The right blood collection tube for therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicology screening procedures: Standard tubes, gel or mechanical separator?

Role of therapeutic drug monitoring in the treatment of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis

Tuberculosis (TB) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide, and resistance to anti-tuberculosis drugs is a challenge to effective treatment. Multi-drug resistant TB (MDR-TB) can be difficult to treat, requiring long durations of therapy and the use of second line drugs, increasing a patient's risk for toxicities and treatment failure. Given the challenges treating MDR-TB, clinicians can improve the likelihood of successful outcomes by utilizing therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). TDM is a clinical technique that utilizes measured drug concentrations from the patient to adjust therapy, increasing likelihood of therapeutic drug concentrations while minimizing the risk of toxic drug concentrations. This review paper provides an overview of the TDM process, pharmacokinetic parameters for MDR-TB drugs, and recommendations for dose adjustments following TDM.

Alzheimer blood biomarkers: practical guidelines for study design, sample collection, processing, biobanking, measurement and result reporting

Alzheimer's disease (AD), the most common form of dementia, remains challenging to understand and treat despite decades of research and clinical investigation. This might be partly due to a lack of widely available and cost-effective modalities for diagnosis and prognosis. Recently, the blood-based AD biomarker field has seen significant progress driven by technological advances, mainly improved analytical sensitivity and precision of the assays and measurement platforms. Several blood-based biomarkers have shown high potential for accurately detecting AD pathophysiology. As a result, there has been considerable interest in applying these biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis, as surrogate metrics to investigate the impact of various covariates on AD pathophysiology and to accelerate AD therapeutic trials and monitor treatment effects. However, the lack of standardization of how blood samples and collected, processed, stored analyzed and reported can affect the reproducibility of these biomarker measurements, potentially hindering progress toward their widespread use in clinical and research settings. To help address these issues, we provide fundamental guidelines developed according to recent research findings on the impact of sample handling on blood biomarker measurements. These guidelines cover important considerations including study design, blood collection, blood processing, biobanking, biomarker measurement, and result reporting. Furthermore, the proposed guidelines include best practices for appropriate blood handling procedures for genetic and ribonucleic acid analyses. While we focus on the key blood-based AD biomarkers for the AT(N) criteria (e.g., amyloid-beta [Aβ]40, Aβ42, Aβ42/40 ratio, total-tau, phosphorylated-tau, neurofilament light chain, brain-derived tau and glial fibrillary acidic protein), we anticipate that these guidelines will generally be applicable to other types of blood biomarkers. We also anticipate that these guidelines will assist investigators in planning and executing biomarker research, enabling harmonization of sample handling to improve comparability across studies.

Behind the Curtain: Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Psychotropic Drugs from a Laboratory Analytical Perspective

PURPOSE

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a well-established tool for guiding psychopharmacotherapy and improving patient care. Despite their established roles in the prescription of psychotropic drugs, the "behind the curtain" processes of TDM requests are invariably obscure to clinicians, and literature addressing this topic is scarce.

METHODS

In the present narrative review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the various steps, starting from requesting TDM to interpreting TDM findings, in routine clinical practice. Our goal was to improve clinicians' insights into the numerous factors that may explain the variations in TDM findings due to methodological issues.

RESULTS

We discussed challenges throughout the TDM process, starting from the analyte and its major variation forms, through sampling procedures and pre-analytical conditions, time of blood sampling, sample matrices, and collection tubes, to analytical methods, their advantages and shortcomings, and the applied quality procedures. Additionally, we critically reviewed the current and future advances in the TDM of psychotropic drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

The "behind the curtain" processes enabling TDM involve a multidisciplinary team, which faces numerous challenges in clinical routine. A better understanding of these processes will allow clinicians to join the efforts for achieving higher-quality TDM findings, which will in turn improve treatment effectiveness and safety outcomes of psychotropic agents.

