Performance and recovery of nitrifying biofilm after exposure to prolonged starvation

Eat seldom is better than eat frequently: Pharmaceuticals degradation kinetics, enantiomeric profiling and microorganisms in moving bed biofilm reactors are affected by feast famine cycle times

Feast-famine (FF) regimes improved the removal of recalcitrant pharmaceuticals in moving bed biofilm reactors (MBBRs), but the optimal FF cycle remained unresolved. The effects of FF cycle time on the removal of bulk substrates (organic carbon and nitrogen) and trace pharmaceuticals by MBBR are systematically evaluated in this study. The feast to famine ratio was fixed to 1:2 to keep the same loading rate, but the time for the FF cycles varied from 18 h to 288 h. The MBBR adapted to the longest FF cycle time (288 h equaling 48 × HRT) resulted in significantly higher degradation rates (up to +183%) for 12 out of 28 pharmaceuticals than a continuously fed (non-FF) reactor. However, other FF cycle times (18, 36, 72 and 144 h) only showed a significant up-regulation for 2-3 pharmaceuticals compared to the non-FF reactor. Enantioselective degradation of metoprolol and propranolol occurred in the second phase of a two phase degradation, which was different for the longer FF cycle time. N-oxidation and N-demethylation pathways of tramadol and venlafaxine differed across the FF cycle time suggestin the FF cycle time varied the predominant transformation pathways of pharmaceuticals. The abundance of bacteria in the biofilms varied considerably between different FF cycle times, which possibly caused the biofilm to remove more recalcitrant bulk organic C and pharmaceuticals under long cycle times.

An alternative approach towards nitrification and bioremediation of wastewater from aquaponics using biofilm-based bioreactors: A review

Aquaponics combines the advantages of aquaculture and hydroponics as it suits the urban environment where a lack of agricultural land and water resources is observed. It is an ecologically sound system that completely reuses its system waste as plant fertilizer. It offers sustainable water savings, making it a supreme technology for food production. The two major processes that hold the system together are nitrification and denitrification. The remains of fish in form of ammonia reach the bio filters where it is converted into nitrite and further into nitrate in presence of nitrifying and denitrifying bacteria. Nitrate eventually is taken up by the plants. However, even after the uptake from the flow stream, the effluent contains remaining ammonium and nitrates, which cannot be directly released into the environment. In this review it is suggested how integrating the biofilm-based bioreactors in addition to aquaculture and hydroponics eliminates the possibility of remains of total ammonia nitrogen [TAN] contents, leading to bioremediation of effluent water from the system. Effluent water after releasing from a bioreactor can be reused in an aquaculture system, conditions provided in these bioreactors promote the growth of required bacteria and encourages the mutual development of plants and fishes and eventually leading to bioremediation of wastewater from aquaponics.

Achieving PN through the selective recovery of AOB activity in inactivated nitrifying bacteria: Combined aerobic starvation and FA

A novel strategy combining aerobic starvation and free ammonia (FA) was proposed to achieve partial nitrification (PN). The impact of the combined strategy on nitrifying bacteria was explored in a 200-day experiment. The effluent concentration of ammonia was below the detection limits (0.1 mg/L), and the effluent concentration of nitrite and nitrate was 68.12 mg/L and 3.46 mg/L without adding carbon source to the artificial wastewater. The nitrite accumulation rate (NAR) was maintained at 90.15% even when the dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration was 1.50 mg/L. Further analysis showed that PN was achieved by selectively restoring the activity of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) in nitrifying bacteria that had lost their activity after starvation. The specific ammonia oxidation rate (SAOR) was 46.25 mg N/g MLVSS/h, and the specific nitrate product rate (SNPR) was only 0.73 mg N/g MLVSS/h in the stable operation stage. The increase in AOB abundance (from 2.79% to 7.13%) and the decrease in nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB) abundance (from 8.75% to 1.44%) explained this phenomenon. Finally, the analyses on the secretion of extracellular polymer substance (EPS), strategies to resist harsh environments, and physical properties of sludge explored the potential mechanism and provided references for applying the combined strategy.

Anoxic/oxic treatment without biomass recycle

The Anoxic/Oxic (A/O) process involves recirculating mixed liquor between its A and O tanks so that nitrate produced in the O tank can be used to for denitrification with influent COD in the A tank. Because biomass is recirculated along with nitrate, A/O operation leads to similar microbial communities in the A and O tanks, which may decrease the rates of denitrification and nitrification in each tank. Here, bench-scale experiments simulated this aspect of the A/O process by exchanging biomass between an anoxic flask and an oxic cylinder at exchange ratios of 0%, 20%, 30%, and 50%. Nitrification and denitrification rates were only 40% and 19% for 50% biomass exchange of that for no biomass exchange. Phylogenetic analysis documented that the microbial communities became much more similar with biomass exchange, and the finding was consistent with community composition in a full-scale A/O process in a municipal wastewater treatment plant. A two-stage vertical baffled bioreactor (VBBR) realized efficient total‑nitrogen removal in recirculation without biomass exchange. Average removals of COD and TN were respectively 6% and 22% higher for the two-stage VBBR than the conventional A/O process, but its hydraulic retention time (HRT) was 55% to 70% of the volume of a conventional A/O process treating the same influent wastewater. The VBBR was more efficient because its anoxic biofilm was enriched in denitrifying bacteria, while its oxic biofilm was enriched in nitrifying bacteria. For example, the phylum Chloroflexi was greater in the An-VBBR, while the phylum Proteobacteria was greater in the Ox-VBBR.