1
|
Agnello L, Gambino CM, Del Ben F, Ciaccio AM, Scazzone C, Lo Sasso B, Ciaccio M. Comparison of a Fully Automated Platform and an Established ELISA for the Quantification of Neurofilament Light Chain in Patients With Cognitive Decline. J Appl Lab Med 2024; 9:990-1003. [PMID: 39311040 DOI: 10.1093/jalm/jfae099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 11/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is the most-used method for neurofilament light chain (NfL) quantification in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Recently, fully automated immunoassays for NfL measurement in CSF and blood have allowed high reproducibility among laboratories, making NfLs suitable for routine use in clinical practice. In this study, we compared the Uman Diagnostics NF-light ELISA with the fully automated platform Lumipulse. METHODS We enrolled 60 patients with cognitive decline, including Alzheimer disease (AD). CSF NfL levels were measured by a NF-light ELISA kit (UmanDiagnostics), and chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) on the Lumipulse G1200 platform (Fujirebio Diagnostics). Serum NfLs levels were measured by CLEIA on the Lumipulse G1200. RESULTS We found a significant, very strong correlation [Spearman rho = 0.94 (0.90-0.96)] between CLEIA and ELISA in CSF, and a significant moderate correlation between CSF and serum with both analytical methods [CLEIA vs serum CLEIA 0.41 (0.16-0.61); ELISA vs serum CLEIA 0.40 (0.15-0.60)]. It is worth noting that CSF CLEIA measurements were approximately 136.12 times higher than the serum measurements. CONCLUSIONS Our findings show a robust correlation between ELISA Uman Diagnostic and the standardized Lumipulse G1200 platform for CSF NfL measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luisa Agnello
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences, and Advanced Diagnostics, Institute of Clinical Biochemistry, Clinical Molecular Medicine, and Clinical Laboratory Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Caterina Maria Gambino
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences, and Advanced Diagnostics, Institute of Clinical Biochemistry, Clinical Molecular Medicine, and Clinical Laboratory Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital "P. Giaccone," Palermo, Italy
| | - Fabio Del Ben
- Immunopathology and Cancer Biomarkers, Department of cancer research and advanced diagnostics, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Anna Maria Ciaccio
- Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties "G. D'Alessandro," Department of Health Promotion, Maternal and Infant Care, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Concetta Scazzone
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences, and Advanced Diagnostics, Institute of Clinical Biochemistry, Clinical Molecular Medicine, and Clinical Laboratory Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Bruna Lo Sasso
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences, and Advanced Diagnostics, Institute of Clinical Biochemistry, Clinical Molecular Medicine, and Clinical Laboratory Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital "P. Giaccone," Palermo, Italy
| | - Marcello Ciaccio
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences, and Advanced Diagnostics, Institute of Clinical Biochemistry, Clinical Molecular Medicine, and Clinical Laboratory Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital "P. Giaccone," Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kurihara M, Kondo S, Ohse K, Nojima H, Kikkawa-Saito E, Iwata A. Relationship Between Cerebrospinal Fluid Alzheimer's Disease Biomarker Values Measured via Lumipulse Assays and Conventional ELISA: Single-Center Experience and Systematic Review. J Alzheimers Dis 2024; 99:1077-1092. [PMID: 38759016 PMCID: PMC11191528 DOI: 10.3233/jad-240185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024]
Abstract
