Relationship between galectin-3 levels and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist use in heart failure: analysis from HF-ACTION

Galectins: A New Frontier in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Research

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common chronic condition characterized by abnormal reflux and regurgitation of stomach contents into the esophagus. Its prevalence is increasing worldwide and poses a high economic burden.

AIM

To explore the potential correlation between galectin-1, galectin-3, galectin-8, galectin-9, and GERD, highlighting their potential role as biomarkers in disease diagnosis, and pathogenesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 40 patients with GERD disease and 40 healthy control subjects from January 2023-May 2024 at Al-Kindy Teaching Hospital-Gastroenterology Unit. Venous blood was collected from patients and controls. Serums of both groups were quantified for galectin-1, galectin-3, galectin-8, and galectin-9 using a human ELISA kit.

RESULTS

Galectin-1 showed no statistically significant difference in the median levels between patients with GERD and controls (p = 0.567). A significant difference was found in the median levels of galectin-3, with higher levels in patients with GERD compared to controls (p = 0.0037). The most significant was galectin-3, AUC = 0.684 (95% CI: 0.570-0.784), p = 0.003, had a significant moderate discriminatory ability in differentiating between patients with GERD and healthy controls with cutoff value <13.682, sensitivity = 74.4%, specificity = 55%, and accuracy = 61.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that serum galectin-3 is the best potential noninvasive diagnostic biomarker for the prediction and identification of GERD.

Galectin inhibitors and nanoparticles as a novel therapeutic strategy for glioblastoma multiforme

Over the past two decades, the gold standard of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) treatment is unchanged and adjunctive therapy has offered little to prolong both quality and quantity of life. To improve pharmacotherapy for GBM, galectins are being studied provided their positive correlation with the malignancy and disease severity. Despite the use of galectin inhibitors and literature displaying the ability of the lectin proteins to decrease tumor burden and decrease mortality within various malignancies, galectin inhibitors have not been studied for GBM therapy. Interestingly, anti-galectin siRNA delivered in nanoparticle capsules, assisting in blood brain barrier penetrance, is well studied for GBM, and has demonstrated a remarkable ability to attenuate both galectin and tumor count. Provided that the two therapies have an analogous anti-galectin effect, it is hypothesized that galectin inhibitors encapsuled within nanoparticles will likely have a similar anti-galectin effect in GBM cells and further correlate to a repressed tumor burden.

Hypermethylation of ACADVL is involved in the high-intensity interval training-associated reduction of cardiac fibrosis in heart failure patients

BACKGROUND

Emerging evidence suggests that DNA methylation can be affected by physical activities and is associated with cardiac fibrosis. This translational research examined the implications of DNA methylation associated with the high-intensity interval training (HIIT) effects on cardiac fibrosis in patients with heart failure (HF).

METHODS

Twelve HF patients were included and received cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging with late gadolinium enhancement for cardiac fibrosis severity and a cardiopulmonary exercise test for peak oxygen consumption ([Formula: see text]O2peak). Afterwards, they underwent 36 sessions of HIIT at alternating 80% and 40% of [Formula: see text]O2peak for 30 min per session in 3-4 months. Human serum from 11 participants, as a means to link cell biology to clinical presentations, was used to investigate the exercise effects on cardiac fibrosis. Primary human cardiac fibroblasts (HCFs) were incubated in patient serum, and analyses of cell behaviour, proteomics (n = 6) and DNA methylation profiling (n = 3) were performed. All measurements were conducted after completing HIIT.

