Low Daily Step Count Is Associated With a High Risk of Hospital Admission and Death in Community-Dwelling Patients With Cirrhosis

ACG Clinical Guideline: Malnutrition and Nutritional Recommendations in Liver Disease

Malnutrition, defined as deficiency, excess, or imbalance of nutrients, is a common complication in patients with liver disease, especially those with cirrhosis. Malnutrition may present as an isolated micronutrient deficiency, such as zinc deficiency, and it commonly presents as frailty and/or sarcopenia in patients with advanced liver disease. Patients with cirrhosis and/or alcohol-associated hepatitis should be assessed for malnutrition because it adversely affects patient outcomes including mortality, as well as waitlist and posttransplant outcomes among liver transplant candidates. The prevalence of malnutrition varies based on the method of assessment and disease severity, being higher in those with advanced liver disease. Among stable outpatients with cirrhosis, counseling should be done to eat small frequent meals, a night-time snack between 7 PM and 10 PM, and 2 or more cups of coffee daily. In selected patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis, vitamin E 800 IU/d should be provided. Among hospitalized patients with cirrhosis, nutritional supplementation preferably by enteral route should be implemented in those with poor oral intake of daily requirements of proteins and/or calories. Protein intake should not be restricted including patients with decompensated cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy. A vegetable source of protein seems to be better tolerated than an animal source of protein in patients with hepatic encephalopathy. Branched chain amino acids augment the efficacy of lactulose and rifaximin in the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy. Level of evidence and strength of recommendations were evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations system. This guideline was developed under the auspices of the American College of Gastroenterology Practice Parameters Committee.

Predictive Value of Frailty on Outcomes of Patients With Cirrhosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Frailty is one of the most common symptoms in patients with cirrhosis. Many researchers have identified it as a prognostic factor for patients with cirrhosis. However, no quantitative meta-analysis has evaluated the prognostic value of frailty in patients with cirrhosis.

Objective

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the prognostic significance of frailty in patients with cirrhosis.

Methods

The systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) recommendations. We conducted a comprehensive search of the literature using databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science, as well as China National Knowledge Infrastructure, encompassing the period from inception to 22 December 2023. Data were extracted for frailty to predict adverse outcomes in patients with cirrhosis. RevMan (version 5.3) and R (version 4.2.2) were used to assess the extracted data.

Results

A total of 26 studies with 9597 patients with cirrhosis were included. Compared with patients having low or no frailty, the frail group had a higher mortality rate (relative ratio, RR=2.07, 95% CI 1.82-2.34, P<.001), higher readmission rate (RR=1.50, 95% CI 1.22-1.84, P<.001), and lower quality of life (RR=5.78, 95% CI 2.25-14.82, P<.001). The summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curve of frailty for mortality in patients with cirrhosis showed that the false positive rate (FPR) was 0.25 (95% CI 0.17-0.34), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 4.17 (95% CI 2.93-5.93), sensitivity was 0.54 (95% CI 0.39-0.69), and specificity was 0.73 (95% CI 0.64-0.81). The SROC curve of readmission showed that the FPR, DOR, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.39 (95% CI 0.17-0.66), 1.38 (95% CI 0.64-2.93), 0.46 (95% CI 0.28-0.64), and 0.60 (95% CI 0.28-0.85), respectively.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis demonstrated that frailty is a reliable prognostic predictor of outcomes in patients with cirrhosis. To enhance the prognosis of patients with cirrhosis, more studies on frailty screening are required.

Cardiorespiratory Fitness From Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Is a Comprehensive Risk-stratifying Tool in Liver Transplant Candidates

Background

Cardiovascular disease and physical decline are prevalent and associated with morbidity/mortality in liver transplant (LT) patients. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) provides comprehensive cardiopulmonary and exercise response assessments. We investigated cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and cardiac stress generated during CPX in LT candidates.

Methods

LT candidates at 2 centers underwent CPX. Standard-of-care cardiac stress testing (dobutamine stress echocardiography, DSE) results were recorded. Physical function was assessed with liver frailty index and 6-min walk test. CPX/DSE double products were calculated to quantify cardiac stress. To better study the association of CPX-derived metrics with physical function, the cohort was divided into 2 groups based on 6-min walk test median (372 m).

