Dosing Fluids in Early Septic Shock

Changes of Serum Pyruvate Kinase M2 Level in Patients with Sepsis and Its Clinical Value

Purpose

The glucose metabolic reprogramming is an important pathological mechanism in sepsis, which involves a series of enzymes including Pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2). The purpose of this study is to explore the diagnostic and prognostic value of serum PKM2 in sepsis patients.

Patients and Methods

This study recruited 143 sepsis patients, 91 non-sepsis patients, and 65 physical examiners, divided into sepsis group, non-sepsis group, and control group. Measure the serum PKM2 concentration of subjects, collect and analyze clinical and laboratory indicators of all subjects. Independent risk factors were selected by Logistic regression analysis. The area under curve (AUC) was calculated by plotting the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to determine the diagnostic and prognostic value of biomarkers.

Results

Compared with non-sepsis and control groups, the serum PKM2 levels in the sepsis group were significantly increased (both P<0.001). PKM2 was an independent risk factor for sepsis and had the best diagnostic efficacy when combined with procalcitonin, with the AUC value of 0.9352. Patients with high levels of PKM2 were more likely to experience organ damage and had a higher incidence of septic shock. On the 1st and 3rd days of admission, the serum PKM2 levels in the septic shock group were higher than those in the sepsis group (both P<0.05), with AUC values of 0.7296 and 0.6247, respectively. On the 3rd and 7th days of admission, the serum PKM2 levels in the non-survival group were significantly higher than those in the survival group (both P<0.001), with AUC values of 0.7033 and 0.8732, respectively.

Conclusion

The serum PKM2 levels in sepsis patients are significantly increased and correlated with disease severity and clinical outcomes. PKM2 may be a new diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for sepsis.

Simultaneous venous-arterial Doppler during preload augmentation: illustrating the Doppler Starling curve

Providing intravenous (IV) fluids to a patient with signs or symptoms of hypoperfusion is common. However, evaluating the IV fluid 'dose-response' curve of the heart is elusive. Two patients were studied in the emergency department with a wireless, wearable Doppler ultrasound system. Change in the common carotid arterial and internal jugular Doppler spectrograms were simultaneously obtained as surrogates of left ventricular stroke volume (SV) and central venous pressure (CVP), respectively. Both patients initially had low CVP jugular venous Doppler spectrograms. With preload augmentation, only one patient had arterial Doppler measures indicative of significant SV augmentation (i.e., 'fluid responsive'). The other patient manifested diminishing arterial response, suggesting depressed SV (i.e., 'fluid unresponsive') with evidence of ventricular asynchrony. In this short communication, we describe how a wireless, wearable Doppler ultrasound simultaneously tracks surrogates of cardiac preload and output within a 'Doppler Starling curve' framework; implications for IV fluid dosing are discussed.

RESPIRATORY VARIABILITY OF VALVULAR PEAK SYSTOLIC VELOCITY AS A NEW INDICATOR OF FLUID RESPONSIVENESS IN PATIENTS WITH SEPTIC SHOCK

ABSTRACT

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and feasibility of pulse Doppler measurements of peak velocity respiratory variability of mitral and tricuspid valve rings during systole as new dynamic indicators of fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock. Methods: Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed to measure the respiratory variability of aortic velocity-time integral (∆VTI), respiratory variability of tricuspid annulus systolic peak velocity (∆RVS), respiratory variability of mitral annulus systolic peak velocity (∆LVS), and other related indicators. Fluid responsiveness was defined as a 10% increase in cardiac output after fluid expansion, assessed by TTE. Results: A total of 33 patients with septic shock were enrolled in this study. First, there was no significant difference in the population characteristics between the fluid responsiveness positive group (n = 17) and the fluid responsiveness negative group (n = 16) ( P > 0.05). Second, Pearson correlation test showed that ∆RVS, ∆LVS, and TAPSE with the relative increase in cardiac output after fluid expansion ( R = 0.55, P = 0.001; R = 0.40, P = 0.02; R = 0.36, P = 0.041). Third, multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that ∆RVS, ∆LVS, and TAPSE were significantly correlated with fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock. Fourth, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed that ∆VTI, ∆LVS, ∆RVS, and TAPSE had good predictive ability for fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock. The area under the curve (AUC) of ∆VTI, ∆LVS, ∆RVS, and TAPSE for predicting fluid responsiveness was 0.952, 0.802, 0.822, and 0.713, respectively. The sensitivity (Se) values were 1.00, 0.73, 0.81, and 0.83, whereas the specificity (Sp) values were 0.84, 0.91, 0.76, and 0.67, respectively. The optimal thresholds were 0.128, 0.129, 0.130, and 13.9 mm, respectively. Conclusion: Tissue Doppler ultrasound evaluation of respiratory variability of mitral and tricuspid annular peak systolic velocity could be a feasible and reliable method for the simple assessment of fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock.

