Issues in the Intensive Care Unit for Patients with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock patients

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a highly complex clinical condition that requires a management strategy focused on early resolution of the underlying cause and the provision of circulatory support. In cases of refractory CS, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is employed to replace the failed cardiocirculatory system, thereby preventing the development of multiorgan failure. There are various types of MCS, and patients with CS typically require devices that are either short-term (< 15 days) or intermediate-term (15-30 days). When choosing the device the underlying cause of CS, as well as the presence or absence of concomitant conditions such as failed ventricle, respiratory failure, and the intended purpose of the support should be taken into consideration. Patients with MCS require the comprehensive care indicated in complex critically ill patients with multiorgan dysfunction, with an emphasis on device monitoring and control. Different complications may arise during support management, and its withdrawal must be protocolized.

A phased intervention bundle to decrease the mortality of patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in intensive care unit

Aim

To evaluate whether a phased multidimensional intervention bundle would decrease the mortality of patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and the complication incidence.

Materials and methods

We conducted a prospective observational study in comparison with a retrospective control group in six intensive care units (ICUs) in China. Patients older than 18 years supported with ECMO between March 2018 to March 2022 were included in the study. A phased intervention bundle to improve the outcome of patients with ECMO was developed and implemented. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to compare the mortality of patients with ECMO and the complication incidence before, during, and up to 18 months after implementation of the intervention bundle.

Results

The cohort included 297 patients in 6 ICUs, mostly VA ECMO (68.7%) with a median (25th–75th percentile) duration in ECMO of 9.0 (4.0–15.0) days. The mean (SD) APECHII score was 24.1 (7.5). Overall, the mortality of ECMO decreased from 57.1% at baseline to 21.8% at 13–18 months after implementation of the study intervention (P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, even after excluding the confounding factors, such as age, APECHII score, pre-ECMO lactate, and incidence of CRRT during ECMO, the intervention bundle still can decrease the mortality independently, which also remained true in the statistical analysis of V-V and V-A ECMO separately. Among all the ECMO-related complications, the incidence of bloodstream infection and bleeding decreased significantly at 13–18 months after implementation compared with the baseline. The CUSUM analysis revealed a typical learning curve with a point of inflection during the implementation of the bundle.

Conclusion

A phased multidimensional intervention bundle resulted in a large and sustained reduction in the mortality of ECMO that was maintained throughout the 18-month study period.

Clinical trial registration

[ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT05024786].

Massive hemoptysis bridged with VV ECMO: A case report

Objective

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can provide full pulmonary support when a patient is completely apneic. The combination of veno-venous (VV) ECMO and induced apnea can be utilized to control significant hemoptysis. We present a case of massive hemoptysis that developed while on VV ECMO and was treated with temporary discontinuation of the ventilator and serial declotting bronchoscopies.

Methods

A 42-year-old male with recent acute ST elevation myocardial infarction status post cardiac stent developed aspiration pneumonia that progressed to acute respiratory distress syndrome. The patient's biventricular function was preserved. VV ECMO was placed for lung rescue on hospital day #7, and tracheostomy was performed for ventilator dependence on hospital day #12. On hospital day #18, the patient developed significant hemoptysis despite the discontinuation of anticoagulation. Bronchoscopy revealed massive bleeding from bilateral bronchi. To facilitate tamponade within the tracheobronchial tree, the ventilator was temporarily discontinued while VV ECMO provided full respiratory support. After 48 h, mechanical ventilation was resumed, and daily bronchoscopies were performed to remove clots from both bronchi until a chest x-ray showed improvement in bilateral opacifications. Bronchoscopy was performed a total of 14 times. There was no recurrence of bronchial bleeding, the patient's respiratory status improved, and VV ECMO was weaned off on hospital day #37. The patient was transferred to a long-term rehabilitation facility 36 days after successful VV ECMO decannulation on hospital day #73.

Conclusions

This patient's survival of massive hemoptysis was facilitated largely by the utilization of serial declotting bronchoscopies with VV ECMO providing full pulmonary support during temporary discontinuation of mechanical ventilation.

