Biventricular pacemaker/defibrillators versus biventricular pacemakers in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy

Association of Depression Symptoms and Biomarkers of Risk on Clinical Outcomes in HFrEF

BACKGROUND

Prior studies have demonstrated an association of depression with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with HFrEF, but the possible mechanisms responsible for the association are not unserstood.

METHODS

142 men and women with HFrEF were enrolled through HF clinics and followed over time. At baseline and 6-months, depression was assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and disease activity by B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP). Proportional Hazards Regression Models assessed the contribution of depressive symptoms and HFrEF disease biomarkers on death or cardiovascular hospitalization.

RESULTS

Over a median follow-up period of 4 years, 42 patients (30%) died, and 84 (60%) had cardiovascular hospitalizations. A 10-point higher baseline BDI-II score was associated with a 35% higher hazard of death or cardiovascular hospitalization. Greater baseline BDI-II scores were associated with poorer HF self-care maintenance (R=-0.30, p<0.001) and fewer daily steps (R=-0.19, p=0.04), suggesting that depression may adversely affect important health behaviors. Increases in plasma BNP over 6 months were associated with worse outcomes. Changes in BDI-II score and plasma BNP over 6 months were positively correlated (R=0.25, p=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

This study underscores the importance of elevated depression symptoms and their association with an increased likelihood of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with HFrEF. Health behaviors may play a greater role than direct biobehavioral pathways in the adverse effects of depression on the HF disease trajectory and resultant clinical outcomes.

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators for primary prevention in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have proved their favorable outcomes on survival in selected patients with cardiomyopathy. Although previous meta-analyses have shown benefit for their use in primary prevention, the evidence remains less robust for patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) in comparison to patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of ICD therapy on reducing all-cause mortality and sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with NICM.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed (1993-2016), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2000-2016), reference lists of relevant articles, and previous meta-analyses. Search terms included defibrillator, heart failure, cardiomyopathy, randomized controlled trials, and clinical trials.

STUDY SELECTION

Eligible trials were randomized controlled trials with at least an arm of ICD, an arm of medical therapy and enrolled some patients with NICM. The primary endpoint in the trials should include all-cause mortality or mortality from SCD.

DATA EXTRACTION

Hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause mortality and mortality from SCD were either extracted or calculated along with their standard errors.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Of the 1047 abstracts retained by the initial screen, eight randomized controlled trials were identified. Five of these trials reported relevant data regarding patients with NICM and were subsequently included in this meta-analysis. Pooled analysis of HRs suggested a statistically significant reduction in all-cause mortality among a total of 2573 patients randomized to ICD vs medical therapy (HR 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67-0.96; P=.02). Pooled analysis of HRs for mortality from SCD was also statistically significant (n=1677) (HR 0.51; 95% CI, 0.34-0.76; P=.001).

CONCLUSION

ICD implantation is beneficial in terms of all-cause mortality and mortality from SCD in certain subgroups of patients with NICM.