Background Although Lumipulse assays and conventional ELISA are strongly correlated, the precise relationship between their measured values remains undetermined. Objective To determine the relationship between Lumipulse and ELISA measurement values. Methods Patients who underwent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker measurements and consented to biobanking between December 2021 and June 2023 were included. The relationship between values measured via Lumipulse assays and conventional ELISA were evaluated by Passing-Bablok analyses for amyloid-β 1-42 (Aβ42), total tau (t-tau), and phospho-tau 181 (p-tau 181). Studies using both assays were systematically searched for in PubMed and summarized after quality assessment. Results Regression line slopes and intercepts were 1.41 (1.23 to 1.60) and -77.8 (-198.4 to 44.5) for Aβ42, 0.94 (0.88 to 1.01) and 98.2 (76.9 to 114.4) for t-tau, and 1.60 (1.43 to 1.75) and -21.1 (-26.9 to -15.6) for p-tau181. Spearman's correlation coefficients were 0.90, 0.95, and 0.95 for Aβ42, t-tau, and p-tau181, respectively. We identified 13 other studies that included 2,117 patients in total. Aβ42 slope varied among studies, suggesting inter-lab difference of ELISA. The slope and intercept of t-tau were approximately 1 and 0, respectively, suggesting small proportional and systematic differences. Conversely, the p-tau181 slope was significantly higher than 1, distributed between 1.5-2 in most studies, with intercepts significantly lower than 0, suggesting proportional and systematic differences. Conclusions We characterized different relationship between measurement values for each biomarker, which may be useful for understanding the differences in CSF biomarker measurement values on different platforms and for future global harmonization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masanori Kurihara
- Department of Neurology, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan
- Integrated Research Initiative for Living Well with Dementia, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Soichiro Kondo
- Department of Neurology, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kensuke Ohse
- Integrated Research Initiative for Living Well with Dementia, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | - Atsushi Iwata
- Department of Neurology, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan
- Integrated Research Initiative for Living Well with Dementia, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dallari C, Lenci E, Trabocchi A, Bessi V, Bagnoli S, Nacmias B, Credi C, Pavone FS. Multilayered Bioorthogonal SERS Nanoprobes Selectively Aggregating in Human Fluids: A Smart Optical Assay for β-Amyloid Peptide Quantification. ACS Sens 2023; 8:3693-3700. [PMID: 37758234 PMCID: PMC10616841 DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.3c00225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023]
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a debilitating neurological condition characterized by cognitive decline, memory loss, and behavioral skill impairment, features that worsen with time. Early diagnosis will likely be the most effective therapy for Alzheimer's disease since it can ensure timely pharmacological treatments that can reduce the irreversible progression and delay the symptoms. Amyloid β-peptide 1-42 (Aβ (1-42)) is considered one of the key pathological AD biomarkers that is present in different biological fluids. However, Aβ (1-42) detection still relies on colorimetric and enzyme-linked immunoassays as the gold standard characterized by low accuracy or high costs, respectively. In this context, optical detection techniques based on surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) through advanced nanoconstructs are promising alternatives for the development of novel rapid and low-cost methods for the targeting of Aβ pathological biomarkers in fluids. Here, a multilayered nanoprobe constituted by bioorthogonal Raman reporters (RRs) embedded within two layers of gold nanoparticles (Au@RRs@AuNPs) has been developed and successfully validated for specific detection of Aβ (1-42) in the human cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) with sensitivity down to pg/mL. The smart double-layer configuration enables us to exploit the outer gold NP surfaces for selective absorption of targeted peptide whose concentration controls the aggregation behavior of Au@RRs@AuNPs, proportionally reflected in Raman intensity changes, providing high specificity and sensitivity and representing a significant step ahead of the state of the art on SERS for clinical analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caterina Dallari
- European
Laboratory for Non-Linear Spectroscopy (LENS), Sesto Fiorentino 50019, Italy
- Department
