Factors associated with increased survival after photodynamic therapy for cholangiocarcinoma

Endoscopic treatment of unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: beyond biliary drainage

Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC) is an aggressive biliary malignancy originating from the epithelial cells of the bile duct, typically located in the extrahepatic biliary tree, proximal to the cystic duct. PHCC often presents with a rapid onset of jaundice. While radical surgical resection remains the only curative treatment, only a minority of patients are eligible due to early metastasis and challenges associated with preoperative evaluations. Comprehensive treatments, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, are crucial for managing PHCC. However, in advanced stages, complications such as cholestatic liver injury, malnutrition, and biliary infections pose significant obstacles to these treatments. Therefore, biliary drainage (BD) is essential in the management of PHCC. In addition to external drainage methods like percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD), endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD), particularly endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), offer an effective option for internal drainage, which is more physiologically compatible and better tolerated. Furthermore, the integration of various endoscopic techniques has expanded the management of PHCC beyond mere drainage. Techniques such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA), photodynamic therapy (PDT), and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) based methods present new therapeutic avenues, albeit with variable results. This review aims to summarize current advancements and ongoing debates in the field of endoscopic treatment for unresectable PHCC.

Enhancing Cancer Treatment Through Combined Approaches: Photodynamic Therapy in Concert with Other Modalities

This review explores the role of photodynamic therapy (PDT) as an adjunctive treatment for cancers, with a focus on its potential to enhance the effects of established therapies like chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy. Given the limitations of conventional cancer treatments, PDT's ability to improve therapeutic outcomes through combination strategies is examined. In cancers such as lung, breast, cholangiocarcinoma, and cervical, PDT shows promise in enhancing response rates, reducing recurrence, and minimizing adverse effects when used alongside standard modalities. This study highlights current findings on PDT's mechanisms in complementing chemotherapy, augmenting surgical precision, and enhancing radiotherapeutic effects, thus offering a multi-faceted approach to cancer treatment. Additionally, insights into the clinical application of PDT in these cancers emphasize its potential for reducing tumor resistance and supporting more effective, personalized care. By providing an overview of PDT's synergistic applications across diverse cancer types, this review underscores its emerging significance in oncology as a tool to address traditional treatment limitations. Ultimately, this review aims to inform and inspire researchers and clinicians seeking to refine and innovate cancer therapy strategies through PDT integration, contributing to the advancement of more effective, synergistic cancer treatments.

Multimodal treatment with endoscopic ablation and systemic therapy for cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) are primary malignancies of biliary system and usually unresectable at the time of diagnosis. As a consequence, majority of these cases are candidates for palliative care. With the advances in chemotherapeutic agents and multidisciplinary care, the survival rate has improved in cases with inoperable malignant biliary obstruction. As a consequence, there is a need to provide effective and durable palliative care in these patients. The main role of endoscopic palliation in the vast majority of CCA includes biliary stenting for obstructive jaundice. Recent advances in the endoscopic palliation and multimodal approach appear promising in imparting durable relief of symptoms. Use of radiofrequency ablation, photodynamic therapy and intraluminal brachytherapy has been shown to improve the survival rates as well as the patency of biliary stents. Infact, intraductal ablation may act synergistically with chemotherapy by modulating tumour signalling pathways and immune microenvironment.

Comparing palliative treatment options for cholangiocarcinoma: photodynamic therapy vs. radiofrequency ablation

Referral to an endoscopist is often done once curative resection is no longer an option for cholangiocarcinoma management. In such cases, palliation has become the main objective of the treatment. Photodynamic therapy and radiofrequency ablation can be performed to achieve palliation, with both procedures associated with improved stent patency and survival. Despite the greatly increased cost and association with photosensitivity, photodynamic therapy allows transmission to the entire biliary tree. In contrast, radiofrequency ablation is cheaper and faster to apply, but requires intraductal contact. This paper reviews both modalities and compares their efficacy and safety for bile duct cancer palliation.

Photodynamic Therapy (PDT), Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) With Biliary Stents in Palliative Treatment of Unresectable Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Extrahepatic unresectable cholangiocarcinoma carries a dismal prognosis. In addition to biliary drainage by stent placement; photodynamic therapy (PDT) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) have been tried to prolong survival. In this meta-analysis, we appraise the current known data on the use of PDT, RFA in the palliative treatment of extrahepatic unresectable cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

We searched multiple databases from inception through July 2020 to identify studies that reported on PDT and RFA. Pooled rates of survival, stent patency, 30-, 90-day mortality, and adverse events were calculated. Study heterogeneity was assessed using I2% and 95% prediction interval.

