1
|
Zakirov AN, Sosnovskaya S, Ryumina ED, Kharybina E, Strelkova OS, Zhironkina OA, Golyshev SA, Moiseenko A, Kireev II. Fiber-Like Organization as a Basic Principle for Euchromatin Higher-Order Structure. Front Cell Dev Biol 2022; 9:784440. [PMID: 35174159 PMCID: PMC8841976 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.784440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
A detailed understanding of the principles of the structural organization of genetic material is of great importance for elucidating the mechanisms of differential regulation of genes in development. Modern ideas about the spatial organization of the genome are based on a microscopic analysis of chromatin structure and molecular data on DNA–DNA contact analysis using Chromatin conformation capture (3C) technology, ranging from the “polymer melt” model to a hierarchical folding concept. Heterogeneity of chromatin structure depending on its functional state and cell cycle progression brings another layer of complexity to the interpretation of structural data and requires selective labeling of various transcriptional states under nondestructive conditions. Here, we use a modified approach for replication timing-based metabolic labeling of transcriptionally active chromatin for ultrastructural analysis. The method allows pre-embedding labeling of optimally structurally preserved chromatin, thus making it compatible with various 3D-TEM techniques including electron tomography. By using variable pulse duration, we demonstrate that euchromatic genomic regions adopt a fiber-like higher-order structure of about 200 nm in diameter (chromonema), thus providing support for a hierarchical folding model of chromatin organization as well as the idea of transcription and replication occurring on a highly structured chromatin template.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir N Zakirov
- Department of Electron Microscopy, AN. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.,Chair of Cell Biology and Histology, Biology Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Sophie Sosnovskaya
- Department of Electron Microscopy, AN. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.,Chair of Cell Biology and Histology, Biology Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Ekaterina D Ryumina
- Department of Electron Microscopy, AN. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.,Faculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Ekaterina Kharybina
- Department of Electron Microscopy, AN. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.,Chair of Cell Biology and Histology, Biology Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Olga S Strelkova
- Department of Electron Microscopy, AN. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Oxana A Zhironkina
- Department of Electron Microscopy, AN. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Sergei A Golyshev
- Department of Electron Microscopy, AN. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Andrey Moiseenko
- Laboratory of Electron Microscopy, Biology Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Igor I Kireev
- Department of Electron Microscopy, AN. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.,Chair of Cell Biology and Histology, Biology Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Merchut-Maya JM, Bartek J, Maya-Mendoza A. Regulation of replication fork speed: Mechanisms and impact on genomic stability. DNA Repair (Amst) 2019; 81:102654. [PMID: 31320249 DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2019.102654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Replication of DNA is a fundamental biological process that ensures precise duplication of the genome and thus safeguards inheritance. Any errors occurring during this process must be repaired before the cell divides, by activating the DNA damage response (DDR) machinery that detects and corrects the DNA lesions. Consistent with its significance, DNA replication is under stringent control, both spatial and temporal. Defined regions of the genome are replicated at specific times during S phase and the speed of replication fork progression is adjusted to fully replicate DNA in pace with the cell cycle. Insults that impair DNA replication cause replication stress (RS), which can lead to genomic instability and, potentially, to cell transformation. In this perspective, we review the current concept of replication stress, including the recent findings on the effects of accelerated fork speed and their impact on genomic (in)stability. We discuss in detail the Fork Speed Regulatory Network (FSRN), an integrated molecular machinery that regulates the velocity of DNA replication forks. Finally, we explore the potential for targeting FSRN components as an avenue to treat cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Maria Merchut-Maya
- DNA Replication and Cancer Group, Genome Integrity Unit, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jiri Bartek
- Genome Integrity Unit, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Division of Genome Biology, Science for Life Laboratory, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Apolinar Maya-Mendoza
- DNA Replication and Cancer Group, Genome Integrity Unit, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Maya‐Mendoza A, Jackson DA. Labeling DNA Replication Foci to Visualize Chromosome Territories In Vivo. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017. [DOI: 10.1002/cpcb.19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dean A. Jackson
