Radionecrosis after repeated courses of radiotherapy under stereotactic conditions for brain metastases: Analysis of clinical and dosimetric data from a retrospective cohort of 184 patients

Brain metastases reirradiation

The advances in cancer screening and therapies have allowed the improvement of metastatic patients' survival, including those with brain metastases. This led to a substantial shift in brain metastases patients' management for whom whole-brain radiation therapy, formerly widely used, has given way to a more focused management in which single- or multifractionated stereotactic radiation therapy now plays a predominant role. Although stereotactic radiation therapy offers excellent local control rates (70 to 90%), it does not prevent brain recurrence outside the radiation field, which is all the more frequent the higher the number of initial metastases and the longer the patient's survival. In the case of brain recurrence after irradiation, therapeutic options will depend both on the previous treatment and on the features of the recurrence. This article aims to review the available data on the efficacy and tolerability of various reirradiation schemes in different clinical situations.

Diagnosis and management of brain radiation necrosis

Brain radiation necrosis (BRN) is a significant and complex side effect of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). Differentiating BRN from local tumor recurrence is critical, requiring advanced diagnostic techniques and a multidisciplinary approach. BRN typically manifests months to years post-treatment, presenting with radiological changes on MRI and may produce neurological symptoms. Key risk factors include the volume of irradiated brain tissue, the radiation dose, and prior radiotherapy history. This manuscript reviews the diagnostic process for BRN, emphasizing the importance of assessing baseline risk, clinical evaluation, and advanced imaging modalities. Multimodal imaging enhances diagnostic accuracy and aids in distinguishing BRN from tumor relapse. Therapeutic management varies based on symptoms. Asymptomatic BRN may be monitored with regular imaging, while symptomatic BRN often requires corticosteroids to reduce inflammation. Emerging therapies like bevacizumab have shown promise in clinical trials, with significant radiographic and symptomatic improvement. Surgical intervention may be necessary for histological confirmation and severe, treatment-resistant cases. Ongoing research aims to improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficacy, enhancing patient outcomes and quality of life. This review underscores the need for a multidisciplinary approach and continuous advancements to address the challenges posed by BRN in brain tumor patients.

Tumor reirradiation: Issues, challenges and perspectives for radiobiology

The radiobiology of tumor reirradiation is poorly understood. It pertains to tumors and their sensitivity at the time of relapse, encompassing primary tumors, metastases, or secondary cancers developed in or proximal to previously irradiated tissues. The ability to control the pathology depends, in part, on understanding this sensitivity. To date, literature data remains limited regarding changes in the radiosensitivity of tissues after initial irradiation, and most proposals are based on conjecture. The response of healthy tissues at the site of irradiation raises concerns about radio-induced complications. Cumulative dose is likely a major factor in this risk, thus using equivalent dose calculations might help reduce the risk of complications. However, the correlation between mathematical equivalence formulas and clinical effects of radiobiological origin is weak, and the lack of knowledge of the alpha/beta (α/β) ratio of healthy tissues remains an obstacle to the extensive use of these formulas. However, tissues exposed to recovery dose may have a tolerance to irradiation much higher than assumed, thus further biological work remains to be developed. Also, the functionality of previously irradiated tissues could be useful in selecting the most suitable irradiation beams. Finally, research on the genomics of irradiated healthy tissues could improve the prediction of side effects and personalize radiotherapy.

Determinants of cerebral radionecrosis in animal models: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Radionecrosis is a common complication in radiation oncology, while mechanisms and risk factors have yet to be fully explored. We therefore conducted a systematic review to understand the pathogenesis and identify factors that significantly affect the development.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search based on the PRISMA guidelines using PubMed, Ovid, and Web of Science databases. The complete search strategy can be found as a preregistered protocol on PROSPERO (CRD42023361662).