of Physics, University of Florence, Sesto Fiorentino 50019, Italy
- National
Institute of Optics (INO), National Research
Council (CNR), Sesto Fiorentino 50019, Italy
| | - Elena Lenci
- Department
of Chemistry, University of Florence, Sesto Fiorentino 50019, Italy
| | - Andrea Trabocchi
- Department
of Chemistry, University of Florence, Sesto Fiorentino 50019, Italy
| | - Valentina Bessi
- Department
of Neurological and Psychiatric Sciences (NeuroFarba), University of Florence, Firenze 50134, Italy
| | - Silvia Bagnoli
- Department
of Neurological and Psychiatric Sciences (NeuroFarba), University of Florence, Firenze 50134, Italy
| | - Benedetta Nacmias
- Department
of Neurological and Psychiatric Sciences (NeuroFarba), University of Florence, Firenze 50134, Italy
- IRCCS Fondazione
Don Carlo Gnocchi, Firenze 50143, Italy
| | - Caterina Credi
- European
Laboratory for Non-Linear Spectroscopy (LENS), Sesto Fiorentino 50019, Italy
- National
Institute of Optics (INO), National Research
Council (CNR), Sesto Fiorentino 50019, Italy
| | - Francesco Saverio Pavone
- European
Laboratory for Non-Linear Spectroscopy (LENS), Sesto Fiorentino 50019, Italy
- Department
of Physics, University of Florence, Sesto Fiorentino 50019, Italy
- National
Institute of Optics (INO), National Research
Council (CNR), Sesto Fiorentino 50019, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Qin W, Chen W, Wang X, Zhang D, Du W, Li S, Li B, Zuo X, Wang X. A highly sensitive method for determination of tacrolimus in peripheral blood mononuclear cells by nano liquid chromatography-high resolution accurate mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 2023; 1706:464259. [PMID: 37567001 DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2023.464259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023]
Abstract
The determination of intracellular tacrolimus concentration in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) is crucial for assessing the effect-site concentration of tacrolimus. Analytical methods previously reported required a minimum of 3 mL of whole blood sample for measuring the tacrolimus concentration. In this study, we developed a highly sensitive method using EASY nLC 1200 combined with Q Exactive orbitrap mass spectrometer for detecting tacrolimus in PBMCs, requiring only 0.5-2 mL of sample. Furthermore, we compared two primary normalization methods for PBMCs tacrolimus concentration using Passing-Bablok regression, Bland-Altman analysis, Spearman's rank correlation, and Mountain plot. The newly established method was employed to compare tacrolimus concentrations in whole blood and PBMCs among 194 lung transplant recipients. The developed method exhibited high sensitivity with a lower limit of quantitation at 5 pg/mL, and excellent intra- and inter-days accuracy and precision. The comparison between different normalization methods for PBMCs tacrolimus concentration revealed a strong correlation between PBMCs count and intracellular protein amount within these cells. This finding suggests that both PBMCs count and intracellular protein amount can be used for normalizing intracellular tacrolimus levels and can be mutually converted. However, a weaker correlation was observed between PBMCs and whole-blood tacrolimus concentrations in lung transplant recipients, warranting further investigation. The method reported herein enables the quantification of PBMCs tacrolimus concentration using smaller volumes of whole blood samples, which has significant implications for both patients and laboratory personnel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Qin
- Department of pharmacy, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China
| | - Wenqian Chen
- Department of pharmacy, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China
| | - Xiaoxing Wang
- Department of pharmacy, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China
| | - Dan Zhang
- Department of pharmacy, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China
| | - Wenwen Du
- Department of pharmacy, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China
| | - Shu Li
- Department of pharmacy, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China
| | - Bo Li
- Department of pharmacy, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China
| | - Xianbo Zuo
- Department of pharmacy, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China.