- Systems Microscopy Centre, Faculty of Life Sciences, The University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shyian M, Mattarocci S, Albert B, Hafner L, Lezaja A, Costanzo M, Boone C, Shore D. Budding Yeast Rif1 Controls Genome Integrity by Inhibiting rDNA Replication. PLoS Genet 2016; 12:e1006414. [PMID: 27820830 PMCID: PMC5098799 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2016] [Accepted: 10/10/2016] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The Rif1 protein is a negative regulator of DNA replication initiation in eukaryotes. Here we show that budding yeast Rif1 inhibits DNA replication initiation at the rDNA locus. Absence of Rif1, or disruption of its interaction with PP1/Glc7 phosphatase, leads to more intensive rDNA replication. The effect of Rif1-Glc7 on rDNA replication is similar to that of the Sir2 deacetylase, and the two would appear to act in the same pathway, since the rif1Δ sir2Δ double mutant shows no further increase in rDNA replication. Loss of Rif1-Glc7 activity is also accompanied by an increase in rDNA repeat instability that again is not additive with the effect of sir2Δ. We find, in addition, that the viability of rif1Δ cells is severely compromised in combination with disruption of the MRX or Ctf4-Mms22 complexes, both of which are implicated in stabilization of stalled replication forks. Significantly, we show that removal of the rDNA replication fork barrier (RFB) protein Fob1, alleviation of replisome pausing by deletion of the Tof1/Csm3 complex, or a large deletion of the rDNA repeat array all rescue this synthetic growth defect of rif1Δ cells lacking in addition either MRX or Ctf4-Mms22 activity. These data suggest that the repression of origin activation by Rif1-Glc7 is important to avoid the deleterious accumulation of stalled replication forks at the rDNA RFB, which become lethal when fork stability is compromised. Finally, we show that Rif1-Glc7, unlike Sir2, has an important effect on origin firing outside of the rDNA locus that serves to prevent activation of the DNA replication checkpoint. Our results thus provide insights into a mechanism of replication control within a large repetitive chromosomal domain and its importance for the maintenance of genome stability. These findings may have important implications for metazoans, where large blocks of repetitive sequences are much more common.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maksym Shyian
- Department of Molecular Biology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Institute of Genetics and Genomics in Geneva (iGE3), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Stefano Mattarocci
- Department of Molecular Biology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Institute of Genetics and Genomics in Geneva (iGE3), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Benjamin Albert
- Department of Molecular Biology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Institute of Genetics and Genomics in Geneva (iGE3), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Lukas Hafner
- Department of Molecular Biology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Institute of Genetics and Genomics in Geneva (iGE3), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Aleksandra Lezaja
- Department of Molecular Biology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Institute of Genetics and Genomics in Geneva (iGE3), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Michael Costanzo
- University of Toronto, Donnelly Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Charlie Boone
- University of Toronto, Donnelly Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Shore
- Department of Molecular Biology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Institute of Genetics and Genomics in Geneva (iGE3), Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yuan K, Seller CA, Shermoen AW, O'Farrell PH. Timing the Drosophila Mid-Blastula Transition: A Cell Cycle-Centered View. Trends Genet 2016; 32:496-507. [PMID: 27339317 DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2016.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2016] [Revised: 05/19/2016] [Accepted: 05/23/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
At the mid-blastula transition (MBT), externally developing embryos refocus from increasing cell number to elaboration of the body plan. Studies in Drosophila reveal a sequence of changes in regulators of Cyclin:Cdk1 that increasingly restricts the activity of this cell cycle kinase to slow cell cycles during early embryogenesis. By reviewing these events, we provide an outline of the mechanisms slowing the cell cycle at and around the time of MBT. The perspectives developed should provide a guiding paradigm for the study of other MBT changes as the embryo transits from maternal control to a regulatory program centered on the expression of zygotic genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Yuan
- Department of Biophysics and Biochemistry, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Charles A Seller
- Department of Biophysics and Biochemistry, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Antony W Shermoen
- Department of Biophysics and Biochemistry, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Patrick H O'Farrell
- Department of Biophysics and Biochemistry, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rivera-Mulia JC, Gilbert DM. Replication timing and transcriptional control: beyond cause and effect-part III. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2016; 40:168-178. [PMID: 27115331 DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2016.03.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2015] [Revised: 03/24/2016] [Accepted: 03/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
DNA replication is essential for faithful transmission of genetic information and is intimately tied to chromosome structure and function. Genome duplication occurs in a defined temporal order known as the replication-timing (RT) program, which is regulated during the cell cycle and development in discrete units referred to as replication domains (RDs). RDs correspond to topologically-associating domains (TADs) and are spatio-temporally compartmentalized in the nucleus. While improvements in experimental tools have begun to reveal glimpses of causality, they have also unveiled complex context-dependent relationships that challenge long recognized correlations of RT to chromatin organization and gene regulation. In particular, RDs/TADs that switch RT during development march to the beat of a different drummer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David M Gilbert
- Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4295, USA; Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lubelsky Y, Prinz JA, DeNapoli L, Li Y, Belsky JA, MacAlpine DM. DNA replication and transcription programs respond to the same chromatin cues. Genome Res 2015; 24:1102-14. [PMID: 24985913 PMCID: PMC4079966 DOI: 10.1101/gr.160010.113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
DNA replication is a dynamic process that occurs in a temporal order along each of the chromosomes. A consequence of the temporally coordinated activation of replication origins is the establishment of broad domains (>100 kb) that replicate either early or late in S phase. This partitioning of the genome into early and late replication domains is important for maintaining genome stability, gene dosage, and epigenetic inheritance; however, the molecular mechanisms that define and establish these domains are poorly understood. The modENCODE Project provided an opportunity to investigate the chromatin features that define the Drosophila replication timing program in multiple cell lines. The majority of early and late replicating domains in the Drosophila genome were static across all cell lines; however, a small subset of domains was dynamic and exhibited differences in replication timing between the cell lines. Both origin selection and activation contribute to defining the DNA replication program. Our results suggest that static early and late replicating domains were defined at the level of origin selection (ORC binding) and likely mediated by chromatin accessibility. In contrast, dynamic domains exhibited low ORC densities in both cell types, suggesting that origin activation and not origin selection governs the plasticity of the DNA replication program. Finally, we show that the male-specific early replication of the X chromosome is dependent on the dosage compensation complex (DCC), suggesting that the transcription and replication programs respond to the same chromatin cues. Specifically, MOF-mediated hyperacetylation of H4K16 on the X chromosome promotes both the up-regulation of male-specific transcription and origin activation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoav Lubelsky
- Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | - Joseph A Prinz
- Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | - Leyna DeNapoli
- Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | - Yulong Li
- Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | - Jason A Belsky
- Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | - David M MacAlpine
- Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Morino M, Tanaka M, Shiomi Y, Nishitani H. Imaging analysis to determine chromatin binding of the licensing factor MCM2-7 in mammalian cells. Methods Mol Biol 2015; 1170:529-37. [PMID: 24906334 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0888-2_29] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
S-CDK and DDK protein kinases initiate DNA replication at replication origins. Prior to the activation of these kinases, origins must become competent for replication by loading MCM2-7 DNA helicase on chromatin. This process is known as replication licensing or pre-replicative complex (pre-RC) formation. After the onset of S phase, however, licensing is inhibited to prevent re-replication of DNA. In this chapter, we describe a method to analyze origin licensing by imaging the chromatin-bound licensing factor MCM2-7. In a normal cell cycle, MCM2-7 is loaded at the end of mitosis or early G1 phase. As S phase progresses, MCM2-7 is dissociated from the replicated regions. When DNA replication is completed, cells in G2 phase have no chromatin-bound MCM2-7. The analysis of chromatin-bound MCM2-7 in each cell provides an insight into cell cycle stage and condition for cell cycle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masayuki Morino
- Graduate School of Life Science, University of Hyogo, Kamigori, Ako-gun, Hyogo, 678-1297, Japan
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chen L, Zhou W, Zhang C, Lupski JR, Jin L, Zhang F. CNV instability associated with DNA replication dynamics: evidence for replicative mechanisms in CNV mutagenesis. Hum Mol Genet 2014; 24:1574-83. [PMID: 25398944 DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddu572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Copy number variation (CNV) in the human genome is of vital importance to human health and evolution of our species. However, much of the molecular basis of CNV mutagenesis remains to be elucidated. Considering the DNA replication model of 'fork stalling and template switching' for CNV formation, we hypothesized that replication fork progression could be important for CNV mutagenesis. However, molecular assays of replication fork progression at the genome level are technically challenging. Instead, we conducted an estimation of DNA replication dynamics, as the statistic R, using the readily available data of replication timing. Small R-values can reflect 'slowed' replication, which could result from less fork initiation, reduced fork speed or fork barriers. We generated genome-wide profiles of R in the genomes of human, mouse and Drosophila. Intriguingly, the CNV breakpoints in all three genomes showed significantly biased distributions toward the genomic regions with small R-values, suggesting potential replication stress-induced CNV instability. Notably, among the human CNVs with distinct breakpoint junction characteristics, the homology-mediated and VNTR-mediated CNVs contribute the most to the correlation between CNV instability and the statistic R, consistent with the recent findings in the C. elegans and yeast genomes of repeat-induced DNA replication error and consequent CNV formation. The statistic R may reflect both replication stress and the effect of local genome architecture on fork progression. Our concordant observations suggest an important role for DNA replicative mechanisms in CNV mutagenesis and genome instability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering and Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology and
| | - Weichen Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering and Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology and
| | - Cheng Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering and Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology and
