Ensuring selectivity using retention time modulation by solvent composition, applied to the analysis of phenol in e-liquids

Recent advances in the analysis of electronic cigarette liquids and aerosols: Sample preparation and chromatographic characterization

Electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) usage has risen dramatically worldwide in recent years. It has been publicized as a safer alternative to the conventional combustible cigarette. This, however, has not yet been supported by robust toxicological research evidence. Analysis of the chemical compositions of e-liquids and generated aerosols is an important step in evaluating the toxicity effects of e-cigarettes. Currently, a broad spectrum of analytical methods have been employed for qualitative and quantitative analysis of chemical compositions of e-cigarette liquids and aerosols. The aim of this article is to review the advances in the chromatographic characterization of chemical composition of the latter in the recent five years. In addition, sample preparation methods for e-liquids and aerosols are surveyed and discussed. A study of the relevant literature indicates that, expectedly, gas chromatography and liquid chromatography with a variety of detection systems, particularly mass spectrometry, have been the main analytical techniques used in this field. Sample preparation procedures primarily include headspace sampling, dilute-and-shoot approach, liquid-liquid extraction and sorbent-based extraction for e-liquids and for aerosols (the latter usually with laboratory-built collection devices). Some challenges of current e-cigarette analytical research, and an overview on prospective work are also presented.

Method Validation Approaches for Analysis of Constituents in ENDS

OBJECTIVE

We assessed how many peer-reviewed publications reporting chemical quantities and/or yields from electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) have included adequate method validation characteristics in the publication for appropriate interpretation of data quality for informing tobacco regulatory science.

METHODS

We searched 5 databases (Web of Knowledge, PubMed, SciFinder, Embase, EBSCOhost) for ENDS publications between January 2007 and September 2018. Of the 283 publications screened, 173 publications were relevant for analysis. We identified the publications that report a certain degree of control in data quality, ie, the publications that report marginally validated methods (MVMs). MVMs refer to the methods that: (1) report 3 or more International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) method validation characteristics, (2) state the method was validated, (3) cite their own previous publication(s) that report MVMs, or (4) use a method within the accreditation scope of an accredited laboratory.

RESULTS

Overall, 97 publications (56%) report MVMs in their studies. This percentage also reflects the publication distribution for the majority of the 28 chemicals measured by MVMs.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the need for reporting sufficient validation characteristics following appropriate guidance to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the published analytical data for proper data interpretations that may support policy.

An improved in situ acetylation with dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction followed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for the sensitive determination of phenols in mainstream tobacco smoke

Phenols in tobacco smoke can adversely affect health with serious consequences that include cardiovascular toxicity, tumor promotion and genotoxic activity. Hence, an improved method involving in situ acetylation and dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) followed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was developed for the determination of 39 phenols in mainstream tobacco smoke (MTS). The in situ acetylation was optimized using four protocols, after which the effects of experimental variables on acetylation efficiency were studied using a multifactorial experimental design. The optimum conditions were found to involve an initial 75 μL volume of acetic anhydride, 140 mg of NaHCO₃ and 72 mg of K₂CO₃. The phenolic acetates were then subjected to DLLME, after which they were identified and quantified by GC-MS. A total of 32 additional phenols were tentatively identified. Good linearity was observed with R > 0.999 and each lack-of-fit P > 0.05. The relative recoveries were in the range of 94.8-104.3% with repeatabilities and reproducibilities less than 5.5% and 6.8%, respectively. The limits of detection ranged from 1.12 to 1.74 ng cig^-1, with high enrichment factors between 87 and 144. This method was applied to the MTS from three commercial cigarettes with different tar levels. The results provide valuable information for assessing the risks of phenols.