Évaluation par l'imagerie embarquée de la précision de positionnement et de repositionnement en radiothérapie stéréotaxique fractionnée

[Ballistic quality assurance]

This review describes the ballistic quality assurance for stereotactic intracranial irradiation treatments delivered with Gamma Knife® either dedicated or adapted medical linear accelerators. Specific and periodic controls should be performed in order to check the mechanical stability for both irradiation and collimation systems. If this step remains under the responsibility of the medical physicist, it should be done in agreement with the manufacturer's technical support. At this time, there are no recent published guidelines. With technological developments, both frequency and accuracy should be assessed in each institution according to the treatment mode: single versus hypofractionnated dose, circular collimator versus micro-multileaf collimators. In addition, "end-to-end" techniques are mandatory to find the origin of potential discrepancies and to estimate the global ballistic accuracy of the delivered treatment. Indeed, they include frames, non-invasive immobilization devices, localizers, multimodal imaging for delineation and in-room positioning imaging systems. The final precision that could be reasonably achieved is more or less 1mm.

[Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases]

PURPOSE

A survey of the literature has been performed to find arguments in order to help the choice between radiosurgery and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in the treatment of brain metastases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A comparison of two groups of brain metastases treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy or radiosurgery, with or without WBRT was performed. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: there were eight series including 448 patients published from 2000 to 2009; treated with 5-6 MV X-Rays, non invasive head immobilization, a margin 2 to 10mm; 24 to 40Gy in three to five fractions; a 5 to 8 days duration in six series and 15-16 days in two other series. WBRT (30%) ; radiosurgery: there were 12 series (1994 to 2005) including 2157 patients; an invasive head immobilization, no margin; doses from 10 to 25 Gy; six series over 12 had Gamma Knife radiosurgery and six had Linacs X-Rays. WBRT (30 Gy/10 F/12 days) associated to radiosurgery in several series. The following parameters were compared: median GTV, median survival, 1-year survival rate, local control rate, necrosis and WBRT rates.

RESULTS

Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy series: the parameters were respectively: 0,52-4,47 cm(3) (median 2,8 cm(3)); 5-16 months (median 8,7 months); 68,2-93% (median 82,5%); necrosis rate 3,1%; associated WBRT 30%. Radiosurgery series: the parameters were respectively: 1,3 to 5,5 cm(3) (median 2 cm(3)); 5,5 to 22 months (median 11 months); 71 to 95% (median 85%); 0,5 to 6% (median 2,4%); associated WBRT 58%. Results seem similar in the two groups: Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with non invasive immobilization could theoretically treat all brain metastases sizes except lesions<10 mm (500 mm(3)). In large volumes,>4200 mm(3) GTV, the toxicity of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy was not reported, thus it was difficult to compare its results with the published reports of radiosurgery toxicity. WBRT was a confusing parameter. Obviously, this initial survey has important limitations, specifically its methodology.

CONCLUSION

Radiosurgery and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy could be used to treat brain metastases with GTV>500 mm(3) and < or = 4200 mm(3) (Ø 20mm); for GTV<500 mm(3) (Ø 10mm) an invasive procedure with radiosurgery is necessary. For GTV>4200 mm(3) (Ø 20mm), hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy could be proposed, provided further studies, using 4 to 6 Gy fractions, a duration less or equal to 10-12 days and a margin of 2mm will be performed.