1
|
Cotta BH, Choueiri TK, Cieslik M, Ghatalia P, Mehra R, Morgan TM, Palapattu GS, Shuch B, Vaishampayan U, Van Allen E, Ari Hakimi A, Salami SS. Current Landscape of Genomic Biomarkers in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. Eur Urol 2023; 84:166-175. [PMID: 37085424 PMCID: PMC11175840 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Dramatic gains in our understanding of the molecular biology of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) have created a foundation for clinical translation to improve patient care. OBJECTIVE To review and contextualize clinically impactful data surrounding genomic biomarkers in ccRCC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic literature search was conducted focusing on genomic-based biomarkers with an emphasis on studies assessing clinical outcomes. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS The advancement of tumor sequencing techniques has led to a rapid increase in the knowledge of the molecular underpinnings of ccRCC and with that the discovery of multiple candidate genomic biomarkers. These include somatic gene mutations such as VHL, PBRM1, SETD2, and BAP1; copy number variations; transcriptomic multigene signatures; and specific immune cell populations. Many of these biomarkers have been assessed for their association with survival and a smaller number as potential predictors of a response to systemic therapy. In this scoping review, we discuss many of these biomarkers in detail. Further studies are needed to continue to refine and validate these molecular tools for risk stratification, with the ultimate goal of improving clinical decision-making and patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS While no tissue or blood-based biomarkers for ccRCC have been incorporated into routine clinical practice to date, the field continues to expand rapidly. There remains a critical need to develop and validate these tools in order to improve the care for patients with kidney cancer. PATIENT SUMMARY Genomic biomarkers have the potential to better predict outcome and select the most appropriate treatment for patients with kidney cancer; however, further research is needed before any of these currently developed biomarkers are adopted into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marcin Cieslik
- Department of Pathology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Pooja Ghatalia
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Rohit Mehra
- Department of Pathology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Todd M Morgan
- Department of Urology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ganesh S Palapattu
- Department of Urology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Brian Shuch
- Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ulka Vaishampayan
- University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Eliezer Van Allen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - A Ari Hakimi
- Division of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Simpa S Salami
- Department of Urology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang T, Qin Y, Ye Z, Jing DS, Fan GX, Liu MQ, Zhuo QF, Ji SR, Chen XM, Yu XJ, Xu XW, Li Z. A new glance at autophagolysosomal-dependent or -independent function of transcriptional factor EB in human cancer. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2023:10.1038/s41401-023-01078-7. [PMID: 37012494 PMCID: PMC10374590 DOI: 10.1038/s41401-023-01078-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Autophagy-lysosome system plays a variety of roles in human cancers. In addition to being implicated in metabolism, it is also involved in tumor immunity, remodeling the tumor microenvironment, vascular proliferation, and promoting tumor progression and metastasis. Transcriptional factor EB (TFEB) is a major regulator of the autophagy-lysosomal system. With the in-depth studies on TFEB, researchers have found that it promotes various cancer phenotypes by regulating the autophagolysosomal system, and even in an autophagy-independent way. In this review, we summarize the recent findings about TFEB in various types of cancer (melanoma, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, ovarian cancer and lung cancer), and shed some light on the mechanisms by which it may serve as a potential target for cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting Wang
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, 213000, China
| | - Yi Qin
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, 213000, China
| | - Zeng Ye
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - De-Sheng Jing
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Gui-Xiong Fan
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Meng-Qi Liu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Qi-Feng Zhuo
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Shun-Rong Ji
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Xue-Min Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, 213000, China
| | - Xian-Jun Yu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| | - Xiao-Wu Xu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| | - Zheng Li