RESULTS

A significant increase (p = 0.009) in [Formula: see text]O2peak (pre- vs. post-HIIT = 19.0 ± 1.1 O2 ml/kg/min vs. 21.8 ± 1.1 O2 ml/kg/min) was observed after HIIT. The exercise strategy resulted in a significant decrease in left ventricle (LV) volume by 15% to 40% (p < 0.05) and a significant increase in LV ejection fraction by approximately 30% (p = 0.010). LV myocardial fibrosis significantly decreased from 30.9 ± 1.2% to 27.2 ± 0.8% (p = 0.013) and from 33.4 ± 1.6% to 30.1 ± 1.6% (p = 0.021) in the middle and apical LV myocardium after HIIT, respectively. The mean single-cell migration speed was significantly (p = 0.044) greater for HCFs treated with patient serum before (2.15 ± 0.17 μm/min) than after (1.11 ± 0.12 μm/min) HIIT. Forty-three of 1222 identified proteins were significantly involved in HIIT-induced altered HCF activities. There was significant (p = 0.044) hypermethylation of the acyl-CoA dehydrogenase very long chain (ACADVL) gene with a 4.474-fold increase after HIIT, which could activate downstream caspase-mediated actin disassembly and the cell death pathway.

CONCLUSIONS

Human investigation has shown that HIIT is associated with reduced cardiac fibrosis in HF patients. Hypermethylation of ACADVL after HIIT may contribute to impeding HCF activities. This exercise-associated epigenetic reprogramming may contribute to reduce cardiac fibrosis and promote cardiorespiratory fitness in HF patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04038723. Registered 31 July 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04038723 .

New Biomarkers and Their Potential Role in Heart Failure Treatment Optimisation-An African Perspective

Heart failure is a clinical syndrome resulting from various cardiovascular diseases of different aetiologies and pathophysiology. These varying pathologies involve several complex mechanisms that lead to the activation of the neurohumoral system, inflammation, angiogenesis, apoptosis, fibrosis, and eventually adverse cardiac remodelling associated with a progressive decline in cardiac function. Once a diagnosis is made, the cardiac function has a gradual decline characterised by multiple hospital admissions. It is therefore imperative to identify patients at different stages of the heart failure continuum to better risk stratify and initiate optimal management strategies. Biomarkers may play a role in the diagnosis, prognostication, and monitoring response to treatment. This review discusses the epidemiology of heart failure and biomarkers commonly used in clinical practice such as natriuretic peptides and cardiac troponins. In addition, we provide a brief overview of novel biomarkers and genetic coding and non-coding biomarkers used in the management of patients with heart failure. We also discuss barriers that hinder the clinical application of novel biomarkers. Finally, we appraise the value of polygenic risk scoring, focusing on sub-Saharan Africa.

Circulating heart failure biomarkers beyond natriuretic peptides: review from the Biomarker Study Group of the Heart Failure Association (HFA), European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

New biomarkers are being evaluated for their ability to advance the management of patients with heart failure. Despite a large pool of interesting candidate biomarkers, besides natriuretic peptides virtually none have succeeded in being applied into the clinical setting. In this review, we examine the most promising emerging candidates for clinical assessment and management of patients with heart failure. We discuss high-sensitivity cardiac troponins (Tn), procalcitonin, novel kidney markers, soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2), galectin-3, growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), cluster of differentiation 146 (CD146), neprilysin, adrenomedullin (ADM), and also discuss proteomics and genetic-based risk scores. We focused on guidance and assistance with daily clinical care decision-making. For each biomarker, analytical considerations are discussed, as well as performance regarding diagnosis and prognosis. Furthermore, we discuss potential implementation in clinical algorithms and in ongoing clinical trials.

