Measurement of vascularity in the scar: A systematic review

Assessing the predictive accuracy of ChatGPT-based image analysis in forecasting long-term scar characteristics from 3-month assessments - A pilot study

INTRODUCTION

Scarring significantly impacts patient quality of life, yet traditional assessments often rely on subjective evaluations, resulting in variability in predictions. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive accuracy of a Smart Image Analysis ChatGPT model in forecasting scar characteristics.

METHODS

This single-institution prospective cohort study included 40 patients who underwent plastic surgery. Scar images were captured at 3 and 12 months, assessing characteristics such as vascularity, pigmentation, height, and width. The ChatGPT model predicted binary outcomes (good vs. bad scars) and continuous outcomes. Predictive accuracy was measured using metrics including mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), root mean squared error (RMSE), and R-squared (R²).

RESULTS

The model achieved an overall accuracy of 97.5% for binary classifications of scars. McNemar's test confirmed no significant differences between predicted and actual outcomes. For continuous outcomes, the MAE was 0.65, with an MSE of 0.9 and RMSE of 0.95, indicating moderate accuracy. Vascularity predictions yielded an R² of 0.234, whereas height and width showed stronger correlations with R² values of 0.857 and 0.956, respectively. Statistically significant differences in paired t-tests were observed for pigmentation (t = 4.356, p = 9.319e-05) and width (t = 2.896, p = 0.0062).

CONCLUSION

The Smart Image Analysis ChatGPT model demonstrates excellent predictive accuracy in binary scar classification and provides valuable insights for scar characteristics. Further refinement is necessary for improving predictions of dynamic features such as vascularity.

Scar Healing after Breast Reconstruction: A 5-year Follow-up in Asian Patients

Objectives

Hypervascularity, hypertrophy, and hyperpigmentation of breast scars often persist for several years after reconstruction. There are few reports on the long-term follow-up of postoperative scars after breast reconstruction. We previously reported that at 1 year after reconstruction, >30% of Asian patients showed abnormal scars. In this study, we followed these patients for as long as 5 years postoperatively.

Methods

We followed 101 Asian patients who underwent immediate two-stage implant-based breast reconstructions between 2013 and 2017 and still had abnormal scars involving hypervascularity, hypertrophy, or hyperpigmentation at 1 year postoperatively. We conducted annual follow-up for an additional 4 years, assessing the time until improvement and performing statistical analysis of factors related to the persistence and healing of abnormal scars.

Results

Hypervascularity improved in 12%, 37%, 68%, and 82% of patients at 2, 3, 4, and 5 years, respectively. Most cases improved between 3 and 4 years postoperatively. Among the patients with both hypervascularity and hypertrophy at 1 year, 36% had residual hypervascularity at 5 years compared with 9.8% of those with hypervascularity only at 1 year. Hypertrophy improved within 5 years in 56% of the cases. Hyperpigmentation improved within 5 years in only 21% of the cases. There was no significant association between abnormal scars and age or body mass index.

Conclusions

Even in Asian patients with persistent hypervascularity of breast scars, most cases improve within 5 years after reconstruction. However, hypervascularity tends to persist in cases that also show hypertrophy. Compared with hypervascularity and hypertrophy, hyperpigmentation showed worse 5-year improvement.

The efficacy of sequentially comprehensive treatment based on surgery in the treatment of keloids: a retrospective study

Purpose

The objective of this study is to investigate the clinical efficacy of sequentially comprehensive treatment based on surgery and to furnish clinical evidence for the management of keloids.

Patients and methods

The patients with keloids were retrospectively analyzed who underwent surgery-based sequentially comprehensive treatment at the Plastic Surgery Department of Shandong Provincial Hospital from January 2018 to August 2021. The recurrence rate and incidence of adverse reactions were explored for all the included patients. For patients who were followed up for more than 1 year, the clinical response rate was calculated, and the chi-square test was used to analyze which factors could influence clinical effectiveness. Binary logistic analysis was performed on the factors with statistical differences. For patients with a follow-up time of less than 1-year, paired t-test was used to evaluate their Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) before and after treatment.

Results

A total of 67 patients with 80 keloids were included. The clinical response rate was 81.5% (44/54), the recurrence rate was 15.0% (12/80) and the adverse reaction rate was 4.5% (3/67). The clinical response rate of tumor-type keloids (95.8%) was higher than that of inflammatory-type (70.0%) with a significant difference (P = 0.040). After treatment, the color, blood vessel distribution, softness, thickness, and VSS score were all decreased, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The sequentially comprehensive treatment based on surgery has a significant curative effect, as well as a low recurrence rate and a low adverse effect rate. The type of keloid has a statistically significant effect on clinical efficacy, and tumor-type keloids are more suitable for sequentially comprehensive treatment based on surgery.

