1
|
Parrinello G, Da Re M, Grizzo F, Camelliti S, Cozzi M, Marinoni F, Villalta D. Diagnostic accuracy of a novel point-of-care test for simultaneous detection of anti-transglutaminase IgA and anti-deamidated gliadin IgG antibodies. J Clin Lab Anal 2024; 38:e25003. [PMID: 38291818 PMCID: PMC10873685 DOI: 10.1002/jcla.25003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Point-of-care tests (POCTs) may have a role in detecting undiagnosed cases of Celiac disease (CD). We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of a novel POCT, compared with the conventional serological methods, for simultaneous anti-transglutaminase (tTG) IgA and anti-deamidated gliadin (DGP) IgG antibody detection. Furthermore, we evaluated the effect of different biological matrices (whole blood and serum) on test performance. METHODS Serum and whole blood from celiac or suspected celiac patients who underwent duodenal biopsy were assayed for the presence of anti-tTG IgA and anti-DGP IgG both with the reference standard methods (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Uppsala, Sweden) and with the POCT (PRIMA Lab SA, Balerna, Switzerland). RESULTS 266 sera (101 negative and 165 positive) and 60 whole blood samples (34 positive and 26 negative) were included in the study. POCT for anti-DGP IgG showed a sensitivity of 84.3% and a specificity of 90.1%, with positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) of 91.07% and 82.73%. POCT for anti-tTG IgA showed a sensitivity of 98.31% and a specificity of 98.02%, with a PPV and NPV of 98.31% and 98.02%. Test accuracies were 86.94% and 98.17%, respectively. The agreement of the results between the two different matrices showed a strong correlation rate: 95% for anti-DGP IgG and 100% for anti-tTG IgA. CONCLUSION The anti-tTG IgA/anti-DGP IgG-based POCT showed good diagnostic accuracy with comparable sensitivities and specificities to reference standard methods in detecting CD in symptomatic patients and could be considered as a mass screening test before referring to conventional serology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mirella Da Re
- Immunology and Allergy UnitSanta Maria degli Angeli HospitalPordenoneItaly
| | - Francesca Grizzo
- Immunology and Allergy UnitSanta Maria degli Angeli HospitalPordenoneItaly
| | | | | | | | - Danilo Villalta
- Immunology and Allergy UnitSanta Maria degli Angeli HospitalPordenoneItaly
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shiha MG, Chetcuti Zammit S, Elli L, Sanders DS, Sidhu R. Updates in the diagnosis and management of coeliac disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2023; 64-65:101843. [PMID: 37652646 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2023.101843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
Coeliac disease is a common autoimmune disorder induced by ingesting gluten, the protein component of wheat, barley, and rye. It is estimated that one-in-hundred people worldwide have coeliac disease, of whom the majority remain undiagnosed. Coeliac disease is characterized by a wide range of gastrointestinal and extraintestinal symptoms but can also present asymptomatically. Diagnosing coeliac disease depends on the concordance of clinical, serological and histopathological data. However, the diagnosis can be challenging and frequently overlooked. Undiagnosed coeliac disease is associated with an increased risk of complications and detrimental effects on quality of life. Early diagnosis and treatment of coeliac disease are necessary to reduce the risk of long-term complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed G Shiha
- Academic Unit of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Department of Infection, Immunity & Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
| | | | - Luca Elli
- Center for Prevention and Diagnosis of Celiac Disease, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - David S Sanders
- Academic Unit of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Department of Infection, Immunity & Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Reena Sidhu
- Academic Unit of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Department of Infection, Immunity & Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Point-of-Care Screening for Coeliac Disease in Schoolchildren Reveals Higher Disease Prevalence in Croatia. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 11:healthcare11010064. [PMID: 36611524 PMCID: PMC9819334 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11010064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Coeliac disease (CD) is an immune-mediated inflammatory disease triggered by dietary gluten and related proteins in genetically predisposed individuals. Point-of-care (POC) methods are non-invasive and easily performed tests, which could help to reduce the diagnostic delay of CD. The aim of our study was to determine the prevalence of CD using rapid POC test in first-grade schoolchildren in Zagreb, Croatia. A rapid qualitative immunoassay POC test designed for detection of immunoglobulin (Ig) A and IgG deamidated gliadin antibodies (DGP), as well as total IgA (to identify IgA deficient patients) in whole blood, was used to test healthy children on gluten containing diet. Out of 1404 tested children (51% female), 85 (6.05%) had a positive rapid POC test result and were referred to paediatric gastroenterologist. Finally, 7 children were diagnosed with CD (0.5%). There was no significant difference in children with CD and children with positive POC but negative serology in sex, BMI, or symptoms. However, children diagnosed with CD complained of abdominal pain significantly more often. The prevalence of CD in first-grade schoolchildren was 1:200 (0.5%), higher than in previous studies performed in Croatia. The results imply the possible benefit of IgA and IgG DGP-based POC tests in population screening.
