Measuring Medication Use, Obstacles, and Knowledge in Individuals With Cirrhosis

Serious Illness Communication in Cirrhosis Care: Tools to Improve Illness Understanding, Prognostic Understanding, and Care Planning

Patients with cirrhosis frequently experience an unpredictable illness trajectory, with frequent hospitalizations and complications. Along with the uncertain nature of the disease, the possibility of a lifesaving and curative transplant often makes prognostic discussions and future care decisions challenging. Serious illness communication (SIC) refers to supportive communication whereby clinicians assess patients' illness understanding, share prognostic information according to patients' preferences, explore patients' goals, and make recommendations for care that align with these goals. SIC includes 3 key components: (1) illness understanding; (2) prognostic understanding; and (3) care planning. In this piece, we explore current barriers to early implementation of SIC in cirrhosis care and share possible solutions, including adopting a multidisciplinary approach, delivering culturally competent care, and training clinicians in SIC core skills. By use of a case example, we aim to demonstrate SIC in action and to provide clinicians with tools and skills that can be used in practice.

Development and Evaluation of a Patient Cirrhosis Knowledge Assessment

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Self-management skills improve outcomes for patients with cirrhosis. While education programs exist to teach these skills, there are limited patient assessments to evaluate their efficacy. We aimed to develop and evaluate cirrhosis knowledge assessments for patients with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis.

METHODS

Across two institutions, a 4-stage process was undertaken: first, we developed a comprehensive set of questions regarding cirrhosis self-management. Second, the questions underwent critical review by patients and hepatology providers. Third, patients with cirrhosis answered these questions before and after a written educational tool. Questions were updated based on results. Fourth, patients answered the updated questions before and after a video educational tool. Binomial test or paired sample t-test was used to compare pre- and post-tests depending on question type.

RESULTS

In phase 3, 134 patients completed pre- and post-tests. 44% were decompensated, 81% were diagnosed with cirrhosis at least 3 years, and 52% were 60-75 years. 95% of single-answer questions were answered correctly by at least 70% of patients in the pre-test. None of the answers improved significantly with education. After phase 3, 6 questions were removed and 6 questions were edited to increase challenge. In phase 4, 96 patients (42 compensated, 54 decompensated) completed pre- and post-tests. In the compensated assessment, 3 questions improved after education and the summative score increased (7.9 to 9.0, P < 0.001). In the decompensated assessment, 4 questions improved after education and the summative score increased (7.0 to 7.7, P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Through a rigorous process, we created and evaluated cirrhosis knowledge assessments for patients with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis. Further validation is required and then these assessments can be used to improve patient education.

Thirty-Day Readmissions Are Largely Not Preventable in Patients With Cirrhosis

INTRODUCTION

Hospital readmissions are common in patients with cirrhosis, but there are few studies describing readmission preventability. We aimed to describe the incidence, causes, and risk factors for preventable readmission in this population.

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study of patients with cirrhosis hospitalized at a single center between June 2014 and March 2020 and followed up for 30 days postdischarge. Demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic data, functional status, and quality of life were collected. Readmission preventability was independently and systematically adjudicated by 3 reviewers. Multinomial logistic regression was used to compare those with (i) preventable readmission, (ii) nonpreventable readmission/death, and (iii) no readmission.

RESULTS

Of 654 patients, 246 (38%) were readmitted, and 29 (12%) were preventable readmissions. Reviewers agreed on preventability for 70% of readmissions. Twenty-two (including 2 with preventable readmission) died. The most common reasons for readmission were hepatic encephalopathy (22%), gastrointestinal bleeding (13%), acute kidney injury (13%), and ascites (6%), and these reasons were similar between preventable and nonpreventable readmissions. Preventable readmission was often related to paracentesis timeliness, diuretic adjustment monitoring, and hepatic encephalopathy treatment. Compared with nonreadmitted patients, preventable readmission was independently associated with racial and ethnic minoritized individuals (odds ratio [OR] 5.80; 95% CI, 1.96-17.13), nonmarried marital status (OR 2.88; 95% CI, 1.18-7.05), and admission in the prior 30 days (OR 3.45; 95% CI, 1.48-8.04).

DISCUSSION

For patients with cirrhosis, readmission is common, but most are not preventable. Preventable readmissions are often related to ascites and hepatic encephalopathy and are associated with racial and ethnic minorities, nonmarried status, and prior admissions.