied in order to analyze construct validity of the UEFI-Br and distribution-based methods were used to estimate its MDC.

RESULTS

Intra- and inter-rater reliability were good with ICC of 0.986 (CI 95 %: 0.98-0.99) and 0.969 (CI 95 %: 0.955-0.979), respectively, at discharge and 0.997 (CI 95 %: 0.996-0.998) and 0.987 (CI 95 %: 0.981-0.991), respectively, at the first outpatient follow-up appointment. We found good internal consistency with Cronbach's α values of 0.987 and 0.996, respectively, at the two times. The SEM was 4.42 and 2.31 at the first and second time points, respectively. The UEFI-Br scores demonstrated strong correlation with the Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief-Br (BSHS-B-Br) function domain scores (r = 0.87-0.90). No significant correlation was found between UEFI-Br scores and participants' characteristics. The MDC of the UEFI-Br lies between 11 and 13 points.

CONCLUSION

The Brazilian version of the UEFI-Br, a useful tool to assess upper limb function and disability, is a valid and reliable tool for use with Brazilian burn survivors. The MDC for the instrument was determined to be 11-13 points.

Validation of the Spanish version of the Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief (BSHS-B) questionnaire

Background

The Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief (BSHS-B) is considered a validated questionnaire to evaluate quality of life after burn. The purpose of this study was to translate the BSHS-B into Spanish and perform its cross-cultural adaptation.

Methods

First, BSHS-B was translated from English into Spanish. Subsequently, 84 patients answered the Spanish version of BSHS-B and SF-36 scales to assess the reliability (Cronbach’s alpha), construct validity (Spearman rank test), and stability in time (intra-class correlation coefficient).

Results

The BSHS-B-Sp showed a good internal consistency with a global Cronbach’s alpha of 0.96. Correlations between the major domains of BSHS-B and SF-36 are reported with Spearman’s coefficient ranging from 0.29 to 0.87 in all sub-domains (p < 0.01). Stability in time was confirmed by intra-class correlation coefficient (0.91–0.99 for every sub-domain and 0.98 for global score, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The Spanish version of the BSHS-B demonstrated an appropriated internal consistency, construct validity, and stability in time. This fact supports its applicability to evaluate the quality of life of burn patients.

Level of evidence: Not gradable

Screening and Assessment for Psychological Distress among Burn Survivors

Given the high rates of psychological distress after burn injury, thorough screening and assessment for psychosocial factors and psychiatric pathology should be routinely completed for individuals with burn injuries. Burn survivors experience unique psychosocial changes and injury sequelae, such as body image concerns, trauma-related pathology, and itching. Screening for these factors is integral to understanding how these may be contributing to psychological distress. Proactively identifying distress and psychiatric pathology is important to optimize physical and emotional outcomes. The aim of this manuscript is to summarize information about the available screening and assessment tools for psychological distress among burn survivors.

Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the burn specific health scale-brief: A National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research Burn Model System Study

OBJECTIVE

The Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief (BSHS-B) is a commonly used burn specific health outcome measure that includes 40 items across nine subscales. The objective of this study was to use both classical and modern psychometric methods to evaluate psychometric properties of the BSHS-B.

METHODS

Data were collected post burn injury by a multisite federally funded project tracking long term outcomes. We examined dimensionality, local dependence, item fit, and functioning of response categories, homogeneity, and floor and ceiling effects. Items were fit to Item Response Theory models for evaluation.

RESULTS

A total of 653 adults with burn injury completed the BSHS-B. Factor analyses supported unidimensionality for all subscales, but not for a total score based on all 40 items. All nine of the subscales had significant ceiling effects. Six item pairs displayed local dependence suggesting redundance and 11 items did not fit the Item Response Theory models. At least 15 items have too many response options.

CONCLUSIONS

Results identified numerous psychometric issues with the BSHS-B. A single summary score should never be used for any purpose. Psychometric properties of the scale need to be improved by removing redundant items, reducing response categories and modifying or deleting problematic items. Additional conceptual work is needed to, at a minimum, revise the work subscale and optimally to revisit and clearly define the constructs measured by all the subscales. Additional items are needed to address ceiling effects.