Collapse
|
4
|
Research on point-of-care tests in outpatient care in Germany: A scoping review and definition of relevant endpoints in evaluation studies. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ, FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAT IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2022; 174:1-10. [PMID: 36055890 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The fast turnaround time and user-friendliness of point-of-care tests (POCTs) offer a great potential to improve outpatient health care where clinical decisions have to be made during the physician-patient encounter and time resources are limited. The aim of this scoping review is to describe the extent and nature as well as gaps in German research activities on POCT in outpatient care. In addition, we define research endpoints that should be addressed in the comprehensive evaluation of POCTs targeted for outpatient care. METHODS We performed a scoping review with a systematic literature search in Medline (via PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane library and Google Scholar for German publications on POCT with relevance to German outpatient care published from January 2005 to November 2020. RESULTS Our literature search identified 2,200 unique records. After literature selection 117 articles were included in this scoping review. Just over half of the articles (67/117, 57.3%) were primary research studies with original data, while one third of all the studies (33.3%) were secondary research articles (e.g., review articles). The remaining articles were clinical recommendations / position papers (7/117, 6.0%) and other types of articles (3.4%). The majority of articles focused on POCT use in infectious diseases (44/117, 37.6%), diabetic syndromes (15.4%), cardiac disease (12.0%) or coagulopathies and thrombosis (10.3%), while the remaining articles did not specify the disease (13.7%) or investigated other diseases (11.1%). Similar to international studies, most primary research studies investigated the diagnostic performance of POCT (e.g., sensitivity, specificity). Evidence beyond diagnostic accuracy remains scarce, such as the impact on therapeutic decisions and practice routines, clinical effectiveness, and user perspectives. In line with this, interventional studies (such as RCTs) on the effectiveness of POCT use in German outpatient care are limited. We define six endpoint domains that should be addressed in the evaluation of POCTs targeted for outpatient care: (i) diagnostic performance, (ii) clinical performance, (iii) time and costs, (iv) impact on clinical routines / processes, (v) perspectives of medical professionals and patients, and (vi) broader aspects. CONCLUSION There is considerable research activity on POCTs targeted for use in outpatient care in Germany. Data on their potential benefits beyond diagnostic accuracy is often lacking and should be addressed in future POCT research studies.