2023 Update on Sepsis and Septic Shock in Adult Patients: Management in the Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

Sepsis/septic shock is a life-threatening and time-dependent condition that requires timely management to reduce mortality. This review aims to update physicians with regard to the main pillars of treatment for this insidious condition.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE were searched from inception with special attention paid to November 2021-January 2023.

RESULTS

The management of sepsis/septic shock is challenging and involves different pathophysiological aspects, encompassing empirical antimicrobial treatment (which is promptly administered after microbial tests), fluid (crystalloids) replacement (to be established according to fluid tolerance and fluid responsiveness), and vasoactive agents (e.g., norepinephrine (NE)), which are employed to maintain mean arterial pressure above 65 mmHg and reduce the risk of fluid overload. In cases of refractory shock, vasopressin (rather than epinephrine) should be combined with NE to reach an acceptable level of pressure control. If mechanical ventilation is indicated, the tidal volume should be reduced from 10 to 6 mL/kg. Heparin is administered to prevent venous thromboembolism, and glycemic control is recommended. The efficacy of other treatments (e.g., proton-pump inhibitors, sodium bicarbonate, etc.) is largely debated, and such treatments might be used on a case-to-case basis.

CONCLUSIONS

The management of sepsis/septic shock has significantly progressed in the last few years. Improving knowledge of the main therapeutic cornerstones of this challenging condition is crucial to achieve better patient outcomes.

Central Venous Waveform Analysis and Cardiac Output in a Porcine Model of Endotoxemic Hypotension and Resuscitation

BACKGROUND

Cardiac output (CO) is a valuable proxy for perfusion, and governs volume responsiveness during resuscitation from distributive shock. The underappreciated venous system has nuanced physiology that confers valuable hemodynamic information. In this investigation, deconvolution of the central venous waveform by the fast Fourier transformation (FFT) algorithm is performed to assess its ability to constitute a CO surrogate in a porcine model of endotoxemia-induced distributive hypotension and resuscitation.

STUDY DESIGN

Ten pigs were anesthetized, catheterized, and intubated. A lipopolysaccharides infusion protocol was used to precipitate low systemic vascular resistance hypotension. Four crystalloid boluses (10 cc/kg) were then given in succession, after which heart rate, mean arterial pressure, thermodilution-derived CO, central venous pressure (CVP), and the central venous waveform were collected, the last undergoing fast Fourier transformation analysis. The amplitude of the fundamental frequency of the central venous waveform's cardiac wave (f0-CVP) was obtained. Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, CVP, f0-CVP, and CO were plotted over the course of the boluses to determine whether f0-CVP tracked with CO better than the vital signs, or than CVP itself.

RESULTS

Distributive hypotension to a 25% mean arterial pressure decrement was achieved, with decreased systemic vascular resistance (mean 918 ± 227 [SD] dyne/s/cm-5 vs 685 ± 180 dyne/s/cm-5; p = 0.038). Full hemodynamic parameters characterizing this model were reported. Slopes of linear regression lines of heart rate, mean arterial pressure, CVP, f0-CVP, and CO were -2.8, 1.7, 1.8, 0.40, and 0.35, respectively, demonstrating that f0-CVP values closely track with CO over the 4-bolus range.

CONCLUSIONS

Fast Fourier transformation analysis of the central venous waveform may allow real-time assessment of CO during resuscitation from distributive hypotension, possibly offering a venous-based approach to clinical estimation of volume responsiveness.

Influence of time from admission to norepinephrine administration and volume of fluids received on outcomes of patients meeting sepsis-3 criteria: a retrospective study using the MIMIC-IV database

Objectives

Vasopressors are a cornerstone in the management of sepsis, marked by distributive shock often unresponsive to fluid resuscitation. Prior research and clinician surveys have suggested that earlier usage of vasopressors corresponds to improved outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective cohort was constructed using patient data contained within the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV database. Analytic cohort included a total of 2079 patients meeting sepsis-3 criteria with a ≥2-point rise in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and administered norepinephrine (NE) as first-line vasopressor within 24 hours of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Patients receiving other vasopressors or missing documented fluid resuscitation information were excluded. Primary end points included mortality, use of invasive mechanical ventilation and length of stay which were analyzed in a multivariate logistic regression model for the primary effect of time from ICU admission to NE administration using covariates.

