PP1-Mediated Dephosphorylation of Lgl Controls Apical-basal Polarity

Capture, mutual inhibition and release mechanism for aPKC-Par6 and its multisite polarity substrate Lgl

The mutually antagonistic relationship of atypical protein kinase C (aPKC) and partitioning-defective protein 6 (Par6) with the substrate lethal (2) giant larvae (Lgl) is essential for regulating polarity across many cell types. Although aPKC-Par6 phosphorylates Lgl at three serine sites to exclude it from the apical domain, aPKC-Par6 and Lgl paradoxically form a stable kinase-substrate complex, with conflicting roles proposed for Par6. We report the structure of human aPKCι-Par6α bound to full-length Llgl1, captured through an aPKCι docking site and a Par6PDZ contact. This complex traps a phospho-S663 Llgl1 intermediate bridging between aPKC and Par6, impeding phosphorylation progression. Thus, aPKCι is effectively inhibited by Llgl1pS663 while Llgl1 is captured by aPKCι-Par6. Mutational disruption of the Lgl-aPKC interaction impedes complex assembly and Lgl phosphorylation, whereas disrupting the Lgl-Par6PDZ contact promotes complex dissociation and Lgl phosphorylation. We demonstrate a Par6PDZ-regulated substrate capture-and-release model requiring binding by active Cdc42 and the apical partner Crumbs to drive complex disassembly. Our results suggest a mechanism for mutual regulation and spatial control of aPKC-Par6 and Lgl activities.

Lgl resets Par complex membrane loading at mitotic exit to enable asymmetric neural stem cell division

The Par complex regulates cell polarity in diverse animal cells 1-4 , but how its localization is restricted to a specific membrane domain remains unclear. We investigated how the tumor suppressor Lethal giant larvae (Lgl) polarizes the Par complex in Drosophila neural stem cells (NSCs or neuroblasts). In contrast to epithelial cells, where Lgl and the Par complex occupy mutually exclusive membrane domains, Lgl is cytoplasmic when the Par complex is apically polarized in NSCs5. Importantly, we found that Lgl's key function is not in directly regulating metaphase Par polarity, but rather in removing the Par complex from the membrane at the end of mitosis, creating a "polarity reset" for the next cell cycle. Without this Lgl-mediated reset, we found that residual Par complex remains on the basal membrane during subsequent divisions, disrupting fate determinant polarization and proper asymmetric cell division. These findings reveal a novel mechanism of polarity regulation by Lgl and highlight the importance of the prepolarized state in Par-mediated polarity.

Proximity labeling reveals interactions necessary to maintain the distinct apical domains of Drosophila photoreceptors

Specialized membrane and cortical protein regions are common features of cells and are utilized to isolate differential cellular functions. In Drosophila photoreceptors, the apical membrane domain is defined by two distinct morphological membranes: the rhabdomere microvilli and the stalk membrane. To define the apical cortical protein complexes, we performed proximity labeling screens utilizing the rhabdomeric-specific protein PIP82 as bait. We found that the PIP82 interactome is enriched in actin-binding and cytoskeleton proteins, as well as proteins for cellular trafficking. Analysis of one target, Bifocal, with PIP82 revealed two independent pathways for localization to the rhabdomeric membrane and an additional mechanism of crosstalk between the protein complexes of the rhabdomeric and stalk membranes. The loss of Bifocal, and enhancement in the PIP82, bifocal double mutant, resulted in the additional distribution of Crumbs, an apical stalk membrane protein, to the lateral basal photoreceptor membrane. This phenotype was recapitulated by the knockdown of the catalytic subunit of Protein phosphatase 1, a known interactor with Bifocal. Taken together, these results expand our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the generation of the two distinct photoreceptor apical domains.

Perturbation of mammary epithelial cell apicobasal polarity by RHBDF1-facilitated nuclear translocation of PKCζ

BACKGROUND

The establishment of apicobasal polarity in epithelial cells is of critical importance in morphogenesis of mammary gland and other secretive gland tissues. The demise of the polarity is a critical step in early stages of tumorigenesis such as in breast ductal carcinoma in situ. The underlying molecular mechanism thus warrants in-depth investigations.