Comparison of Colorado Needle Electrocautery and Traditional Scalpel for Lower Eyelid Blepharoplasty Incision: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Lower eyelid blepharoplasty is one of the most popular aesthetic procedures. Electrocautery provides a hemostatic benefit for skin incision; however, its effect on scar cosmesis remains unclear, particularly in Asian skin types. We compared the Colorado needle electrocautery (pure-cutting mode) versus the traditional scalpel in terms of efficacy, complications, and cosmetic outcomes.

Methods

A prospective intraindividual randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the efficacy of Colorado needle electrocautery and scalpel in lower blepharoplasty. The study outcomes were scar quality at different times until 1 year postoperatively, bleeding during incision, and postoperative ecchymosis. Scar quality was evaluated using 3 standard scar ratings: the Vancouver Scar Scale, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, and Hollander wound evaluation scale.

Results

The study included 25 patients, and the electrocautery side had less blood loss during incision than the scalpel side (2.6 ± 0.65 versus 5.28 ± 0.68 sticks; P < 0.001). The electrocautery side had less postoperative ecchymosis (P < 0.001); however, 1-year scar quality was not statistically significant between the groups.

Conclusions

Colorado needle electrocautery pure-cutting mode can be an alternative to the traditional scalpel for lower eyelid blepharoplasty skin incision because of long-term scar quality. Electrocautery also has hemostatic benefits, leading to a decrease in intraoperative and postoperative bleeding.

The Art of Local Tissue Rearrangements in Burn Reconstruction: Z-Plasty and More

In recent decades, advances in surgical anatomy, burn pathophysiology, surgical techniques, and laser therapy have led to a paradigm shift in how we approach burn scars and contractures. Scar excision and replacement with uninjured tissue, which predominated burn scar treatment for much of the 20th century, is no longer appropriate in many patients. A scar's intrinsic ability to remodel can be induced by reducing tension on the scar using various techniques for local tissue rearrangement. Often in combination with laser therapy, local flaps can optimally camouflage a burn scar with adjacent normal tissue and restore a patient more closely to their preinjury condition.

Effectiveness of a Regenerative Epithelial Suspension (RES), on the pigmentation of split-thickness skin graft donor sites in children: the dRESsing pilot randomised controlled trial protocol

BACKGROUND

Paediatric donor site wounds are often complicated by dyspigmentation following a split-thickness skin graft. These easily identifiable scars can potentially never return to normal pigmentation. A Regenerative Epidermal Suspension (RES) has been shown to improve pigmentation in patients with vitiligo, and in adult patients following a burn injury. Very little is known regarding the efficacy of RES for the management of donor site scars in children.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A pilot randomised controlled trial of 40 children allocated to two groups (RES or no RES) standard dressing applied to donor site wounds will be conducted. All children aged 16 years or younger requiring a split thickness skin graft will be screened for eligibility. The primary outcome is donor site scar pigmentation 12 months after skin grafting. Secondary outcomes include re-epithelialisation time, pain, itch, dressing application ease, treatment satisfaction, scar thickness and health-related quality of life. Commencing 7 days after the skin graft, the dressing will be changed every 3-5 days until the donor site is ≥ 95% re-epithelialised. Data will be collected at each dressing change and 3, 6 and 12 months post skin graft.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval was confirmed on 11 February 2019 by the study site Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) (HREC/18/QCHQ/45807). Study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. This study was prospectively registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (available at https://anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12620000227998.aspx).

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry [Available at https://anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12620000227998.aspx].

In vivo burn scar assessment with speckle decorrelation and joint spectral and time domain optical coherence tomography

Significance

Post-burn scars and scar contractures present significant challenges in burn injury management, necessitating accurate evaluation of the wound healing process to prevent or minimize complications. Non-invasive and accurate assessment of burn scar vascularity can offer valuable insights for evaluations of wound healing. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography (OCTA) are promising imaging techniques that may enhance patient-centered care and satisfaction by providing detailed analyses of the healing process.

Aim

Our study investigates the capabilities of OCT and OCTA for acquiring information on blood vessels in burn scars and evaluates the feasibility of utilizing this information to assess burn scars.

Approach

Healthy skin and neighboring scar data from nine burn patients were obtained using OCT and processed with speckle decorrelation, Doppler OCT, and an enhanced technique based on joint spectral and time domain OCT. These methods facilitated the assessment of vascular structure and blood flow velocity in both healthy skin and scar tissues. Analyzing these parameters allowed for objective comparisons between normal skin and burn scars.