Results

Time to NE use was defined as either early, using <6 hours from time of ICU admission or late using >6 hours to ≤24 hours. Patients who received early NE had significantly lower adjusted odds of mortality (0.75, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.97, p=0.026), higher adjusted odds of invasive mechanical ventilation (1.48, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.16, p=0.045), no significant difference in hospital length of stay (difference in days 0.6 (95% CI -3.24 to 2.04)) and lower ICU length of stay (difference in days -0.9 (95% CI -1.74 to -0.01)), as compared with the late NE group.

Conclusion

Among patients admitted to the ICU for sepsis, early use of NE was associated with significantly lower odds of mortality but higher odds of mechanical ventilation, and no significant difference in length of hospital stay but less time in the ICU. Furthermore, the volume of fluids received prior to NE use may have a significant impact on optimal NE timing.

Level of evidence

Level IV-therapeutic care/management.

The emerging concept of fluid tolerance: A position paper

Fluid resuscitation is a core component of emergency and critical care medicine. While the focus of clinicians has largely been on detecting patients who would respond to fluid therapy, relatively little work has been done on assessing patients' tolerance to this therapy. In this article we seek to review the concept of fluid tolerance, propose a working definition, and introduce relevant clinical signals by which physicians can assess fluid tolerance, hopefully becoming a starting point for further research.

Assessing Fluid Intolerance with Doppler Ultrasonography: A Physiological Framework

Ultrasonography is becoming the favored hemodynamic monitoring utensil of emergentologists, anesthesiologists and intensivists. While the roles of ultrasound grow and evolve, many clinical applications of ultrasound stem from qualitative, image-based protocols, especially for diagnosing and managing circulatory failure. Often, these algorithms imply or suggest treatment. For example, intravenous fluids are opted for or against based upon ultrasonographic signs of preload and estimation of the left ventricular ejection fraction. Though appealing, image-based algorithms skirt some foundational tenets of cardiac physiology; namely, (1) the relationship between cardiac filling and stroke volume varies considerably in the critically ill, (2) the correlation between cardiac filling and total vascular volume is poor and (3) the ejection fraction is not purely an appraisal of cardiac function but rather a measure of coupling between the ventricle and the arterial load. Therefore, management decisions could be enhanced by quantitative approaches, enabled by Doppler ultrasonography. Both fluid ‘responsiveness’ and ‘tolerance’ are evaluated by Doppler ultrasound, but the physiological relationship between these constructs is nebulous. Accordingly, it is argued that the link between them is founded upon the Frank–Starling–Sarnoff relationship and that this framework helps direct future ultrasound protocols, explains seemingly discordant findings and steers new routes of enquiry.

Does Fluid Administration Based on Fluid Responsiveness Tests such as Passive Leg Raising Improve Outcomes in Sepsis?

The management of sepsis requires the rapid administration of fluid to support blood pressure and tissue perfusion. Guidelines suggest that patients should receive 30 ml per kg of fluid over the first one to three hours of management. The next concern is to determine which patients need additional fluid. This introduces the concept of fluid responsiveness, defined by an increase in cardiac output following the administration of a fluid bolus. Dynamic tests, measuring cardiac output, identify fluid responders better than static tests. Passive leg raising tests provide an alternative approach to determine fluid responsiveness without administering fluid. However, one small randomized trial demonstrated that patients managed with frequent passive leg raising tests had a smaller net fluid balance at 72 hours and reduced requirements for renal replacement therapy and mechanical ventilation, but no change in mortality. A meta-analysis including 4 randomized control trials reported that resuscitation guided by fluid responsiveness does not improve mortality outcomes in patients with sepsis. Recent studies have demonstrated that the early administration of norepinephrine may improve outcomes in patients with sepsis. The concept of fluid responsiveness helps clinicians analyze the clinical status of patients, but this information must be integrated into the overall management of the patient. This review considers the use and benefit of fluid responsiveness tests to direct fluid administration in patients with sepsis.

How I Do It: Risks and Benefits of Fluid Administration as Assessed by Ultrasound

For patients in shock, decisions regarding administering or withholding IV fluids are both difficult and important. Although a strategy of relatively liberal fluid administration has traditionally been popular, recent trial results suggest that moving to a more fluid-restrictive approach may be prudent. The goal of this article was to outline how whole-body point-of-care ultrasound can help clarify both the possible benefits and the potential risks of fluid administration, aiding in the risk/benefit calculations that should always accompany fluid-related decisions.