Collapse
|
5
|
Fung BM, Markarian E, Serper M, Tabibian JH. Current Applications of Telemedicine in Gastroenterology. Am J Gastroenterol 2022; 117:1072-1079. [PMID: 35385404 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Telemedicine generally refers to the use of technology to communicate with patients and provide health care from a distance. Advances in technology, specifically computers, cellphones, and other mobile devices, have facilitated healthcare providers' growing ability to virtually monitor and mentor patients. There has been a progressive expansion in the use of telemedicine in the field of gastroenterology (GI), which has been accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. In this review, we discuss telemedicine-its history, various forms, and limitations-and its current applications in GI. Specifically, we focus on telemedicine in GI practice in general and specific applications, including the management of inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease, and colorectal cancer surveillance and its use as an aid in endoscopic procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian M Fung
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
- Banner-University Medical Center Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Eric Markarian
- Academy of Science and Medicine, Crescenta Valley High School, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Marina Serper
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - James H Tabibian
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, Sylmar, California, USA
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Magazzù G, Aquilina S, Barbara C, Bondin R, Brusca I, Bugeja J, Camilleri M, Cascio D, Costa S, Cuzzupè C, Duca A, Fregapane M, Gentile V, Giuliano A, Grifò A, Grima AM, Ieni A, Li Calzi G, Maisano F, Melita G, Pallio S, Panasiti I, Pellegrino S, Romano C, Sorce S, Tabacchi ME, Taormina V, Tegolo D, Tortora A, Valenti C, Vella C, Raso G. Recognizing the Emergent and Submerged Iceberg of the Celiac Disease: ITAMA Project-Global Strategy Protocol. Pediatr Rep 2022; 14:293-311. [PMID: 35736659 PMCID: PMC9227897 DOI: 10.3390/pediatric14020037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Coeliac disease (CD) is frequently underdiagnosed with a consequent heavy burden in terms of morbidity and health care costs. Diagnosis of CD is based on the evaluation of symptoms and anti-transglutaminase antibodies IgA (TGA-IgA) levels, with values above a tenfold increase being the basis of the biopsy-free diagnostic approach suggested by present guidelines. This study showcased the largest screening project for CD carried out to date in school children (n=20,000) aimed at assessing the diagnostic accuracy of minimally invasive finger prick point-of-care tests (POCT) which, combined with conventional celiac serology and the aid of an artificial intelligence-based system, may eliminate the need for intestinal biopsy. Moreover, this study delves deeper into the "coeliac iceberg" in an attempt to identify people with disorders who may benefit from a gluten-free diet, even in the absence of gastrointestinal symptoms, abnormal serology and histology. This was achieved by looking for TGA-IgA mucosal deposits in duodenal biopsy. This large European multidisciplinary health project paves the way to an improved quality of life for patients by reducing the costs for diagnosis due to delayed findings of CD and to offer business opportunities in terms of diagnostic tools and support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Magazzù
- Dipartimento di Patologia Umana dell’Adulto e dell’Età Evolutiva “Gaetano Barresi”, Università di Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy; (C.C.); (A.G.); (A.I.); (F.M.); (G.M.); (I.P.); (C.R.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Samuel Aquilina
- Department of Paediatrics, Mater Dei Hospital, 2090 Msida, Malta; (S.A.); (R.B.); (A.-M.G.); (C.V.)
| | - Christopher Barbara
- Department of Pathology, Mater Dei Hospital, 2090 Msida, Malta; (C.B.); (M.C.)
| | - Ramon Bondin
- Department of Paediatrics, Mater Dei Hospital, 2090 Msida, Malta; (S.A.); (R.B.); (A.-M.G.); (C.V.)
| | - Ignazio Brusca
- Ospedale Fatebenefratelli, Buccheri La Ferla, 90123 Palermo, Italy; (I.B.); (M.F.)
| | | | - Mark Camilleri
- Department of Pathology, Mater Dei Hospital, 2090 Msida, Malta; (C.B.); (M.C.)
| | - Donato Cascio
- Dipartimento di Fisica e Chimica-“E. Segrè”, Università di Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy; (D.C.); (V.G.); (G.L.C.); (S.S.); (V.T.); (G.R.)
| | - Stefano Costa
- DAI Materno-Infantile, AOU Policlinico G. Martino, 98124 Messina, Italy; (S.C.); (S.P.)
| | - Chiara Cuzzupè
- Dipartimento di Patologia Umana dell’Adulto e dell’Età Evolutiva “Gaetano Barresi”, Università di Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy; (C.C.); (A.G.); (A.I.); (F.M.); (G.M.); (I.P.); (C.R.)
| | - Annalise Duca
- AcrossLimits Ltd., 4013 Birkirkara, Malta; (J.B.); (A.D.); (A.G.)
| | - Maria Fregapane
- Ospedale Fatebenefratelli, Buccheri La Ferla, 90123 Palermo, Italy; (I.B.); (M.F.)
| | - Vito Gentile
- Dipartimento di Fisica e Chimica-“E. Segrè”, Università di Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy; (D.C.); (V.G.); (G.L.C.); (S.S.); (V.T.); (G.R.)
