Factors Associated With Polypharmacy in Nursing Home Residents

ATOUM 6: does a multimodal intervention involving nurses reduce the use of antibiotics in French nursing homes?: A protocol for a cluster randomized study

INTRODUCTION

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is common in elderly living in nursing homes, and antibiotics prescription for this infection is particularly challenging. In these facilities, due to the absence of on-site physicians, nurses play an essential role when an infection is suspected, as they are the ones who collect and communicate by phone all the information needed by the physician for the decision-making process. In that context, our study aims to reduce antibiotic consumption in nursing homes, using a multimodal intervention, by strengthening nurses' involvement during the process of prescription for UTI.

METHODS/DESIGN

This is a planned 2-arm cluster randomized study of 40 nursing homes randomly assigned either to the control group or to the intervention group, using a 1:1 ratio. The intervention consists of reinforcing the nurses' knowledge concerning antibiotics and UTI; assist their clinical judgment using a decision aid diagram; improving their communication skills with the residents, their relatives, and the prescribers; and also increasing their involvement in the intervention' process by organizing a competition opposing the nursing homes of the interventional group to select additional intervention tools.

ANALYSIS

The main outcome is the reduction of the relative frequency of antibiotics prescription for UTIs in the interventional group.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval was obtained from the French Committee for the Protection of Persons (N. 19.01.04/SI CNRIPH 18.12.07.48123). An article including the main outcome will be submitted to a peer review journal.

Associations between polypharmacy and treatment intensity for hypertension and diabetes: a cross-sectional study of nursing home patients in British Columbia, Canada

OBJECTIVES

Describe nursing home polypharmacy prevalence in the context of prescribing for diabetes and hypertension and determine possible associations between lower surrogate markers for treated hypertension and diabetes (overtreatment) and polypharmacy.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

6 nursing homes in British Columbia, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

214 patients residing in one of the selected facilities during data collection period.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Polypharmacy was defined as ≥9 regular medications. Overtreatment of diabetes was defined as being prescribed at least one hypoglycaemic medication and a glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≤7.5%. Overtreatment of hypertension required being prescribed at least one hypertension medication and having a systolic blood pressure ≤128 mm Hg. Polypharmacy prescribing, independent of overtreatment, was calculated by subtracting condition-specific medications from total medications prescribed.

RESULTS

Data gathering was completed for 214 patients, 104 (48%) of whom were prescribed ≥9 medications. All patients were very frail. Patients with polypharmacy were more likely to have a diagnosis of hypertension (p=0.04) or congestive heart failure (p=0.003) and less likely to have a diagnosis of dementia (p=0.03). Patients with overtreated hypertension were more likely to also experience polypharmacy (Relative Risk (RR))1.77 (1.07 to 2.96), p=0.027). Patients with overtreated diabetes were prescribed more non-diabetic medications than those with a higher HbA1c (11.0±3.7vs 7.2±3.1, p=0.01).

CONCLUSION

Overtreated diabetes and hypertension appear to be prevalent in nursing home patients, and the presence of polypharmacy is associated with more aggressive treatment of these risk factors. The present study was limited by its small sample size and cross-sectional design. Further study of interventions designed to reduce overtreatment of hypertension and diabetes is needed to fully understand the potential links between polypharmacy and potential of harms of condition-specific overtreatment.

The psychotropic education and knowledge test for nurses in nursing homes: striving for PEAK performance

OBJECTIVES

The psychotropic education and knowledge test for nurses in acute geriatric care (PEAK-AC) measures knowledge of psychotropic indications, doses and adverse drug reactions in older inpatients. Given the low internal consistency and poor discrimination of certain items, this study aims to adapt the PEAK-AC, validate it in the nursing home setting and identify factors related to nurses' knowledge of psychotropics.

METHOD

This study included nurses and nurse assistants employed by nursing homes (n = 13) and nursing students at educational institutions (n = 5) in Belgium. A Delphi technique was used to establish content validity, the known groups technique for construct validity (n_respondents = 550) and the test-retest procedure for reliability (n_respondents = 42). Internal consistency and item analysis were determined.