RESULTS

Protein kinase C isoform ζ (PKCζ), which is highly expressed in breast cancer cells, accumulates in the nuclei of human mammary epithelial cells overexpressing human rhomboid family-1 (RHBDF1), an endoplasmic reticulum membrane protein. Nuclear translocation of PKCζ results in the failure of the formation of the cytosolic apicobasal polarity complex Par, of which PKCζ is an essential component. Additionally, enhanced nuclear translocation of PKCζ is accompanied by an inhibition of the expression of cell tight junction and adherens junction proteins and an increase of cell mobility. Mechanistically, RHBDF1 is able to interact with importin β1 and PKCζ and promote PKCζ phosphorylation. Consistently, treatment of RHBDF1-overexpressing cells with an inhibitor of PKCζ phosphorylation leads to restoration of apicobasal polarity and cell-cell junctions, as well as suppressed cell mobility.

CONCLUSIONS

RHBDF1-facilitated nuclear translocation of PKCζ is critically responsible for the dismantlement of epithelial cell apicobasal polarity, and thus may serve as a target in the development of therapeutic approaches against early stages of breast cancer.

Mitochondrial morphology dynamics and ROS regulate apical polarity and differentiation in Drosophila follicle cells

Mitochondrial morphology dynamics regulate signaling pathways during epithelial cell formation and differentiation. The mitochondrial fission protein Drp1 affects the appropriate activation of EGFR and Notch signaling-driven differentiation of posterior follicle cells in Drosophila oogenesis. The mechanisms by which Drp1 regulates epithelial polarity during differentiation are not known. In this study, we show that Drp1-depleted follicle cells are constricted in early stages and present in multiple layers at later stages with decreased levels of apical polarity protein aPKC. These defects are suppressed by additional depletion of mitochondrial fusion protein Opa1. Opa1 depletion leads to mitochondrial fragmentation and increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) in follicle cells. We find that increasing ROS by depleting the ROS scavengers, mitochondrial SOD2 and catalase also leads to mitochondrial fragmentation. Further, the loss of Opa1, SOD2 and catalase partially restores the defects in epithelial polarity and aPKC, along with EGFR and Notch signaling in Drp1-depleted follicle cells. Our results show a crucial interaction between mitochondrial morphology, ROS generation and epithelial cell polarity formation during the differentiation of follicle epithelial cells in Drosophila oogenesis.

PP1 phosphatases control PAR-2 localization and polarity establishment in C. elegans embryos

Cell polarity relies on the asymmetric distribution of the conserved PAR proteins, which is regulated by phosphorylation/dephosphorylation reactions. While the kinases involved have been well studied, the role of phosphatases remains poorly understood. In Caenorhabditis elegans zygotes, phosphorylation of the posterior PAR-2 protein by the atypical protein kinase PKC-3 inhibits PAR-2 cortical localization. Polarity establishment depends on loading of PAR-2 at the posterior cortex. We show that the PP1 phosphatases GSP-1 and GSP-2 are required for polarity establishment in embryos. We find that codepletion of GSP-1 and GSP-2 abrogates the cortical localization of PAR-2 and that GSP-1 and GSP-2 interact with PAR-2 via a PP1 docking motif in PAR-2. Mutating this motif in vivo, to prevent binding of PAR-2 to PP1, abolishes cortical localization of PAR-2, while optimizing this motif extends PAR-2 cortical localization. Our data suggest a model in which GSP-1/-2 counteracts PKC-3 phosphorylation of PAR-2, allowing its cortical localization at the posterior and polarization of the one-cell embryo.

Balancing cell polarity PARts through dephosphorylation

How cells spatially organize their plasma membrane, cytoskeleton, and cytoplasm remains a central question for cell biologists. In this issue of JCB, Calvi et al. (2022. J. Cell Biol.https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202201048) identify PP1 phosphatases as key regulators of C. elegans anterior-posterior polarity, by counterbalancing aPKC-mediated phosphorylation of PAR-2.

Minimal functional domains of the core polarity regulator Dlg

The compartmentalized domains of polarized epithelial cells arise from mutually antagonistic actions between the apical Par complex and the basolateral Scrib module. In Drosophila, the Scrib module proteins Scribble (Scrib) and Discs-large (Dlg) are required to limit Lgl phosphorylation at the basolateral cortex, but how Scrib and Dlg could carry out such a ‘protection’ activity is not clear. We tested Protein Phosphatase 1α (PP1) as a potential mediator of this activity, but demonstrate that a significant component of Scrib and Dlg regulation of Lgl is PP1 independent, and found no evidence for a Scrib-Dlg-PP1 protein complex. However, the Dlg SH3 domain plays a role in Lgl protection and, in combination with the N-terminal region of the Dlg HOOK domain, in recruitment of Scrib to the membrane. We identify a ‘minimal Dlg’ comprised of the SH3 and HOOK domains that is both necessary and sufficient for Scrib localization and epithelial polarity function in vivo.