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gupta S, Sukov WR, Vanderbilt CM, Shen W, Herrera-Hernandez L, Lohse CM, Thompson RH, Boorjian SA, Leibovich BC, Jimenez RE, Cheville JC. A contemporary guide to chromosomal copy number profiling in the diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:512-524. [PMID: 34092479 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.04.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The routine clinical implementation of molecular methods other than fluorescence in situ hybridization in the evaluation of renal neoplasia is currently limited, as the current standard of care primarily involves a combination of morphologic and immunophenotypic analysis of such tumors. Amongst various molecular techniques, global copy number profiling using single nucleotide polymorphism-based microarrays, colloquially referred to as SNP-arrays, is being increasingly utilized to profile renal tumors, as several subtypes have characteristic recurrent patterns of copy number alterations. Recurrent copy number alterations in common tumor types include loss of chromosome 3p in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC), gain of chromosomes 7 and 17 in papillary RCC and multiple losses in chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, 13, 17, and 21 in chromophobe RCC. Such assays are being increasingly utilized in the clinical setting. Herein, we discuss some common clinical applications of such testing that includes high yield diagnostic and prognostic applications. Diagnostic utility includes evaluation of tumor types that are primarily defined by underlying copy number alterations, establishing the underlying subtype in high grade dedifferentiated (unclassified) renal tumors, as well as assessment of loss of heterozygosity, which is an important component in the workup for germline alterations in tumor suppressor genes. Universal adoption of these techniques across clinical laboratories will likely be significantly affected by variables such as cost, reimbursement, and turnaround time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sounak Gupta
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| | - William R Sukov
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Chad M Vanderbilt
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Wei Shen
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Christine M Lohse
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | - Rafael E Jimenez
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - John C Cheville
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van de Beek I, Glykofridis IE, Wagner A, den Toom DT, Bongers EMHF, van Leenders GJLH, Johannesma PC, Meijers‐Heijboer HEJ, Wolthuis RMF, van Steensel MAM, Dubbink HJ, Houweling AC. Combined germline pathogenic variants in FLCN and TP53 are associated with early onset renal cell carcinoma and brain tumors. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2022; 11:e2098. [PMID: 36382415 PMCID: PMC9938753 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.2098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We present a family consisting of a father and his two children with an exceptional phenotype of childhood renal cell carcinoma and brain tumors. Extensive genetic testing revealed two inherited tumor predisposition syndromes in all three family members: Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome and Li-Fraumeni syndrome. The corresponding genes (FLCN and TP53) are both located on the short arm of chromosome 17. METHODS We describe the phenotype and performed single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analysis of the tumors. RESULTS All examined tumors showed somatic loss of the wild-type alleles of both FLCN and TP53. CONCLUSIONS We hypothesize that a synergistic effect of both mutations caused the unusual phenotype of childhood renal cell carcinoma in this family. This family emphasizes the importance of further genetic testing if a tumor develops at an unexpected young age in an inherited cancer predisposition syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irma van de Beek
- Department of Human GeneticsAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Iris E. Glykofridis
- Department of Human Genetics, Cancer Center AmsterdamAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Anja Wagner
- Department of Clinical GeneticsUniversity Medical Center Rotterdam, Erasmus MC Cancer InstituteRotterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Dorine T. den Toom
- Department of PathologyUniversity Medical Center Rotterdam, Erasmus MC Cancer InstituteRotterdamthe Netherlands
| | | | - Geert J. L. H. van Leenders
- Department of PathologyUniversity Medical Center Rotterdam, Erasmus MC Cancer InstituteRotterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Paul C. Johannesma
- Department of PulmonologyAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | | | - Rob M. F. Wolthuis
- Department of Human Genetics, Cancer Center AmsterdamAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Maurice A. M. van Steensel
- Lee Kong Chian School of MedicineNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore,Singapore Skin Research Institute, Agency for Science, Technology and ResearchSingaporeSingapore
| | - Hendrikus J. Dubbink
- Department of PathologyUniversity Medical Center Rotterdam, Erasmus MC Cancer InstituteRotterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Arjan C. Houweling