| | - Xiaoxue Wang
- Department of pharmacy, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gobom J, Parnetti L, Rosa-Neto P, Vyhnalek M, Gauthier S, Cataldi S, Lerch O, Laczo J, Cechova K, Clarin M, Benet AI, Pascoal TA, Rahmouni N, Vandijck M, Huyck E, Le Bastard N, Stevenson J, Chamoun M, Alcolea D, Lleó A, Andreasson U, Verbeek MM, Bellomo G, Rinaldi R, Ashton N, Zetterberg H, Sheardova K, Hort J, Blennow K. Validation of the LUMIPULSE automated immunoassay for the measurement of core AD biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid. Clin Chem Lab Med 2021; 60:207-219. [PMID: 34773730 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2021-0651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The core cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers; total tau (tTau), phospho-tau (pTau), amyloid β 1-42 (Aβ 1-42), and the Aβ 1-42/Aβ 1-40 ratio have transformed Alzheimer's disease (AD) research and are today increasingly used in clinical routine laboratories as diagnostic tools. Fully automated immunoassay instruments with ready-to-use assay kits and calibrators has simplified their analysis and improved reproducibility of measurements. We evaluated the analytical performance of the fully automated immunoassay instrument LUMIPULSE G (Fujirebio) for measurement of the four core AD CSF biomarkers and determined cutpoints for AD diagnosis. METHODS Comparison of the LUMIPULSE G assays was performed with the established INNOTEST ELISAs (Fujirebio) for hTau Ag, pTau 181, β-amyloid 1-42, and with V-PLEX Plus Aβ Peptide Panel 1 (6E10) (Meso Scale Discovery) for Aβ 1-42/Aβ 1-40, as well as with a LC-MS reference method for Aβ 1-42. Intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility was evaluated for all assays. Clinical cutpoints for Aβ 1-42, tTau, and pTau was determined by analysis of three cohorts of clinically diagnosed patients, comprising 651 CSF samples. For the Aβ 1-42/Aβ 1-40 ratio, the cutpoint was determined by mixture model analysis of 2,782 CSF samples. RESULTS The LUMIPULSE G assays showed strong correlation to all other immunoassays (r>0.93 for all assays). The repeatability (intra-laboratory) CVs ranged between 2.0 and 5.6%, with the highest variation observed for β-amyloid 1-40. The reproducibility (inter-laboratory) CVs ranged between 2.1 and 6.5%, with the highest variation observed for β-amyloid 1-42. The clinical cutpoints for AD were determined to be 409 ng/L for total tau, 50.2 ng/L for pTau 181, 526 ng/L for β-amyloid 1-42, and 0.072 for the Aβ 1-42/Aβ 1-40 ratio. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that the LUMIPULSE G assays for the CSF AD biomarkers are fit for purpose in clinical laboratory practice. Further, they corroborate earlier presented reference limits for the biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johan Gobom
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Lucilla Parnetti
- Laboratory of Clinical Neurochemistry, Section of Neurology, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Pedro Rosa-Neto
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Douglas Research Institute, Le Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux (CIUSSS) de l'Ouest-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Psychiatry and Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Martin Vyhnalek
- Department of Neurology, Second Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.,Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.,International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Serge Gauthier
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Douglas Research Institute, Le Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux (CIUSSS) de l'Ouest-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Psychiatry and Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Samuela Cataldi
- Laboratory of Clinical Neurochemistry, Section of Neurology, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Ondrej Lerch
- Department of Neurology, Second Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.,Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.,International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Jan Laczo
- Department of Neurology, Second Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.,Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.,International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Katerina Cechova
- Department of Neurology, Second Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.,Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.,International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Marcus Clarin
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Andrea I Benet
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, McGill Centre for Studies in Aging, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Tharick A Pascoal
- Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, McGill Centre for Studies in Aging, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Neserine Rahmouni
- Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, McGill Centre for Studies in Aging, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Jenna Stevenson
- Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, McGill Centre for Studies in Aging, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Mira Chamoun
- Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, McGill Centre for Studies in Aging, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Daniel Alcolea
- Department of Neurology, Memory Unit, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau- Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau-Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED), Madrid, Spain
| | - Alberto Lleó