This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper.

Summary: A minimal SH3-HOOK fragment of Dlg is sufficient to support epithelial polarity through mechanisms independent of the PP1 phosphatase.

Endocytosis at the Crossroad of Polarity and Signaling Regulation: Learning from Drosophila melanogaster and Beyond

Cellular trafficking through the endosomal–lysosomal system is essential for the transport of cargo proteins, receptors and lipids from the plasma membrane inside the cells and across membranous organelles. By acting as sorting stations, vesicle compartments direct the fate of their content for degradation, recycling to the membrane or transport to the trans-Golgi network. To effectively communicate with their neighbors, cells need to regulate their compartmentation and guide their signaling machineries to cortical membranes underlying these contact sites. Endosomal trafficking is indispensable for the polarized distribution of fate determinants, adaptors and junctional proteins. Conversely, endocytic machineries cooperate with polarity and scaffolding components to internalize receptors and target them to discrete membrane domains. Depending on the cell and tissue context, receptor endocytosis can terminate signaling responses but can also activate them within endosomes that act as signaling platforms. Therefore, cell homeostasis and responses to environmental cues rely on the dynamic cooperation of endosomal–lysosomal machineries with polarity and signaling cues. This review aims to address advances and emerging concepts on the cooperative regulation of endocytosis, polarity and signaling, primarily in Drosophila melanogaster and discuss some of the open questions across the different cell and tissue types that have not yet been fully explored.

Basolateral protein Scribble binds phosphatase PP1 to establish a signaling network maintaining apicobasal polarity

Scribble, a member of the LAP protein family, contributes to the apicobasal polarity (ABP) of epithelial cells. The LAP-unique region of these proteins, which is essential and sufficient for ABP, includes a conserved Leucine-Rich Repeat (LRR) domain. The major binding partners of this region that could regulate ABP remain unknown. Here, using proteomics, native gel electrophoresis, and site-directed mutagenesis, we show that the concave surface of LRR domain in Scribble participates in three types of mutually exclusive interactions-(i) homodimerization, serving as an auto-inhibitory mechanism; (ii) interactions with a diverse set of polarity proteins, such as Llgl1, Llgl2, EPB41L2, and EPB41L5, which produce distinct multiprotein complexes; and (iii) a direct interaction with the protein phosphatase, PP1. Analogy with the complex between PP1 and LRR domain of SDS22, a well-studied PP1 regulator, suggests that the Scibble-PP1 complex stores a latent form of PP1 in the basolateral cell cortex. Such organization may generate a dynamic signaling network wherein PP1 could be dispatched from the complex with Scribble to particular protein ligands, achieving fast dephosphorylation kinetics.

Evidence for a nuclear role for Drosophila Dlg as a regulator of the NURF complex

Scribble (Scrib), Discs-large (Dlg), and Lethal giant larvae (Lgl) are basolateral regulators of epithelial polarity and tumor suppressors whose molecular mechanisms of action remain unclear. We used proximity biotinylation to identify proteins localized near Dlg in the Drosophila wing imaginal disc epithelium. In addition to expected membrane- and cytoskeleton-associated protein classes, nuclear proteins were prevalent in the resulting mass spectrometry dataset, including all four members of the nucleosome remodeling factor (NURF) chromatin remodeling complex. Subcellular fractionation demonstrated a nuclear pool of Dlg and proximity ligation confirmed its position near the NURF complex. Genetic analysis showed that NURF activity is also required for the overgrowth of dlg tumors, and this growth suppression correlated with a reduction in Hippo pathway gene expression. Together, these data suggest a nuclear role for Dlg in regulating chromatin and transcription through a more direct mechanism than previously thought.