sST2 adds to the prognostic value of Gal-3 and BNP in chronic heart failure

Background: The soluble form of the IL-33 receptor (sST2) and Galectin-3 (Gal-3) are fibrosis biomarkers with prognostic value in heart failure (HF). We investigated the prognostic capacity of sST2 when combined with Gal-3, and determined if the prognostic utility of sST2 is affected by mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) therapy.Methods: sST-2 and Gal-3 were measured in 101 stable chronic HF (CHF) patients receiving MRA therapy and compared to 97 BNP and cardiovascular risk factor matched patients not treated with MRA. sST2 and Gal-3 levels were measured to determine the relationship with all-cause mortality at 6-year follow-up.Results: ROC curve cut-off points were defined as sST2 = 36.3 ng/mL, Gal-3 = 17.8 ng/mL, and BNP = 500 pg/mL, and had 6-year mortality hazard ratios (HR) of 7.3, 6.6 and 5.4, respectively. The combination of an elevated sST2 and Gal-3 had a HR = 4.4 [95% CI 1.9-8.9]. Combining sST2 and Gal-3 to a clinical model relevant for CHF prognosis allowed a significant reclassification of 1-year adverse outcome risk, even when BNP was included. Finally, prognostic prediction by sST2 was unaffected by MRA treatment.Conclusion: Simultaneous sST2 and Gal-3 elevation is associated with poorer prognosis compared to either alone, regardless of BNP levels, and the prognostic capacity of sST2 is independent of MRA therapy.

Effect of Galectin 3 on Aldosterone-Associated Risk of Cardiovascular Mortality in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography

Recent experimental studies have suggested that galectin-3 has an interaction with aldosterone, and modifies its adverse effects. We therefore aimed to elucidate whether the relationship between plasma aldosterone concentrations (PACs) and long-term fatal cardiovascular (CV) events would depend on plasma galectin-3 levels. A total of 2,457 patients (median age: 63.5 [interquartile range (IQR) = 56.3 to 70.6] years, 30.1% women) from the LUdwigshafen RIsk and Cardiovascular Health study, with a median follow-up of 9.9 (IQR = 8.5 to 10.7) years, were included. We tested the interaction between aldosterone and galectin-3 for CV-mortality using a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model, reporting hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs). Adjustments for multiple CV risk factors as well as medication use were included. Mean PAC was 79.0 (IQR = 48.0 to 124.0) pg/ml and there were 558 (16.8%) CV deaths. There was a significant interaction between PAC and galectin-3 (p = 0.021). When stratifying patients by the median galectin-3, there was a significant association between aldosterone and CV-mortality for those above (HR per 1 standard deviation = 1.14; 95%CI [1.01 to 1.30], p = 0.023), but not below the cut-off value (HR per 1 standard deviation = 1.00; 95%CI [0.87 to 1.15], p = 0.185). In conclusion, the current study demonstrates for the first time a modifying effect of galectin-3 on the association between aldosterone and CV-mortality risk in humans. These findings indicate that galectin-3 is an intermediate between aldosterone and adverse outcomes.

Plasma galectin-3 concentrations in patients with primary aldosteronism

BACKGROUND

The incidence of cardiovascular events is higher in patients with primary aldosteronism than in patients with essential hypertension (EHT), despite similar blood pressure levels. This suggests detrimental cardiovascular effects of aldosterone. Amongst others, it has been suggested that galectin-3 (Gal-3) is a key mediator in aldosterone-induced myocardial fibrosis.

OBJECTIVE

We studied whether patients with primary aldosteronism have higher plasma Gal-3 concentrations than patients with EHT and evaluated its reversibility after adrenalectomy.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort from our tertiary referral centre, we measured plasma Gal-3 concentrations in 78 patients with primary aldosteronism, 39 cured primary aldosteronism patients after adrenalectomy and 56 patients with EHT. Paired samples were available in 11 patients (preadrenalectomy and postadrenalectomy). We compared plasma Gal-3 levels by univariate analysis of covariance with correction for cardiovascular risk factors, plasma creatinine concentration, plasma potassium levels and alcohol intake.

RESULTS

Adjusted plasma Gal-3 concentrations in patients with primary aldosteronism, patients after adrenalectomy and patients with EHT were 11.39 ± 0.60, 11.64 ± 0.81 and 11.41 ± 0.73 ng/ml, respectively (mean ± SD; P = 0.95). In 11 patients of whom paired samples were available, mean Gal-3 concentrations increased from 10.03 ± 1.67 ng/ml preadrenalectomy to 14.36 ± 2.07 ng/ml postadrenalectomy (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

In patients with primary aldosteronism, plasma Gal-3 concentrations are not elevated when compared with patients with EHT, and levels do not decrease after adrenalectomy. These results are in contrast to previous studies and do not support a pathophysiological role of plasma Gal-3 in the increased cardiovascular risk in patients with primary aldosteronism.