Blood alcohol concentration in the clinical laboratory: a narrative review of the preanalytical phase in diagnostic and forensic testing

The analysis of blood alcohol concentration (BAC), a pivotal toxicological test, concerns acute alcohol intoxication (AAI) and driving under the influence (DUI). As such, BAC presents an organizational challenge for clinical laboratories, with unique complexities due to the need for forensic defensibility as part of the diagnostic process. Unfortunately, a significant number of scientific investigations dealing with the subject present discrepancies that make it difficult to identify optimal practices in sample collection, transportation, handling, and preparation. This review provides a systematic analysis of the preanalytical phase of BAC that aims to identify and explain the chemical, physiological, and pharmacological mechanisms underlying controllable operational factors. Nevertheless, it seeks evidence for the necessity to separate preanalytical processes for diagnostic and forensic BAC testing. In this regard, the main finding of this review is that no literature evidence supports the necessity to differentiate preanalytical procedures for AAI and DUI, except for the traceability throughout the chain of custody. In fact, adhering to correct preanalytical procedures provided by official bodies such as European federation of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine for routine phlebotomy ensures both diagnostic accuracy and forensic defensibility of BAC. This is shown to depend on the capability of modern pre-evacuated sterile collection tubes to control major factors influencing BAC, namely non-enzymatic oxidation and microbial contamination. While certain restrictions become obsolete with such devices, as the use of sodium fluoride (NaF) for specific preservation of forensic BAC, this review reinforces the recommendation to use non-alcoholic disinfectants as a means to achieve "error-proof" procedures in challenging operational environments like the emergency department.

Overdose of the HIV Medicine Genvoya® in Two Auto-Intoxications

Toxicological data on overdose with human immunodeficiency virus inhibitors are scarce. We present a case report of two independent suicide attempts by self-administered overdose with the same antiretroviral medicine Genvoya® (emtricitabine/elvitegravir/tenofovir alafenamide/cobicistat). Both patients were admitted to the hospital and presented with a loss of consciousness, lactic acidosis, elevated hepatic transaminase levels and hemodynamic instability. While one patient survived with advanced supportive measures, the other passed away. Emtricitabine levels were measured in vivo in various consecutive serum samples and postmortem urine, peripheral and cardiac serum samples and confirmed excessive use in both cases. This is the first time that emtricitabine levels following overdose are reported. Although measured concentrations for emtricitabine were quite similar in these cases, metabolic acidosis was more pronounced in the fatal case. The difference in outcomes between the two could be due to a difference in physiological status, susceptibility to accumulation and adverse effects, and perhaps a varying interval between ingestion and the start of supportive measures.

Adsorption of Therapeutic and Recreational Drugs During Prolonged Storage of Plasma Samples in Gel Separator Tubes

Hospital samples collected in gel separator tubes are often submitted to forensic toxicology laboratories for analysis in impaired driving and death investigations. Drug adsorption to the gel separator material may lead to underestimation of the drug concentration present at the time of sample collection, potentially affecting the interpretation of analytical results. Using liquid chromatography--tandem mass spectrometry (LC--MS-MS), decreases in plasma concentration of 53 drugs and metabolites relevant to forensic toxicology casework were investigated in samples stored in BD Vacutainer® PSTTM tubes for up to 3 months. After storage for only 1 day, approximately 50% of the drugs and metabolites had significantly lower concentrations in plasma separation tubes (PSTs) compared to non-gel tubes (up to 27% lower). After storage for 3 months, approximately 75% of the drugs and metabolites had significantly lower concentrations in PSTs compared to non-gel tubes (up to 69% lower). Fentanyl, carfentanil, ketamine, diphenhydramine and several antidepressants were among the drugs most susceptible to adsorption. Central nervous system stimulants (e.g., methamphetamine and amphetamine) as well as naturally-occurring and semi-synthetic opioids (e.g., morphine, hydromorphone and oxycodone) were among the drugs least susceptible to adsorption and displayed only minimal relative decreases in concentration (if any) over the 3-month sample storage period. The potential for decreases in drug concentration due to adsorption of drugs to the gel material should be considered for toxicological interpretation based on the analysis of a sample collected in a gel separator tube.