- Department of Neurology, Memory Unit, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau- Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau-Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED), Madrid, Spain
| | - Ulf Andreasson
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Marcel M Verbeek
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Neurology, Radboud Alzheimer Centre, Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Giovanni Bellomo
- Laboratory of Clinical Neurochemistry, Section of Neurology, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Roberta Rinaldi
- Laboratory of Clinical Neurochemistry, Section of Neurology, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Nicholas Ashton
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, London, UK.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health & Biomedical Research Unit for Dementia at South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation, London, UK
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden.,Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK.,UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, London, UK
| | - Katerina Sheardova
- Department of Neurology, Second Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.,First Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University and St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Jakub Hort
- Department of Neurology, Second Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.,Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.,First Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University and St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Kaj Blennow
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shelver WL, McGarvey AM, Yeater KM. Performance of allergen testing in a survey of frozen meals and meals ready-to-eat (MREs). Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess 2021; 38:1249-1259. [PMID: 34014811 DOI: 10.1080/19440049.2021.1914870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
A 7-plex immunoassay capable of detecting cashew, egg, hazelnut, milk, peanut, shrimp, and soy allergens was used to screen meals ready-to-eat (MREs) and frozen meals that contained meat or poultry. The same food matrices were also evaluated using single individual allergen immunoassays. Multiplex and single allergen test results were compared with the allergen declared on the food label, which was considered the standard. For both the frozen meals (n = 113) and MREs (n = 24) each analytical method failed to detect allergens that were declared on product labels, but only in frozen meals were allergens detected that were not declared on the label. Undeclared allergens were detected for egg in 1.8% (2/113) and for soy in 7.1% (8/113) of frozen meals. Labelled allergens were not detected in 0.9% (1/113) of milk, 4.4% (5/113) of egg, and 15% (17/113) of soy allergens in frozen meals. Assay performance for evaluating allergens in MREs was poor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weilin L Shelver
- USDA Agricultural Research Service, Biosciences Research Laboratory, Edward T. Schafer Agricultural Research Center, Fargo, North Dakota, U.S.A
| | - Amy M McGarvey
- USDA Agricultural Research Service, Biosciences Research Laboratory, Edward T. Schafer Agricultural Research Center, Fargo, North Dakota, U.S.A
| | - Kathleen M Yeater
- Plains Area Administrative Office, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Fort Collins, Colorado, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
2020 update on the clinical validity of cerebrospinal fluid amyloid, tau, and phospho-tau as biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease in the context of a structured 5-phase development framework. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:2121-2139. [PMID: 33674895 PMCID: PMC8175301 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05258-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Purpose In the last decade, the research community has focused on defining reliable biomarkers for the early detection of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology. In 2017, the Geneva AD Biomarker Roadmap Initiative adapted a framework for the systematic validation of oncological biomarkers to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) AD biomarkers—encompassing the 42 amino-acid isoform of amyloid-β (Aβ42), phosphorylated-tau (P-tau), and Total-tau (T-tau)—with the aim to accelerate their development and clinical implementation. The aim of this work is to update the current validation status of CSF AD biomarkers based on the Biomarker Roadmap methodology. Methods A panel of experts in AD biomarkers convened in November 2019 at a 2-day workshop in Geneva. The level of maturity (fully achieved, partly achieved, preliminary evidence, not achieved, unsuccessful) of CSF AD biomarkers was assessed based on the Biomarker Roadmap methodology before the meeting and presented and discussed during the workshop. Results By comparison to the previous 2017 Geneva Roadmap meeting, the primary advances in CSF AD biomarkers have been in the area of a unified protocol for CSF sampling, handling and storage, the introduction of certified reference methods and materials for Aβ42, and the introduction of fully automated assays. Additional advances have occurred in the form of defining thresholds for biomarker positivity and assessing the impact of covariates on their discriminatory ability. Conclusions Though much has been achieved for phases one through three, much work remains in phases four (real world performance) and five (assessment of impact/cost). To a large degree, this will depend on the availability of disease-modifying treatments for AD, given these will make accurate and generally available diagnostic tools key to initiate therapy. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-021-05258-7.
