1
|
Dobre A, Nedelcu RI, Turcu G, Brinzea A, Struna I, Tudorache G, Ali A, Hulea I, Balasescu E, Fertig TE, Gherghiceanu M, Harwood C, Ion DA, Forsea AM. Multiple Keratoacanthomas Associated with Genetic Syndromes: Narrative Review and Proposal of a Diagnostic Algorithm. Am J Clin Dermatol 2025; 26:45-59. [PMID: 39572470 PMCID: PMC11742465 DOI: 10.1007/s40257-024-00900-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/26/2024] [Indexed: 01/19/2025]
Abstract
Keratoacanthoma (KA) is a relatively common, fast-growing epithelial tumour, with characteristic behaviour and clinical variability. Although it appears as a solitary lesion in a majority of cases, multiple KAs do occur, secondary to skin exposure to ultraviolet radiation, chemical carcinogens or certain medications, but may also be associated with various genetic syndromes. Thus, multiple KAs may serve as an early clinical alarm sign. Prompt diagnosis of the underlying cause and identification of the mechanism of development are critical for the secondary prevention of associated organ disorders or neoplasias, the improvement of patient quality of life and familial counselling. Although research in this field has seen important progress in the last few years, there are still many pathogenic processes that have not been elucidated. Additionally, the literature on this topic is limited to individual case reports and small case series, making it difficult for clinicians to parse available data and select the essential information. Therefore, this work aims to review current knowledge, summarizing existing studies, with focus on multiple KAs associated with genetic syndromes, and proposes a diagnostic algorithm for these rare cases to help guide clinicians in their practice. Lastly, we aim to highlight the main gaps in understanding the underlying mechanisms and suggest further research avenues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Dobre
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
- Oncologic Dermatology Department, Elias Emergency University Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Roxana-Ioana Nedelcu
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
- Derma 360 Clinic, Bucharest, Romania.
| | - Gabriela Turcu
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
- Derma 360 Clinic, Bucharest, Romania
- Dermatology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Alice Brinzea
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
- Derma 360 Clinic, Bucharest, Romania
- Outpatient Clinic, National Institute for Infectious Diseases, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Irina Struna
- Oncologic Dermatology Department, Elias Emergency University Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Gabriela Tudorache
- Oncologic Dermatology Department, Elias Emergency University Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Alen Ali
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ionela Hulea
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Elena Balasescu
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Tudor Emanuel Fertig
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
- Ultrastructural Pathology and Bioimaging Lab, Victor Babeş National Institute of Pathology, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Mihaela Gherghiceanu
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
- Ultrastructural Pathology and Bioimaging Lab, Victor Babeş National Institute of Pathology, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Catherine Harwood
- Department of Dermatology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, Whitechapel, London, UK
- Centre for Cell Biology and Cutaneous Research, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine, Dentistry Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | | - Ana-Maria Forsea
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
- Oncologic Dermatology Department, Elias Emergency University Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Carrizosa C, Undlien DE, Vigeland MD. shinyseg: a web application for flexible cosegregation and sensitivity analysis. Bioinformatics 2024; 40:btae201. [PMID: 38598476 PMCID: PMC11069105 DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Revised: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
MOTIVATION Cosegregation analysis is a powerful tool for identifying pathogenic genetic variants, but its implementation remains challenging. Existing software is either limited in scope or too demanding for many end users. Moreover, current solutions lack methods for assessing the robustness of cosegregation evidence, which is important due to its reliance on uncertain estimates. RESULTS We present shinyseg, a comprehensive web application for clinical cosegregation analysis. Our app streamlines penetrance specification based on either liability classes or epidemiological data such as risks, hazard ratios, and age of onset distribution. In addition, it incorporates sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of cosegregation evidence, and offers support in clinical interpretation. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION The shinyseg app is freely available at https://chrcarrizosa.shinyapps.io/shinyseg, with documentation and complete R source code on https://chrcarrizosa.github.io/shinyseg and https://github.com/chrcarrizosa/shinyseg.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Carrizosa
- Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| | - Dag E Undlien
- Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| | - Magnus D Vigeland
- Department of Forensic Sciences, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Eikenboom EL, Moen S, van Leeuwen L, Geurts-Giele WR, Tops CM, van Ham TJ, Dinjens WN, Dubbink HJ, Spaander MC, Wagner A. Unexplained mismatch repair deficiency: Case closed. HGG ADVANCES 2022; 4:100167. [PMID: 36624813 PMCID: PMC9823207 DOI: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2022.100167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
To identify Lynch syndrome (LS) carriers, DNA mismatch repair (MMR) immunohistochemistry (IHC) is performed on colorectal cancers (CRCs). Upon subsequent LS diagnostics, MMR deficiency (MMRd) sometimes remains unexplained (UMMRd). Recently, the importance of complete LS diagnostics to explain UMMRd, involving MMR methylation, germline, and somatic analyses, was stressed. To explore why some MMRd CRCs remain unsolved, we performed a systematic review of the literature and mapped patients with UMMRd diagnosed in our center. A systematic literature search was performed in Ovid Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar for articles on UMMRd CRCs after complete LS diagnostics published until December 15, 2021. Additionally, UMMRd CRCs diagnosed in our center since 1993 were mapped. Of 754 identified articles, 17 were included, covering 74 patients with UMMRd. Five CRCs were microsatellite stable. Upon complete diagnostics, 39 patients had single somatic MMR hits, and six an MMR germline variant of unknown significance (VUS). Ten had somatic pathogenic variants (PVs) in POLD1, MLH3, MSH3, and APC. The remaining 14 patients were the only identifiable cases in the literature without a plausible identified cause of the UMMRd. Of those, nine were suspected to have LS. In our center, complete LS diagnostics in approximately 5,000 CRCs left seven MMRd CRCs unexplained. All had a somatic MMR hit or MMR germline VUS, indicative of a missed second MMR hit. In vitually all patients with UMMRd, complete LS diagnostics suggest MMR gene involvement. Optimizing detection of currently undetectable PVs and VUS interpretation might explain all UMMRd CRCs, considering UMMRd a case closed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellis L. Eikenboom