- Department of Human GeneticsAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Beck P, Selle B, Madenach L, Jones DTW, Vokuhl C, Gopisetty A, Nabbi A, Brecht IB, Ebinger M, Wegert J, Graf N, Gessler M, Pfister SM, Jäger N. The genomic landscape of pediatric renal cell carcinomas. iScience 2022; 25:104167. [PMID: 35445187 PMCID: PMC9014386 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Pediatric renal cell carcinomas (RCC) differ from their adult counterparts not only in histologic subtypes but also in clinical characteristics and outcome. However, the underlying biology is still largely unclear. For this reason, we performed whole-exome and transcriptome sequencing analyses on a cohort of 25 pediatric RCC patients with various histologic subtypes, including 10 MiT family translocation (MiT) and 10 papillary RCCs. In this cohort of pediatric RCC, we find only limited genomic overlap with adult RCC, even within the same histologic subtype. Recurrent somatic mutations in genes not previously reported in RCC were detected, such as in CCDC168, PLEKHA1, VWF, and MAP3K9. Our papillary pediatric RCCs, which represent the largest cohort to date with comprehensive molecular profiling in this age group, appeared as a distinct genomic subtype differing in terms of gene mutations and gene expression patterns not only from MiT-RCC but also from their adult counterparts. WES and RNA-seq of 25 pediatric RCCs with various histologic subtypes Detected only limited genomic overlap with adult RCC Revealed recurrent somatic mutations in genes not previously reported in RCC Discovery of a CRK-PITPNA fusion gene in a pediatric papillary RCC
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pengbo Beck
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ) & Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Faculty of Biosciences, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Barbara Selle
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ) & Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lukas Madenach
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ) & Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Faculty of Biosciences, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David T W Jones
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ) & Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Pediatric Glioma Research Group, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Vokuhl
- Section of Pediatric Pathology, Department of Pathology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Apurva Gopisetty
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ) & Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Faculty of Biosciences, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arash Nabbi
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ines B Brecht
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, University Children's Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Martin Ebinger
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, University Children's Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jenny Wegert
- Theodor-Boveri-Institute/Biocenter, Developmental Biochemistry, Würzburg University & Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Norbert Graf
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
| | - Manfred Gessler
- Theodor-Boveri-Institute/Biocenter, Developmental Biochemistry, Würzburg University & Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Stefan M Pfister
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ) & Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Natalie Jäger
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ) & Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yoshikawa Y, Yamada Y, Emi M, Atanesyan L, Smout J, de Groot K, Savola S, Nakanishi-Shinkai Y, Kanematsu A, Nojima M, Ohmuraya M, Hashimoto-Tamaoki T, Yamamoto S. Risk prediction for metastasis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma using digital multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Cancer Sci 2021; 113:297-307. [PMID: 34687579 PMCID: PMC8748218 DOI: 10.1111/cas.15170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 10/02/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Precise quantification of copy‐number alterations (CNAs) in a tumor genome is difficult. We have applied a comprehensive copy‐number analysis method, digital multiplex ligation‐dependent probe amplification (digitalMLPA), for targeted gene copy‐number analysis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Copy‐number status of all chromosomal arms and 11 genes was determined in 60 ccRCC samples. Chromosome 3p loss and 5q gain, known as early changes in ccRCC development, as well as losses at 9p and 14q were detected in 56/60 (93.3%), 31/60 (51.7%), 11/60 (18.3%), and 33/60 (55%), respectively. Through gene expression analysis, a significant positive correlation was detected in terms of 14q loss determined using digitalMLPA and downregulation of mRNA expression ratios with HIF1A and L2HGDH (P = .0253 and .0117, respectively). Patients with early metastasis (<1 y) (n = 18) showed CNAs in 6 arms (in median), whereas metastasis‐free patients (n = 34) showed those in significantly less arms (3 arms in median) (P = .0289). In particular, biallelic deletion of CDKN2A/2B was associated with multiple CNAs (≥7 arms) in 3 tumors. Together with sequence‐level mutations in genes VHL, PBRM1, SETD2, and BAP1, we performed multiple correspondence analysis, which identified the association of 9p loss and 4q loss with early metastasis (both P < .05). This analysis indicated the association of 4p loss and 1p loss with poor survival (both, P < .05). These findings suggest that CNAs have essential roles in aggressiveness of ccRCC. We showed that our approach of measuring CNA through digitalMLPA will facilitate the selection of patients who may develop metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshie Yoshikawa
- Department of Genetics, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan
| | - Yusuke Yamada
- Department of Urology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Emi
- Department of Genetics, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan
| | - Lilit Atanesyan
- Oncogenetics Department, MRC Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Smout
- Oncogenetics Department, MRC Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karel de Groot
- Bioinformatics Department, MRC Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Suvi Savola