Results

Our study found that blood vessel distribution in burn scars significantly differs from that in healthy skin. Burn scars exhibit increased vascularization, featuring less uniformity and lacking the intricate branching network found in healthy tissue. Specifically, the density of the vessels in burn scars is 67% higher than in healthy tissue, while axial flow velocity in burn scar vessels is 25% faster than in healthy tissue.

Conclusions

Our research demonstrates the feasibility of OCT and OCTA as burn scar assessment tools. By implementing these technologies, we can distinguish between scar and healthy tissue based on its vascular structure, providing evidence of their practicality in evaluating burn scar severity and progression.

Scars

Wound healing occurs as a response to disruption of the epidermis and dermis. It is an intricate and well-orchestrated response with the goal to restore skin integrity and function. However, in hundreds of millions of patients, skin wound healing results in abnormal scarring, including keloid lesions or hypertrophic scarring. Although the underlying mechanisms of hypertrophic scars and keloid lesions are not well defined, evidence suggests that the changes in the extracellular matrix are perpetuated by ongoing inflammation in susceptible individuals, resulting in a fibrotic phenotype. The lesions then become established, with ongoing deposition of excess disordered collagen. Not only can abnormal scarring be debilitating and painful, it can also cause functional impairment and profound changes in appearance, thereby substantially affecting patients' lives. Despite the vast demand on patient health and the medical society, very little progress has been made in the care of patients with abnormal scarring. To improve the outcome of pathological scarring, standardized and innovative approaches are required.

Histological Comparison of Porcine Small Intestine Submucosa and Bovine Type-I Collagen Conduit for Nerve Repair in a Rat Model

Purpose

After nerve injury, macrophages and Schwann cells remove axon and myelin debris. We hypothesized that nerves repaired with different conduit materials will result in varying levels of these cell populations, which impacts Wallerian degeneration and axonal regeneration.

Methods

We performed a unilateral sciatic nerve transection in 18 rats. The nerves were repaired with small intestine submucosa (SIS, n = 9) or isolated type-I collagen (CLC, n = 9) conduits. Rats were monitored for 4 weeks. Histology samples were obtained from the proximal nerve, mid-implant, and distal nerve regions. Samples were stained for total macrophages, M2 macrophages, foamy phagocytes, Schwann cells, vascular components, axon components, and collagen density.

Results

Distal nerve analyses showed higher populations of total macrophages and M2 macrophages in SIS-repaired nerves and higher density of foamy phagocytes in CLC-repaired nerves. Proximal nerve, mid-implant, and distal nerve analyses showed higher Schwann cell and vascular component densities in SIS-repaired nerves. Axon density was higher in the mid-implant region of SIS-repaired nerves. Collagen staining in the mid-implant was scant, but less collagen density was observed in SIS-repaired versus CLC-repaired nerves.

Conclusions

In the distal nerve, the following were observed: (1) lower total macrophages in CLC-repaired nerves, suggesting lower overall inflammation versus SIS-repaired nerves; (2) higher M2 macrophages in SIS-repaired versus CLC-repaired nerves, a driving factor for higher total macrophages and indicative of an inflammation resolution response in SIS-repaired nerves; and (3) a lower foamy phagocyte density in SIS-repaired nerves, suggesting earlier resolution of Wallerian degeneration versus CLC-repaired nerves. In the proximal nerve, mid-implant, and distal nerve, higher Schwann cell and vascular component densities were noted in SIS-repaired nerves. In the mid-implant, a higher axon component density and a lower collagen density of the SIS-repaired nerves versus CLC-repaired nerves were noted. These results indicate more robust nerve regeneration with less collagen deposition.

Clinical relevance

This in vivo study evaluated two common conduit materials that are used in peripheral nerve repair. Clinical outcomes of nerves repaired with conduits may be impacted by the response to different conduit materials. These nerve repair responses include Wallerian degeneration, nerve regeneration, and nerve scarring. This study evaluated Wallerian degeneration using total macrophages, M2 macrophages, and foamy phagocytes. Nerve regeneration was evaluated using Schwann cells and axons. Nerve scarring was evaluated using vascular and collagen density.