ST2 and Galectin-3: Ready for Prime Time?

ST2 and galectin-3 are emerging biomarkers in the field of heart failure and have been extensively studied, and that whether they provide additional prognostic value on top of the clinical models and the gold standard in HF, (NT-pro)BNP. Our aim was to provide a comprehensive review of these emerging HF-related biomarkers in chronic, acute and incident heart failure. Regardless of the type of heart failure, both biomarkers seem to have an additional effect on top of the clinical model including natriuretic peptides. Strategies that combine multiple biomarkers may ultimately prove to be beneficial in the guidance of HF therapy in the future. However, additional prognostic value appears to be limited, and what we need is to prospectively test the consistent observations, which then might lead to the implementation of ST2 and galectin-3 in heart failure algorithms.

Randomized trials are frequently fragmented in multiple secondary publications

OBJECTIVE

To assess the frequency and features of secondary publications of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

For 191 RCTs published in high-impact journals in 2009, we searched for secondary publications coauthored by at least one same author of the primary trial publication. We evaluated the probability of having secondary publications, characteristics of the primary trial publication that predict having secondary publications, types of secondary analyses conducted, and statistical significance of those analyses.

RESULTS

Of 191 primary trials, 88 (46%) had a total of 475 secondary publications by 2/2014. Eight trials had >10 (up to 51) secondary publications each. In multivariable modeling, the risk of having subsequent secondary publications increased 1.32-fold (95% CI 1.05-1.68) per 10-fold increase in sample size, and 1.71-fold (95% CI 1.19-2.45) in the presence of a design article. In a sample of 197 secondary publications examined in depth, 193 tested different hypotheses than the primary publication. Of the 193, 43 tested differences between subgroups, 85 assessed predictive factors associated with an outcome of interest, 118 evaluated different outcomes than the original article, 71 had differences in eligibility criteria, and 21 assessed different durations of follow-up; 176 (91%) presented at least one analysis with statistically significant results.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately half of randomized trials in high-impact journals have secondary publications published with a few trials followed by numerous secondary publications. Almost all of these publications report some statistically significant results.

The Current and Potential Clinical Relevance of Heart Failure Biomarkers

Heart failure is a growing epidemic, and our understanding of the intricacies of its pathophysiology continues to evolve. Over the last decade, biomarkers of heart failure have been extensively investigated, particularly for diagnosis and risk stratification. While the natriuretic peptides remain the gold standard heart failure biomarker, they are plagued by their non-specific nature; furthermore, the strategy of natriuretic peptide-guided care remains elusive. Multiple candidate markers indicative of other physiologic aspects of heart failure have been identified and studied, including soluble ST2, galectin-3, and high-sensitivity cardiac troponins. Each of these biomarkers has the potential to provide unique therapeutically relevant information. Ultimately, a multi-marker approach may be applied to improve care of patients with heart failure. Definitive clinical trials and the use of advanced statistical analytic techniques are needed to truly determine the optimal strategy of biomarker-assisted diagnosis, prognostication, and management of patients who suffer from this devastating condition.

Using the galectin-3 test to predict mortality in heart failure patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

Galectin-3 (Gal-3) is a new biomarker for assessing prognosis of heart failure (HF) patients. This systemic review and meta-analysis aims to examine Gal-3's ability in assessing prognosis of HF patients.

METHOD

We searched MEDLINE and Embase up to November 2014. Test performance characteristics were summarized using forest plots and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

The diagnostic odds ratio of Gal-3 in predicting mortality in chronic HF patients was 2.36 (95% CI: 1.71-3.26) and 2.30 (95% CI: 1.76-3.01) in acute HF patients.