- Oncogenetics Department, MRC Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Akihiro Kanematsu
- Department of Urology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan
| | - Michio Nojima
- Department of Urology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan
| | - Masaki Ohmuraya
- Department of Genetics, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan
| | | | - Shingo Yamamoto
- Department of Urology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gulati S, Vogelzang NJ. Biomarkers in renal cell carcinoma: Are we there yet? Asian J Urol 2021; 8:362-375. [PMID: 34765444 PMCID: PMC8566366 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2021.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Revised: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Management of kidney cancer has undergone a paradigm shift with the approval of new therapies over the last two decades. Although these drugs have improved clinical outcomes in patients with kidney cancer, there are still a large number of patients who do not show objective responses. A multitude of investigators, including those for The Cancer Genome Atlas have biologically characterized and sub-classified kidney cancer. However, we have not been able to identify molecular targets to effectively treat patients with kidney cancer. As we familiarize ourselves with newer drugs for patients with kidney cancer, it is important to understand that these drugs may not work in every patient and instead may expose patients to unnecessary toxic effects along with burdening society with the financial impact. As we head toward the era of "precision medicine", validated biomarkers are being utilized to guide treatment choices and help identify pathways of resistance in other tumor types. The current review aims at evaluating the progress made so far in this realm for patients with kidney cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuchi Gulati
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Oh, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Akgul M, Williamson SR, Ertoy D, Argani P, Gupta S, Caliò A, Reuter V, Tickoo S, Al-Ahmadie HA, Netto GJ, Hes O, Hirsch MS, Delahunt B, Mehra R, Skala S, Osunkoya AO, Harik L, Rao P, Sangoi AR, Nourieh M, Zynger DL, Smith SC, Nazeer T, Gumuskaya B, Kulac I, Khani F, Tretiakova MS, Vakar-Lopez F, Barkan G, Molinié V, Verkarre V, Rao Q, Kis L, Panizo A, Farzaneh T, Magers MJ, Sanfrancesco J, Perrino C, Gondim D, Araneta R, So JS, Ro JY, Wasco M, Hameed O, Lopez-Beltran A, Samaratunga H, Wobker SE, Melamed J, Cheng L, Idrees MT. Diagnostic approach in TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma: a multi-institutional international survey. J Clin Pathol 2021; 74:291-299. [PMID: 33514585 DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2020-207372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Transcription factor E3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma (TFE3-RCC) has heterogenous morphologic and immunohistochemical (IHC) features.131 pathologists with genitourinary expertise were invited in an online survey containing 23 questions assessing their experience on TFE3-RCC diagnostic work-up.Fifty (38%) participants completed the survey. 46 of 50 participants reported multiple patterns, most commonly papillary pattern (almost always 9/46, 19.5%; frequently 29/46, 63%). Large epithelioid cells with abundant cytoplasm were the most encountered cytologic feature, with either clear (almost always 10/50, 20%; frequently 34/50, 68%) or eosinophilic (almost always 4/49, 8%; frequently 28/49, 57%) cytology. Strong (3+) or diffuse (>75% of tumour cells) nuclear TFE3 IHC expression was considered diagnostic by 13/46 (28%) and 12/47 (26%) participants, respectively. Main TFE3 IHC issues were the low specificity (16/42, 38%), unreliable staining performance (15/42, 36%) and background staining (12/42, 29%). Most preferred IHC assays other than TFE3, cathepsin K and pancytokeratin were melan A (44/50, 88%), HMB45 (43/50, 86%), carbonic anhydrase IX (41/50, 82%) and CK7 (32/50, 64%). Cut-off for positive TFE3 fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) was preferably 10% (9/50, 18%), although significant variation in cut-off values was present. 23/48 (48%) participants required TFE3 FISH testing to confirm TFE3-RCC regardless of the histomorphologic and IHC assessment. 28/50 (56%) participants would request additional molecular studies other than FISH assay in selected cases, whereas 3/50 participants use additional molecular cases in all cases when TFE3-RCC is in the differential.Optimal diagnostic approach on TFE3-RCC is impacted by IHC and/or FISH assay preferences as well as their conflicting interpretation methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmut Akgul
- Pathology, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Sean R Williamson
- Robert J. Tomsich Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Dilek Ertoy
- Department of Pathology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Pedram Argani
- Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sounak Gupta
- Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Anna Caliò
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Verona, Veneto, Italy
| | - Victor Reuter
- Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Satish Tickoo
- Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Hikmat A Al-Ahmadie
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - George J Netto
- Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Ondrej Hes
- Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University, Plzen, Czech Republic.,Medical Teaching School, University Hospital, Charles University, Plzen, Czech Republic
