Mesocosm constructed wetlands to remove micropollutants from wastewater treatment plant effluent: Effect of matrices and pre-treatments

Biochar obtained from recovered cellulose and its mixture with conventional sources: Assessment of its potential for the removal of pollutants in water

Yearly thousands of tons of cellulose, in the form of toilet paper, end up in the wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) through the sewage. Cellulose was recovered with a 0.35 mm sieve and processed obtaining three different pellets: pure cellulose, straw mix (50 % cellulose-50 % straw) and wood mix (50 % cellulose-50 % wood). Those materials were carbonized at 750 °C for 210 min producing non-activated biochar. Then, a part of those biochars was biologically activated by fermentation adding minerals, nutrients and a mixture of bacteria. All biochar versions were characterized, assessing the surface, porosity and adsorption capacity for a dye (indigo carmine) and a selection of 5 micropollutants (MPs): benzotriazole, carbamazepine, clarithromycin, DEET, and diclofenac. However, results showed that conventional analysis for adsorbents was not adequate for biologically activated materials since biofilm can obstruct the pores of the supporting material hindering the pollutants' adsorption. Therefore, the biological degradation of the pollutants by the microorganisms was also tested. Finally, biologically activated WOW-Biochar straw mix was the selected material to be further applied in constructed wetlands (CW) due to its higher average MPs removal capacity. Validation test at mesocosm scale demonstrates the suitability of the material as an admixture in CW, reaching a MPs removal rate higher than the 90 % regarding the WWTP inlet.

Amended biochar in constructed wetlands: Roles, challenges, and future directions removing pharmaceuticals and personal care products

Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in wastewater pose significant threats to both human health and aquatic ecosystems. Wastewater discharge from various sources is the primary cause of these contaminants, and proper treatment is essential for protecting the environment. Traditional treatment technologies are often too expensive and ineffective in removing PPCPs. Constructed wetlands (CWs) offer a sustainable, cost-efficient alternative for wastewater treatment, though their capability to eliminate PPCPs can vary based on multiple aspects. Recent studies highlight biochar-a carbon-rich material resultant from biomass pyrolysis-as a promising amendment to improve CW performance. However, there is a deficiency of proper literature reviews on using biochar in CWs specifically for PPCP removal. This review focuses on biochar's role in CWs and its effectiveness in removing PPCPs and enhancing microbial activity and nutrient cycling. A bibliometric analysis using Vosviewer software was used to assess the current research trends in the biochar-amended CWs to attenuate PPCPs. While biochar shows potential in eliminating PPCPs, challenges, such as optimizing its application and addressing long-term operational concerns for treating emerging pollutants like PPCPs. Future research should enhance biochar production and low-cost techniques for diverse groups of PPCPs and perform field trials to validate laboratory results under actual conditions exploring microbial-biochar and plant-biochar interactions. Addressing these challenges is crucial to advancing biochar-amended CWs and enhancing wastewater treatment on a global scale.

Free water surface constructed wetlands: review of pollutant removal performance and modeling approaches

Free water surface constructed wetlands (FWSCWs) for the treatment of various wastewater types have evolved significantly over the last few decades. With an increasing need and interest in FWSCWs applications worldwide due to their cost-effectiveness and other benefits, this paper reviews recent literature on FWSCWs' ability to remove different types of pollutants such as nutrients (i.e., TN, TP, NH4-N), heavy metals (i.e., Fe, Zn, and Ni), antibiotics (i.e., oxytetracycline, ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, sulfamethazine, and ofloxacin), and pesticides (i.e., Atrazine, S-Metolachlor, imidacloprid, lambda-cyhalothrin, diuron 3,4-dichloroanilin, Simazine, and Atrazine) that may co-exist in wetland inflow, and discusses approaches for simulating hydraulic and pollutant removal processes. A bibliometric analysis of recent literature reveals that China has the highest number of publications, followed by the USA. The collected data show that FWSCWs can remove an average of 61.6%, 67.8%, 54.7%, and 72.85% of inflowing nutrients, heavy metals, antibiotics, and pesticides, respectively. Optimizing each pollutant removal process requires specific design parameters. Removing heavy metal requires the lowest hydraulic retention time (HRT) (average of 4.78 days), removing pesticides requires the lowest water depth (average of 0.34 m), and nutrient removal requires the largest system size. Vegetation, especially Typha spp. and Phragmites spp., play an important role in FWSCWs' system performance, making significant contributions to the removal process. Various modeling approaches (i.e., black-box and process-based) were comprehensively reviewed, revealing the need for including the internal process mechanisms related to the biological processes along with plants spp., that supported by a further research with field study validations. This work presents a state-of-the-art, systematic, and comparative discussion on the efficiency of FWSCWs in removing different pollutants, main design factors, the vegetation, and well-described models for performance prediction.

