Deep inspiratory breath hold assisted by continuous positive airway pressure ventilation for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy

Lung and Liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy During Mechanically Assisted Deep Inspiration Breath-Holds: A Prospective Feasibility Trial

Purpose

Radiation therapy for tumors subject to breathing-related motion during breath-holds (BHs) has the potential to substantially reduce the irradiated volume. Mechanically assisted and noninvasive ventilation (MANIV) could ensure the target repositioning accuracy during each BH while facilitating treatment feasibility through oxygen supplementation and a perfectly replicated mechanical support. However, there is currently no clinical evidence substantiating the use of MANIV-induced BH for moving tumors. The aim of this work was, therefore, to evaluate the technique's performance under real treatment conditions.

Methods and Materials

Patients eligible for lung or liver stereotactic body radiation therapy were prospectively included in a single-arm trial. The primary endpoint corresponded to the treatment feasibility with MANIV. Secondary outcomes comprised intrafraction geometric uncertainties extracted from real-time imaging, tolerance to BH, and treatment time.

Results

Treatment was successfully delivered in 92.9% (13/14) of patients: 1 patient with a liver tumor was excluded because of a mechanically induced gastric insufflation displacing the liver cranially by more than 1 cm. In the left-right/anteroposterior/craniocaudal directions, the recalculated safety margins based on intrafraction positional data were 4.6 mm/5.1 mm/5.6 mm and 4.7 mm/7.3 mm/5.9 mm for lung and liver lesions, respectively. Compared with the free-breathing internal target volume and midposition approaches, the average reduction in the planning target volume with MANIV reached -47.2% ± 15.3%, P < .001, and -29.4% ± 19.2%, P = .007, for intrathoracic tumors and -23.3% ± 12.4%, P < .001, and -9.3% ± 15.3%, P = .073, for upper abdominal tumors, respectively. For 1 liver lesion, large caudal drifts of occasionally more than 1 cm were measured. The total slot time was 53.1 ± 10.6 minutes with a BH comfort level of 80.1% ± 10.6%.

Conclusions

MANIV enables high treatment feasibility within a nonselected population. Accurate intrafraction tumor repositioning is achieved for lung tumors. Because of occasional intra-BH caudal drifts, pretreatment assessment of BH stability for liver lesions is, however, recommended.

Application and dosimetric comparison of surface-guided deep inspiration breath-hold for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy

Respiratory motion management is the crucial challenge for safe and effective application of lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The present study implemented lung SBRT treatment in voluntary deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) with surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) system and evaluated the geometric and dosimetric benefits of DIBH to organs-at-risk (OARs), aiming to advising the choice between DIBH technology and conventional free breathing 4 dimensions (FB-4D) technology. Five patients of lung SBRT treated in DIBH with SGRT at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. CT scans were acquired in DIBH and FB-4D, treatment plans were generated for both respiratory phases. The geometric and dosimetry of tumor, ipsilateral lung, double lungs and heart were compared between the DIBH and FB-4D treatment plans. In terms of target coverage, utilizing DIBH significantly reduced the mean plan target volume (PTV) by 21.9% (p = 0.09) compared to FB-4D, the conformity index (CI) of DIBH and FB-4D were comparable, but the dose gradient index (DGI) of DIBH was higher. With DIBH expanding lung, the volumes of ipsilateral lung and double lungs were 2535.1 ± 403.0cm3 and 4864.3 ± 900.2cm3, separately, 62.2% (p = 0.009) and 73.1% (p = 0.009) more than volumes of ipsilateral lung (1460.03 ± 146.60cm3) and double lungs (2811.25 ± 603.64cm3) in FB-4D. The heart volume in DIBH was 700.0 ± 146.1cm3, 11.6% (p = 0.021) less than that in FB-4D. As for OARs protection, the mean dose, percent of volume receiving > 20Gy (V20) and percent of volume receiving > 5Gy (V5) of ipsilateral lung in DIBH were significantly lower by 33.2% (p = 0.020), 44.0% (p = 0.022) and 24.5% (p = 0.037) on average, separately. Double lungs also showed significant decrease by 31.1% (p = 0.019), 45.5% (p = 0.024) and 20.9% (p = 0.048) on average for mean dose, V20 and V5 in DIBH. Different from the lung, the mean dose and V5 of heart showed no consistency between DIBH and FB-4D, but lower maximum dose of heart was achieved in DIBH for all patients in this study. Appling lung SBRT in DIBH with SGRT was feasibly performed with high patient compliance. DIBH brought significant dosimetric benefits to lung, however, it caused more or less irradiated heart dose that depend on the patients' individual differences which were unpredictable.

Protocol of a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of deep-inspiration breath-hold daily online adaptive radiotherapy for centrally located lung tumours (PUDDING study)

BACKGROUND

Centrally located lung tumours present a challenge because of their tendency to exhibit symptoms such as airway obstruction, atelectasis, and bleeding. Surgical resection of these tumours often requires sacrificing the lungs, making definitive radiotherapy the preferred alternative to avoid pneumonectomy. However, the proximity of these tumours to mediastinal organs at risk increases the potential for severe adverse events. To mitigate this risk, we propose a dual-method approach: deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) radiotherapy combined with adaptive radiotherapy. The aim of this single-centre, single-arm phase II study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of DIBH daily online adaptive radiotherapy.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with centrally located lung tumours according to the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer recommendations, are enrolled and subjected to DIBH daily online adaptive radiotherapy. The primary endpoint is the one-year cumulative incidence of grade 3 or more severe adverse events, as classified by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0).

DISCUSSION

Delivering definitive radiotherapy for centrally located lung tumours presents a dilemma between ensuring optimal dose coverage for the planning target volume and the associated increased risk of adverse events. DIBH provides measurable dosimetric benefits by increasing the normal lung volume and distancing the tumour from critical mediastinal organs at risk, leading to reduced toxicity. DIBH adaptive radiotherapy has been proposed as an adjunct treatment option for abdominal and pelvic cancers. If the application of DIBH adaptive radiotherapy to centrally located lung tumours proves successful, this approach could shape future phase III trials and offer novel perspectives in lung tumour radiotherapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered at the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT; https://jrct.niph.go.jp/ ); registration number: jRCT1052230085 ( https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCT1052230085 ).