Defective determination of synthetic cathinones in blood for forensic investigation

Antemortem specimens are sometimes the sole sources available for forensic investigation, and samples collected in nonideal ways are inevitably employed to achieve toxicological analysis. It is essential to assess the effects of blood collection tubes on the recoveries of emerging synthetic cathinones (SC) to estimate actual drug concentrations, and no such systematic investigations have been previously carried out. Seventy-one SC with various LogP values were employed to examine commonly used blood collection tubes, including plasma tubes, serum tubes and gel-containing tubes in recoveries which determined by a reliable LC-MS/MS method. Significantly poor recoveries for hydrophobic SC were obtained using serum separating tubes (SST). Notably, the suppressed recoveries in SST can be reversed by adding anticoagulants. Adding a procoagulant to a plasma separating tube (PST) considerably reduced recoveries, which indicated that clotting processes in the presence of polymeric gels contributed to poor recoveries of these hydrophobic drugs. In this study, we find that clotting formation in the presence of polymeric gels could significantly affect the determination of hydrophobic drugs. However, in real-world scenarios, nonideal collection methods are inevitably employed for antemortem specimens. Thus, it is important to rigorously interpret forensic toxicological results, especially for susceptible species.

Evaluation of Serum and Rapid Serum Separator Collection Tubes for Therapeutic Drug Assays

Appropriate specimen collection and storage is essential to preserve sample integrity and ensure accurate test results. The default collection containers for blood drug concentrations are tubes without gel separators to avoid possible drug adsorption. However, routine chemistry tests are generally collected in gel separator tubes due to their convenient transport and processing; collection of an additional gel-free tube is often required for drug measurements. Citrated whole blood was pooled, spiked with drug, and transferred to three tubes (red, SST gold, RST orange) containing calcium chloride. Blood was allowed to clot, centrifuged and stored at ambient temperature (24 h) or refrigerated (7 days). At defined times, serum drug concentrations were determined (Roche cobas c502). Based on these results, specimen collection requirements were updated to allow serum separator tubes for 17 assays. Of the 21 assays evaluated, 18 displayed acceptable stability in both gel-containing tubes (acetaminophen, amikacin, carbamazepine, digoxin, ethanol, gentamicin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, lithium, methotrexate, phenobarbital, phenytoin, salicylate, theophylline, tobramycin, valproic acid, vancomycin, voriconazole). Three drugs displayed strong decreases in measured concentrations after storage in one or both gel-containing tubes (total tricyclics, lidocaine, and free phenytoin). Following adoption of gel-containing tubes, 94% of the five most frequently ordered drug monitoring tests in the Emergency Department were collected in serum separator tubes. Evaluation of the stability and accuracy of commonly monitored drugs revealed that the majority were not affected by exposure to gel separator material under conditions similar to outpatient clinic storage, courier transport and laboratory storage. Expanding the collection requirements for appropriate drugs to include gel separator tubes decreases the number of specimens drawn and the complexity of laboratory workflows.

Stability of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Antiarrhythmic Drugs in Serum Collected in Standard (Nongel) Serum Tubes Versus Tubes Containing Gel Separators

BACKGROUND

Separation gels are often used in collection tubes, but adsorption of drugs onto the gel may cause falsely low concentrations in therapeutic drug monitoring. In this study, the stability of apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, flecainide, amiodarone, and desethylamiodarone was assessed in tubes, with and without gel separators.

METHODS

Drug-free blood was spiked and stored for up to 7 days in nongel tubes and gel tubes from 2 manufacturers (Vacuette and Vacutainer). The samples were analyzed in triplicates using ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

At ambient temperature conditions, the serum concentrations of apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban in a tube with acrylic-based gel had already decreased at baseline, whereas it took 6 hours to observe the same result in a tube with olefin-based gel. At 4°C, the reduction in serum concentration was considerably slower. For flecainide, the gel tube concentrations were stable at ambient temperature for 3 days, but decreased after 7 days in acrylic-based gel tubes. Amiodarone and desethylamiodarone stored in gel tubes at 4°C showed decrease in concentrations after 24 hours and 6 hours, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Acrylic-based gel tubes should not be used for any of the tested drugs. Although olefin-based gel tubes may be used for anticoagulants and flecainide, it is advisable to prefer nongel tubes as a general precaution.