| | - James R Lupski
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics and Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX 77030, USA Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Li Jin
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering and Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology and Collaborative Innovation Center for Genetics and Development, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China
| | - Feng Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering and Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology and Collaborative Innovation Center for Genetics and Development, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China,
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gindin Y, Meltzer PS, Bilke S. Replicon: a software to accurately predict DNA replication timing in metazoan cells. Front Genet 2014; 5:378. [PMID: 25404939 PMCID: PMC4217517 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2014] [Accepted: 10/13/2014] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Eukaryotic DNA replication follows a strict temporal program where genomic loci are replicated at precise times during the S phase of the cell cycle. Yet, the mechanism in control of the timing program in metazoan cells is poorly understood. In a recent publication, the authors proposed an intuitive stochastic model of DNA replication and showed that it predicts replication timing with an accuracy approaching the level of experimental biological repeats. Here, we discuss an extended software implementation of the mechanistic model: Replicon. This package allows interested researchers to predict the global replication timing program in human cells from chromatin data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yevgeniy Gindin
- Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health Bethesda, MD, USA ; Graduate Program in Bioinformatics, Boston University Boston, MA, USA
| | - Paul S Meltzer
- Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sven Bilke
- Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gindin Y, Valenzuela MS, Aladjem MI, Meltzer PS, Bilke S. A chromatin structure-based model accurately predicts DNA replication timing in human cells. Mol Syst Biol 2014; 10:722. [PMID: 24682507 PMCID: PMC4017678 DOI: 10.1002/msb.134859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The metazoan genome is replicated in precise cell lineage‐specific temporal order. However, the mechanism controlling this orchestrated process is poorly understood as no molecular mechanisms have been identified that actively regulate the firing sequence of genome replication. Here, we develop a mechanistic model of genome replication capable of predicting, with accuracy rivaling experimental repeats, observed empirical replication timing program in humans. In our model, replication is initiated in an uncoordinated (time‐stochastic) manner at well‐defined sites. The model contains, in addition to the choice of the genomic landmark that localizes initiation, only a single adjustable parameter of direct biological relevance: the number of replication forks. We find that DNase‐hypersensitive sites are optimal and independent determinants of DNA replication initiation. We demonstrate that the DNA replication timing program in human cells is a robust emergent phenomenon that, by its very nature, does not require a regulatory mechanism determining a proper replication initiation firing sequence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yevgeniy Gindin
- Genetics Branch Center for Cancer Research, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
DNA damage is one of many possible perturbations that challenge the mechanisms that preserve genetic stability during the copying of the eukaryotic genome in S phase. This short review provides, in the first part, a general introduction to the topic and an overview of checkpoint responses. In the second part, the mechanisms of error-free tolerance in response to fork-arresting DNA damage will be discussed in some detail.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nimrat Chatterjee
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Little is known about the molecular machinery that contributes to site-specific copy number variations or how CNVs fit into the chronology of tumor progression. Black et al. (2013) now demonstrate that the overexpression of a histone demethylase induces transient copy gain of specific genomic loci known to harbor proto-oncogenes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Rickels
- Stowers Institute for Medical Research, 1000 East 50th Street, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Yekezare M, Gómez-González B, Diffley JFX. Controlling DNA replication origins in response to DNA damage - inhibit globally, activate locally. J Cell Sci 2013; 126:1297-306. [PMID: 23645160 DOI: 10.1242/jcs.096701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
DNA replication in eukaryotic cells initiates from multiple replication origins that are distributed throughout the genome. Coordinating the usage of these origins is crucial to ensure complete and timely replication of the entire genome precisely once in each cell cycle. Replication origins fire according to a cell-type-specific temporal programme, which is established in the G1 phase of each cell cycle. In response to conditions causing the slowing or stalling of DNA replication forks, the programme of origin firing is altered in two contrasting ways, depending on chromosomal context. First, inactive or 'dormant' replication origins in the vicinity of the stalled replication fork become activated and, second, the S phase checkpoint induces a global shutdown of further origin firing throughout the genome. Here, we review our current understanding on the role of dormant origins and the S phase checkpoint in the rescue of stalled forks and the completion of DNA replication in the presence of replicative stress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona Yekezare
- Cancer Research UK London Research Institute, Clare Hall Laboratories, South Mimms EN6 3LD, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|