Inhibition, but not excitation, recovers from partial cone loss with greater spatiotemporal integration, synapse density, and frequency.
Cell Rep 2022;
38:110317. [PMID:
35108533 PMCID:
PMC8865908 DOI:
10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110317]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Revised: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Neural circuits function in the face of changing inputs, either caused by normal variation in stimuli or by cell death. To maintain their ability to perform essential computations with partial inputs, neural circuits make modifications. Here, we study the retinal circuit’s responses to changes in light stimuli or in photoreceptor inputs by inducing partial cone death in the mature mouse retina. Can the retina withstand or recover from input loss? We find that the excitatory pathways exhibit functional loss commensurate with cone death and with some aspects predicted by partial light stimulation. However, inhibitory pathways recover functionally from lost input by increasing spatiotemporal integration in a way that is not recapitulated by partially stimulating the control retina. Anatomically, inhibitory synapses are upregulated on secondary bipolar cells and output ganglion cells. These findings demonstrate the greater capacity for inhibition, compared with excitation, to modify spatiotemporal processing with fewer cone inputs.
Lee et al. find partial cone loss triggers inhibition, but not excitation, to increase spatiotemporal integration, recover contrast gain, and increase synaptic release onto retinal ganglion cells. Natural images filtered by cone-loss receptive fields perceptually match those of controls. Thus, inhibition compensates for fewer cones to potentially preserve perception.
Collapse