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 CE Rotterdam, the Netherlands,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 CE Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sarah Moen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 CE Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lotte van Leeuwen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 CE Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Willemina R.R. Geurts-Giele
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 CE Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Carli M.J. Tops
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Tjakko J. van Ham
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 CE Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Winand N.M. Dinjens
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 CE Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hendrikus J. Dubbink
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 CE Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Manon C.W. Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 CE Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anja Wagner
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 CE Rotterdam, the Netherlands,Corresponding author
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Macias A, Fichna JP, Topolewska M, Rȩdowicz MJ, Kaminska AM, Kostera-Pruszczyk A. Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Reveals Mutations in Non-coding Regions and Potential Regulatory Sequences of Calpain-3 Gene in Polish Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy Patients. Front Neurosci 2021; 15:692482. [PMID: 34720847 PMCID: PMC8551377 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.692482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Limb–girdle muscular dystrophy type R1 (LGMDR1) is caused by mutations in CAPN3 and is the most common type of recessive LGMD. Even with the use of whole-exome sequencing (WES), only one mutant allele of CAPN3 is found in a significant number of LGMDR patients. This points to a role of non-coding, intronic or regulatory, sequence variants in the disease pathogenesis. Targeted sequencing of the whole CAPN3 gene including not only intronic, 3′ and 5′ UTRs but also potential regulatory regions was performed in 27 patients suspected with LGMDR1. This group included 13 patients with only one mutated CAPN3 allele detected previously with exome sequencing. A second rare variant in the non-coding part of CAPN3 was found in 11 of 13 patients with previously identified single mutation. Intronic mutations were found in 10 cases, with c.1746-20C>G variant present in seven patients. In addition, a large deletion of exons 2–8 was found in one patient. In the patients with no causative mutation previously found, we detected rare CAPN3 variants in 5 out of 10 patients and in two of them in a compound heterozygous state. Rare variants within putative regulatory sequences distant from the CAPN3 gene were found in 15 patients, although in 11 of these cases, other variants are deemed causative. The results indicate that intronic mutations are common in Polish LGMDR patients, and testing for non-coding mutations in CAPN3 should be performed in apparently single heterozygous patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Macias
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Jakub Piotr Fichna
- Laboratory of Neurogenetics, Department of Neurodegenerative Disorders, Mossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Malgorzata Topolewska
- Laboratory of Molecular Basis of Cell Motility, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Maria J Rȩdowicz
- Laboratory of Molecular Basis of Cell Motility, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Anna M Kaminska
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Strategies for Lynch syndrome identification in selected and unselected gynecological cancers. Eur J Cancer Prev 2021; 31:369-376. [PMID: 34519692 DOI: 10.1097/cej.0000000000000711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endometrial carcinoma represents a sentinel cancer for Lynch syndrome (LS) identification. It is crucial to highlight how other types of tumors can arise in the gynecological tract acting as sentinel tumors in LS patients.Up to now, no established LS patient management strategy has incorporated the presence of these additional candidate sentinel tumors to improve the prevention and management of LS tumors. METHODS In order to investigate the involvement of the most frequent gynecological cancers in gynecological cancers, we studied different subsets of gynecological cancers using both somatic approaches, including mismatch repair (MMR) gene immunohistochemical expression, microsatellite instability, and germline analyses ofMSH2, MSH6, MLH1, PMS2 and EPCAM genes.A total of 261 patients referring to the Cancer Genetic Counselling Service of our institution were included in the study. In detail, our series was composed of 131 patients affected by uterus cancers including endometrial, isthmus and non-HPV endocervical carcinomas, 113 patients affected by ovarian cancers and 17 patients affected by synchronous endometrial/ovarian carcinomas (SEOC).In addition, we studied 115 cases of endometrial cancers identified by 2 years of universal testing (endometrial cancers/UTs) using IHC analysis of four MMR proteins. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS The incidence of MMR defective gynecological cancers ranged from 7.1 to 47.1% depending on cancer site and selection. LS patients carriers of pathogenetic MMR variants were identified in 19.8% of uterus cancers, 35.3% of SEOC, 4.4% of ovarian cancers. In addition, pathogenetic MMR variants were identified in 4.3% of endometrial cancers/universal testing investigated with universal screening.In conclusion, gynecological cancers are heavily involved in LS and our study shows that MMR screening using immunohistochemical pattern and MSI analysis of endometrial and ovarian cancers as well as of rare entities such as non-HPV related endocervical cancers and synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancers are sentinels for LS.Tumor testing approach improves early identification of MMR defective gynecological cancers and this is an effective strategy to detect high-risk patients and to offer them and their relatives personalized cancer prevention.
Collapse
|