Photographic evaluation of different adrenaline-containing tumescent solutions on skin graft donor site bleeding: A prospective randomised trial

Tumescent technique for split-thickness skin graft donor sites: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) is widely used for reconstructive wound management. This review aimed to use level I evidence to determine if tumescent techniques were safe and effective compared to other interventions for STSG donor sites. It was hypothesized that tumescent techniques were safe and effective for STSG donor sites.

METHODS

Five databases (MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus) were searched to identify studies concerning the use of tumescent solutions for STSG. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) and Cochrane's guidelines were strictly followed.

RESULTS

Nine randomized controlled trials met the criteria. Included studies were published from 2001 to 2021, with results from 40 of 121 possible queried outcomes and complications. Outcomes included patient demographics, formulations of tumescent solutions, tumescent technique, hemodynamics, pain, perfusion, graft take, healing time, and postoperative complications. The tumescent technique reduced estimated blood loss (standard mean differences [SMD]: -2.68, 95%CI: -3.41 to -1.94; participants = 72; studies = 2; I2 = 96%; p < 0.001), and postoperative analgesic use within 24 hours (SMD: -1.75, 95%CI: -2.09 to -1.41; participants = 202; studies = 2; I2 = 96%; p < 0.001), without increasing graft loss/take (SMD: 0.29, 95%CI: -0.02 to 0.61; participants = 158; studies = 3; I2 = 41%; p = 0.07) and infection (risk ratios [RR]: 0.52, 95%CI: 0.08 to 3.54; participants = 87; studies = 3; I2 = 0%; p = 0.58) complications compared to other interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Level I evidence demonstrated tumescent techniques were safe and effective for STSG donor sites. Tumescent techniques reduced blood loss and postoperative analgesic use within 24 hours without increasing graft loss/take and infection complications compared to other interventions. Inconsistencies between studies limit conclusions and emphasize the need for standardized protocols regarding tumescent solution formulations, techniques, and reported outcomes.

Management of skin graft donor site in pediatric patients with tumescent technique and AQUACEL® Ag foam dressing

Split thickness skin graft donor sites are challenging to manage in children because of patient fear and anxiety. Therefore, strategies that minimize the frequency of dressing change are beneficial. This paper describes a technique to simplify wound care for split thickness skin graft donor sites. A tumescent solution of saline containing 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine is infiltrated into the graft donor site. Skin grafts are harvested with an electric dermatome. The donor sites are dressed with AQUACEL^® Ag Foam, which is a sodium carboxymethylcellulose hydrofiber dressing that contains silver ions. A total of 17 split thickness skin grafts were performed with this technique. Patient age ranged from 2.4 year to 16.9 years (average 12 years). The AQUACEL^® Ag Foam dressings were removed at an average of 23 days (range 11 to 31 days) at which time complete donor site epithelialization was seen in 13/17 (76.5%) patients. The remaining 4 patients had < 5% of the donor site that had not epithelialized; these went on to heal uneventfully with a brief period of petrolatum gauze dressing changes. Two patients had foul smelling discharge under the dressing that resolved promptly with dressing removal. The above technique allows the primary dressing to stay in place long enough for epithelialization to take place. The obviation of dressing changes in the early post-operative period results in patient comfort and care giver convenience.