Evaluation of BD Barricor™ and PST™ blood collection tubes compared to serum for testing 11 therapeutic drugs on a Roche Cobas® 8000 platform

INTRODUCTION

The type of blood collection tube used when obtaining samples for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has important implications on the accuracy of results. Serum tubes without a gel separator are currently considered best practice. We sought to evaluate the performance of Barricor™, a novel plasma tube that utilizes an inert mechanical separator, as well as a gel-based tube (PST™) for testing acetaminophen, digoxin, gentamicin, methotrexate, phenobarbital, phenytoin, salicylate, vancomycin, valproic acid, carbamazepine, and theophylline on a Roche Cobas® 8000 platform.

METHODS

Paired patient samples were collected from individuals taking at least one of the medications evaluated. These were supplemented with spiked specimens to ensure a minimum of 40 paired samples per drug. All drugs were measured within two hours of collection on Roche e602 or c502 instruments. Deming regression was used to assess bias between Barricor™ vs serum and PST™ vs serum. Seven-day refrigerated stability was also assessed in Barricor™, PST™, and serum tubes in a subset of samples (n = 10) for each drug.

RESULTS

Drug concentrations in Barricor™ were similar to serum for each drug assessed. In contrast, a negative bias was observed in PST™ compared to serum tubes for carbamazepine (-7.6%) and phenytoin (-6.8%) although this did not surpass our total allowable error goal of 10%. All drugs recovered within ±10% of baseline value when samples were stored refrigerated for 7 days except for carbamazepine, phenytoin, and phenobarbital where significant analyte loss was observed within the first day in PST™ tubes.

CONCLUSION

Barricor™ tubes are a suitable alternative to serum for TDM on the Roche Cobas® 8000 platform.

Review of the Preanalytical Errors That Impact Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

PURPOSE

Preanalytical errors comprise the majority of testing errors experienced by clinical laboratories and significantly impact the accuracy of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM).

METHODS

Specific preanalytical factors in sample timing, collection, transport, processing, and storage that lead to errors in TDM were reviewed. We performed a literature search using several scientific databases including PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, and ResearchGate for human studies published in the English language from January 1980 to February 2021, reporting on TDM and the preanalytical phase.

RESULTS

Blood collection errors (ie, wrong anticoagulant/clot activator used, via an intravenous line, incorrect time after dosing) delay testing, cause inaccurate results, and adversely impact patient care. Blood collected in lithium heparin tubes instead of heparin sodium tubes produce supertoxic lithium concentrations, which can compromise care. Specimens collected in serum separator gel tubes cause falsely decreased concentrations due to passive absorption into the gel when samples are not processed and analyzed quickly. Dried blood spots are popular for TDM as they are minimally invasive, allowing for self-sampling and direct shipping to a clinical laboratory using regular mail. However, blood collection techniques, such as trauma to the collection site, filter paper fragility, and hematocrit (Hct) bias, can adversely affect the accuracy of the results. Volumetric absorptive microsampling is a potential alternative to dried blood spot that offers fast, volume-fixed sampling, low pain tolerance, and is not susceptible to Hct concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

The identification of preanalytical factors that may negatively impact TDM is critical. Developing workflows that can standardize TDM practices, align appropriate timing and blood collection techniques, and specimen processing will eliminate errors.

Implementation of a Dual-Column Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass-Spectrometry Method for the Quantification of Isavuconazole in Clinical Practice

Objectives  Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of isavuconazole, which is a novel broad-spectrum antimycoticum against invasive fungal infections, ensures an effective exposure of the drug and minimizes the risk of toxicity. This study is aimed at evaluating the analytical performance of a dual-column liquid chromatography-tandem mass-spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for isavuconazole quantification.

Materials and Methods  The method was performed on a Voyager TSQ Quantum triple quadrupole instrument equipped with an Ultimate 3000 chromatography system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, California, United States). Analytical and preanalytical requirements of the isavuconazole LC-MS/MS method were evaluated. Sample stability measurements were performed at room temperature (RT) and in serum tubes with separator gel.