Complications of Peripheral Cannulation Site in Obese Patients on Adult Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Placement of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in obese patients has been challenging; however, cannulation risk in obese patients has not been clearly investigated. We therefore explored ECMO cannulation complications in this obese population. Data were reviewed from adult ECMO database from 2010 to 2019. Patients were stratified by body mass index (BMI) (normal weight [NW] [BMI 18.5-24.9], overweight [BMI 25-29.9], class I [BMI 30-34.9], class II [BMI 35-39.9], class III [BMI >40]). Patients with central cannulation were excluded from this study. Combined ECMO cannulation complications and survival data were retrospectively analyzed. There were 233 patients, 156 venoarterial (VA) ECMO patients (45 [28%] NW, 51 [33%] overweight, 37 [24%] class I, 12 [8%] class II, and 11 [7.0%] class III) and 77 venovenous (VV) ECMO patients (14 [18%] NW, 13 [17%] overweight, 17 [22%] class I, 11 [14%] class II, and 22 [29%] class III). There were significantly more cannulation site bleeds in VA class III (55%) patients compared with VA NW patients (22%), p = 0.006. There was no significant difference in cannulation site bleeding between BMI groups for VV ECMO. There was no difference in 30 day mortality, ECMO survival for all BMI groups in both VA and VV ECMO. There is significant increased risk of bleeding with peripheral VA cannulation of obese patients with BMI > 35. Cannulating surgeon should be aware of this bleeding risk in morbidly obese patient who undergo VA ECMO.

Outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in influenza versus COVID-19 during the first wave of COVID-19

PURPOSE

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a refractory treatment for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to influenza and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2, also referred to as coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19]). We conducted this study to compare the outcomes of influenza patients treated with veno-venous-ECMO (VV-ECMO) to COVID-19 patients treated with VV-ECMO, during the first wave of COVID-19.

METHODS

Patients in our institution with ARDS due to COVID-19 or influenza who were placed on ECMO between August 1, 2010 and September 15, 2020 were included in this comparative, retrospective study. To improve homogeneity, only VV-ECMO patients were analyzed. The clinical characteristics and outcomes were extracted and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 28 COVID-19 patients and 17 influenza patients were identified and included. ECMO survival rates were 68% (19/28) in COVID-19 patients and 94% (16/17) in influenza patients (p = .04). Thirty days survival rates after ECMO decannulation were 54% (15/28) in COVID-19 patients and 76% (13/17) in influenza patients (p = .13). COVID-19 patients spent a longer time on ECMO compared to flu patients (21 vs. 12 days; p = .025), and more COVID-19 patients (26/28 vs. 2/17) were on immunomodulatory therapy before ECMO initiation (p < .001). COVID-19 patients had higher rates of new infections during ECMO (50% vs. 18%; p = .03) and bacterial pneumonia (36% vs. 6%; p = .024).

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 patients who were treated in our institution with VV-ECMO had statistically lower ECMO survival rates than influenza patients. It is possible that COVID-19 immunomodulation therapies may increase the risk of other superimposed infections.

Outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19: The lessons learned from the first wave of COVID-19

Introduction

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used as a refractory treatment for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), but there has been little evidence of its efficacy. We conducted this study to share our experience using ECMO as a bridge to recovery for ARDS due to COVID‐19.

Methods

All adult patients who were placed on ECMO for ARDS due to COVID‐19 between April 2020 and June 2020 (during the first wave of COVID‐19) were identified. The clinical characteristics and outcomes of these patients were analyzed with a specific focus on the differences between patients who survived to hospital discharge and those who did not.

Results

In total, 20 COVID‐19 patients were included in this study. All patients were placed on veno‐veno ECMO. Comparing survivors and non‐survivors, older age was found to be associated with hospital mortality (p = .02). The following complications were observed: renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy (35%, n = 7), bacteremia during ECMO (20%, n = 4), coinfection with bacterial pneumonia (15%, n = 3), cannula site bleeding (15%, n = 3), stroke (10%, n = 2), gastrointestinal bleeding (10%, n = 2), and liver failure (5%, n = 1). The complications associated with patient mortality were culture‐positive septic shock (p = .01), culture‐negative systemic inflammatory response syndrome (p = .01), and renal failure (p = .01). The causes of death were septic shock (44%, n = 4), culture‐negative systemic inflammatory response syndrome (44%, n = 4), and stroke (11%, n = 1).