Collapse
|
8
|
Dakterzada F, López-Ortega R, Arias A, Riba-Llena I, Ruiz-Julián M, Huerto R, Tahan N, Piñol-Ripoll G. Assessment of the Concordance and Diagnostic Accuracy Between Elecsys and Lumipulse Fully Automated Platforms and Innotest. Front Aging Neurosci 2021; 13:604119. [PMID: 33746733 PMCID: PMC7970049 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.604119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Manual ELISA assays are the most commonly used methods for quantification of biomarkers; however, they often show inter- and intra-laboratory variability that limits their wide use. Here, we compared the Innotest ELISA method with two fully automated platforms (Lumipulse and Elecsys) to determine whether these new methods can provide effective substitutes for ELISA assays. We included 149 patients with AD (n = 34), MCI (n = 94) and non-AD dementias (n = 21). Aβ42, T-tau, and P-tau were quantified using the ELISA method (Innotest, Fujirebio Europe), CLEIA method on a Lumipulse G600II (Fujirebio Diagnostics), and ECLIA method on a Cobas e 601 (Roche Diagnostics) instrument. We found a high correlation between the three methods, although there were systematic differences between biomarker values measured by each method. Both Lumipulse and Elecsys methods were highly concordant with clinical diagnoses, and the combination of Lumipulse Aβ42 and P-tau had the highest discriminating power (AUC 0.915, 95% CI 0.822–1.000). We also assessed the agreement of AT(N) classification for each method with AD diagnosis. Although differences were not significant, the use of Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio instead of Aβ42 alone in AT(N) classification enhanced the diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.798, 95% CI 0.649–0.947 vs. AUC 0.778, 95% CI 0.617–0.939). We determined the cut-offs for the Lumipulse and Elecsys assays based on the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio ± status as a marker of amyloid pathology, and these cut-offs were consistent with those recommended by manufacturers, which had been determined based on visual amyloid PET imaging or diagnostic accuracy. Finally, the biomarker ratios (P-tau/Aβ42 and T-tau/Aβ42) were more consistent with the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio for both Lumipulse and Elecsys methods, and Elecsys P-tau/Aβ42 had the highest consistency with amyloid pathology (AUC 0.994, 95% CI 0.986–1.000 and OPA 96.4%) at the ≥0.024 cut-off. The Lumipulse and Elecsys cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) AD assays showed high analytical and clinical performances. As both automated platforms were standardized for reference samples, their use is recommended for the measurement of CSF AD biomarkers compared with unstandardized manual methods, such as Innotest ELISA, that have demonstrated a high inter and intra-laboratory variability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farida Dakterzada
- Cognitive Disorders Unit, Clinical Neuroscience Research Group, Santa Maria University Hospital, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Ricard López-Ortega
- Cognitive Disorders Unit, Clinical Neuroscience Research Group, Santa Maria University Hospital, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Alfonso Arias
- Cognitive Disorders Unit, Clinical Neuroscience Research Group, Santa Maria University Hospital, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Iolanda Riba-Llena
- Cognitive Disorders Unit, Clinical Neuroscience Research Group, Santa Maria University Hospital, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Maria Ruiz-Julián
- Cognitive Disorders Unit, Clinical Neuroscience Research Group, Santa Maria University Hospital, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Raquel Huerto
- Cognitive Disorders Unit, Clinical Neuroscience Research Group, Santa Maria University Hospital, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Nuria Tahan
- Cognitive Disorders Unit, Clinical Neuroscience Research Group, Santa Maria University Hospital, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Gerard Piñol-Ripoll
- Cognitive Disorders Unit, Clinical Neuroscience Research Group, Santa Maria University Hospital, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Keshavan A, Wellington H, Chen Z, Khatun A, Chapman M, Hart M, Cash DM, Coath W, Parker TD, Buchanan SM, Keuss SE, Harris MJ, Murray‐Smith H, Heslegrave A, Fox NC, Zetterberg H, Schott JM. Concordance of CSF measures of Alzheimer's pathology with amyloid PET status in a preclinical cohort: A comparison of Lumipulse and established immunoassays. ALZHEIMER'S & DEMENTIA (AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS) 2021; 13:e12131. [PMID: 33598527 PMCID: PMC7867115 DOI: 10.1002/dad2.12131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We assessed the concordance of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid beta (Aβ) and tau measured on the fully automated Lumipulse platform with pre-symptomatic Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology on amyloid positron emission tomography (PET). METHODS In 72 individuals