CONCLUSION

Elevated levels of Gal-3 are associated with mortality in both acute and chronic HF patients. However, current evidence does not support sole use of Gal-3 for prognosis evaluation of HF patients.

Biomarker Guided Therapy in Chronic Heart Failure

This review article addresses the question of whether biomarker-guided therapy is ready for clinical implementation in chronic heart failure. The most well-known biomarkers in heart failure are natriuretic peptides, namely B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-BNP. They are well-established in the diagnostic process of acute heart failure and prediction of disease prognosis. They may also be helpful in screening patients at risk of developing heart failure. Although studied by 11 small- to medium-scale trials resulting in several positive meta-analyses, it is less well-established whether natriuretic peptides are also helpful for guiding chronic heart failure therapy. This uncertainty is expressed by differences in European and American guideline recommendations. In addition to reviewing the evidence surrounding the use of natriuretic peptides to guide chronic heart failure therapy, this article gives an overview of the shortcomings of the trials, how the results may be interpreted and the future directions necessary to fill the current gaps in knowledge. Therapy guidance in chronic heart failure using other biomarkers has not been prospectively tested to date. Emerging biomarkers, such as galectin-3 and soluble ST2, might be useful in this regard, as suggested by several post-hoc analyses.

The prognostic value of plasma galectin-3 in chronic heart failure patients is maintained when treated with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists

OBJECTIVE

Galectin-3 (Gal-3) is considered as a myocardial fibrosis biomarker with prognostic value in heart failure (HF). Since aldosterone is a neurohormone with established fibrotic properties, we aimed to investigate if mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) would modulate the prognostic value of Gal-3.

METHODS

The IBLOMAVED cohort comprised 427 eligible chronic HF patients (CHF) with echocardiography and heart failure biomarkers assessments (BNP). After propensity score matching CHF patients for cardiovascular risk factors, to form balanced groups, Gal-3 levels were measured at baseline in plasma from patients treated with MRAs (MRA-Plus, n=101) or not (MRA-Neg, n=101). The primary end point was all-cause mortality with a follow-up of 3 years.

RESULTS

Gal-3 in plasma from these patients were similar with median values of 14.0 ng/mL [IQR, 9.9-19.3] and 14.4 ng/mL [IQR, 12.3-19.8] (P = 0.132) in MRA-Neg and MRA-Plus, respectively. Patients with Gal-3 ≤17.8 ng/mL had an HR of 1 (reference group) and 1.5 [0.4-5.7] in MRA-Neg and MRA-Plus, respectively (p=0.509). Patients with Gal-3 ≥ 17.8 ng/mL had an HR of 7.4 [2.2-24.6] and 9.0 [2.9-27.8] in MRA-Plus and MRA-Neg, respectively (p=0.539) and a median survival time of 2.4 years [95%CI,1.8-2.4]. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis confirmed that MRA and the interaction term between MRA treatment and Gal-3 >17.8 ng/mL were not factors associated with survival.

CONCLUSIONS

MRA treatment did not impair the prognostic value of Gal-3 assessed with a 17.8 ng/mL cut off. Gal-3 levels maintained its strong prognostic value in CHF also in patients treated with MRAs. The significance of the observed lack of an interaction between Gal-3 and treatment effect of MRAs remains to be elucidated.

Galectin-3 and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist use in patients with chronic heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Galectin-3 is a prognostic heart failure biomarker associated with aldosterone-induced myocardial fibrosis; mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) may reduce such fibrosis. We sought to examine outcomes of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) as a function of galectin-3 and MRA therapy.

METHODS

A total of 151 patients with chronic HFrEF were categorized by baseline galectin-3 and subsequent MRA therapy trends with regard to cardiovascular (CV) events, left ventricular remodeling, safety, and quality of life, over a mean of 10 months.