RESULTS

A total of 55 studies (2146 patients) were included. A total of 1149 patients underwent treatment with PDT (33 studies), 545 with RFA (22 studies), and 452 patients with stent-only strategy. The pooled survival rate with PDT, RFA, and stent-only groups was 11.9 [95% confidence interval (CI): 10.7-13.1] months, 8.1 (95% CI: 6.4-9.9) months, and 6.7 (95% CI: 4.9-8.4) months, respectively. The pooled time of stent patency with PDT, RFA, and stent-only groups was 6.1 (95% CI: 4.2-8) months, 5.5 (95% CI: 4.2-6.7) months, and 4.7 (95% CI: 2.6-6.7) months, respectively. The pooled rate of 30-day mortality with PDT was 3.3% (95% CI: 1.6%-6.7%), with RFA was 7% (95% CI: 4.1%-11.7%) and with stent-only was 4.9% (95% CI: 1.7%-13.1%). The pooled rate of 90-day mortality with PDT was 10.4% (95% CI: 5.4%-19.2%) and with RFA was 16.3% (95% CI: 8.7%-28.6%).

CONCLUSION

PDT seemed to demonstrate better overall survival and 30-day mortality rates than RFA and/or stent-only palliation.

Ablative therapies of the biliary tree

Cholangiocarcinoma, a malignancy of the epithelial cells in the intrahepatic or extrahepatic biliary tree, is often diagnosed at later stages. Median survival duration ranges from 3 to 9 months with a less than ten percent 5-year survival rate. Thus, often treatment strategies are aimed more towards palliation instead of cure. With the majority of patients presenting with unresectable disease at the time of diagnosis, surgical intervention is not feasible, making less invasive endoscopic therapies more suitable. Initially, biliary stents were utilized for biliary decompression to mitigate cholestatic symptoms and prevent cholangitis; however, this strategy did not prove to provide significant survival benefit. Therefore, efforts to treat the tumor burden itself in addition to maintaining biliary patency became a focus of innovation and research in the endoscopic field. This study has led to the advent of therapies such as photodynamic therapy, radiofrequency ablation, and intraluminal brachytherapy. These options combined with biliary stenting have shown to not only offer the benefit of biliary decompression, but also to potentially improve stent patency and survival. Further, there is an anti-tumor effect of each of these modalities, portending an additional benefit in this subset of patients. Despite numerous retrospective and prospective studies assessing these ablative therapies, there is still a paucity of appropriately powered randomized controlled trials, and further research has yet to be done in the field. This review details the current literature entailing endobiliary ablative strategies.

Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Current status of endoscopic approach and additional therapies

The prognosis of patients with advanced or unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is poor. More than 50% of patients with jaundice are inoperable at the time of first diagnosis. Endoscopic treatment in patients with obstructive jaundice ensures bile duct drainage in preoperative or palliative settings. Relief of symptoms (pain, pruritus, jaundice) and improvement in quality of life are the aims of palliative therapy. Stent implantation by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is generally preferred for long-term palliation. There is a vast variety of plastic and metal stents, covered or uncovered. The stent choice depends on the expected length of survival, quality of life, costs and physician expertise. This review will provide the framework for the endoscopic minimally invasive therapy in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Moreover, additional therapies, such as brachytherapy, photodynamic therapy, radiofrequency ablation, chemotherapy, molecular-targeted therapy and/or immunotherapy by the endoscopic approach, are the nonsurgical methods associated with survival improvement rate and/or local symptom palliation.

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography-Guided Ablation for Cholangiocarcinoma

Most patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma present with surgically unresectable disease owing to the insidious nature of this malignancy. Relief of malignant perihilar biliary obstruction is a key aspect of cholangiocarcinoma. Although palliative stenting using uncovered metal stents has been advocated in patients with unresectable malignant perihilar biliary strictures, several endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided ablative modalities have emerged. Palliative photodynamic therapy, radiofrequency ablation, and intraluminal brachytherapy have been associated with improved stent patency and survival, although the ideal treatment approach remains unclear. This article reviews the published evidence for using each of these endobiliary ablative modalities in this difficult-to-treat patient population.

WITHDRAWN: A comparative effectiveness meta-analysis of photodynamic therapy and stent drainage for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the author(s) and Editor. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal.

Novel zinc‑ and silicon‑phthalocyanines as photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy of cholangiocarcinoma

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has emerged as an effective and minimally invasive cancer treatment modality. In the present study, two novel phthalocyanines, tetra‑triethyleneoxysulfonyl substituted zinc phthalocyanine (ZnPc) and dihydroxy‑2,9(10),16(17),23(24)‑tetrakis(4,7,10‑trioxaundecan‑1‑sulfonyl) silicon phthalocyanine (Pc32), were investigated as photosensitizers (PS) for PDT of cholangiocarcinoma (CC). ZnPc showed a pronounced dose‑dependent and predominantly cytoplasmic accumulation in EGI‑1 and TFK‑1 CC cell lines. Pc32 also accumulated in the CC cells, but this was less pronounced. Without photoactivation, the PS did not exhibit any antiproliferative or cytotoxic effects. Upon photoactivation, ZnPc induced the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and immediate phototoxicity, leading to a dose‑dependent decrease in cell proliferation, and an induction of mitochondria‑driven apoptosis and cell cycle arrest of EGI‑1 and TFK‑1 cells. Although photoactivated Pc32 also induced ROS formation in the two cell lines, the extent was less marked, compared with that induced by ZnPc‑PDT, and pronounced antipoliferative effects occurred only in the less differentiated EGI‑1 cells, whereas the more differentiated TFK‑1 cells did not show sustained growth inhibition upon Pc32‑PDT induction. In vivo examinations on the antiangiogenic potency of the novel PS were performed using chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assays, which revealed reduced angiogenic sprouting with a concomitant increase in nonperfused regions and degeneration of the vascular network of the CAM following induction with ZnPc‑PDT only. The study demonstrated the pronounced antiproliferative and antiangiogenic potency of ZnPc as a novel PS for PDT, meriting further elucidation as a promising PS for the photodynamic treatment of CC.