from the Insight 46 study, CSF Aβ40, Aβ42, total tau (t-tau), and phosphorylated tau at site 181 (p-tau181) were measured using Lumipulse, INNOTEST, and Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) assays and inter-platform Pearson correlations derived. Lumipulse Aβ42 measures were adjusted to incorporate standardization to certified reference materials. Logistic regressions and receiver operating characteristics analysis generated CSF cut-points optimizing concordance with 18F-florbetapir amyloid PET status (n = 63). RESULTS Measurements of CSF Aβ, p-tau181, and their ratios correlated well across platforms (r 0.84 to 0.94, P < .0001); those of t-tau and t-tau/Aβ42 correlated moderately (r 0.57 to 0.79, P < .0001). The best concordance with amyloid PET (100% sensitivity and 94% specificity) was afforded by cut-points of 0.075 for Lumipulse Aβ42/Aβ40, 0.087 for MSD Aβ42/Aβ40 and 17.3 for Lumipulse Aβ42/p-tau181. DISCUSSION The Lumipulse platform provides comparable sensitivity and specificity to established CSF immunoassays in identifying pre-symptomatic AD pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashvini Keshavan
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - Henrietta Wellington
- UK Dementia Research Institute Fluid Biomarkers LaboratoryUK DRI at University College LondonLondonUK
| | - Zhongbo Chen
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - Ayesha Khatun
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - Miles Chapman
- Neuroimmunology and CSF LaboratoryNational Hospital for Neurology and NeurosurgeryLondonUK
| | - Melanie Hart
- Neuroimmunology and CSF LaboratoryNational Hospital for Neurology and NeurosurgeryLondonUK
- Department of NeuroinflammationUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - David M. Cash
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - William Coath
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - Thomas D. Parker
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - Sarah M. Buchanan
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - Sarah E. Keuss
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - Matthew J. Harris
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - Heidi Murray‐Smith
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - Amanda Heslegrave
- UK Dementia Research Institute Fluid Biomarkers LaboratoryUK DRI at University College LondonLondonUK
| | - Nick C. Fox
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- UK Dementia Research Institute Fluid Biomarkers LaboratoryUK DRI at University College LondonLondonUK
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry and NeurochemistryInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University HospitalMölndalSweden
| | - Jonathan M Schott
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Keshavan A, Wellington H, Chen Z, Khatun A, Chapman M, Hart M, Cash DM, Coath W, Parker TD, Buchanan SM, Keuss SE, Harris MJ, Murray‐Smith H, Heslegrave A, Fox NC, Zetterberg H, Schott JM. Concordance of CSF measures of Alzheimer's pathology with amyloid PET status in a preclinical cohort: A comparison of Lumipulse and established immunoassays. ALZHEIMER'S & DEMENTIA (AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS) 2020; 12:e12097. [PMID: 32999915 PMCID: PMC7503103 DOI: 10.1002/dad2.12097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Revised: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We assessed the concordance of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid beta (Aβ) and tau measured on the fully automated Lumipulse platform with pre-symptomatic Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology on amyloid positron emission tomography (PET). METHODS In 72 individuals from the Insight 46 study, CSF Aβ40, Aβ42, total tau (t-tau), and phosphorylated tau at site 181 (p-tau181) were measured using Lumipulse, INNOTEST, and Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) assays, and inter-platform Pearson correlations were derived. Logistic regressions and receiver-operating characteristic analysis generated CSF cut-points optimizing concordance with 18F-florbetapir amyloid PET status (n = 63). RESULTS Measurements of CSF Aβ, p-tau181, and their ratios correlated well across platforms (r 0.84-.94, P < .0001); those of t-tau and t-tau/Aβ42 correlated moderately (r 0.57-0.79, P < .0001). The best concordance with amyloid PET (100% sensitivity and 94% specificity) was afforded by cut-points of 0.110 for Lumipulse Aβ42/Aβ40, 0.087 for MSD Aβ42/Aβ40, and 25.3 for Lumipulse Aβ42/p-tau181. DISCUSSION The Lumipulse platform provides comparable sensitivity and specificity to established CSF immunoassays in identifying pre-symptomatic AD pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashvini Keshavan
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Henrietta Wellington
- UK Dementia Research Institute Fluid Biomarkers LaboratoryUK DRI at University College LondonLondonUK
| | - Zhongbo Chen
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Ayesha Khatun
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Miles Chapman