| | - Angele Giuliano
- AcrossLimits Ltd., 4013 Birkirkara, Malta; (J.B.); (A.D.); (A.G.)
| | - Alessia Grifò
- Dipartimento di Patologia Umana dell’Adulto e dell’Età Evolutiva “Gaetano Barresi”, Università di Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy; (C.C.); (A.G.); (A.I.); (F.M.); (G.M.); (I.P.); (C.R.)
| | - Anne-Marie Grima
- Department of Paediatrics, Mater Dei Hospital, 2090 Msida, Malta; (S.A.); (R.B.); (A.-M.G.); (C.V.)
| | - Antonio Ieni
- Dipartimento di Patologia Umana dell’Adulto e dell’Età Evolutiva “Gaetano Barresi”, Università di Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy; (C.C.); (A.G.); (A.I.); (F.M.); (G.M.); (I.P.); (C.R.)
| | - Giada Li Calzi
- Dipartimento di Fisica e Chimica-“E. Segrè”, Università di Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy; (D.C.); (V.G.); (G.L.C.); (S.S.); (V.T.); (G.R.)
| | - Fabiana Maisano
- Dipartimento di Patologia Umana dell’Adulto e dell’Età Evolutiva “Gaetano Barresi”, Università di Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy; (C.C.); (A.G.); (A.I.); (F.M.); (G.M.); (I.P.); (C.R.)
| | - Giuseppinella Melita
- Dipartimento di Patologia Umana dell’Adulto e dell’Età Evolutiva “Gaetano Barresi”, Università di Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy; (C.C.); (A.G.); (A.I.); (F.M.); (G.M.); (I.P.); (C.R.)
| | - Socrate Pallio
- Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Università di Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy;
| | - Ilenia Panasiti
- Dipartimento di Patologia Umana dell’Adulto e dell’Età Evolutiva “Gaetano Barresi”, Università di Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy; (C.C.); (A.G.); (A.I.); (F.M.); (G.M.); (I.P.); (C.R.)
| | - Salvatore Pellegrino
- DAI Materno-Infantile, AOU Policlinico G. Martino, 98124 Messina, Italy; (S.C.); (S.P.)
| | - Claudio Romano
- Dipartimento di Patologia Umana dell’Adulto e dell’Età Evolutiva “Gaetano Barresi”, Università di Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy; (C.C.); (A.G.); (A.I.); (F.M.); (G.M.); (I.P.); (C.R.)
| | - Salvatore Sorce
- Dipartimento di Fisica e Chimica-“E. Segrè”, Università di Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy; (D.C.); (V.G.); (G.L.C.); (S.S.); (V.T.); (G.R.)
- Facoltà di Ingegneria e Architettura, Università degli Studi di Enna “Kore”, 94100 Enna, Italy
| | - Marco Elio Tabacchi
- Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica, Università di Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy; (M.E.T.); (D.T.); (C.V.)
| | - Vincenzo Taormina
- Dipartimento di Fisica e Chimica-“E. Segrè”, Università di Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy; (D.C.); (V.G.); (G.L.C.); (S.S.); (V.T.); (G.R.)
| | - Domenico Tegolo
- Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica, Università di Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy; (M.E.T.); (D.T.); (C.V.)
| | - Andrea Tortora
- DAI Scienze Mediche, AOU Policlinico G. Martino, 98124 Messina, Italy;
| | - Cesare Valenti
- Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica, Università di Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy; (M.E.T.); (D.T.); (C.V.)
| | - Cecil Vella
- Department of Paediatrics, Mater Dei Hospital, 2090 Msida, Malta; (S.A.); (R.B.); (A.-M.G.); (C.V.)
| | - Giuseppe Raso
- Dipartimento di Fisica e Chimica-“E. Segrè”, Università di Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy; (D.C.); (V.G.); (G.L.C.); (S.S.); (V.T.); (G.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Poralla L, Schumann M. [Update on celiac disease]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2022; 147:460-469. [PMID: 35405750 DOI: 10.1055/a-1520-4184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Celiac disease is a T-cell-mediated autoimmune disorder. It is relevant to us for two very different reasons. Firstly, it has a prevalence of 1 % in the European population. Thus, a huge number of celiac patients remains undiagnosed. Secondly, the celiac trigger, gluten, functions as a "switch", that has the potential to selectively activate celiac immune pathology, thereby allowing us to uncover previously unknown immune conditions. This again contributes to new celiac treatment modalities that will presumably alleviate the future fate of celiac disease patients. In 2022, the German guidelines for celiac disease are published by the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS). We have summarized some of the recommendations published therein.