RESULTS

Although galectin-3 >20 ng/mL was associated with doubling in adjusted risk for CV events, regardless of MRA treatment, there was no difference in CV event rates with regard to MRA use patterns, independent of galectin-3 concentrations. Specifically, in patients with elevated galectin-3 treated with intensified MRA therapy, a significant difference was not detected in CV event rates (P = .79) or the cumulative number of such events (P = .76). Adjusted analysis revealed no difference in time to first CV event if MRA was added/intensified in those with elevated galectin-3 (hazard ratio 0.99, 95% CI 0.97-1.02, P = .74); similarly, cumulative MRA dose was not a specific predictor of benefit. In those with elevated galectin-3, MRA therapy did not affect left ventricular remodeling indices or quality of life at follow-up; these patients had the highest rates of treatment-related adverse events with intensified MRA use. Regardless of MRA use, elevated galectin-3 was associated with more significant renal dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with chronic HFrEF and elevated galectin-3 concentrations, we found no specific benefit from addition or intensification of MRA therapy.

Impact of worsening renal function related to medication in heart failure

AIMS

Renal failure is a major challenge in treating heart failure (HF) patients. HF medication may deteriorate renal function, but the impact thereof on outcome is unknown. We investigated the effects of HF medication on worsening renal function (WRF) and the relationship to outcome.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This post-hoc analysis of TIME-CHF (NT-proBNP-guided vs. symptom-guided management in chronic HF) included patients with LVEF ≤45% and ≥1 follow-up visit (n = 462). WRF III was defined as a rise in serum creatinine ≥0.5 mg/dL (i.e. 44.2 µmol/L) at any time during the first 6 months. Four classes of medication were considered: loop diuretics, beta-blockers, renin-angiotensin system (RAS)-blockers, and spironolactone. Functional principal component analysis of daily doses was used to comprehend medication over time. All-cause mortality after 18 months was the primary outcome. Interactions between WRF, medication, and outcome were tested. Patients with WRF III received on average higher loop diuretic doses (P = 0.0002) and more spironolactone (P = 0.02), whereas beta-blockers (P = 0.69) did not differ and lower doses of RAS-blockers were given (P = 0.09). There were significant interactions between WRF III, medicationn and outcome. Thus, WRF III was associated with poor prognosis if high loop diuretic doses were given (P = 0.001), but not with low doses (P = 0.29). The opposite was found for spironolactone (poor prognosis in the case of WRF III with no spironolactone, P <0.0001; but not with spironolactone, P = 0.31). Beta-blockers were protective in all patients (P <0.001), but most in those with WRF III (P <0.05 for interaction). RAS-blockade was associated with improved outcome (P = 0.006), irrespective of WRF III.

CONCLUSION

Based on this analysis, it may be hypothesized that high doses of loop diuretics might have detrimental effects, particularly in combination with significant WRF, whereas spironolactone and beta-blockers might be protective in patients with WRF.

Direct role for smooth muscle cell mineralocorticoid receptors in vascular remodeling: novel mechanisms and clinical implications

The mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) is a key regulator of blood pressure. MR antagonist drugs are used to treat hypertension and heart failure, resulting in decreased mortality by mechanisms that are not completely understood. In addition to the kidney, MR is also expressed in the smooth muscle cells (SMCs) of the vasculature, where it is activated by the hormone aldosterone and affects the expression of genes involved in vascular function at the cellular and systemic levels. Following vascular injury due to mechanical or physiological stresses, vessels undergo remodeling resulting in SMC hypertrophy, migration, and proliferation, as well as vessel fibrosis. Exuberant vascular remodeling is associated with poor outcomes in cardiovascular patients. This review compiles recent findings on the specific role of SMC-MR in the vascular remodeling process. The development and characterization of a SMC-specific MR-knockout mouse has demonstrated a direct role for SMC-MR in vascular remodeling. Additionally, several novel mechanisms contributing to SMC-MR-mediated vascular remodeling have been identified and are reviewed here, including Rho-kinase signaling, placental growth factor signaling through vascular endothelial growth factor type 1 receptor, and galectin signaling.