Mechanistic insights into the chemical structural changes of lignite on potential formation of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

Generation and emission mechanism of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAHs) during the coking process in Shanxi, China

Although coking process is the important source of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the environment, the generation and emission of PAHs during this process is unclear. It is crucial to clarify the formation mechanism of PAHs in coal pyrolysis during the coking process for effectively identifying and controlling the emission of these organic pollutants. In this study, the combination of laboratory simulation and field sampling was used to analyze the mechanism of PAHs formation and emission in coking process. The release of PAHs from the pyrolysis process of coal blends used in coking plants was 1778.20 ± 111.95 μg · g-1, which was much higher than the content of free PAHs in raw coal (76.50 ± 12.46 μg · g-1). 3-ring PAHs were the most abundant components of free PAHs and pyrolysis-generated PAHs. PAH formation during pyrolysis of coal blends was primarily attributed to the cracking of the macromolecular structure of coal, with minimal influence of free PAHs in blended coal. The emission of PAHs from coal-charging was higher (62.93 ± 17.75 μg · m-3) than that from pushing of coke (11.79 ± 1.91 μg · m-3·, PC) and combustion of coke oven gas (5.53 ± 1.20 μg · m-3, CG), and was mainly related to free PAHs in coal. In contrast, the characteristics of PAHs in the flue gas of PC and CG were similar to those from blended coal pyrolysis. PAHs in fugitive emission from coke oven were primarily affected by flue gas leakage and were mainly related to coal pyrolysis and free PAHs in blended coal.

Mono and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in waterpipe wastewater: Level and ecotoxicological risk assessment

Increasing of tobacco consumption around the world has led to the production of a large volume of waterpipe wastewater that enter the environment (e.g., coastal areas)and threaten aquatic creatures. However, until now, no research has been carried out on the amounts of monocyclic and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in hookah wastewater. In the current study, the levels of PAHs and BTEX compounds in waterpipe wastewater resulting from the use of different tobacco brands were determined and their eco-toxicological effects were also evaluated. The mean levels of ƩPAHs in waterpipe wastewater of Al Tawareg, Al-Fakher, Nakhla, Tangiers and traditional tobacco brands samples were 3.48 ± 1.65, 3.33 ± 1.52, 3.08 ± 1.25, 2.41 ± 0.87 and 0.70 ± 0.13 μg/L, respectively. The mean levels of ƩBTEX in waterpipe wastewater of Al Tawareg, Al-Fakher, Nakhla, Tangiers and traditional tobacco brands samples were also 2.53 ± 0.61, 2.65 ± 0.78, 2.51 ± 0.72, 2.35 ± 0.56, and 0.78 ± 0.12 μg/L, respectively. The maximum level of PAHs and BTEX compounds in all brands/flavors samples were for naphthalene (Naph) and toluene, respectively. The concentrations of some PAHs (fluoranthene (Flrt), anthracene (Ant), benzo(b)fluoranthene (BbF), benzo(b)fluoranthene (BkF), benzo (g,h,i)perylene (BghiP) and dibenzo (a, h) anthracene (DahA)) and BTEX compounds (benzene) in the waterpipe wastewater samples were more than recommended guidelines and standards by the international reputable organizations such as World Health Organization (WHO) for water quality. Waterpipe wastewater can be introduced as an important origin for the release of these dangerous contaminants into the environmental matrixes. Therefore, more stringent regulations should be considered for the safe disposal of such hazardous wastes including waterpipe wastewater.