Collapse
|
8
|
Loughrey MB, Shepherd NA. The indications for biopsy in routine upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Histopathology 2020; 78:215-227. [PMID: 33382487 DOI: 10.1111/his.14213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
This review describes the indications and contraindications for endoscopic biopsy, in routine practice, of the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract. We accept that this review provides grounds for controversy, as our stance in certain situations is counter to some national guidelines. Nevertheless, we provide evidence to support our viewpoints, especially on efficiency and economic grounds. We describe the particular controversies concerning the biopsy assessment of Barrett's oesophagus, chronic gastritis and the duodenum in the investigation of coeliac disease. We accept that there are indications for more extensive upper GI biopsy protocols in children than in adults; the latter constitute our main focus in this article. We would encourage detailed discussion between pathologists and their endoscopy colleagues about the indications, or lack of them, for routine upper GI endoscopic biopsy, as studies have shown that adherence to agreed guidelines has resulted in a very considerable diminution in the biopsy workload without compromising patient management. Furthermore, where biopsy is indicated, we emphasise the importance of accompanying clinical information provided to the pathologist, in particular regarding biopsy site(s), and regular feedback to endoscopists to improve and maintain the quality of such information. Finally, local dialogue is also advised, when necessary, to indicate to endoscopists the need to appropriately segregate biopsies into separate, individually labelled specimens, to maximise the information that can be derived by pathological evaluation and thereby improve the quality of the final pathology report.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurice B Loughrey
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Neil A Shepherd
- Gloucestershire Cellular Pathology Laboratory, Cheltenham General Hospital, Cheltenham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Elli L, Barisani D, Vaira V, Bardella MT, Topa M, Vecchi M, Doneda L, Scricciolo A, Lombardo V, Roncoroni L. How to manage celiac disease and gluten-free diet during the COVID-19 era: proposals from a tertiary referral center in a high-incidence scenario. BMC Gastroenterol 2020; 20:387. [PMID: 33213379 PMCID: PMC7675390 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-020-01524-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The outbreak of COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 infection is spreading worldwide as the first coronavirus pandemic. The clinical picture is variable but flu-like symptoms are common with bilateral interstitial pneumonia being the most frightening presentation. No specific therapies nor vaccine have been developed to date and the only way to limit the virus diffusion is by modifying one's lifestyle limiting social life and following strict hygienic precautions. No data is available on the risk of COVID-19 and its outcomes in celiac disease (CeD). The restrictions applied to counter COVID-19 can impact on CeD treatment and gluten-free dieting, the only available therapy for CeD. With the present manuscript, we aim to support gastroenterologists and nutritionists in the management of CeD patients in the new pandemic scenario, being conscious that availability and local situations are extremely various.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Elli
- Center for Prevention and Diagnosis of Celiac Disease, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.
- Department of Pathophisiology and Transplantation, University of Milano, Milan, Italy.
| | - Donatella Barisani
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Valentina Vaira
- Department of Pathophisiology and Transplantation, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
- Division of Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Teresa Bardella
- Center for Prevention and Diagnosis of Celiac Disease, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Matilde Topa
- Center for Prevention and Diagnosis of Celiac Disease, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy
- Department of Pathophisiology and Transplantation, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Maurizio Vecchi
- Center for Prevention and Diagnosis of Celiac Disease, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy
- Department of Pathophisiology and Transplantation, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Luisa Doneda
- Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Alice Scricciolo
- Center for Prevention and Diagnosis of Celiac Disease, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenza Lombardo
- Center for Prevention and Diagnosis of Celiac Disease, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Leda Roncoroni
- Center for Prevention and Diagnosis of Celiac Disease, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|