| | - Michelle S Hirsch
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Brett Delahunt
- Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wellington South, New Zealand
| | - Rohit Mehra
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Stephanie Skala
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Adeboye O Osunkoya
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Lara Harik
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Priya Rao
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ankur R Sangoi
- Department of Pathology, El Camino Hospital, Mountain View, California, USA
| | - Maya Nourieh
- Department of Pathology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Debra L Zynger
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Steven Cristopher Smith
- Department of Pathology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Tipu Nazeer
- Pathology, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Berrak Gumuskaya
- Department of Pathology, Yildirim Beyazit University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ibrahim Kulac
- Department of Pathology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Francesca Khani
- Department of Pathology, Cornell University Joan and Sanford I Weill Medical College, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Maria S Tretiakova
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Funda Vakar-Lopez
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Guliz Barkan
- Department of Pathology, Loyola University Health System, Maywood, Illinois, USA
| | - Vincent Molinié
- Pathology, University Hospital Center of Martinique, Fort-de-France, Martinique
| | - Virginie Verkarre
- Department of Pathology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou Anatomie Pathologie, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| | - Qiu Rao
- Department of Pathology, Nanjing Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Lorand Kis
- Department of Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Angel Panizo
- Department of Pathology, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra Servicio de Cardiologia, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - Ted Farzaneh
- Department of Pathology, Univer Irvine Healthcare, Orange County, California, USA
| | - Martin J Magers
- IHA Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Joseph Sanfrancesco
- Department of Pathology, Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Carmen Perrino
- Department of Pathology, Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Dibson Gondim
- Department of Pathology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | - Ronald Araneta
- Department of Pathology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
| | - Jeffrey S So
- Department of Pathology, St Luke's Hospital, Manila, Philippines
| | - Jae Y Ro
- Department of Pathology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Matthew Wasco
- Department of Pathology, St Joseph Mercy Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Omar Hameed
- Forward Pathology Solutions, Vanderbilt University, Kansas City, Montana, USA
| | - Antonio Lopez-Beltran
- Department of Pathology and Surgery, Cordoba University Medical School, Cordoba, Spain
| | | | - Sara E Wobker
- Department of Pathology, University of North Carolina System, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jonathan Melamed
- Department of Pathology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Liang Cheng
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Muhammad T Idrees
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tretiakova MS. Renal Cell Tumors: Molecular Findings Reshaping Clinico-pathological Practice. Arch Med Res 2020; 51:799-816. [PMID: 32839003 DOI: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2020.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Over the past 20 years, the number of subtypes of renal epithelial cell neoplasia has grown. This growth has resulted from detailed histological and immunohistochemical characterization of these tumors and their correlation with clinical outcomes. Distinctive molecular phenotypes have validated the unique nature of many of these tumors. This growth of unique renal neoplasms has continued after the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumours. A consequence is that both the pathologists who diagnose the tumors and the clinicians who care for these patients are confronted with a bewildering array of renal cell carcinoma variants. Many of these variants have important clinical features, i.e. familial or syndromic associations, genomics alterations that can be targeted with systemic therapy, and benignancy of tumors previously classified as carcinomas. Our goal in the review is to provide a practical guide to help recognize these variants, based on small and distinct sets of histological features and limited numbers of immunohistochemical stains, supplemented, as necessary, with molecular features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria S Tretiakova
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Miron PM, Fang M. The evolving clinical testing landscape of genomic aberrations in solid tumors and hematological malignancies - Insights from evidence-based reviews for B-ALL and breast, brain, and renal cell neoplasia. Cancer Genet 2020; 244:60-61. [PMID: 32473557 DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2020.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia M Miron
- UMassMemorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA, USA; Quest Diagnostics, Marlborough, MA, USA
| | - Min Fang
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|