Success of photodynamic therapy in palliating patients with nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on clinical outcomes of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in non-resectable cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

Included studies compared outcomes with photodynamic therapy and biliary stenting (PDT group) vs biliary stenting only (BS group) in palliation of non-resectable cholangiocarcinoma. Articles were searched in MEDLINE, PubMed, and EMBASE. Pooled proportions were calculated using fixed and random effects model. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the I2 statistic.

RESULTS

Ten studies (n = 402) that met inclusion criteria were included in this analysis. The P for χ2 heterogeneity for all the pooled accuracy estimates was > 0.10. Pooled odds ratio for successful biliary drainage (decrease in bilirubin level > 50% within 7days after stenting) in PDT vs BS group was 4.39 (95%CI: 2.35-8.19). Survival period in PDT and BS groups were 413.04 d (95%CI: 349.54-476.54) and 183.41 (95%CI: 136.81-230.02) respectively. The change in Karnofsky performance scores after intervention in PDT and BS groups were +6.99 (95%CI: 4.15-9.82) and -3.93 (95%CI: -8.63-0.77) respectively. Odds ratio for post-intervention cholangitis in PDT vs BS group was 0.57 (95%CI: 0.35-0.94). In PDT group, 10.51% (95%CI: 6.94-14.72) had photosensitivity reactions that were self-limiting. Subgroup analysis of prospective studies showed similar results, except the incidence of cholangitis was comparable in both groups.

CONCLUSION

In palliation of unresectable cholangiocarcinoma, PDT seems to be significantly superior to BS alone. PDT should be used as an adjunct to biliary stenting in these patients.

Treatment of unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using hematoporphyrin photodynamic therapy: A prospective study

BACKGROUND

The available evidence of Photodynamic therapy (PDT) combined with stent placement treatment for unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC) is still insufficient. It also remains unclear whether PDT influences systemic inflammatory response.

AIM

To explore the clinical efficacy and safety of the combination treatment and the systemic inflammatory response in patients with EHCC.

METHODS

Patients with unresectable EHCC underwent either the combined treatment using Hematoporphyrin PDT and stent placement (PDT+stent group, n=12) or stent-only (stent group, n=27). The primary end-point was overall survival. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interleukin (IL)-6 levels were measured. Quality of life was assessed using the Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) every 3 months.

RESULTS

Average survival time (13.8 vs. 9.6 months), and 6-month (91.7% vs. 74.1%), and 1-year (58.3% vs. 3.7%) survival rates of PDT+stent group were significantly increased compared with the stent group. KPS scores in the PDT+stent group were significantly improved. TNF-α and IL-6 levels were significantly increased in the PDT+stent group.

CONCLUSION

Hematoporphyrin-PDT combined with stent placement is an effective and safe treatment for EHCC. The treatment might promote systemic inflammatory response.

Efficacy and safety of photodynamic therapy for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Photodynamic therapy with the placement of a biliary stent may improve the prognosis in patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma. The aim of this research is to determine the hazard ratio of photodynamic therapy with stent compared to biliary stenting alone or other therapies for the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

Several databases were searched from inception to December 31 2013 for trials comparing photodynamic therapy+stent vs. stent-only or other treatments for cholangiocarcinoma. The outcomes of interest included patient survival, the changes of serum bilirubin levels, the quality of life (Karnofsky performance status), and adverse events. The hazard ratios (HR) were extracted from the survival curves using Tierney's Method. LnHR and its variance were pooled using an inverse variance-weighted average. Inconsistency was quantified using I(2) statistics.

RESULTS

In all, 8 trials comparing PDT+stent with other therapeutic methods were selected. We made a meta-analysis based on the 7 trials, which compared the result of PDT+stent and the stent-only group. HR summarizes the survival for the two groups. Overall survival was significantly better in patients who received photodynamic therapy than those who did not [HR=0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.33∼0.73, P=0.0005]. Among the 8 trials (642 subjects), 5 assessed the changes of serum bilirubin levels, and/or Karnofsky performance status, as other indications for improvement. In all, the incidence for phototoxic reaction is 11.11%. The incidence for other events in photodynamic therapy and the stent-only group was 13.64% and 12.79%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The palliative treatment of cholangiocarcinoma, with photodynamic therapy, is associated with an increased survival benefit, an improved biliary drainage, and a better quality of life. However, the quality of this evidence is low.