Protein phosphatase 1 regulates atypical mitotic and meiotic division in Plasmodium sexual stages

PP1 is a conserved eukaryotic serine/threonine phosphatase that regulates many aspects of mitosis and meiosis, often working in concert with other phosphatases, such as CDC14 and CDC25. The proliferative stages of the malaria parasite life cycle include sexual development within the mosquito vector, with male gamete formation characterized by an atypical rapid mitosis, consisting of three rounds of DNA synthesis, successive spindle formation with clustered kinetochores, and a meiotic stage during zygote to ookinete development following fertilization. It is unclear how PP1 is involved in these unusual processes. Using real-time live-cell and ultrastructural imaging, conditional gene knockdown, RNA-seq and proteomic approaches, we show that Plasmodium PP1 is implicated in both mitotic exit and, potentially, establishing cell polarity during zygote development in the mosquito midgut, suggesting that small molecule inhibitors of PP1 should be explored for blocking parasite transmission.

Protein phosphatase 1: life-course regulation by SDS22 and Inhibitor-3

Protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) is expressed in all eukaryotic cells and catalyzes a sizable fraction of protein Ser/Thr dephosphorylation events. It is tightly regulated in space and time through association with a wide array of regulatory interactors of protein phosphatase one (RIPPOs). Suppressor-of-Dis2-number 2 (SDS22) and Inhibitor-3 (I3), which form a ternary complex with PP1, are the first two evolved and most widely expressed RIPPOs. Their deletion causes mitotic-arrest phenotypes and is lethal in some organisms. The role of SDS22 and I3 in PP1 regulation has been a mystery for decades as they were independently identified as both activators and inhibitors of PP1. This conundrum has largely been solved by recent reports showing that SDS22 and I3 control multiple steps of the life course of PP1. Indeed, they contribute to (a) the stabilization and activation of newly translated PP1, (b) the translocation of PP1 to the nucleus, and (c) the storage of PP1 as a reserve for holoenzyme assembly. Preliminary evidence suggests that SDS22 and I3 may also function as scavengers of released or aged PP1 for re-use in holoenzyme assembly or proteolytical degradation, respectively. Hence, SDS22 and I3 are emerging as master regulators of the life course of PP1.

Scrib module proteins: Control of epithelial architecture and planar spindle orientation

The Scrib module proteins, Scrib, Dlg, and Lgl, are conserved regulators of cell polarity in diverse biological contexts. Originally discovered as neoplastic tumor suppressors in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, disruption of Scrib module components leads to tumorigenesis in mammalian epithelia and is associated with human cancers. With multiple protein interacting domains, Scrib module proteins function as determinants of basolateral identity in epithelial cells with apical-basal polarity while acting as signaling platform scaffold proteins. Recent studies have further revealed novel roles of the Scrib module in the control of epithelial architecture, ranging from polarity establishment and tricellular junction formation to planar spindle orientation during cell division. This review updates the current understanding of the molecular nature and physiological functions of the Scrib module with a focus on in vivo studies, providing a framework for how these protein dynamics affect the processes of epithelial organization.

Lgl cortical dynamics are independent of binding to the Scrib-Dlg complex but require Dlg-dependent restriction of aPKC

Apical-basal polarity underpins the formation of epithelial barriers that are crucial for metazoan physiology. Although apical-basal polarity is long known to require the basolateral determinants Lethal Giant Larvae (Lgl), Discs Large (Dlg) and Scribble (Scrib), mechanistic understanding of their function is limited. Lgl plays a role as an aPKC inhibitor, but it remains unclear whether Lgl also forms complexes with Dlg or Scrib. Using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching, we show that Lgl does not form immobile complexes at the lateral domain of Drosophila follicle cells. Optogenetic depletion of plasma membrane PIP₂ or dlg mutants accelerate Lgl cortical dynamics. However, Dlg and Scrib are required only for Lgl localization and dynamic behavior in the presence of aPKC function. Furthermore, light-induced oligomerization of basolateral proteins indicates that Lgl is not part of the Scrib-Dlg complex in the follicular epithelium. Thus, Scrib and Dlg are necessary to repress aPKC activity in the lateral domain but do not provide cortical binding sites for Lgl. Our work therefore highlights that Lgl does not act in a complex but in parallel with Scrib-Dlg to antagonize apical determinants.