RESULTS

The psychotropic education and knowledge test for nurses in nursing homes (PEAK-NH) (n_items = 19) demonstrated reliability (κ = 0.641) and internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.773). Significant differences between-group median scores were observed by function (p < 0.001), gender (p = 0.019), educational background (p < 0.001), work experience (p = 0.008) and continuing education (p < 0.001) for depression, delirium and pharmacotherapy topics. Items were acceptably difficult (n_items = 15) and well-functioning discriminators (n_items = 17). Median PEAK-NH score was 9/19 points (interquartile range 6-11 points). Respondents' own estimated knowledge was related to their PEAK-NH performance (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The PEAK-NH is a valid and reliable instrument to measure nurses' knowledge of psychotropics. These results suggest that nurses have limited knowledge of psychotropic use in nursing homes and are aware of their knowledge deficits. The PEAK-NH enables educational initiatives to be targeted and their impact on nurses' knowledge to be tracked.

Exploring the past, present and future of care home medicine management systems: pharmacists' perceptions of multicompartment compliance aids

Objectives

Medicines maintain and improve care home (CH) residents' health and therefore, it is imperative that CH medicine management systems are regularly evaluated to ensure they continually provide a high standard of care. Multicompartment compliance aid (MCA) medicine management systems are often used to assist United Kingdom CH staff with managing the large volume of medicines used by residents. This study aimed to identify the factors that led to the widespread adoption of MCAs into United Kingdom CHs, limitations associated with their current use and their relevance in the future.

Method

In June and July 2014 semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight pharmacists who were purposively selected for their expertise in CH medicine management systems in the United Kingdom. A qualitative thematic approach was employed in the analysis of data.

Key findings

Findings indicated that MCAs were introduced into CHs to address unsafe medicine administration practices and because of pharmacy commercial interest. Identified limitations included reduced staff alertness during medicine administration, restricted ability to identify medicines, and medicine wastage. Participants predicted continued use of MCAs in the future due to their perceived benefits of improved safety and efficiency, although some pharmacists recommended that they be removed and CH staff trained to administer medicines from original packaging.

Conclusion

These findings can contribute towards information used by health care providers when deciding on the relevance of MCAs in their current medicine management systems. Additionally, they can contribute towards information used by policy makers when revising United Kingdom CH medicine management guidelines.

Depressive symptoms are associated with analgesic use in people with Alzheimer's disease: Kuopio ALSOVA study

Neuropsychiatric symptoms of Alzheimer's disease (AD) such as depression may be associated with pain, which according to the literature may be inadequately recognized and managed in this population. This study aimed to identify the factors associated with analgesic use in persons with AD; in particular, how AD severity, functional status, neuropsychiatric symptoms of AD, co-morbidities and somatic symptoms are associated with analgesic use. 236 community-dwelling persons with very mild or mild AD at baseline, and their caregivers, were interviewed over five years as part of the prospective ALSOVA study. Generalized Estimating Equations (GEEs) were used to estimate unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for the factors associated with analgesic use over a five year follow-up. The proportion of persons with AD using any analgesic was low (13.6%) at baseline and remained relatively constant during the follow-up (15.3% at Year 5). Over time, the most prevalent analgesic changed from non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (8.1% of persons with AD at Year 1) to acetaminophen (11.1% at Year 5). Depressive symptoms (measured by the Beck Depression Inventory, BDI) were independently associated with analgesic use, after effects of age, gender, education, AD severity, comorbidities and somatic symptoms were taken into account. For every one unit increase in BDI, the odds of analgesic use increased by 4% (OR = 1.04, 95% confidence interval CI = 1.02-1.07). Caregiver depressive symptoms were not statistically significantly associated with analgesic use of the person with AD. Depressive symptoms were significantly associated with analgesic use during the five year follow-up period. Possible explanations warranting investigation are that persons with AD may express depressive symptoms as painful somatic complaints, or untreated pain may cause depressive symptoms. Greater awareness of the association between depressive symptoms and analgesic use may lead to safer and more effective prescribing for these conditions.