Advances in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a malignancy of the bile ducts that carries high morbidity and mortality. Patients with CCA typically present with obstructive jaundice, and associated complications of CCA include cholangitis and biliary sepsis. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a valuable treatment modality for patients with CCA, as it enables internal drainage of blocked bile ducts and hepatic segments by using plastic or metal stents. While there remains debate as to if bilateral (or multi-segmental) hepatic drainage is required and/or superior to unilateral drainage, the underlying tenant of draining any persistently opacified bile ducts is paramount to good ERCP practice and good clinical outcomes. Endoscopic therapy for malignant biliary strictures from CCA has advanced to include ablative therapies via ERCP-directed photodynamic therapy (PDT) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA). While ERCP techniques cannot cure CCA, advancements in the field of ERCP have enabled us to improve upon the quality of life of patients with inoperable and incurable disease. ERCP-directed PDT has been used in lieu of brachytherapy to provide neoadjuvant local tumor control in patients with CCA who are awaiting liver transplantation. Lastly, mounting evidence suggests that palliative ERCP-directed PDT, and probably ERCP-directed RFA as well, offer a survival advantage to patients with this difficult-to-treat malignancy.

Role of photodynamic therapy and intraductal radiofrequency ablation in cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma comprises 3% of all gastrointestinal malignancies. Prognosis is poor as the disease is locally advanced at the time of its presentation. Biliary endoprosthesis are widely used for biliary decompression, however, they only provides temporary relief. Photodynamic therapy and Radiofrequency ablation are two innovative approaches performed endoscopically to locally destruct the malignant tissue. This chapter focuses on their application and appropriate use along with their benefits and complications.

Photodynamic Therapy using Talaporfin Sodium for the Recurrence of Cholangiocarcinoma after Surgical Resection

We herein report the case of a 72-year-old man who underwent photodynamic therapy (PDT) with talaporfin sodium for recurrent cholangiocarcinoma after surgical resection. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) showed severe stenosis with an irregular surface measuring approximately 1 cm in length from the anastomotic site, and a recurrent nodular lesion was observed at the anastomotic site of the right anterior intrahepatic bile duct on gastrointestinal endoscopy. ERC after PDT revealed a dramatic improvement in the bile duct stenosis, and the nodular lesion had disappeared. No adverse events from the PDT were detected. PDT using talaporfin sodium may be a safe alternative treatment for cholangiocarcinoma.

Endoscopic treatment options for cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinomas are often locally advanced or have metastasized, and at the time of diagnosis individuals often have a poor prognosis. Endoscopic treatment options traditionally include biliary decompression via stenting to allow for systemic chemotherapy and radiotherapy, with self-expanding metal biliary stents being preferred. Recent developments in locoregional therapy delivered endoscopically, such as photodynamic therapy and radiofrequency abalation, have shown promising results in improving patient survival.

Endoscopic treatment options for cholangiocarcinomas

Cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCC) is a very aggressive tumor, which remains highly resistant to current chemoradiation therapies. Death is usually caused by the tumor burden. However, biliary obstruction, which leads to cholangitis and liver failure, is also a cause of death. Therefore, relief of biliary obstruction is one of the key palliative treatment options for patients with hilar or distal CCC. Radiologic or endoscopic insertions of stents (plastic or self-expanding metal) are definite biliary drainage options. Whereas stents alone can help achieve relief of bile duct obstruction, endoscopic ablative interventions with photodynamic therapy or radiofrequency ablation are also useful in destroying intraluminal tumor. Destroying the tumor leads to an increase in the luminal diameter of the obstructed bile duct, allowing for placement of more or larger diameter stents, and thus improving bile flow. Besides decreasing morbidity associated with obstruction, ablative therapies such as photodynamic therapy have also been associated with improved survival in a sub-group of patients with CCC and should therefore be incorporated into the treatment algorithm of any center treating patients with CCC.

Randomised phase II trial of photodynamic therapy plus oral fluoropyrimidine, S-1, versus photodynamic therapy alone for unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma is an uncommon cancer and its overall incidence is increasing. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been proposed as palliative management for unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma (UHC). To date, little is known about the role of the addition of systemic chemotherapy to PDT for UHC. We performed a prospective, randomised, phase II trial to compare PDT plus S-1 and PDT alone for UHC.

METHODS

Patients with UHC were randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to PDT plus S-1 or PDT alone. The primary end-point was overall survival. The secondary end-points were progression-free survival, complications, re-intervention rate and quality of life. This trial is registered with clinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00869635.

FINDINGS

Between February 2009 and May 2012, we randomly assigned 21 patients to receive PDT plus S-1 and 22 to receive PDT alone. The UHC patients treated with PDT plus S-1 showed higher 1-year survival rate compared with the patients treated with PDT alone (76.2% versus 32%, P=0.003) and prolonged overall survival (median 17 months, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.6-21.4, versus 8 months, 95% CI: 6-10, P=0.005, hazard ratio [HR], 0.36; 95% CI: 0.17-0.75). Regarding the secondary end-points, PDT plus S-1 was associated with prolonged progression-free survival compared with PDT alone (median 10 months [95% CI: 4.1-16] versus 2 months [95% CI: 0.4-3.5], P=0.009 (HR for progression 0.39, 95% CI: 0.19-0.83). There were no differences in the number of PDT sessions, the frequency of cholangitis, overall adverse events or the quality of life in either group.