Biochar from recovered cellulose as new admixture in constructed wetlands for micropollutant removal: A circular approach

This study aimed to evaluate the suitability of biochar produced by pyrolysis from recovered wastewater cellulose and activated biologically as an admixture in Constructed Wetlands (CWs) when applied as a post-treatment step to remove micropollutants (MPs) from municipal wastewater effluent. Two planted vertical flow mesocosm CWs with cellulose-based admixtures of different origins (plant residue and recovered toilet paper) were fed with a municipal wastewater effluent representative for rural catchments. The results showed an average MPs elimination of 89.1 % for the activated biochar produced from recovered cellulose when 15 relevant compounds are considered and a reduction of the risk from compounds cocktail below the maximum acceptable level having diclofenac, carbamazepine, PFOS, ciprofloxacin and clarithromycin as main risk drivers (Risk Quotient > 1). The implementation of a circular approach to reduce MPs was finally conducted for the Blies catchment (Saarland region in Germany) characterized by low population density and small, sensitive water bodies. This approach demonstrates the feasibility of combining cellulose recovery with a fine sieve in large wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and providing biochar produced from recovered cellulose as an admixture to small WWTP where CW is an affordable solution for MP mitigation.

Current Trends in Bioaugmentation Tools for Bioremediation: A Critical Review of Advances and Knowledge Gaps

Bioaugmentation is widely used in soil bioremediation, wastewater treatment, and air biofiltration. The addition of microbial biomass to contaminated areas can considerably improve their biodegradation performance. Nevertheless, analyses of large data sets on the topic available in literature do not provide a comprehensive view of the mechanisms responsible for inoculum-assisted stimulation. On the one hand, there is no universal mechanism of bioaugmentation for a broad spectrum of environmental conditions, contaminants, and technology operation concepts. On the other hand, further analyses of bioaugmentation outcomes under laboratory conditions and in the field will strengthen the theoretical basis for a better prediction of bioremediation processes under certain conditions. This review focuses on the following aspects: (i) choosing the source of microorganisms and the isolation procedure; (ii) preparation of the inoculum, e.g., cultivation of single strains or consortia, adaptation; (iii) application of immobilised cells; (iv) application schemes for soil, water bodies, bioreactors, and hydroponics; and (v) microbial succession and biodiversity. Reviews of recent scientific papers dating mostly from 2022-2023, as well as our own long-term studies, are provided here.

The removal of micropollutants from treated effluent by batch-operated pilot-scale constructed wetlands

Micropollutants (MPs), such as pharmaceuticals and antibiotics, are present in the environment at low concentrations (ng/L-μg/L). A constructed wetland (CW) is a nature-based wastewater treatment technology, which can be used to remove MPs from wastewater treatment plant effluent. This study aimed to improve MP removal of CWs by optimizing the design of batch-operated CW. Three pilot-scale CWs were built to study the effect of two design-features: the use of a support matrix (a mixture of bark and biochar) and continuous aeration. The use of bark-biochar as support matrix increased the removal of 11 of 12 studied MPs compared to the CW filled with conventional material sand. The highest improved removal by the addition of bark-biochar was more than 40% (median) for irbesartan, carbamazepine, hydrochlorothiazide and benzotriazole. Aerating the bed of the bark-biochar CW did not change MP removal. Besides, the presence of bark-biochar also enhanced the removal of total nitrogen during 10 months of operation, but no improvement was observed on the total organic carbon and total phosphorus removal. Considering the application in a batch-operated CW, MP removal can be greatly enhanced by replacing sand with bark-biochar that will act as MP adsorbing matrix.

A 'Limitations' section should be mandatory in all scientific papers

It is unusual, and can be difficult, for scientists to reflect in their publications on any limitations their research had. This is a consequence of the extreme pressure that scientists are under to 'publish or perish'. The inevitable consequence is that much published research is not as good as it could, and should, be, leading to the current 'reproducibility crisis'. Approaches to address this crisis are required. Our suggestion is to include a 'Limitations' section in all scientific papers. Evidence is provided showing that such a section must be mandatory. Adding a 'Limitations' section to scientific papers would greatly increase honesty, openness and transparency, to the considerable benefit of both the scientific community and society in general. This suggestion is applicable to all scientific disciplines. Finally, we apologise if our suggestion has already been made by others.