Mid-Term Follow-Up Study of Children Undergoing Autologous Skin Transplantation for Burns

Deep partial and full-thickness burns require surgical treatment with autologous skin grafts after necrectomy, which is the generally accepted way to achieve permanent wound coverage. This study sought to examine the grafted and donor areas of children who underwent autologous skin transplantation, using two assessment scales to determine the severity of the scarring and the cosmetic outcome during long-term follow-up. At the Surgical Unit of the Department of Paediatrics of the University of Pécs, between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2019, children who had been admitted consecutively and received autologous skin transplantation were analyzed. Twenty patients met the inclusion criteria in this retrospective cohort study. The authors assessed the results using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS). There was a significant difference in how parents and examiners perceived the children’s scars. In the evaluation of the observer scale, the most critical variables for the area of skin grafted were relief and thickness. Besides color, relief was the worst clinical characteristic on the patient scale. However, when medical professionals evaluated the donor site, significantly better results were obtained compared to the transplanted area (average observer scale score: 1.4 and 2.35, p = 0.001; VSS: 0.85 vs. 2.60, p < 0.001), yet it was similar to the graft site in the parents’ opinion (Patient Scale: 2.95 and 4.45, p = 0.181).

The Importance of Psychometric and Physical Scales for the Evaluation of the Consequences of Scars-A Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Scars affect patients after trauma, burns, or surgical procedures and can generate both physical and psychosocial changes. The aesthetic damage represents the modification of a person's physical appearance, in its bodily integrity, causing numerous sufferings and determining social or economic consequences. The aim of this research is to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages offered by the available psychosocial and physical scar scales in assessing the physical, aesthetic, psychosocial, and juridical consequences of scars. This will aid to inform medical examiners about the most valued existing scales to allow them to select the most appropriate instrument to manage their patient.

METHODS

A broad search of relevant scientific studies on the psychosocial determinants of post-traumatic and surgical scars was conducted by using the following international database tools: PsycINFO, MedLine Social Science Index, Scopus, Web of Science, published from 1960 until 2022.

RESULTS

We analyzed 63 scientific studies to assess the advantages and limits of several psychometric and physical scar evaluation scales.

CONCLUSIONS

The researchers analyzed in this review highlight the advantages and limitation of existing instruments, evidencing the demand for future scar evaluation instruments and a scar-assessing algorithm that takes into account the physical, aesthetic, psychosocial, and legal consequences of scars.

Correlation between elastic modulus and clinical severity of pathological scars: a cross-sectional study

Though widely used to assess pathological scars, the modified Vancouver Scar Scale (mVSS) is neither convenient nor objective. Shear wave elastography (SWE) is used to evaluate the stiffness of pathological scars. We aimed to determine the correlation between mVSS score and elastic modulus (EM) measured by SWE for pathological scars. Clinical information including ultrasound (US) results of the enrolled patients with pathological scars was analyzed. The clinical severity of the pathological scars was evaluated by mVSS. Skin stiffness, as represented by EM, was calculated using SWE. The average EM of the whole scar (EM_WHOLE), hardest part of the scar (EM_HARDEST), and normal appearance of the skin around the scar (EM_NORMAL) were also recorded. Enrolled in this study were 69 pathological scars, including 28 hypertrophic scars and 41 keloids. The univariable regression analyses showed that the EM of pathological scars was closely related to mVSS score, while the linear multivariable regression analyses showed no significantly correlation. Curve fitting and threshold effect analysis revealed that when EM_WHOLE was less than 166.6 kPa or EM_HARDEST was less than 133.07 kPa, EM was positively correlated with mVSS score. In stratified analysis, there was no significant linear correlation and threshold effect between EM_WHOLE and mVSS score in hypertrophic scars or keloids. However, the fully adjusted smooth curves presented a linear association between mVSS score and EM_HARDEST in keloids (the adjusted β [95% CI] was 0.010 [0.001, 0.018]), but a threshold and nonlinear association were found in hypertrophic scars. When EM_HARDEST was less than 156.13 kPa, the mVSS score increased along with the hardest scar part stiffness; the adjusted β (95% CI) was 0.024 (0.009, 0.038). In conclusion, EM of pathological scars measured by SWE were correlated with mVSS within a threshold range, and showed different association patterns in hypertrophic scars and keloids.

Scar Assessment After Breast Reconstruction: Risk Factors for Hypertrophy and Hyperpigmentation in Asian Patients

BACKGROUND

Breast scars after breast reconstruction can be hypertrophic and/or hyperpigmented, especially in Asian patients, whose skin is thicker and has increased melanin. Few studies have focused on breast scars after breast reconstruction, and the risk factors for an abnormal breast scar remain unknown.

