Echocardiographic Evaluation of Diastolic Function Is of Limited Value in the Diagnosis and Management of HFpEF

Heart Failure Preserved Ejection Fraction in Women: Insights Learned from Imaging

While the prevalence of heart failure, in general, is similar in men and women, women experience a higher rate of HFpEF compared to HFrEF. Cardiovascular risk factors, parity, estrogen levels, cardiac physiology, and altered response to the immune system may be at the root of this difference. Studies have found that in response to increasing age and hypertension, women experience more concentric left ventricle remodeling, more ventricular and arterial stiffness, and less ventricular dilation compared to men, which predisposes women to developing more diastolic dysfunction. A multi-modality imaging approach is recommended to identify patients with HFpEF. Particularly, appreciation of sex-based differences as described in this review is important in optimizing the evaluation and care of women with HFpEF.

Heart failure alters diagnostic yield for pulmonary embolism in patients undergoing computed tomography pulmonary angiogram

INTRODUCTION

There is limited evidence regarding the effects of a pre-existing heart failure (HF) on the diagnostic yield of pulmonary embolism (PE) evaluation in the Emergency Department (ED).

METHODS

Electronic medical record of consecutive adults who underwent a computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) in the ED at Loma Linda University Medical Center between June 1, 2019 and March 25, 2022 were reviewed. Repeat studies for the same patient and patients with unspecified HF diagnoses or isolated right ventricular HF were excluded. Key demographics, lab values and vital signs, relevant medications were collected. Primary outcome was the incidence of PE on CTPA compared between patients with and without pre-existing HF.

RESULTS

A total of 2846 patients were included in the study (602 patients with HF and 2244 without). In total cohort, 11.7% (n = 334) of patients had PE found on CTPA. The incidence of PE on CTPA was lower among patients with a history of HF than patients without a history of HF (12.5% vs 9%). A history of pre-existing HF was associated with a lower odds ratio for a positive PE study (OR 0.13, 95%CI: 0.03-0.57) in multivariable analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we observed that the incidence of PE among patients who undergo CTPA was lower among patients with pre-existing HF compared to those without. Further studies should determine if HF is an important mitigating factor when risk stratifying patients for PE.

Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction Screening by a Smartphone-Case Based on Single Lead ECG

Aims:

To investigate the potential of a signal processed by smartphone-case based on single lead electrocardiogram (ECG) for left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) determination as a screening method.

Methods and Results:

We included 446 subjects for sample learning and 259 patients for sample test aged 39 to 74 years for testing with 2D-echocardiography, tissue Doppler imaging and ECG using a smartphone-case based single lead ECG monitor for the assessment of LVDD. Spectral analysis of ECG signals (spECG) has been used in combination with advanced signal processing and artificial intelligence methods. Wavelengths slope, time intervals between waves, amplitudes at different points of the ECG complexes, energy of the ECG signal and asymmetry indices were analyzed. The QTc interval indicated significant diastolic dysfunction with a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 65%, a Tpeak parameter >590 ms with 63% and 58%, a T value off >695 ms with 63% and 74%, and QRSfi > 674 ms with 74% and 57%, respectively. A combination of the threshold values from all 4 parameters increased sensitivity to 86% and specificity to 70%, respectively (OR 11.7 [2.7-50.9], P < .001). Algorithm approbation have shown: Sensitivity—95.6%, Specificity—97.7%, Diagnostic accuracy—96.5% and Repeatability—98.8%.

Conclusion:

Our results indicate a great potential of a smartphone-case based on single lead ECG as novel screening tool for LVDD if spECG is used in combination with advanced signal processing and machine learning technologies.

Clinical implications of the universal definition for the prevention and treatment of heart failure

The diagnosis of heart failure (HF) primarily relies on signs and symptoms that are neither sensitive nor specific. This impedes timely diagnosis and delays effective therapies or interventions, despite the availability of several evidence-based treatments for HF. Through monumental collaborative efforts from representatives of HF societies worldwide, the universal definition of HF was published in 2021, to provide the necessary standardized framework required for clinical management, clinical trials, and research. This review elaborates the key concepts of the new universal definition of HF, highlighting the key merits and potential avenues, which can be nuanced further in future iterations. We also discuss the key implications of the universal definition document from the perspectives of various stakeholders within the healthcare framework, including patients, care providers, system/payers and policymakers.

The utility of growth differentiation factor-15, galectin-3, and sST2 as biomarkers for the diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and compared to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review

The objective was to evaluate the diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) using the biomarkers, growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), galectin-3 (Gal-3), and soluble ST2 (sST2), and to determine whether they can differentiate HFpEF from heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Medline and Embase databases were searched with the terms diastolic heart failure or HFpEF, biomarkers, and diagnosis, limited to years 2000 to 2019. There were significantly and consistently higher levels of GDF-15, Gal-3, and sST2 in HFpEF compared to no heart failure. Importantly, the magnitude of the increase in GDF-15 or Gal-3 and possibly sST2,correlated with a greater degree of diastolic dysfunction. There were no significant differences between GDF-15, Gal-3, and sST2 in patients with HFpEF vs HFrEF. In the studies assessing these three biomarkers, BNP was significantly greater in heart failure than controls. Furthermore, BNP was significantly higher in HFrEF compared to HFpEF. The diagnostic utility of GDF-15, Gal-3, and sST2 compared to BNP was evaluated by comparing ROC curves. The data supports the contention that to distinguish HFpEF from HFrEF, an index is needed that incorporates GDF-15, Gal-3, or sST2 as well as BNP. The three biomarkers GDF-15, Gal-3, or sST2 can identify patients with HFpEF compared to individuals without heart failure but cannot differentiate HFpEF from HFrEF. BNP is higher in and is better at differentiating HFrEF from HFpEF. Indices that incorporate GDF-15, Gal-3, or sST2 as well as BNP show promise in differentiating HFpEF from HFrEF.

Use of speckle tracking to assess heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) currently represents approximately 50% of heart failure (HF) cases in the USA and is increasingly recognized as a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Recent data suggest that the prevalence of HFpEF relative to HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is increasing at a rate of 1% per year. With an aging population and increasing risk factors such as hypertension, obesity, and diabetes mellitus, HFpEF will soon be the most prevalent HF phenotype. Two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) has been used to diagnose HFpEF specifically by focusing on the longitudinal systolic function of the left ventricle (LV). Yet there are many patients with HFpEF in whom there are no differences in LV global longitudinal systolic strain, but there are changes in left atrial function and structure. There are several proposed pathophysiological mechanisms for HFpEF such as endothelial dysfunction, interactions among proteins, signaling pathways, and myocardial bioenergetics. Yet only one specific therapy, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, spironolactone, is recommended as a treatment for patients with HFpEF. However, spironolactone does not address many of the pathophysiologic changes that occur in HFpEF, thus new novel therapeutic agents are needed. With the limited available therapies, clinicians should use STE to assess for the presence of this syndrome in their patients to provide effective diagnosis and management.