INTERPRETATIONS

PDT plus S-1 was well tolerated and was associated with a significant improvement of overall survival and progression-free survival compared with PDT alone in patients with UHC. These findings warrant further clinical investigation of PDT plus S-1 in patients with UHC.

Endoscopic management of malignant bile duct strictures

Malignant biliary obstruction can arise from intrahepatic, extrahepatic, and hilar locations from either primary or metastatic disease. Biliary-enteric surgical bypass has been surpassed in the last 20 years by endoscopic balloon dilation and stenting. The goal of stenting for biliary decompression is to palliate obstructive symptoms; it has not been shown that survival is affected by stenting alone. Novel endoscopic therapies, including photodynamic therapy and radiofrequency ablation, have been evaluated and show promise. Both therapies seem to be safe and effective in the treatment of malignant bile duct strictures but are in need of prospective studies of longer duration.

Current status of photodynamic therapy for bile duct cancer

The most common form in bile duct cancers is a highly desmoplastic cancer with a growth pattern characterized by periductal extension and infiltration. The prognosis of bile duct cancers, especially hilar cholangiocarcinoma, is limited by tumor spread along the biliary tree leading to refractory obstructive cholestasis, cholangitis, and liver failure. Although biliary endoprosthesis improves occlusion rates and reduces the number of therapeutic interventions, median survival time is not ameliorated. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a local photochemical tumor treatment that consists of a photosensitizing agent in combination with laser irradiation of a distinct wavelength. Tumor ablation with PDT combined with biliary stenting reduces cholestasis and significantly improves median survival time in selected patients with bile duct cancers.

Photodynamic therapy for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma: a comparative effectiveness systematic review and meta-analyses

BACKGROUND

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with placement of a biliary stent may improve bile duct patency in patients with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). We aimed to determine the effectiveness of biliary stenting with PDT compared to biliary stenting alone in the palliative treatment of CCA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Several databases were searched from inception to December 2011 for prospective studies comparing biliary stenting with PDT vs. biliary stenting only for CCA. Outcomes of interest included patient survival, quality of life (using Karnofsky score), and serum bilirubin levels. The relative risk (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and the weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous outcomes were estimated using DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model. Inconsistency was quantified using I(2) statistics. The extent of publication bias was ascertained by visual inspection of funnel plots and Egger's test.

RESULTS

There were six studies that met inclusion criteria. A total of 170 participants received PDT and 157 had biliary stenting only. Compared with biliary stenting, PDT was associated with a statistically significant increase in the length of survival (WMD 265 days; 95% CI: 154-376; p = 0.01; I(2) = 65%), improvement in Karnofsky scores (WMD 7.74; 95% CI: 3.73-11.76; p = 0.01; I(2)= 14%), and a trend for decline in serum bilirubin (WMD -2.92 mg/dL; 95% CI: -7.54 to 1.71; p=0.22; I(2) = 94%). The pooled event rate for biliary sepsis was 15% and was similar between PDT and control groups.

CONCLUSION

Palliative treatment of CCA with PDT is associated with increased survival benefit, improved biliary drainage, and quality of life. However, the quality of this evidence is low.

Longterm outcome of photodynamic therapy compared with biliary stenting alone in patients with advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine longterm outcomes and factors associated with increased survival after photodynamic therapy (PDT) compared with endoscopic biliary drainage alone in patients presenting with advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma (CC).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the institutional database identifying all patients who presented with a diagnosis of hilar CC between December 1999 and January 2011 was conducted.

RESULTS

Of the 232 patients identified, 72 (31%) were treated with PDT (Group A) and 71 (31%) were treated with endoscopic biliary drainage alone (Group B). Median survival was 9.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.42-12.25] in Group A and 7.3 months (95% CI 4.79-9.88) in Group B (P= 0.029). On multivariate analysis, biliary drainage without PDT (P= 0.025) and higher T-stage (P= 0.002) were significant predictors of shorter survival in all patients. In a subgroup analysis of patients in the PDT group, lower pre-PDT bilirubin level (P= 0.005), multiple PDT treatments (P= 0.044) and shortened time to treatment after diagnosis (P= 0.013) were significant predictors of improved survival. Median metal stent patency was longer in Group A than in Group B (215 days vs. 181 days; P= 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

Photodynamic therapy with stenting resulted in longer survival than stenting alone. Early PDT after diagnosis and multiple PDT treatments were shown to have survival benefits. Metal stent patency was longer in patients receiving PDT. Higher T-stage appears to be a predictor of early mortality in advanced bile duct cancer treated with PDT.