Combining quality improvement and geriatrics training: the nursing home polypharmacy outcomes project

To examine sustained effects of an educational intervention, the authors repeated a successful quality improvement (QI) project on medication safety and cost effectiveness. In October 2007 and August 2008, the facility leadership and geriatrics faculty identified all patients receiving nine or more medications (polypharmacy cohort) in a 170-bed teaching nursing home. They then taught Geriatric Medicine fellows (n = 12 in 2007, 11 in 2008) to (a) systematically collect medication data; (b) generate medication recommendations (stop, taper, or continue) based on expert criteria (Beers criteria) or drug-drug interaction programs; (c) discuss recommendations with patients' attending physicians; and (d) implement approved recommendations. Over the two projects, the polypharmacy cohorts demonstrated decreased potentially inappropriate medications (odds ratio [OR] = .78, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] [0.69, 0.88], p < .001), contraindicated medications (OR = .63, 95% CI [0.47, 0.85], p = .002) and medication costs (OR = .97, 95% CI [0.96, 0.99], p < .001). Findings suggest that programs planning educational QI projects for trainees may benefit from a multiyear approach to maximize clinical and educational benefits.

Rates, variability, and associated factors of polypharmacy in nursing home patients

Objectives

To determine the rate and variability of polypharmacy in nursing home (NH) residents and investigate its relationship to age, sex, functional status, length of stay, and comorbidities.

Methods

We conducted a cross sectional, multicenter study that included six nursing homes. Demographic, clinical characteristics, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), the number and classes of chronic medications, rate of polypharmacy >5 drugs (per day) and polypharmacy >7 drugs (per day) were recorded.

Results

Nine hundred and ninety-three residents were included; 750 (75.5%) fully dependent residents and 243 (24.5%) mobile demented residents requiring institutional care. The mean age was 85.04±7.55 (65–108) years. The mean rates of polypharmacy >5 drugs and polypharmacy >7 drugs were 42.6% and 18.6%, respectively. Differences in polypharmacy >5 drugs and polypharmacy >7 drugs were observed in NHs 24.7%–56% and 4.9%–30.4%, respectively (P<0.001). Mean number of chronic drugs per resident was 5.14±2.60 from 3.81±2.24 to 5.95±2.73 (P<0.001). No differences in polypharmacy were found between sex and fully dependent versus mobile demented residents. The most common medications taken were for gastrointestinal, neurological, and cardiovascular disorders. Regression analysis revealed four independent variables for polypharmacy >5 drugs: groups aged 75–84 and >85 relative to 65–74, odds ratio (OR) 0.46 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27–0.78) P=0.004, OR 0.35 (95% confidence interval 0.19–0.53), respectively, P<0.001; length of stay >2 years, OR 0.51 (95% CI 0.36–0.73) P<0.001; CCI, OR 1.58 (95% CI 1.42–1.75) P<0.001; and feeding tube versus normal feeding, OR 0.27 (95% CI 0.12–0.60) P=0.001.

Conclusion

Rates of polypharmacy in NHs are high with significant variability. Variability rates of polypharmacy, distinct residents’ characteristics, and excessive use of certain drug groups may indicate that a decrease in medication is potentially feasible.

Incidence and economical effects of pneumonia in the older population living in French nursing homes: design and methods of the INCUR study

Background

Among the most burdensome clinical conditions occurring in older persons, respiratory infections are particularly relevant. In fact, the onset of pneumonias is associated with a significant worsening of the individual’s global health status and significant increase of healthcare costs. The clinical and economical negative consequences of pneumonia may be particularly evident among the frailest groups of elders, in particular those living in nursing home. Nevertheless, specific research on incidence and economical effects of pneumonia in nursing homes residents is still scarce. In the present article, we present the rationale, the design and the methods of the “Incidence of pNeumonia and related ConseqUences in nursing home Resident (INCUR) study, specifically aimed at filling some of the gaps currently present in the field.