METHODS

We examined 257 Asian patients who underwent an immediate 2-stage unilateral implant-based breast reconstruction. Vascularity, hypertrophy, and hyperpigmentation of the patients' breast scars were assessed at 1 year postoperatively. Risk factors for an abnormal scar were analyzed statistically. Analyzed patient factors included age, body mass index, incision site (frontal or lateral), breast size (the weight of the resected specimen), skin necrosis at the initial operation (expander placement), and adjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

At 1 year postoperatively, 161 patients (63%) showed normal vascularity, 77 patients (30%) showed mild vascularity, 18 patients (7%) showed moderate vascularity, and 1 patient (0.4%) showed severe vascularity. No patient factors were correlated with vascularity. Thirty-two patients (12%) showed hypertrophy, and the rate of hypertrophy was significantly higher in the patients with a lateral incision (n = 59) compared with those with a frontal incision (n = 198) (28.8% vs 7.6%, P < 0.01). Even in the frontal incision group, a lateral part of the frontal scar was likely to be hypertrophic. Forty-six patients (18%) showed hyperpigmentation, and the rate of hyperpigmentation was significantly higher in the patients with skin necrosis (n = 47) at the initial operation than those without skin necrosis (n = 210) (57.4% vs 9.0%, P < 0.01). Large breast was also a risk factor for hyperpigmentation due to its higher frequency of skin necrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

In Asian patients who undergo breast reconstruction, the use of a lateral incision is a risk factor for hypertrophy, and skin necrosis at the initial operation is a risk factor for hyperpigmentation at the breast scar.

Vascularity and Thickness Changes in Immature Hypertrophic Scars Treated With a Pulsed Dye Laser

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Growth of capillaries is an essential process after a dermal injury. An immature scar with robust growth of capillaries tends to be hypertrophic. Pulsed dye laser (PDL) causes damage to microvascular structures and is increasingly used for early erythematous scars to limit scar growth. To have a better understanding of the impact of PDL on scar vascularity and to optimize the clinical use of PDL for managing hypertrophic scars, this study aimed to explore changes in scar erythema, blood perfusion, and thickness of immature hypertrophic scars in Asian patients who received PDL treatments at an early stage.

STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a 3-month, assessor-blinded, clinical study. There were two groups of patients, the PDL group and the control group, who had hypertrophic scars less than 1-year post-injury. Patients in the PDL group received three PDL sessions at 4-week intervals. A total of three assessments were performed, at baseline, 1 and 3 months, consisting of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and objective measurements of scar erythema, blood perfusion, and scar thickness.

RESULTS

A total of 45 patients were enrolled, 22 in the PDL group and 23 in the control group. After the 3-month treatment, parameters of scar vascularity (P = 0.003), pigmentation (P = 0.026), color (P < 0.001), thickness (P < 0.05), and overall scores (P < 0.01) on the POSAS significantly decreased in the PDL group. Moreover, objective measurements of scar erythema and blood perfusion showed significant improvements in the PDL group (P = 0.009 and P = 0.022, respectively) but not in the control group (P = 0.296 and P = 0.115, respectively). A stable scar thickness was maintained in the PDL group from baseline to 3 months (0.21 cm vs. 0.22 cm, P > 0.05), whereas scar thickness significantly increased in the control group (0.22 cm vs. 0.32 cm, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Use of PDL at an early stage controls vascularity of immature hypertrophic scar by improving its poor blood perfusion that further limits scar thickness growth and promotes scar maturation. Lasers Surg. Med. 00:00-00, 2020. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Hypertrophic Scar Improvement by Early Intervention With Ablative Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser Treatment

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Ablative fractional laser treatment has been used to improve the color and texture of hypertrophic scars with safe and effective results. However, no consensus on the optimal time to initiate fractional laser treatment is available. The effect on early-stage scars remains controversial. This study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of ablative fractional carbon dioxide (CO₂ ) laser treatments for hypertrophic burn scars and to analyze the efficacy and safety in the early period within 3 months after injury.

STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of 221 hypertrophic scar patients. According to the time of the first laser treatment after injury, patients were divided into five subgroups, including less than 1 month, 1-3 months, 3-6 months, 6-12 months, and more than 12 months postinjury. One month after the last laser treatment, the scars were assessed by photography, the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), durometry, and spectrocolorimetry.

RESULTS

The patients included 118 males and 103 females. The average age was 33.6 years. Fire/flame was the primary injury source. Thirty-six percent of the patients underwent at least one fractional CO₂ laser treatment. All the included patients, including those treated within 1 month after injury, had significantly decreased VSS scores after laser treatment. We also noted that hardness and redness scores were decreased after treatment for both scars treated within 3 months and those treated more than 12 months after injury. Seepage (17.6%), bleeding (22.2%), and swelling (9.0%) were the main adverse events after laser treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the safety and efficacy of ablative fractional CO₂ laser treatment applied to early-stage burn scars. The optimal time for laser application for burn patients can be within 1 month after injury. Durometry and spectrocolorimetry were effective for assessing scars as objective modalities. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.