Conclusions

Based on our experience, ECMO can improve refractory ARDS due to COVID‐19 in select patients. Proper control of bacterial infections during COVID‐19 immunomodulation therapy may be critical to improving survival.

Red blood cell transfusion requirements for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a rescue procedure used for cardiac and pulmonary dysfunction. Patients on ECMO often require blood transfusions to maintain oxygen delivery and recover from bleeding complications. Goals of the current study were to determine transfusion requirements while on ECMO, and incidence and transfusion requirements for bleeding complications.

METHODS

Packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusions and bleeding complications were identified by retrospective chart review of patients on ECMO from 2010 to 2018 at our institution. Patients were categorized into those who did not bleed (group A) and those who bled (group B). Incidence, sites of bleed, and transfusion requirement for each bleeding were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 217 patients including veno-arterial (VA) (n = 148) and veno-venous (VV) (n = 69) ECMO, we identified 62 patients without bleeding complications (group A) and 155 patients with bleeding complications (group B). In group A, transfusion requirement was 0.6 PRBC/day for VA-ECMO (n = 42) and 0.2 PRBC/day for VV-ECMO (n = 20) (p = 0.0015). In group B, number of PRBC given per event per day for bleeding complications during ECMO was mediastinal/thoracic bleed (83 events, 4.7 PRBC/event/day), gastrointestinal bleed (59 events, 4.8 PRBC/event/day), cannulation site bleed (88 events, 3.6 PRBC/event/day), and nasopharyngeal bleed (103 events, 2.8 PRBC/event/day). Thirty-day hospital mortality rate was co-related to transfusion requirement (area under ROC curve: 0.70).

CONCLUSION

Patients without clinical bleeding still required transfusion, with higher rates observed with VA- than VV-ECMO. Transfusion requirements dramatically increased when patients developed various bleeding complications and had a significant impact on 30-day mortality rate.

Outcomes of end-organ function and survival with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

INTRODUCTION

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) is a temporary therapy option for refractory cardiac or respiratory failure. Preliminary study suggests that ECMO aids in the recovery of end-organ function by maintaining systemic perfusion.

METHODS

A retrospective IRB approved database research and chart review was performed on patients initiated on veno-arterial (VA-) ECMO between September 2010 and April 2019. End-organ injury markers were compared between the pre-ECMO period, defined as markers recorded before ECMO initiation, and the pre-decannulation period, defined as markers prior to ECMO decannulation. Data was expressed with mean ± standard deviation, or median [quartile 1, quartile 3] and compared between Pre-ECMO and per-decannulation period.

RESULTS

Among the 159 VA-ECMO patients, 100 patients (63%) survived ECMO with mean ECMO duration 10 ± 7 days. Within the survival group, 78 patients (49%) weaned to recovery, and 22 patients (14%) weaned off to durable implantable devices. Compared to the pre-ECMO period, the pre-decannulation period significantly improved in pH (7.23 ± 0.19 vs. 7.40 ± 0.09; p < 0.001) and lactate (5.5 [2.3, 9.0] vs. 1.6 [0.9, 2.3]; p < 0.001), and serum creatinine (1.4 [1.1, 2.1] vs. 1.1 [0.8, 1.7]; p < 0.001). Significant changes were noted in ventilation parameters as well, such as FiO₂ (100 [100, 100] vs. 50 [50, 50]; p < 0.001), PaO₂ (88 [62, 135], 126 [87, 162]; p < 0.001) and PEEP (8.0 [5.0, 12.0] vs. 5.0 [5.0, 8.0]; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Maintaining perfusion with VA-ECMO utilization on indicated patients demonstrated improvements in end-organ functions. Survival rates of VA-ECMO patients were also optimistic.