Distinct activities of Scrib module proteins organize epithelial polarity

A polarized architecture is central to both epithelial structure and function. In many cells, polarity involves mutual antagonism between the Par complex and the Scribble (Scrib) module. While molecular mechanisms underlying Par-mediated apical determination are well-understood, how Scrib module proteins specify the basolateral domain remains unknown. Here, we demonstrate dependent and independent activities of Scrib, Discs-large (Dlg), and Lethal giant larvae (Lgl) using the Drosophila follicle epithelium. Our data support a linear hierarchy for localization, but rule out previously proposed protein-protein interactions as essential for polarization. Cortical recruitment of Scrib does not require palmitoylation or polar phospholipid binding but instead an independent cortically stabilizing activity of Dlg. Scrib and Dlg do not directly antagonize atypical protein kinase C (aPKC), but may instead restrict aPKC localization by enabling the aPKC-inhibiting activity of Lgl. Importantly, while Scrib, Dlg, and Lgl are each required, all three together are not sufficient to antagonize the Par complex. Our data demonstrate previously unappreciated diversity of function within the Scrib module and begin to define the elusive molecular functions of Scrib and Dlg.

Switching states: dynamic remodelling of polarity complexes as a toolkit for cell polarization

Polarity is defined by the segregation of cellular components along a defined axis. To polarize robustly, cells must be able to break symmetry and subsequently amplify these nascent asymmetries. Finally, asymmetric localization of signaling molecules must be translated into functional regulation of downstream effector pathways. Central to these behaviors are a diverse set of cell polarity networks. Within these networks, molecules exhibit varied behaviors, dynamically switching among different complexes and states, active versus inactive, bound versus unbound, immobile versus diffusive. This ability to switch dynamically between states is intimately connected to the ability of molecules to generate asymmetric patterns within cells. Focusing primarily on polarity pathways governed by the conserved PAR proteins, we discuss strategies enabled by these dynamic behaviors that are used by cells to polarize. We highlight not only how switching between states is linked to the ability of polarity proteins to localize asymmetrically, but also how cells take advantage of 'state switching' to regulate polarity in time and space.

New insights into apical-basal polarization in epithelia

The establishment of an apical-basal axis of polarity is essential for the organization and functioning of epithelial cells. Polarization of epithelial cells is orchestrated by a network of conserved polarity regulators that establish opposing cortical domains through mutually antagonistic interactions and positive feedback loops. While our understanding is still far from complete, the molecular details behind these interactions continue to be worked out. Here, we highlight recent findings on the mechanisms that control the activity and localization of apical-basal polarity regulators, including oligomerization and higher-order complex formation, auto-inhibitory interactions, and electrostatic interactions with the plasma membrane.

Cell polarity oscillations in mitotic epithelia

Epithelial organization and function depend on coordinated cell polarity. In developing tissues, proliferative epithelia maintain whole tissue polarity as individual cells undergo symmetric divisions. However, recent work has shown that cells in diverse epithelia remodel their polarity in a cell cycle-dependent manner. Here, we discuss the different mechanisms that drive mitotic polarity oscillations and their implications for tissue morphogenesis.

Light-Induced Protein Clustering for Optogenetic Interference and Protein Interaction Analysis in Drosophila S2 Cells

Drosophila Schneider 2 (S2) cells are a simple and powerful system commonly used in cell biology because they are well suited for high resolution microscopy and RNAi-mediated depletion. However, understanding dynamic processes, such as cell division, also requires methodology to interfere with protein function with high spatiotemporal control. In this research study, we report the adaptation of an optogenetic tool to Drosophila S2 cells. Light-activated reversible inhibition by assembled trap (LARIAT) relies on the rapid light-dependent heterodimerization between cryptochrome 2 (CRY2) and cryptochrome-interacting bHLH 1 (CIB1) to form large protein clusters. An anti-green fluorescent protein (GFP) nanobody fused with CRY2 allows this method to quickly trap any GFP-tagged protein in these light-induced protein clusters. We evaluated clustering kinetics in response to light for different LARIAT modules, and showed the ability of GFP-LARIAT to inactivate the mitotic protein Mps1 and to disrupt the membrane localization of the polarity regulator Lethal Giant Larvae (Lgl). Moreover, we validated light-induced co-clustering assays to assess protein-protein interactions in S2 cells. In conclusion, GFP-based LARIAT is a versatile tool to answer different biological questions, since it enables probing of dynamic processes and protein-protein interactions with high spatiotemporal resolution in Drosophila S2 cells.