Results

Fifty-four participants (62 ± 8 y; 65% men, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Na 14 [10-18]) underwent CPX. Peak oxygen consumption was 14.1 mL/kg/min for an anerobic threshold of 10.2 mL/kg/min, with further CRF decline in the lower 6MWT cohort despite lack of liver frailty index-frailty in 90%. DSE was nondiagnostic in 18% versus 4% of CPX (P = 0.058). All CPX were negative for ischemia. A double product of ≥25 000 was observed in 32% of CPX and 11% of DSE (P = 0.020). Respiratory function testing was normal. No patient presented major cardiovascular events at 30 d post-LT.

Conclusions

CPX provided efficient and effective combined cardiopulmonary risk and frailty assessments of LT candidates in a 1-stop test. The CRF was found to be very low despite preserved physical function or lack of frailty.

Liver cirrhosis: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic interventions

Liver cirrhosis is the end-stage of chronic liver disease, characterized by inflammation, necrosis, advanced fibrosis, and regenerative nodule formation. Long-term inflammation can cause continuous damage to liver tissues and hepatocytes, along with increased vascular tone and portal hypertension. Among them, fibrosis is the necessary stage and essential feature of liver cirrhosis, and effective antifibrosis strategies are commonly considered the key to treating liver cirrhosis. Although different therapeutic strategies aimed at reversing or preventing fibrosis have been developed, the effects have not be more satisfactory. In this review, we discussed abnormal changes in the liver microenvironment that contribute to the progression of liver cirrhosis and highlighted the importance of recent therapeutic strategies, including lifestyle improvement, small molecular agents, traditional Chinese medicine, stem cells, extracellular vesicles, and gut remediation, that regulate liver fibrosis and liver cirrhosis. Meanwhile, therapeutic strategies for nanoparticles are discussed, as are their possible underlying broad application and prospects for ameliorating liver cirrhosis. Finally, we also reviewed the major challenges and opportunities of nanomedicine‒biological environment interactions. We hope this review will provide insights into the pathogenesis and molecular mechanisms of liver cirrhosis, thus facilitating new methods, drug discovery, and better treatment of liver cirrhosis.

Frailty and transplant-free survival of patients with liver cirrhosis: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Frailty is a common condition among patients with liver cirrhosis. Nonetheless, its role in predicting liver transplant-free survival (TFS) remains unclear.

AIM

This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to elucidate the relationship between frailty and TFS in patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

Cohort studies addressing the objective of this meta-analysis were extracted from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed with the Cochrane Q test, and the I^2 statistic was estimated. Random-effect models, considering potential heterogeneity, were employed to combine the results.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis encompassed 17 cohort studies involving 6273 patients with cirrhosis, of whom 1983 (31.6%) were classified as frail at baseline. The follow-up periods in the included studies ranged from 3 to 29 months, with an average duration of 11.5 months. The analysis revealed that frailty was significantly associated with a poor TFS (risk ratio [RR]: 2.07, 95% confidence interval: 1.72 to 2.50, p<0.001; I2 = 51%). Sensitivity analyses that sequentially omitted one dataset consistently supported these findings (RR: 1.95 to 2.17, p<0.05 in all cases). Subgroup analyses based on variables such as study design, mean age of patients, baseline Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, tool used for frailty evaluation, follow-up duration, and study quality score also yielded congruent results.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence suggests that frailty may be an independent risk factor for poor TFS in patients with liver cirrhosis, thus emphasizing the importance of early identification and management of frailty in this population.

A survey questionnaire evaluating physical activity patterns and determinants in patients with chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND

Physical activity can reduce the risk of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD), whereas physical inactivity adversely affects clinical outcomes. Since data on physical activity in CLD are scarce, we conducted a questionnaire survey to assess the physical activity patterns and determinants in patients with CLD.

METHODS

We surveyed 437 patients from outpatient clinics at Gifu University Hospital about their physical activity patterns and determinants in 2022 using a validated questionnaire. The primary objective was to examine the proportion of patients who exercised and the clinical characteristics of patients who achieved high levels of physical activity. The secondary objectives were to explore the types, motivations, barriers, and preferences for physical activity.

