1
|
Juusola M, Takalo J, Kemppainen J, Haghighi KR, Scales B, McManus J, Bridges A, MaBouDi H, Chittka L. Theory of morphodynamic information processing: Linking sensing to behaviour. Vision Res 2025; 227:108537. [PMID: 39755072 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2024.108537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Revised: 11/27/2024] [Accepted: 12/10/2024] [Indexed: 01/06/2025]
Abstract
The traditional understanding of brain function has predominantly focused on chemical and electrical processes. However, new research in fruit fly (Drosophila) binocular vision reveals ultrafast photomechanical photoreceptor movements significantly enhance information processing, thereby impacting a fly's perception of its environment and behaviour. The coding advantages resulting from these mechanical processes suggest that similar physical motion-based coding strategies may affect neural communication ubiquitously. The theory of neural morphodynamics proposes that rapid biomechanical movements and microstructural changes at the level of neurons and synapses enhance the speed and efficiency of sensory information processing, intrinsic thoughts, and actions by regulating neural information in a phasic manner. We propose that morphodynamic information processing evolved to drive predictive coding, synchronising cognitive processes across neural networks to match the behavioural demands at hand effectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikko Juusola
- School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.
| | - Jouni Takalo
- School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK
| | - Joni Kemppainen
- School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK
| | | | - Ben Scales
- School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK
| | - James McManus
- School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK
| | - Alice Bridges
- School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK
| | - HaDi MaBouDi
- School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK
| | - Lars Chittka
- Centre for Brain and Behaviour, School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sigulinsky CL, Pfeiffer RL, Jones BW. Retinal Connectomics: A Review. Annu Rev Vis Sci 2024; 10:263-291. [PMID: 39292552 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-vision-102122-110414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/20/2024]
Abstract
The retina is an ideal model for understanding the fundamental rules for how neural networks are constructed. The compact neural networks of the retina perform all of the initial processing of visual information before transmission to higher visual centers in the brain. The field of retinal connectomics uses high-resolution electron microscopy datasets to map the intricate organization of these networks and further our understanding of how these computations are performed by revealing the fundamental topologies and allowable networks behind retinal computations. In this article, we review some of the notable advances that retinal connectomics has provided in our understanding of the specific cells and the organization of their connectivities within the retina, as well as how these are shaped in development and break down in disease. Using these anatomical maps to inform modeling has been, and will continue to be, instrumental in understanding how the retina processes visual signals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Crystal L Sigulinsky
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA;
| | - Rebecca L Pfeiffer
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA;
| | - Bryan William Jones
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chander PR, Hanson L, Chundekkad P, Awatramani GB. Neural Circuits Underlying Multifeature Extraction in the Retina. J Neurosci 2024; 44:e0910232023. [PMID: 37957014 PMCID: PMC10919202 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.0910-23.2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Classic ON-OFF direction-selective ganglion cells (DSGCs) that encode the four cardinal directions were recently shown to also be orientation-selective. To clarify the mechanisms underlying orientation selectivity, we employed a variety of electrophysiological, optogenetic, and gene knock-out strategies to test the relative contributions of glutamate, GABA, and acetylcholine (ACh) input that are known to drive DSGCs, in male and female mouse retinas. Extracellular spike recordings revealed that DSGCs respond preferentially to either vertical or horizontal bars, those that are perpendicular to their preferred-null motion axes. By contrast, the glutamate input to all four DSGC types measured using whole-cell patch-clamp techniques was found to be tuned along the vertical axis. Tuned glutamatergic excitation was heavily reliant on type 5A bipolar cells, which appear to be electrically coupled via connexin 36 containing gap junctions to the vertically oriented processes of wide-field amacrine cells. Vertically tuned inputs are transformed by the GABAergic/cholinergic "starburst" amacrine cells (SACs), which are critical components of the direction-selective circuit, into distinct patterns of inhibition and excitation. Feed-forward SAC inhibition appears to "veto" preferred orientation glutamate excitation in dorsal/ventral (but not nasal/temporal) coding DSGCs "flipping" their orientation tuning by 90° and accounts for the apparent mismatch between glutamate input tuning and the DSGC's spiking response. Together, these results reveal how two distinct synaptic motifs interact to generate complex feature selectivity, shedding light on the intricate circuitry that underlies visual processing in the retina.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Laura Hanson
- Department of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia V8W 4A4, Canada
| | - Pavitra Chundekkad
- Department of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia V8W 4A4, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sawant A, Saha A, Khoussine J, Sinha R, Hoon M. New insights into retinal circuits through EM connectomics: what we have learnt and what remains to be learned. FRONTIERS IN OPHTHALMOLOGY 2023; 3:1168548. [PMID: 38983069 PMCID: PMC11182165 DOI: 10.3389/fopht.2023.1168548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2024]
Abstract
The retinal neural circuit is intricately wired for efficient processing of visual signals. This is well-supported by the specialized connections between retinal neurons at both the functional and ultrastructural levels. Through 3D electron microscopic (EM) reconstructions of retinal neurons and circuits we have learnt much about the specificities of connections within the retinal layers including new insights into how retinal neurons establish connections and perform sophisticated visual computations. This mini-review will summarize the retinal circuitry and provide details about the novel insights EM connectomics has brought into our understanding of the retinal circuitry. We will also discuss unresolved questions about the retinal circuitry that can be addressed by EM connectomics in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhilash Sawant
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
- Cellular and Molecular Biology Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
- McPherson Eye Research Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Aindrila Saha
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
- Cellular and Molecular Biology Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
- McPherson Eye Research Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Jacob Khoussine
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
- Cellular and Molecular Biology Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
- McPherson Eye Research Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
- Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Raunak Sinha
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
- McPherson Eye Research Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Mrinalini Hoon
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
- McPherson Eye Research Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| |
Collapse
|