RESULTS

We included 83 studies, most involving healthy animals (n = 72, 86.75 %). High doses of hemispherical irradiation of 30 Gy in rats and 50 Gy in mice led repeatedly to radionecrosis among different studies and set-ups. Higher dose and larger irradiated volume were associated with earlier onset. Fractionated schedules showed limited effectiveness in the prevention of radionecrosis. Distinct anatomical brain structures respond to irradiation in various ways. White matter appears to be more vulnerable than gray matter. Younger age, more evolved animal species, and genetic background were also significant factors, whereas sex was irrelevant. Only 13.25 % of the studies were performed on primary brain tumor bearing animals, no studies on brain metastases are currently available.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review identified various factors that significantly affect the induction of radionecrosis. The current state of research neglects the utilization of animal models of brain tumors, even though patients with brain malignancies constitute the largest group receiving brain irradiation. This latter aspect should be primarily addressed when developing an experimental radionecrosis model for translational implementation.

Successful treatment of medically and surgically refractory lymphocytic hypophysitis with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: a single-center experience and systematic literature review

PURPOSE

To explore the potential role of focused radiotherapy in managing the lymphocytic hypophysitis (LH) refractory to medical therapy and surgery.

METHOD

A systematic literature review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines to identify the studies on radiation treatment for hypophysitis, along with the experience in our institution.

RESULTS

The study included eight patients, three from our institution and five from existing literature. The age at presentation ranged from 37 to 75 years old, with a median age of 58. The presenting symptoms involved headache in seven patients and diplopia in two patients. Pre-radiation visual field defects were noticed in four patients. All patients exhibited variable degrees of hypopituitarism before radiation, with oral corticosteroids being the initial medical treatment. Immunosuppressive therapy was attempted in two patients prior to radiation. Seven patients had a history of transsphenoidal surgery with a histologically confirmed LH. Three patients underwent stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), while the remaining received FSRT, with a mean irradiation volume of 2.2 cm3. A single-session total dose of 12 -15 Gy was administered in the SRS group. In the FSRT group, doses ranged from 24 to 30 Gy with a median dose of 25 Gy, delivered in 2 Gy fractions. Four patients achieved a resolution of visual field defects, while another two patients demonstrated improvement in their associated focal neurologic deficits. No change in pre-existing endocrine status was shown after radiation, except in one patient. Clinical response was achieved in seven patients after a single course of radiation, while one patient required the second course. Six patients remained stable on low-dose glucocorticoid during at least a 12-month follow-up period, and one discontinued it entirely without experiencing relapse. Three patients demonstrated a complete radiologic response, while the remaining showed a partial radiologic response.

CONCLUSIONS

Focused radiation, including FSRT, can play a role in symptomatic relief, effective mass shrinkage, and minimizing radiation exposure to critical surrounding structures in patients with refractory LH. However, further research efforts are necessary to better clarify its effects and optimal dose planning.

Comparative study of dynamic conformal arc therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy for treating single brain metastases: A retrospective analysis of dosimetric and clinical outcomes

Background and purpose

Stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) is commonly used to treat brain metastases (BMs). This retrospective study compared two SRT techniques, dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), for single BM treatments.

Material and methods

Data of patients treated between January 2010 and June 2020 were considered. Patients with multiple BMs, resected BMs, reirradiation, whole-brain radiation therapy and brainstem metastases were excluded. We focused our analysis on 97 patients who received 23.1 Gy in three fractions. Acute toxicities and follow-up outcomes were recorded. Dosimetric data were analyzed in two subgroups (PTV ≤ 10 cc and PTV > 10 cc).

Results

DCAT and VMAT were used in 70 (72.2 %) and 27 (27.8 %) patients, respectively. Acute toxicities were not significantly different between groups (p = 0.259), and no difference was detected in the incidence rate of radionecrosis, local recurrence and cerebral recurrence (p > 0.999, p > 0.999 and p = 0.682, respectively). PTV coverage was better with DCAT for small volumes (PTV ≤ 10 cc). Mean conformity index (CI) was significantly higher with VMAT and mean gradient index (GI) was significantly lower with DCAT whatever volume subgroups (p < 0.001). DCAT had more heterogeneous plans and VMAT required more monitor units. DCAT resulted in reduced low and intermediate doses, whereas VMAT led to decreased high doses.

Conclusion

DCAT and VMAT are two effective and safe SRT techniques for BMs treatment. In the era of re-irradiation, it is important to reduce the doses delivered to healthy tissues. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

The dosimetric parameters impact on local recurrence in stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases

OBJECTIVES

Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for brain metastases (BM) allows very good local control (LC). However, approximately 20%-30% of these lesions will recur. The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the impact of dosimetric parameters on LC in cerebral SRT.

