Effectiveness of the implementation of a simple radiation reduction protocol in the catheterization laboratory

Exploring the implementation of evidence-based optimisation strategies: A qualitative study of the experience of diagnostic radiographers

INTRODUCTION

Radiographers are responsible for ensuring safe and effective use of ionising radiation. Through evidence-based practice (EBP), valuable optimisation strategies can be implemented to fulfil these responsibilities. This study aimed to explore radiographers' attitudes, perceptions, and experience of using evidence-based optimisation strategies.

METHODS

A Grounded Theory approach using in-depth interviews. UK-based radiographers were recruited. Discussions focused on (1) the role of evidence-based optimisation strategies in daily practice, (2) assistance in implementing evidence-based optimisation strategies, and (3) the role of EBP and optimisation strategies in the future. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using open and axial coding.

RESULTS

Participants (n = 13) stated that EBP is not frequently used to implement optimisation strategies. Participants relied on the knowledge taught in education settings and their professional skills to optimise in daily practice, alongside departmental protocols. Barriers identified as affecting the implementation of optimisation strategies related to reluctance to change, a lack of support from superiors, and a lack of resources to engage with EBP. Some participants expected the use of optimisation strategies to become unnecessary due to technology advancements.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that effective operationalisation of EBP is not part of daily practice among radiographers to implement valuable optimisation strategies in daily practice.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The potential barriers to implementing evidence-based optimisation strategies highlighted in this study suggest that improving access to resources and empowerment of individual radiographers is required to enable radiographers to implement optimisation strategies.

Radiation doses during cardiac catheterisation procedures in India: a multicentre study: Radiation dose study

AIMS

Established, evidence-based measures of radiation are required to minimise its hazards, while maintaining adequate image quality. The aim of this study is to evaluate radiation data and generate reference radiation levels for commonly performed coronary catheterisation procedures in India.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this prospective, observational study, all procedures were performed in accordance with the established standards using Innova IGS 520/2100-IQ catheterisation laboratories. Demographic, procedural and radiation data were collected. Dose reference limits (DRL) were established as the 75th percentile of the total distribution. There were 2,906 coronary angiograms (CAG), 750 percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and 715 CAG+PCI. DRLs for dose area product were: 19.6 Gy·cm2 for CAG, 49.8 Gy·cm2 for PCI and 72.0 Gy·cm2 for CAG+PCI, respectively. Median cumulative air kerma levels were: 185 mGy for CAG, 533mGy for PCI, and 891 mGy for CAG+PCI. Male gender, higher BMI, combining CAG+PCI, fluoroscopy time, number of cine frames, and image acquisition settings were significant contributors to increased radiation dose.

CONCLUSIONS

This study established reference radiation dose levels for diagnostic and interventional coronary procedures in India, which were comparable to and in the lower range of international standards.

PATIENT DOSIMETRY DURING INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC PROCEDURES IN A DEDICATED CATHETERIZATION LABORATORY

Cardiac interventions often result in high radiation dose to patient's skin, so a reliable indicator in terms of a commonly used dose descriptor is required to monitor skin exposures. In the present study, Gafchromic XR-RV3 film was used to measure the peak skin dose (PSD) during 40 coronary angiography (CA) and 50 percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) procedures. Corresponding values of kerma-area product (PKA), fluoroscopy time (FT) and reference air-kerma (Ka,r) were recorded and correlated with PSD. Doses to patient's eyes and thyroid were also measured by using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) during PTCA procedures. The average dose to thyroid was about six times higher than the average dose to eyes. The mean values of PSD, PKA and FT were 1140 mGy, 97 Gy cm2 and 15.7 min for PTCA and 290 mGy, 21.1 Gy cm2 and 2.4 min for CA procedures, respectively. One in seven patients of PTCA procedure received PSD >2 Gy. With respect to FT, PKA may be used as a better predictor of skin exposures because the correlation of PSD with PKA was found better than with FT for both CA and PTCA procedures.