Methods/design

INCUR is an observational longitudinal study recruiting 800 residents across 13 randomly selected nursing homes in France. Multidimensional evaluations of participants are conducted at the baseline, mid-term (at 6 months), and end of the study (at 12 months) visits in order to measure and follow-up their physical function, nutrition, cognition, depression, quality of life, and healthcare costs. Incident pneumonia as well as the onset/recurrence of other major health-related events are monitored during the study follow-up.

Discussion

The INCUR study will provide valuable information about older persons living in nursing homes. Results from INCUR study may constitute the basis for the development of future preventive campaigns against pneumonia and its consequences.

Epidemiology of polypharmacy among family medicine patients at hospital discharge

BACKGROUND

Polypharmacy has been identified as a quality indicator, but no studies have been reported about the epidemiology of polypharmacy among hospital patients at discharge.

METHODS

Records of 142 family medicine patients aged ≥65 years who were discharged from the hospital during the period November 2008 to October 2009 were extracted. Forty-six of these patients were readmitted within 30 days and the remaining 96 not readmitted within 30 days. Polypharmacy was measured as >16 medications at dismissal. Independent variables related to person (use of medical care in the 12 months prior to hospitalization, number of high-risk diagnoses, and demographic characteristics), place (living situation at admission and disposition location), and time (month of admission). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cancer, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, and coronary artery disease were diagnoses determined to be high-risk.

RESULTS

Mean number of medications at dismissal was 13.5 and 23.2% of patients were prescribed more than 16 medications. No interactions were found between readmission status and any of the independent variables. Use of medical services in the previous year was not related to polypharmacy and no seasonal pattern was detected. Two or more high-risk diagnoses were independently related to polypharmacy (odds ratio [OR] = 4.75, confidence interval [CI] = 1.0-11.2, P = .00). Being discharged to a location with personal health services such as home care or a skilled nursing facility was also related to polypharmacy (OR = 3.07, CI = 1.3-7.2, P = .01).

CONCLUSION

Drug reviews intended to reduce the rate of polypharmacy among discharged persons aged ≥65 years can be targeted at patients who have 2 or more high-risk diagnoses and at those discharged to receive personal health services either at home or in a convalescence facility.

Reducing cost by reducing polypharmacy: the polypharmacy outcomes project

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of intervention by geriatric medicine fellows and a geriatrician on medication cost among long term care residents with polypharmacy.

DESIGN

Interventional study.

SETTING

A single hospital-affiliated long term care facility.

PARTICIPANTS

Long term care residents with polypharmacy, defined as being on 9 or more medications.

INTERVENTION

Medication lists of all nursing home residents were reviewed in October 2007 by geriatric medicine fellows and a faculty geriatrician using the 2003 Beers Criteria and the Epocrates online drug-drug interaction program. Recommendations for each resident were prepared and discussed directly with their primary physicians, who made the final decisions regarding medication discontinuation or taper.

MEASUREMENTS

Mean monthly costs (derived from current retail prices) for overall as well as scheduled and pro re nata (PRN) medications were compared before and after the intervention. Estimated reduction in nursing administration time and cost were calculated based on published literature on medication administration time and nursing labor costs.

RESULTS

Seventy-four (46.3%) of 160 residents were on 9 or more medications. Four residents died or were discharged before the intervention, leaving a final sample of 70 residents for the intervention. After the intervention, mean monthly medication costs per resident significantly decreased; overall medications, from $874.27 to $843.56 (P < .0001); scheduled medications, from $814.05 to $801.14 (P= .007); PRN medications, from $60.22 to $42.43 (P < .0001). Gastrointestinal medications demonstrated the highest cost savings of all medication categories (eg, promethazine and proton pump inhibitors), followed by central nervous system-active medications (including benzodiazepines and fluoxetine), then analgesics and diabetes medications.

CONCLUSION

This polypharmacy reduction intervention by physicians used readily available tools, demonstrated a significant decrease in medication-related costs, and provided training in the core competencies of practice-based learning and improvement and systems-based practice to geriatric medicine fellows in long term care.