Intraoperative liposomal bupivacaine for skin graft donor site analgesia: A retrospective cohort study

An Appraisal of Pharmacotherapy-Pertinent Literature Published in 2021 and 2022 for Clinicians Caring for Patients With Thermal or Inhalation Injury

Studies focusing on pharmacotherapy interventions to aid patients after thermal injury are a minor focus in burn injury-centered studies and published across a wide array of journals, which challenges those with limited resources to keep their knowledge current. This review is a renewal of previous years' work to facilitate extraction and review of the most recent pharmacotherapy-centric studies in patients with thermal and inhalation injury. Twenty-three geographically dispersed, board-certified pharmacists participated in the review. A Medical Subject Heading-based, filtered search returned 2336 manuscripts over the previous 2-year period. After manual review, 98 (4%) manuscripts were determined to have a potential impact on current pharmacotherapy practice. The top 10 scored manuscripts are discussed. Only 17% of those reviewed were assessed to likely have little effect on current practice. The overall impact of the current cohort was higher than previous editions of this review, which is encouraging. There remains a need for investment in well-designed, high-impact, pharmacotherapy-pertinent research for patients sustaining thermal or inhalation injuries.

Use of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve blocks by landmark technique is ineffective in decreasing narcotic usage after skin grafts: A retrospective case-control study

INTRODUCTION

Cutaneous burns are commonly treated with autologous skin grafts. Following skin grafting, many patients complain of pain at the donor site. Donor sites are taken most commonly from the lateral thigh, which is innervated by the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN). Use of a LFCN blocks should decrease nociception from the donor site.

METHODS

Our group began utilizing LFCN blocks in 2019. Utilizing anatomic landmarks, LFCN blocks were performed on all patients who received autologous skin grafts to reduce perioperative pain. A retrospective cohort study was performed on all patients with 10% or less total body surface areas burns who received an autologous skin graft. A similar cohort from 2016, prior to use of any local or regional analgesia, was used as a historical control. Post-operative enteral and parenteral narcotic analgesics were collected for each post-operative day up to day 5 or discharge (whichever came first) and converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MME) to quantify analgesia after surgery.

RESULTS

Chart review identified 55 patients in the 2020 cohort. Fifty-five patients from the 2016 cohort were matched based upon size of skin graft, total body surface area (TBSA) burned, gender, and age. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of size of graft, TBSA burned, age, gender, or type of burn. When examining narcotics usage in the immediate perioperative period (days 0-2), we found no difference between the two groups for total MME (113 vs 133, p = 0.28) or IV MME (38 vs 33, p = 0.45). Similar relationships existed in the extended post-operative period (days 1-5) for total MME (149 vs. 188, t = 0.22) or IV MME (37 vs. 50, t = 0.25). Examining daily narcotic usage also yielded no statistically different values.

CONCLUSION

Our data shows that use of LFCN block by landmark technique did not reduce narcotic usage in patients that undergo skin grafting procedures. Future studies should consider ultrasound-guided LFCN blocks.

Evaluation of liposomal bupivacaine infiltration at reconstructive skin graft donor sites in adolescent and young adult burn patients: A retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain at skin graft donor sites is frequently undertreated in burn patients, which can impair reconstructive outcomes and result in harmful psychological consequences. We find a critical need to explore and promote non-opioid, multimodal analgesics. Donor site infiltration of the local anesthetic liposomal bupivacaine in adolescent and young adult burn patients has not been previously investigated. Therefore, the goal of this study was to evaluate intraoperative liposomal bupivacaine infiltration for postoperative donor site pain control in adolescent and young adult burn patients undergoing reconstructive skin graft procedures.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included patients aged 14-25 years, who underwent at least two reconstructive skin graft procedures, one that received donor site infiltration of the standard treatment (bupivacaine hydrochloride) and one that received donor site infiltration of liposomal bupivacaine. The final sample included 30 patients with a total of 44 liposomal bupivacaine cases and 53 standard treatment cases analyzed.

RESULTS

In the authors' five-year experience, the use of liposomal bupivacaine compared to standard treatment was associated with statistically significant decreases in 0-4 h postoperative pain scores (mean 1.4/10 versus 2.3/10, p = 0.04) and 0-24 h postoperative pain scores (mean 1.7/10 versus 2.4/10, p = 0.02). Neither analgesic was associated with adverse events. Differences in length of stay and inpatient postoperative opioid usage were not regarded as significant.

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective analysis, the authors report the first results that suggest intraoperative liposomal bupivacaine donor site infiltration may be associated with statistically improved patient outcomes in adolescent and young adult burn patients. However, the reported differences are most likely not clinically significant, establishing the necessity for further evaluation of using liposomal bupivacaine in this unique patient population.