METHODS

Patients treated with SRT for 1-3 BM between January 2015 and December 2018 were retrospectively included. A total of 349 patients with 538 lesions were included. The median gross tumour volume (GTV) was 2 cm3 (IQR, 0-7). The median biological effective dose with α/β = 10 (BED10) was 60 Gy (IQR, 32-82). The median prescription isodose was 71% (IQR, 70-80). Correlations with LC were examined using the Cox regression model.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 55 months (min-max, 7-85). Median overall survival was 17.8 months (IQR, 15.2-21.9). There were 95 recurrences and LC at 1 and 2 years was 87.1% (95% CI, 84-90) and 78.1% (95% CI, 73.9-82.4), respectively. Univariate analysis showed that systemic treatment, dose to 2% and 50% of the planning target volume (PTV), BED10 > 50 Gy, and low PTV and GTV volume were significantly correlated with better LC. In the multivariate analysis, GTV volume, isodose, and BED10 were significantly associated with LC.

CONCLUSION

These results show the importance of a BED10 > 50 Gy associated with a prescription isodose <80% to optimize LC during SRT for BM.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Isodose, BED, and GTV volume were significantly associated with LC. A low isodose improves LC without increasing the risk of radionecrosis.

Stereotactic Radiation Therapy of Single Brain Metastases: A Literature Review of Dosimetric Studies

Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) plays a major role in treating brain metastases (BMs) and can be delivered using various equipment and techniques. This review aims to identify the dosimetric factors of each technique to determine whether one should be preferred over another for single BMs treatment. A systematic literature review on articles published between January 2015 and January 2022 was conducted using the MEDLINE and ScienceDirect databases, following the PRISMA methodology, using the keywords "dosimetric comparison" and "brain metastases". The included articles compared two or more SRT techniques for treating single BM and considered at least two parameters among: conformity (CI), homogeneity (HI) and gradient (GI) indexes, delivery treatment time, and dose-volume of normal brain tissue. Eleven studies were analyzed. The heterogeneous lesions along with the different definitions of dosimetric indexes rendered the studied comparison almost unattainable. Gamma Knife (GK) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) provide better CI and GI and ensure the sparing of healthy tissue. To conclude, it is crucial to optimize dosimetric indexes to minimize radiation exposure to healthy tissue, particularly in cases of reirradiation. Consequently, there is a need for future well-designed studies to establish guidelines for selecting the appropriate SRT technique based on the treated BMs' characteristics.

Hypofractionated postoperative stereotactic radiotherapy for large resected brain metastases

PURPOSE

The aim of the present retrospective study was to report outcomes after hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) for resected brain metastases (BM).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed results of patients with resected BM treated with postoperative HSRT (3×7.7Gy to the prescription isodose 70%) between May 2013 and June 2020. Local control (LC), distant brain control (DBC), overall survival (OS), leptomeningeal disease relapse (LMDR), and radiation necrosis (RN) occurrence were reported.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients with 23 brain cavities were included. Karnofsky Performance status (KPS) was≥70 in 77.3%. Median preoperative diameter was 37mm [21.0-75.0] and median planning target volume (PTV) was 23 cm³ [9.9-61.6]. Median time from surgery to SRT was 69 days [7-101] and 48% of patients had a local relapse on pre-SRT imaging. Median follow-up was 17.5 months [1.6-95.9]. One and two-year LC rates were 60.9 and 52.2% respectively. One and 2-year DBC rates were 45.5 and 40.9%. Median OS was 16.5 months. Four patients (18.2%) presented LMDR during follow-up. RN occurred in 6 patients (27.2%). Three factors were associated with OS: ECOG-PS (P=0.009), KPS (P=0.04), and cystic metastasis before surgery (P=0.037). Several factors were related to RN occurrence: PTV diameter and volume, Normal brain V21, V21 and V24 isodoses volumes.

CONCLUSION

HSRT is the most widely used scheme for larger brain cavities after surgery. The optimal dose and scheme remain to be defined as well as the optimal delay between postoperative SRT and surgery. Dose escalation may be necessary, especially in case of subtotal resection.