Results  The isavuconazole LC-MS/MS method was linear over the concentration range of 0.2 to 12.8 mg/L. The coefficient of determination ( r² ) always exceeded 0.999. Within- and between-run precision ranged between 1.4 to 2.9% and 1.5 to 3.0%, the recovery between 93.9 and 102.7%. At RT, serum samples were stable for 3 days. Isavuconazole serum concentrations were significantly lower after incubation (18 hours) in serum tubes with separator gel at RT.

Conclusion  The dual-column isavuconazole LC-MS/MS is a reliable tool for the TDM of isavuconazole. Serum samples are stable for at least 3 days and should be collected in tubes without separator gel.

Improved Sample Quality and Decreased Turnaround Time When Using Plasma Blood Collection Tubes with a Mechanical Separator in a Large University Hospital

BACKGROUND

Serum is commonly used for clinical chemistry testing but many conditions can affect the clotting process, leading to poor sample quality and impaired workflow. With serum gel tubes, we found a high proportion of sample probe aspiration errors on our Beckman AU5800 analyzers. We decided to implement the BD Barricor™ plasma tubes, and we validated an off-specification centrifugation scheme and verified that results obtained for 65 chemistry and immunochemistry tests were comparable to those obtained in serum gel tubes. Finally, we evaluated the impact of this new tube on sample error rate and laboratory turnaround time.

METHODS

To validate centrifugation settings, 50 paired samples were collected in Barricor tubes and centrifuged at 1912 × g for 10 min or 5 min (off-specification). To compare serum gel tubes with Barricor plasma tubes, 119 paired samples were collected from volunteers and results were analyzed using weighed Deming regression. Finally, the proportion of aspiration errors and laboratory TAT for potassium were measured before and after implementing Barricor tubes.

RESULTS

Barricor tubes showed clinically acceptable equivalence to serum gel tubes for the studied analytes, and the off-specification centrifugation scheme did not affect the results. Implementing Barricor tubes improved the laboratory workflow by decreasing the aspiration error rates (2.01% to 0.77%, P < 0.001) and lowering hemolysis (P < 0.001). The laboratory TAT for potassium were also significantly lowered (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Use of Barricor tubes instead of serum gel tubes leads to better sample quality, shorter more reproducible laboratory TAT, and decreases costs associated with error management.

Paroxetine-Overview of the Molecular Mechanisms of Action

In the 21st century and especially during a pandemic, the diagnosis and treatment of depression is an essential part of the daily practice of many family doctors. It mainly affects patients in the age category 15–44 years, regardless of gender. Anxiety disorders are often diagnosed in children and adolescents. Social phobias can account for up to 13% of these diagnoses. Social anxiety manifests itself in fear of negative social assessment and humiliation, which disrupts the quality of social functioning. Treatment of the above-mentioned disorders is based on psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy. Serious side effects or mortality from antidepressant drug overdose are currently rare. Recent studies indicate that paroxetine (ATC code: N06AB), belonging to the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, has promising therapeutic effects and is used off-label in children and adolescents. The purpose of this review is to describe the interaction of paroxetine with several molecular targets in various points of view including the basic chemical and pharmaceutical properties. The central point of the review is focused on the pharmacodynamic analysis based on the molecular mechanism of binding paroxetine to various therapeutic targets.

Efficacy of a ciprofloxacin/amikacin combination against planktonic and biofilm cultures of susceptible and low-level resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

BACKGROUND

Eradicating bacterial biofilm without mechanical dispersion remains a challenge. Combination therapy has been suggested as a suitable strategy to eradicate biofilm.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of a ciprofloxacin/amikacin combination in a model of in vitro Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm.

METHODS

The antibacterial activity of ciprofloxacin and amikacin (alone, in combination and successively) was evaluated by planktonic and biofilm time-kill assays against five P. aeruginosa strains: PAO1, a WT clinical strain and three clinical strains overexpressing the efflux pumps MexAB-OprM (AB), MexXY-OprM (XY) and MexCD-OprJ (CD), respectively. Amikacin MIC was 16 mg/L for XY and ciprofloxacin MIC was 0.5 mg/L for CD. The other strains were fully susceptible to ciprofloxacin and amikacin. The numbers of total and resistant cells were determined.