Photodynamic therapy for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma (CC) is a rare primary malignancy of the biliary tract with a dismal prognosis. Curative resection can only be applied to a small proportion of early diagnosed patients. Palliative biliary drainage by either percutaneous or endoscopic insertion of endoprostheses improves quality-of-life by reducing pruritis, cholangitis, and pain, but has been reported to improve survival time only slightly. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a relatively new local, minimally invasive palliative strategy for unresectable CC. PDT uses a photosensitive molecule that accumulates in proliferating tissue such as tumors. Activation of the photosensitizer by use of light of a specific wavelength generates reactive oxygen species leading to selective tumor-cell death. After initial feasibility studies and promising prospective phase II studies, results from two prospective randomized controlled trials comparing PDT after endoprostheses insertion with endoprostheses alone for patients with unresectable CC have been published. One study resulted in dramatically prolonged median survival in the PDT group (493 days) compared with the non-PDT group (98 days) (P < 0.0001), and significantly improved performance status (PS) in the PDT group. A second study with high baseline patients' PS confirmed the benefit of PDT for survival (630 days in the PDT group compared with 210 days for endoprostheses alone, P < 0.01). The procedures were generally well tolerated. PDT has also been reported to have a favorable outcome as adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for CC. Although accumulated data and local expertise are limited, PDT can be regarded as a standard palliative therapy for unresectable CC.

Feasibility and safety of long-term photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the palliative treatment of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Background and Aim

PDT is an important palliative option for patients with unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CC). However, the results published to date reported on studies with no more than 6 (mostly up to 4) PDT procedures. Furthermore, the clinical experience of PDT in combination with chemotherapy is limited. The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of multiple (4 to 14) settings of PDT, combined with biliary drainage, and (in some cases) with chemotherapy.

Methods

Ten patients with unresectable extrahepatic CC were treated with biliary stenting and at least 4 PDT procedures in our department between 10/2005 and 08/2010.

Results

Ten patients (male/female = 5/5), mean age 68.8 years (range, 54 - 81 years) who received at least 4 PDT procedures were analyzed. All patients underwent endoscopic biliary drainage. Nine patients received metallic stents and one patient a plastic stent. In 4 patients (40%) bilateral metal stenting (JoStent SelfX^®) was performed. The mean number of PDT sessions was 7.9 ± 3.9 (range: 4 - 14). Eight patients had elevated bilirubin levels with a mean bilirubin at admission of 9.9 ± 11.3 mg/dL, which had decreased to an average minimum of 1.2 ± 0.9 mg/dL after 3 months. No severe toxicity was noted. Two patients received concomitant chemotherapy (GEMCIS as 1^st line, GEMOX plus cetuximab as 2^nd line). The median overall survival has not been reached, whereas the estimated survival of all patients was 47.6 months, 95% CI 25.9 - 48.1.

Conclusion

Long-term PDT in patients with extrahepatic CC is feasible and effective and is accompanied - at least in this cohort- by a survival time of more than 2 years.

State of the art in the endoscopic imaging and ablation of Barrett's esophagus

Barrett's esophagus is the result of long-term acid reflux and is a precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma. Surgical resection of the esophagus has been the mainstay of treatment for high grade dysplasia and early cancer. However, recent advances in the endoscopic imaging and ablation technologies have made esophagectomy avoidable in patients with dysplasia and superficial neoplasia. In this article, we review the most relevant endoscopic imaging technologies, such as chromoendoscopy, narrow band and autofluorescence imaging, and confocal laser endomicroscopy. We also review the various endoscopic ablation technologies, such as endoscopic mucosal resection, photodynamic therapy, radiofrequency ablation, and cryotherapy. Finally, we focus on the studies that evaluate the efficacy of these imaging and ablation technologies in finding and eradicating neoplastic Barrett's esophagus.

Clinical feasibility of direct peroral cholangioscopy-guided photodynamic therapy for inoperable cholangiocarcinoma performed by using an ultra-slim upper endoscope (with videos)

BACKGROUND

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has emerged as a promising palliative treatment for inoperable cholangiocarcinoma. Cholangioscopy-guided PDT can be useful for identification of tumor margins, determination of the appropriate location for placement of the diffuser, and evaluation of the patient's response to therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility of PDT under direct peroral cholangioscopy (POC) by using an ultra-slim upper endoscope in patients with inoperable cholangiocarcinoma.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational, pilot study.

SETTING

Single tertiary-care referral center.

PATIENTS

This study involved 9 patients with inoperable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

INTERVENTION

Photofrin II was administered intravenously 48 hours before PDT. Additional PDT was performed up to 48 hours after the initial application of therapy. A successful direct POC-guided PDT was defined as advancement of the endoscope into the distal margin of the tumor and maintenance of endoscope position until PDT was completed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The clinical feasibility, usefulness, and complications of direct POC for PDT.

RESULTS

Seventeen sessions of direct POC for PDT were performed in 9 patients. PDT was performed successfully in 15 of 17 sessions (88.2%) and 7 of 9 patients (77.8%). Biliary drainage under direct POC, if necessary after PDT, was possible in 100% of patients (7/7). Follow-up direct POC confirmed significant tumor ablation after PDT in 5 patients. One patient reported mild skin redness; no major procedure-related complications were observed.

LIMITATIONS

Small sample size, pilot study.

