Achalasia is Strongly Associated With Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Other Allergic Disorders

Clinical and nutritional correlates associated with weight changes in achalasia patients and the impact of laparoscopic Heller myotomy

BACKGROUND

Achalasia is characterized by symptoms of esophageal obstruction, preventing food consumption. However, weight loss is observed only in a subset of patients, and data from literature is conflicting.

AIMS

Our study aimed at evaluating predictors of weight loss in achalasia patients and at verifying the impact of treatment on nutritional status.

METHODS

123 achalasia patients, eligible for laparoscopic Heller myotomy, were studied. Demographic, clinical and nutritional data (calorie intake and macronutrient composition) were recorded at baseline and one-year post-treatment. Significant weight loss/gain was considered for variation of 10 % of body weight at baseline and post-treatment, respectively.

RESULTS

57.7 % of patients reported weight loss at presentation. These subjects had shorter disease duration, worse symptoms, lower BMI and consumed fewer calories than patients without weight loss. Post-treatment, we observed a considerable improvement in Eckardt score and BMI values. Almost 50 % of the population reported significant weight gain, particularly in individuals with weight loss at baseline. Caloric intake also rose significantly, positively affecting BMI categories.

CONCLUSION

We showed that achalasia-induced weight loss is associated with symptoms' severity and disease duration. Conversely, over 50 % of treated patients were in the overweight/obese category, highlighting the need for individualized nutritional interventions in achalasia patients.

Association of circulating cytokine levels and tissue-infiltrating myeloid cells with achalasia: results from Mendelian randomization and validation through clinical characteristics and single-cell RNA sequencing

BACKGROUND

Achalasia is a rare motility disorder of the esophagus often accompanied by immune dysregulation, yet specific underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood.

METHODS

We utilized Mendelian randomization (MR) to explore the causal effects of cytokine levels on achalasia, with cis-expression/protein quantitative trait loci (cis-eQTLs/pQTLs) for 47 cytokines selected from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis and GWAS data for achalasia obtained from FinnGen. For cytokines significantly linked to achalasia, we analyzed their plasma concentrations and expression differences in the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) profiling, respectively. We further employed bioinformatics approaches to investigate underlying mechanisms.

RESULTS

We revealed positive associations of circulating Eotaxin, macrophage inflammatory protein-1b (MIP1b), soluble E-selectin (SeSelectin) and TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) with achalasia. When combining MR findings with scRNA-seq data, we observed upregulation of TRAIL (OR = 2.70, 95% CI, 1.20-6.07), encoded by TNFSF10, in monocytes and downregulation of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) (OR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.59-0.84), encoded by IL1RN, in FOS_macrophages in achalasia. TNFSF10high monocytes in achalasia displayed activated type I interferon signaling, and IL1RNlow FOS_macrophages exhibited increased intercellular communications with various lymphocytes, together shaping the proinflammatory microenvironment of achalasia.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified circulating Eotaxin, MIP1b, SeSelectin and TRAIL as potential drug targets for achalasia. TNFSF10high monocytes and IL1RNlow macrophages may play a role in the pathogenesis of achalasia.

AGA Clinical Practice Update on Esophageal Dysfunction Due to Disordered Immunity and Infection: Expert Review

METHODS

This expert review was commissioned and approved by the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute Clinical Practice Updates Committee (CPUC) and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the AGA membership, and underwent internal peer review by the CPUC and external peer review through standard procedures of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. These Best Practice Advice (BPA) statements were drawn from a review of the published literature and from expert opinion. Since systematic reviews were not performed, these BPA statements do not carry formal ratings regarding the quality of evidence or strength of the presented considerations.

