Reducing fluoroscopic and cineangiographic contribution to radiation exposure for chronic total coronary occlusion interventions

How to Improve Radiation Protection in Interventional Cardiology Procedures

The use of ionizing radiation during cardiac catheterization procedures poses risks to patients and medical staff, both directly and indirectly through orthopedic injuries caused by lead aprons. In this review, we summarize recent advances in radiation protection in the cardiac catheterization laboratory and discuss the effectiveness of traditional and novel radiation protection strategies and equipment.

Improvement of Radiation Management in Percutaneous Interventions of Chronic Total Occlusions in a Multicenter Registry

BACKGROUND

Excess radiation exposure is a limiting factor in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total coronary occlusion (CTO).

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to analyze changes in radiation dose for CTO PCI with increasing risk awareness during the past decade and the determinants of these changes.

METHODS

A total of 16,439 procedures performed by 14 operators continuously participating in the European Registry of CTO-PCI from 2012 to 2023 were analyzed. Changes in air kerma (AK) were assessed, and a dose rate index (DRI) was calculated as AK per fluoroscopy time (FT).

RESULTS

Lesion complexity increased from a median J-CTO (Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan) score of 2 (Q1-Q3: 1-3) to 3 (Q1-Q3: 2-3) (P < 0.001), and technical success improved from 89.1% to 94.9% (P < 0.001), with stable FT. AK decreased from 2.50 Gy (Q1-Q3: 1.54-4.04 Gy) to 1.20 Gy (Q1-Q3: 0.66-2.12 Gy), a reduction of 52.0% (P < 0.001). Excess radiation of AK >5 Gy was reduced from 15.8% in 2012-2013 to 3.7% in 2022-2023. Clinical determinants of excess radiation were body mass index, gender, and previous bypass surgery; procedural determinants were FT, retrograde approach, and intravascular ultrasound use; and equipment determinants were radiographic equipment updates and fluoroscopy dose mode. Operators reduced DRI by 21.7% from 62.6 mGy/min (Q1-Q3: 44.7-89.3 mGy/min) to 49.0 mGy/min (Q1-Q3: 35.4-71.2 mGy/min) before a radiographic equipment update; after the update, DRI was further reduced to 31.5 mGy/min (Q1-Q3: 22.0-45.6 mGy/min), a decrease of 28.0% (P < 0.001) The interoperator comparison of DRI indicated considerable variability in radiation management.

CONCLUSIONS

AK for CTO PCI was reduced during the past decade to a level such that most procedures no longer must be aborted because of excess radiation. Equipment updates were instrumental, but interoperator differences remained.

Predictors and trends of contrast use and radiation exposure in a large cohort of patients treated with percutaneous coronary interventions: Chronic total occlusion analysis based on a national registry

BACKGROUND

The aim herein, was to assess predictors and current trends of radiation exposure and total contrast amount use in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention within chronic total occlusion (CTO PCI) and non-CTO PCI.

METHODS

Based on a nationwide registry (ORPKI), 535,857 patients treated with PCI between 2014 and 2018 were analysed. The study included 12,572 (2.34%) patients treated with CTO PCI. The CTO PCI and non-CTO PCI groups were compared before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Multifactorial mixed regression models were used to assess predictors of contrast amount use and radiation exposure.

RESULTS

The mean total contrast dose and radiation exposure decrease reached statistical significance in following years for the CTO PCI (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001) and non-CTO PCI groups (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). Multifactorial analysis revealed that non-CTO PCI was a strong independent predictor of lower total contrast dose (estimate: -17.41; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -18.45 to -16.49, p < 0.001) and radiation exposure (estimate: -264.28; 95% CI: -273.75 to -254.81, p < 0.001). After PSM, it was confirmed that CTO PCI was an independent predictor of greater radiation exposure (estimate: 328.6; 95% CI: 289.1-368.1; p < 0.001) and total contrast dose (estimate: 30.5; 95% CI: 27.28-33.74; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Contrast dose and radiation exposure have decreased in previous years with regard to the CTO PCI and non-CTO PCI groups. CTO PCI was found to be an independent predictor of greater total contrast dose and radiation exposure in the overall group of patients treated with PCI.