RESULTS

Among the 397 eligible patients (median age 68 years; 51% men; and median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score 6), 55.4% reported performing physical activity less than once a week. Physical activity frequency was not associated with sex, body mass index, comorbidities, or hepatic reserve. Among the respondents, 60.4% expressed concern regarding physical strength, and 80.6% expressed concern regarding physical inactivity. The main barriers to physical activity were work, household chores, and health problems. However, many respondents expressed their willingness to increase their physical activity frequency with some promotional policies. Walking was the most common physical activity practiced in the past year and the activity most respondents wanted to try in the future.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CLD are insufficiently active and need physical activity interventions, especially regarding walking.

Use of a Mobile-Assisted Telehealth Regimen to Increase Exercise in Transplant Candidates: A Home-Based Prehabilitation Pilot and Feasibility Trial

INTRODUCTION

Physical fitness assessed by the Liver Frailty Index (LFI) and 6-minute walk test (6MWT) informs the prognosis of liver transplant candidates, although there are limited data on its reversibility after prehabilitation. On a home-based exercise trial, we aimed to improve LFI and 6MWT and to investigate trial feasibility and intervention adherence.

METHODS

Liver transplant candidates with cirrhosis wore a personal activity tracker and used Exercise and Liver FITness app for 14 weeks, including a 2-week technology acclimation run-in. The 12-week intervention consisted of Exercise and Liver FITness app plus personal activity tracker and 15-/30-minute weekly calls with a physical activity coach aiming to complete ≥2 video-training sessions/week, or ≥500 step/d baseline increase for ≥8 weeks. We defined feasibility as ≥66% of subjects engaging in the intervention phase and adherence as ≥50% subjects meeting training end point.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients (61 ± 7 years, 71% female, model for end-stage liver disease 17 ± 5, ∼33% frail) consented and 21 (68%) started the intervention. In the 15 subjects who completed the study, LFI improved from 3.84 ± 0.71 to 3.47 ± 0.90 ( P = 0.03) and 6MWT from 318 ± 73 to 358 ± 64 m ( P = 0.005). Attrition reasons included death (n = 4) and surgery (n = 2). There was 57% adherence, better for videos than for walking, although daily steps significantly increased (3,508 vs baseline: 1,260) during best performance week. One adverse event was attributed to the intervention.

DISCUSSION

Our clinical trial meaningfully improved LFI by 0.4 and 6MWT by 41 m and met feasibility/adherence goals. In-training daily step increase supported physical self-efficacy and intervention uptake, but maintenance remained a challenge despite counseling.

Exercise training as an intervention for frailty in cirrhotic patients on the liver transplant waiting list: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The existing literature suggests that exercise for cirrhotic patients is safe and favours significant improvement to their physical capacity. However, exercise training for this population and how to deliver activities, especially in severe stages of the disease and while waiting for a liver transplant (LT), remain undefined.

AIM

To review the existing exercise prescriptions for cirrhotic patients on the waiting list for LT, their results for frailty evolution and their effect on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines and searching the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases. The keyword "liver transplant" was used in combination with the free terms "frailty" and "exercise" for the literature review. Clinical studies that evaluated the effect of a regular training program, independent of supervision or the duration or intensity of physical exercise, in cirrhotic patients on the waiting list for LT were reviewed. The data on safe physical activity prescriptions following Frequency, Intensity, Time, and Type recommendations were extracted and summarised.

RESULTS

Nine articles met the inclusion criteria for this review. Various instruments for frailty assessment were used, frequently in combination. Five studies prescribed physical activity for patients, one in-person and four to be performed remotely and unsupervised. The remaining four studies only used a self-report instrument to assess the level of physical activity. None reported adverse events related to exercise training. The exercise frequency mainly varied from daily to a minimum of twice per week. The intensity depended on frailty and included increasing levels of activity. The type of exercise was predominantly a combination of aerobic and resistance training. The duration of exercise varied from 4 to 12 wk. Three articles evaluated the effect of the exercise program on clinical outcomes, reporting a reduction in 90-d readmission rates post-transplant and improved frailty scores, as well as improved survival of cirrhotic patients waiting for LT.

CONCLUSION

Routine frailty assessment is essential for this population. Although more robust evidence is required, the prescription of exercise is safe and can improve patients' functional capacity, improving pre- and post-LT outcomes.