Burn Specific Health Scale - Brief - Brazil and International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in burn patients

With better burn trauma survival rates, quality of life and functionality have become important outcomes in the evaluation of burn patients.The objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of life of burn survivors using the Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief-Br and their function and health using the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) in order to assess whether there is a correlation in the results obtained between the two instruments. A cross-sectional study with 80 burn patients who underwent outpatient follow-up was completed. Quality of life was assessed using the BSHS-B-Br, an instrument translated and validated in Brazilian Portuguese. Based on ICF category concepts, a data collection tool was used with "yes" and "no" answers. A "yes" answer represented the "8" qualifier, indicating a problem without a specific order of magnitude. Both instruments were self-applied in standardized conditions without complications during the process. Results were analyzed through Spearman's rank correlation coefficients. The BSHS-B-Br had an average score of 127.12 (SD ± 23.03). The correlation was moderate between the total BSHS-B-Br score and the answers of ICF for body functions (r= -0.53; p <0.001) and environmental factors (r= -0.50; p <0.001). It was weak for body structures (r= -0.47; p <0.001) and for activities and participation (r= -0.43; p <0.001). This study found a moderate correlation between the results of the Burn Specific Health Scale - Brief - Brazil and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health for burn patients showing that both instruments provide complementary information about burned patients.

Quantifying Burn Injury-Related Disability and Quality of Life in the Developing World: A Primer for Patient-Centered Resource Allocation

BACKGROUND

Untreated or undertreated burns are commonly encountered by plastic surgeons on medical trips in India and represent a major cause of disability. We sought to utilize validated patient-reported outcomes instruments to identify the patient population with the greatest burn-related disability in order to appropriately allocate plastic surgery resources to those in greatest need.

METHODS

The Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, RAND 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, and Burn-Specific Health Scale-Revised, Brief, and Adapted questionnaires were administered via an interpreter during a plastic surgery trip to Jharkhand, India, in January 2018. Demographics, comorbidities, and burn-specific history were recorded.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight postburn patients were surveyed (mean age, 17.0 ± 9.2 years; male:female ratio, 1:2.5). Mean time from injury was 4.74 years. No patient had received formal, primary burn care. Mechanism of injury: flame (39%), oil (32%), scalding water (14%), and other (14%). Fifty-four percent were extremity burns; 25%, facial; and 18%, neck burns. The Burn-Specific Health Scale-Revised, Brief, and Adapted demonstrated that the most significantly impacted domains for all patients were body image and skin sensitivity, with more than 80% of patients complaining of issues with skin sensitivity. In addition, children (aged <18 years) had diminished body image domain scores. RAND SF-36 scores were lowest in the energy (73.1 ± 25.0) and general health (76.5 ± 13.8) domains, and females with extremity burns demonstrated statistically significant decreases in their physical limitation domain scores (85.9 ± 17.3, P < 0.05). Females with extremity burns also had statistically significant lower scores in the energy domain (64.09 ± 25.75) as compared with their male counterparts with extremity burns (100 ± 0, P = 0.045). In general, females scored lower than did males in multiple domains, and those results reached statistical significance in the energy (65.9 ± 24.6 vs 93.6 ± 10.9), emotional (77.2 ± 21.5 vs 95.4 ± 11.2), and general health domains (71.1 ± 11.9 vs 90.0 ± 7.5) with P < 0.05. Children demonstrated significantly diminished scores in the emotional (75.5 ± 24.6) and general health (79.1 ± 11.8) domains.

CONCLUSION

These data demonstrate the significant impact on quality of life that untreated burns have in this population. Male and female children with extremity burns and adult women with extremity burns were most significantly affected in multiple domains. Consequently, children and adult women with extremity burns appear to be the patient cohort with the greatest opportunity to impact their quality of life. These data may be utilized to improve patient triage and resource allocation for future surgical trips but could also be of significant benefit to internal health agencies and ministries for the same purpose.

Cross cultural adaptation and validation of burn specific health scale- brief in Nepali (BSHS-B-Np)

BACKGROUND

Burns are a global health problem affecting the survivors and disrupting many aspects of their lives. It is the second most common injury in rural Nepal accounting 5% of disabilities. Burn Specific Health Scale (BSHS) is a valid and most commonly used tool to measure Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) of the patient with Burns. BSHS- B (Brief) has been translated, culturally adapted and validated in multiple languages but not in Nepali. Therefore we aim to translate, culturally adapt and validate the BSHS-B in Nepali language (BSHS-B-Np).

METHODS

Standard guideline was followed to translate the scale into Nepali language. One hundred eleven participants were evaluated to establish the psychometric properties of BSHS-B-Np. Internal consistency, test retest, content validity, discriminant validity and construct validity were assessed using Cronbach's alpha, Interclass correlation coefficient, Factor analysis, Spearman rank test, and Mann- Whitney U test respectively.

RESULTS

The Cronbach's alpha for BSHS-B-Np was 0.93. Test retest inter-class correlation coefficient was between 0.92 and 0.98. The principal component factor analysis with varimax rotation resulted in separation of nine factors explaining 75.19% of total variance. BSHS-B-Np showed good discriminant validity in 35 out of 36 domain correlations confirming the construct of the scale. Furthermore, the scale was able to discriminate between face, upper limb and lower limb injury (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

BSHS-B-Np is a reliable and valid scale for Nepali burns survivors to assess their health related quality of life.

PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS: CONCEPTUAL BASIS AND EVALUATION METHODS - PART II

ABSTRACT Objective: to present and discuss conceptual bases and methods for evaluating the content, construct and criterion validity of self-reported measuring instruments. Method: theoretical study based on the concepts of the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments and those evaluated in the Evaluating the Measurement of Patient-Reported Outcomes, which includes concepts of instrument assessment to assess patient-reported outcomes. Results: validity is significant for the methodological quality of an instrument; however, it is a relative criterion, since it depends on the adequacy of the instrument to be measured. There are three different validity measurement properties described in the literature: content, construct and criterion validity. Conclusions: as validity is an important property, it is recommended that it be verified in studies that aimed to develop new scales and in those that adapted and validated for another culture or population.

Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Reliability of the Burn Specific Health Scale-Revised in Brazilian Burned Patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to analyze the factor structure and the reliability of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Burn Specific Health Scale-Revised (BSHS-R) in a sample of Brazilian burned adults.

METHODS

This study was a cross-sectional study. The internal consistency was analyzed using Cronbach's α, considering coefficients ≥.70 as appropriate. We conducted confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to test the hypothesis that the BSHS-R Brazilian-Portuguese version has a factor structure similar to the original. We assessed the factor structure of the BSHS-R Brazilian-Portuguese version by CFA, examining three models: three-factor, six-factor, and seven-factor structure.

RESULTS

The participants were 299 burned adults. The CFA indicated good model fit indices for the seven-factor model (root mean square error of approximation = .062; goodness-of-fit index = .844; adjusted goodness-of-fit index = .809; Akaike information criterion = 1,054.06). The seven-factor BSHS-R Brazilian-Portuguese version showed Cronbach's α of .93.

CONCLUSIONS

The BSHS-R Brazilian-Portuguese version with seven factors is reliable and valid and measures the perceived health status construct.

Health related quality of life in adults after burn injuries: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Measurement of health-related quality of life (HRQL) is essential to qualify the subjective burden of burns in survivors. We performed a systematic review of HRQL studies in adult burn patients to evaluate study design, instruments used, methodological quality, and recovery patterns.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed. Relevant databases were searched from the earliest record until October 2016. Studies examining HRQL in adults after burn injuries were included. Risk of bias was scored using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool.

RESULTS

Twenty different HRQL instruments were used among the 94 included studies. The Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief (BSHS-B) (46%), the Short Form-36 (SF-36) (42%) and the EuroQol questionnaire (EQ-5D) (9%) were most often applied. Most domains, both mentally and physically orientated, were affected shortly after burns but improved over time. The lowest scores were reported for the domains 'work' and 'heat sensitivity' (BSHS-B), 'bodily pain', 'physical role limitations' (SF-36), and 'pain/discomfort' (EQ-5D) in the short-term and for 'work' and 'heat sensitivity', 'emotional functioning' (SF-36), 'physical functioning' and 'pain/discomfort' in the long-term. Risk of bias was generally low in outcome measurement and high in study attrition.

CONCLUSION

Consensus on preferred validated methodologies of HRQL measurement in burn patients would facilitate comparability across studies, resulting in improved insights in recovery patterns and better estimates of HRQL after burns. We recommend to develop a guideline on the measurement of HRQL in burns. Five domains representing a variety of topics had low scores in the long-term and require special attention in the aftermath of burns.

Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire for screening children and adolescents for plastic surgery: cross-cultural validation study

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE

Patient-reported outcome measurements assessing the emotional state of children and adolescents who seek plastic surgery are important for determining whether the intervention is indicated or not. The aim of this study was to cross-culturally adapt and validate the Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (child/adolescent and parent versions) for Brazilian Portuguese, test its psychometric properties and assess the emotional state of children and adolescents who seek plastic surgery. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-cultural validation study conducted in a plastic surgery outpatient clinic at a public university hospital.

METHODS

A total of 124 consecutive patients of both sexes were selected between September 2013 and February 2014. Forty-seven patients participated in the cultural adaptation of the questionnaire. The final version was tested for reliability on 20 patients. Construct validity was tested on 57 patients by correlating the Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (child/adolescent and parent versions) with the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem scale.

RESULTS

The child/adolescent and parent versions of the Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire showed Cronbach's alpha of 0.768 and 0.874, respectively, and had good inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC = 0.757 and ICC = 0.853, respectively) and intra-rater reliability (ICC = 0.738 and ICC = 0.796, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire is a reproducible instrument with face, content and construct validity.The mood state and feelings among children and adolescents seeking cosmetic surgery were healthy.