DESCRIPTION

Infectious and immune-mediated esophageal disorders are poorly understood and often under-diagnosed conditions that lead to esophageal dysfunction and health care costs due to repeated procedures and a lack of understanding of their etiology and pathogenesis. Without a high index of suspicion, these disorders may be overlooked. Esophageal dysfunction may arise from active, localized infection and immune-mediated disease (ie, candida, etc.) or from an organ-specific manifestation of a more diffuse immune-mediated disease or infection (ie, systemic sclerosis, connective tissue disease, neurologic disease). These conditions can sometimes lead to neuromuscular dysfunction and subsequent esophageal dysmotility. Awareness of local and systemic processes that lead to esophageal dysfunction will improve patient outcomes by focusing therapeutics and limiting unnecessary procedures. Therefore, the purpose of this AGA Clinical Practice Update Expert Review is to provide BPA on diagnostic considerations of immune-mediated disorders that should be considered when encountering patients with dysphagia, heartburn, and odynophagia. Best Practice Advice Statements: BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: Gastroenterologists should be aware of the esophageal manifestations of systemic immunologic and infectious diseases to reduce diagnostic delay. Clinicians should identify if there are risks for inflammatory or infectious possibilities for a patient's esophageal symptoms and investigate for these disorders as a potential cause of esophageal dysfunction. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Once esophageal infection is identified, clinicians should identify whether accompanying signs/symptoms suggest immunocompromise leading to a more systemic infection. Consultation with an infectious disease expert will aid in guiding appropriate treatment. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: If symptoms do not improve after therapy for infectious esophagitis, evaluation for refractory infection or additional underlying sources of esophageal and immunologic dysfunction should be performed. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: In individuals with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) who continue to experience symptoms of esophageal dysfunction despite histologic and endoscopic disease remission, clinicians should be aware that some patients with EoE may develop motility disorders. Further evaluation of esophageal motility may be warranted. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: In individuals with histologic and endoscopic features of lymphocytic esophagitis, clinicians should consider treatment of lymphocytic-related inflammation with proton-pump inhibitor therapy or swallowed topical corticosteroids and as needed esophageal dilation. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: In patients who present with esophageal symptoms in the setting of hypereosinophilia (absolute eosinophil count [AEC] >1500 cells/uL), consider further work-up of non-EoE eosinophilic gastrointestinal (GI) disease, hypereosinophilic syndrome, and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA). Consultation with allergy/immunology may help guide further diagnostic work-up and treatment. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: In individuals with rheumatologic diseases of systemic sclerosis (SSc), mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), or Sjogren's disease, clinicians should be aware that esophageal symptoms can occur due to involvement of the esophageal muscle layer, resulting in dysmotility and/or incompetence of the lower esophageal sphincter. The degree of dysfunction is often especially significant in those with SSc or MCTD. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: In individuals with Crohn's disease, clinicians should be aware that a minority of individuals can develop esophageal involvement from inflammatory, stricturing, or fistulizing changes with granulomas seen histologically. Esophageal manifestations of Crohn's disease tend to occur in individuals with active intestinal disease. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 9: In individuals with dermatologic diseases of lichen planus or bullous disorders, clinicians should be aware that dysphagia can occur due to endoscopically visible esophageal mucosal involvement. Esophageal lichen planus, in particular, can occur without skin involvement and can be difficult to define on esophageal histopathology. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 10: Clinicians should consider infectious and inflammatory causes of secondary achalasia during initial evaluation. One should query for any history of recent COVID infections, risks for Chagas disease, and symptoms or signs of eosinophilic disease.

Measuring and improving quality in esophageal care and swallowing disorders

Evaluating clinical care through quality-related metrics is increasingly common. There are now numerous quality statements and indicators related to the medical management of benign and pre-malignant esophageal diseases. Expert consensus leveraging evidence-based recommendations from published society guidelines has been the most frequently used basis for developing esophageal quality statements. While surgical care of patients with esophageal malignancies, including squamous cell carcinoma, has also been developed, those related to benign esophageal disease now include domains of diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring for gastroesophageal reflux disease, eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), achalasia, and Barrett's esophagus (BE). Several recent studies evaluating adherence to quality metrics affirm substantial variation in practice patterns with opportunities for improvement in care across esophageal diseases. In particular, patient education regarding treatment options in achalasia, frequency of esophageal biopsies among patients with dysphagia to evaluate for EoE, and endoscopic evaluation within a BE segment are areas identified to have need for improvement. As the management of esophageal diseases becomes more complex and interdisciplinary, adherence to quality metrics may be a source of standardization and improvement in delivery and ultimately patient outcomes. Indeed, the development of national quality databases has resulted in a significant growth in the use of these metrics for quality improvement activities and may form the basis for future inclusion in quality reporting and payment programs.