- Neuroimmunology and CSF LaboratoryNational Hospital for Neurology and NeurosurgeryLondonUK
| | - Melanie Hart
- Neuroimmunology and CSF LaboratoryNational Hospital for Neurology and NeurosurgeryLondonUK
- Department of NeuroinflammationUCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - David M. Cash
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - William Coath
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Thomas D. Parker
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Sarah M. Buchanan
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Sarah E. Keuss
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Matthew J. Harris
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Heidi Murray‐Smith
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Amanda Heslegrave
- UK Dementia Research Institute Fluid Biomarkers LaboratoryUK DRI at University College LondonLondonUK
| | - Nick C. Fox
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- UK Dementia Research Institute Fluid Biomarkers LaboratoryUK DRI at University College LondonLondonUK
- Clinical Neurochemistry LaboratoryDepartment of Psychiatry and NeurochemistryInstitute of Neuroscience and PhysiologyThe Sahlgrenska Academy at University of GothenburgSahlgrenska University HospitalMölndalSweden
| | - Jonathan M. Schott
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Agnello L, Piccoli T, Vidali M, Cuffaro L, Lo Sasso B, Iacolino G, Giglio VR, Lupo F, Alongi P, Bivona G, Ciaccio M. Diagnostic accuracy of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers measured by chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay for Alzheimer disease diagnosis. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2020; 80:313-317. [PMID: 32255379 DOI: 10.1080/00365513.2020.1740939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Revised: 02/04/2020] [Accepted: 03/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
In the last decades, an important role of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for Alzheimer disease (AD) diagnosis has emerged. The evaluation of the triad consisting of 42 aminoacid-long amyloid-beta peptide (Aβ42), total Tau (tTau) and Tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (pTau) have been recently integrated into the research diagnostic criteria of AD. For a long time, the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has represented the most commonly used method for the measurement of CSF biomarkers levels. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of CSF biomarkers, namely Aβ42, tTau and pTau and their ratio, measured by fully automated CLEIA assay (Lumipulse). We included 96 patients clinically diagnosed as AD (48) and non-AD (48). All CSF biomarkers levels were measured on Lumipulse G1200 fully automated platform (Fujirebio Inc. Europe, Gent, Belgium). Aβ42 levels, 42/40 ratio, 42/tTau ratio, 42/PTau ratio were significantly reduced, and tTau and PTau levels were significantly increased in AD patients in comparison with non-AD patients. The receiving operator curve (ROC) analysis showed good diagnostic accuracy of all CSF biomarkers and their ratios for discriminating AD patients from non-AD patients, with 42/40 ratio having the best AUC (0.724, 95%CI 0.619-0.828; p < 0.001). Our findings support the use of CSF biomarkers measured by CLEIA method on a fully automated platform for AD diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luisa Agnello
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, Institute of Clinical Biochemistry, Clinical Molecular Medicine and Laboratory Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Tommaso Piccoli
- Unit of Neurology, Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Matteo Vidali
- Unit of Clinical Chemistry, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Luca Cuffaro
- Unit of Neurology, Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Bruna Lo Sasso
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, Institute of Clinical Biochemistry, Clinical Molecular Medicine and Laboratory Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Giorgia Iacolino
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, Institute of Clinical Biochemistry, Clinical Molecular Medicine and Laboratory Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Vincenza Rosaria Giglio
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, Institute of Clinical Biochemistry, Clinical Molecular Medicine and Laboratory Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Federica Lupo
- Unit of Neurology, Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Pierpaolo Alongi
- Unit of Neurology, Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Giulia Bivona
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, Institute of Clinical Biochemistry, Clinical Molecular Medicine and Laboratory Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Marcello Ciaccio
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, Institute of Clinical Biochemistry, Clinical Molecular Medicine and Laboratory Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, AOUP "P. Giaccone", Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|