CONCLUSION

Direct POC-guided PDT by using an ultra-slim upper endoscope seems to be both feasible and safe in select patients with inoperable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Photodynamic therapy: Palliation and endoscopic technique in cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma is the primary malignancy arising from the biliary epithelium. The disease is marked by jaundice, cholestasis, and cholangitis. Over 50 percent of patients present with advanced stage disease, precluding curative surgical resection as an option of treatment. Prognosis is poor, and survival has been limited even after biliary decompression. Palliative management has become the standard of care for unresectable disease and has evolved to include an endoscopic approach. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) consists of administration of a photosensitizer followed by local irradiation with laser therapy. Several studies conducted in Europe and the United States have shown a marked improvement in the symptoms of cholestasis, survival, and quality of life. This article summarizes the published experience regarding PDT for cholangiocarcinoma and the steps required to administer this therapy safely.

Photodynamic therapy for cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma is the primary malignancy arising from the biliary epithelium, and it presents as jaundice, cholestasis, and cholangitis. Over 50 percent of patients present with advanced-stage disease, and the prognosis is poor with the survival measured in months even after biliary decompression. Palliative management has become the standard of care for unresectable disease, and this involves an endoscopic approach. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involves the administration of a photosensitizer followed by local irradiation with laser therapy. The use of PDT for palliation of bile-duct tumors has produced promising results. Several studies conducted in Europe and the United States have shown that PDT produces a marked improvement in the symptoms of cholestasis, survival, and quality of life. This chapter summarizes the principle of PDT, the technique employed, and the published experience regarding PDT for cholangiocarcinoma.

Inflammation and carcinogenesis of the biliary tract: update on endoscopic treatment

Both diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma are suboptimal. From the former standpoint, fluorescence in situ hybridization, direct cholangioscopy, endocystoscopy, and optical coherence tomography are just a few of the myriad technologies being studied or employed to improve diagnostic yield. From the latter standpoint, most series suggest that fewer than 1 third of patients are resectable for cure, although liver transplantation has increasingly been used in a subset of cholangiocarcinoma patients with extrahepatic disease. Palliation has included chemotherapy which is of dubious value in most series. Instead, a majority of therapies have addressed mechanisms to improve biliary drainage to delay and preclude hepatic failure and minimize the risk of cholangitis. Although the latter has been accomplished with surgery and attempted with external beam irradiation and brachytherapy, percutaneous and/or endoscopic drainage are the most commonly employed methods in widespread use. There are prospective, randomized studies that suggest that bilateral stenting is associated with improved outcomes in bifurcation lesions if plastic stents are placed, that percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage is more successful than endoscopic stenting in Klatskin tumors, that self-expandable biliary stents have prolonged patency compared with plastic prostheses, and that, if approached with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging guidance to preclude contamination of the contralateral undrained system, outcomes are comparable in patients treated with unilateral as opposed to bilateral self-expandable metal stents. There is a single prospective, randomized study suggesting that patients treated with endoscopic or percutaneous stenting in conjunction with photodynamic therapy have prolonged survival compared with stent placement alone.

Photodynamic therapy for cholangiocarcinoma: overview and new developments

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with hematoporphyrins has emerged as promising treatment for nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma in several prospective observational studies and two randomized studies. This review describes the mechanism of action of PDT, gives an overview of clinical experience in cholangiocarcinoma and summarizes the results published in 2007 and 2008.

RECENT FINDINGS

The mechanism of action of PDT has been further elucidated. PDT induces an apoptotic, antiangiogenic as well as an immunomodulatory response. Interleukin-6, a bile duct epithelium growth factor correlating with tumor burden, decreases after PDT. The efficacy of PDT was confirmed in a comparative study in the United States. Patients with no visible mass on imaging studies, high serum albumin levels and treatment immediately after diagnosis seem to benefit most from PDT. Although it is recommended to perform PDT in bile ducts without stents in place, illumination through metal stents is possible if the light dose is adjusted. Meso-tetrahydroxyphenyl chlorine is a new potent photosensitizer for PDT of cholangiocarcinoma.

SUMMARY

In advanced nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma, PDT is the only evidence-based treatment that improves survival when compared with stenting. Therefore, PDT should be offered to those who are unsuitable for surgery.

Systematic review: photodynamic therapy for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Palliative therapies for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma such as stent, radiotherapy and chemotherapy have generally been disappointing. Therefore, it is necessary to find a new approach to fighting the disease. Several published clinical trials have reported the therapeutic effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT) for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and efficacy of photodynamic therapy for patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

Relevant studies were retrieved from the Medline, Current Contents, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Inclusion of papers was determined by using a predetermined protocol; independent assessments and the final consensus decision were performed by two independent reviewers. Acceptable study designs included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials (CCTs), case studies, and case reports. Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria, and were tabulated and critically appraised in terms of characteristics, methods, outcomes, and complications.

RESULTS

Twenty studies were included. The quality of the available evidence was low to moderate with the majority of studies being uncontrolled before and after design and thus limited by the retrospective nature of much of the available data. After PDT, it is reported that bilirubin serum levels declined, quality of life improved and survival time increased in most of the patients. At the same time, there were few complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on currently available evidence, PDT was safe and effective for patients with inoperable cholangiocarcinoma.