RESULTS

In planktonic cultures, regrowth of high-level resistant mutants was observed when CD was exposed to ciprofloxacin alone and XY to amikacin alone. Eradication was obtained with ciprofloxacin or amikacin in the other strains, or with the combination in XY and CD strains. In biofilm, bactericidal reduction after 8 h followed by a mean 4 log10 cfu/mL plateau in all strains and for all regimens was noticed. No regrowth of resistant mutants was observed whatever the antibiotic regimen. The bacterial reduction obtained with a second antibiotic used simultaneously or consecutively was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The ciprofloxacin/amikacin combination prevented the emergence of resistant mutants in low-level resistant strains in planktonic cultures. Biofilm persister cells were not eradicated, either with monotherapy or with the combination.

Comparison of Three Blood Collection Tubes for 35 Biochemical Analytes: The Becton Dickinson Barricor Tube, Serum Separating Tube, and Plasma Separating Tube

The Barricor tube (Becton Dickinson [BD], Sunnyvale, CA, USA) was recently developed to mechanically separate plasma by increasing the centrifugation rate. We compared the Barricor tube with existing serum- and plasma-based tubes based on 35 biochemical analytes and preanalytical turnaround time (TAT). Blood samples were collected from 30 healthy volunteers in a Barricor tube, serum separating tube (SST, Vacutainer SST II Tube 8.5 mL, #368972; BD), or plasma separating tube (PST, Vacutainer PST Tube 8.0 mL, #367964; BD) in random order. Next, 27 chemistry analytes, six immunochemistry analytes, and two cardiac markers were compared using Passing-Bablok regression and the Bland-Altman method. Preanalytical TAT was measured for each tube.

The Barricor tube exhibited bias exceeding the desirable limit for nine and four analytes compared with the SST and PST, respectively. The Barricor tube lactate dehydrogenase value showed a bias of −10.29% and −9.86% compared with that of the SST and PST, respectively. The preanalytical TAT of Barricor tube was 8.8 minutes, which was the shortest among the three tubes. The clinical performance of the Barricor tube was equivalent to that of the SST and PST for most analytes, with an apparent advantage in preanalytical TAT. When using the Barricor tube, the reference range needs to be changed for some analytes that exceed the desirable bias limit.

Switching from serum to plasma: Implementation of BD Vacutainer® Barricor™ Plasma Blood Collection Tubes improves sample quality and laboratory turnaround time

BACKGROUND

For blood, most 24/7 standard (immuno)chemistry parameters are either measured in serum or in lithium heparin plasma. Standard serum and plasma gel tubes have their shortcomings when timely analysis of high quality results is required. Serum requires clotting time and interference of gel globules in the plasma and adsorption of hydrophobic analytes into the gel layer potentially compromises high quality results from lithium heparin gel tubes. We sought to evaluate the impact of BD Vacutainer® Barricor™ Tube (Barricor™) on laboratory efficiency by measuring its effect on TAT and sample quality, as well as evaluate potential cost opportunities resulting from improved sample quality.

METHODS

TAT data and remediation activities were extracted and captured during two 6 months phases. Serum was used as the predominant matrix in the first phase and Barricor™ plasma was used in the second phase.

RESULTS

Barricor™ significantly reduced the median TAT, especially for routine-priority samples during peak-hours. The TAT key-performance-indicator (percentage of results available within 90 ​min) improved to >90% for STAT as well as routine priority samples. Converting from serum gel, Barricor™ reduced fibrin-related remediation activities from 2.3% to 0.4%. This resulted in remediation-related cost reduction of €6.010,47 over the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

By implementing Barricor™, we saw a significant reduction in TAT and a reduction in fibrin-related remediation time and costs, when compared to a predominant serum workflow. The improved TAT opens up the possibility of consolidating to one single priority level, eliminating the need for the use of the STAT priority level.