Photodynamic therapy for non-resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has emerged as a useful tool for palliative treatment of the otherwise difficult to treat perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (CC). PDT is a minimally invasive and effective technique for local tumour ablation with rare and predictable side effects. A modest number of studies and randomised trials using porfimer (Photofrin) could demonstrate an improvement in quality of life and survival time. A novel approach to a priori non-resectable perihilar CC was proven in a pilot study using neoadjuvant porfimer-PDT for down-sizing of the tumour followed by R0 resection. These days, active phase II and phase III trials investigate if the tumouricidal activity can be increased using temoporfin (Foscan) as an alternative photosensitiser with higher penetration capability and whether porfimer-based PDT plus stenting is superior to biliary stenting alone in terms of overall survival, respectively. The local tumour ablation and correction of obstructive cholestasis with PDT will allow for novel multimodal strategies to treat cholangiocarcinoma.

Endoscopic deployment of multiple JOSTENT SelfX is effective and safe in treatment of malignant hilar biliary strictures

BACKGROUND & AIMS

For the treatment of unresectable biliary tract carcinoma with hilar biliary stricture, antitumor therapy and biliary stenting should be addressed in terms of prolonged survival with a good quality of life. However, the endoscopic management of malignant hilar biliary strictures is difficult even for an expert endoscopist. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the endoscopic deployment of multiple JOSTENT SelfX units in patients with hilar biliary strictures treated with or without chemotherapy.

METHODS

Between November 2003 and December 2006, endoscopic deployment of multiple JOSTENT SelfX units in hilar biliary strictures by using a partial stent-in-stent procedure was performed on 41 consecutive patients with primary cholangiocarcinoma (n = 34) and gallbladder carcinoma (n = 7) at a gastroenterologic center of Okayama University Hospital. Thirty-three patients were treated with gemcitabine (n = 25) or S-1 (n = 8).

RESULTS

Metallic stent deployment was successfully accomplished in all cases via only endoscopic procedures. During the follow-up period (mean, 210 days), mean patency time was 150 days, and metallic stent obstruction occurred in 15 cases (37%). Although a repeat intervention was required in all metallic stent obstructed cases, the deployment of the second metallic or plastic stent was completed successfully. The remaining 26 cases (63%) required no interventions. The median overall survival period was only 235 days. However, that of the patients receiving chemotherapy was 392 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic partial stent-in-stent deployment with multiple JOSTENT SelfX prostheses is effective and safe for the treatment of malignant hilar biliary stricture even in patients receiving chemotherapy.

Unresectable cholangiocarcinoma: comparison of survival in biliary stenting alone versus stenting with photodynamic therapy

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma is associated with improvement in cholestasis, quality of life, and potentially survival. We compared survival in patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with PDT and stent placement with a group undergoing ERCP with stent placement alone.

METHODS

Forty-eight patients were palliated for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma during a 5-year period. Nineteen were treated with PDT and stents; 29 patients treated with biliary stents alone served as a control group. Multivariate analysis was performed by using Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, age, treatment by chemotherapy or radiation, and number of ERCP procedures and PDT sessions to detect predictors of survival.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated improved survival in the PDT group compared with the stent only group (16.2 vs 7.4 months, P<.004). Mortality in the PDT group at 3, 6, and 12 months was 0%, 16%, and 56%, respectively. The corresponding mortality in the stent group was 28%, 52%, and 82%, respectively. The difference between the 2 groups was significant at 3 months and 6 months but not at 12 months. Only the number of ERCP procedures and number of PDT sessions were significant on multivariate analysis. Adverse events specific to PDT included 3 patients with skin phototoxicity requiring topical therapy only.

CONCLUSIONS

ERCP with PDT seems to increase survival in patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma when compared with ERCP alone. It remains to be proved whether this effect is attributable to PDT or the number of ERCP sessions. A prospective randomized multicenter study is required to confirm these data.

Advances in photodynamic therapy for gastrointestinal tumors and its propect

This paper reviews the photodynamic therapy for gastrointestinal tumors and its mechanisms, and describes the authors' experience with it. It is feasible and reasonable to use photodynamic therapy for gastrointestinal tumors. It is not in contradiction with PDT and traditional surgical treatment, chemotherapy, radiation and immune therapy, etc. The main mechanisms of photodynamic therapy for gastrointestinal tumors are to damage tumor microvasculature, induce cancer cell apoptosis, injure cancer cell membrane, and trigger immune reactions.

Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma is a primary hepatic malignancy originating from bile duct epithelium. It is the second most common primary hepatic neoplasia, and its incidence has increased within the last 3 decades. Although several risk factors have been identified, especially chronic biliary tract inflammation, most patients with cholangiocarcinoma have no identifiable risk factors. Recent developments in radiologic and molecular diagnostic methods have helped in the diagnosis of this disease. The only curative therapy is surgical resection or liver transplantation. For patients with advanced stage disease, survival remains limited. With growing understanding of the molecular and cellular etiology of this disease, new targeted therapies are being developed.