Effect of 2-propanol content on solute retention mechanisms determined using amylose tris(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) chiral stationary phase under normal- and reversed-phase conditions

Advantages of polar organic solvent chromatography for enantioseparation of chiral liquid crystals

Three sets of fluorinated chiral liquid crystals were used to explore the polar organic solvent chromatography mode for their enantioseparation. The materials include a set of newly synthesized compounds with chiral center derived from 2-hexanol and two sets of compounds with chiral center derived from 2-/3-octanol. Baseline enantioseparation of all materials was achieved using binary mobile phases without additives. For some of the compounds exceedingly high values of enantioresolution (> 20) and enantioselectivity (> 4) were found. The chromatographic behavior of the sample set was studied on three different polysaccharide-based chiral columns - Chiralpak IA-U, IG-U and IB-U. Comparison of results from Chiralpak IA-U and IB-U shows the effect of amylose vs. cellulose polysaccharide backbone while comparison of Chiralpak IA-U and IG-U reveals the effect of 3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate vs. 3‑chloro-5-methylphenylcarbamate substituent. The mobile phases tested included whole range of acetonitrile/methanol mixtures to demonstrate that acetonitrile-rich and alcohol-rich mobile phases offer different enantiorecognition mechanisms and can provide complementarity to some extent. The effect of temperature on enantioseparation was investigated on Chiralpak IA-U by constructing van't Hoff plots for selected liquid crystals in pure acetonitrile and pure methanol as mobile phases.

Heterogenous adsorption mechanisms for describing enantioselective retention in normal-phase liquid chromatography

In this study, the enantioselective retention behaviors of methyl mandelate (MM) and benzoin (B) were investigated using Chiralpak IB as a sorbent and ethanol, 1-propanol, and 1-butanol as solvent modifiers in the normal-phase mode. For both MM and B, similar chiral recognition mechanisms were observed, potentially involving at least two types of chiral adsorption sites. With a retention model describing local retention behaviors, an enantioselectivity model based on a three-site model was proposed to describe the data. Fitted parameters were also used to analyze the contributions of each type of adsorption site to the apparent retention behavior. Combining the local retention model with the three-site model provided a qualitative and quantitative explanation for the correlation between modifier concentration and enantioselectivity. Overall, our results indicated that heterogeneous adsorption mechanisms are a key aspect in understanding enantioselective retention behaviors. Distinct local adsorption sites contribute differently to apparent retention behaviors, with these contributions being influenced by the mobile phase composition to varying degrees. Hence, enantioselectivity changes with variations in modifier concentration.

Effect of mobile-phase modifiers on the enantioselective retention behavior of methyl mandelate with an amylose 3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate chiral stationary phase under reversed-phase conditions

In this study, methanol, ethanol, n-propyl alcohol, isopropyl alcohol, acetone, and tert-butanol were used as organic modifiers in reversed-phase mode chiral liquid-chromatography to systematically investigate the effects of mobile phase components on the enantioselective retention behavior of methyl mandelate with immobilized amylose 3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate-based sorbent called Chiralpak IA. A two-site enantioselective model was used to obtain information on the recognition mechanisms by observing the dependence of the enantioselectivity and retention factor difference on the modifier content. Similar enantioselective retention behaviors were observed for all modifiers, and characteristic modifier concentration points (P_L , P_M , and P_H ) were identified. At modifier concentrations up to P_M , the weakened hydrophobic environment resulted in polymer structural relaxation, which changed the recognition mechanisms. By contrast, at concentrations beyond P_H , considerably different enantioselectivity behaviors were observed, indicating that the existence of dipole-dipole interaction, which was stronger at higher modifier concentrations, contributed to the retention mechanisms. The concentrations at which these characteristic points occurred were dependent on the carbon number of the modifier molecule. Modifiers with more carbon numbers facilitated the transition in the enantioselective behaviors. These results demonstrated that the proposed method can provide a physically consistent quantitative description of enantioselective retention behavior in reversed-phase mode.

Recognition in the Domain of Molecular Chirality: From Noncovalent Interactions to Separation of Enantiomers

It is not a coincidence that both chirality and noncovalent interactions are ubiquitous in nature and synthetic molecular systems. Noncovalent interactivity between chiral molecules underlies enantioselective recognition as a fundamental phenomenon regulating life and human activities. Thus, noncovalent interactions represent the narrative thread of a fascinating story which goes across several disciplines of medical, chemical, physical, biological, and other natural sciences. This review has been conceived with the awareness that a modern attitude toward molecular chirality and its consequences needs to be founded on multidisciplinary approaches to disclose the molecular basis of essential enantioselective phenomena in the domain of chemical, physical, and life sciences. With the primary aim of discussing this topic in an integrated way, a comprehensive pool of rational and systematic multidisciplinary information is provided, which concerns the fundamentals of chirality, a description of noncovalent interactions, and their implications in enantioselective processes occurring in different contexts. A specific focus is devoted to enantioselection in chromatography and electromigration techniques because of their unique feature as "multistep" processes. A second motivation for writing this review is to make a clear statement about the state of the art, the tools we have at our disposal, and what is still missing to fully understand the mechanisms underlying enantioselective recognition.

Retention modeling and adsorption mechanisms in reversed-phase liquid chromatography

To interpret the dependence of solute retention behavior on modifier content in reversed-phase liquid chromatography, a theoretical framework, based on the concentration dependence of solvophobic forces imposed on solutes and the competitive adsorptions of solutes and solvent modifiers, was proposed. The generality of the developed model was demonstrated by comparing the model with conventional retention models. The linear dependence of the Gibbs energy change of solute adsorption with respect to the modifier concentration was assumed, and the model was fitted to the experimental results, with good agreement demonstrated between the experimental data and the model. Retention behaviors were inferred to be determined by two key dimensionless groups that represented the reductions in the retention factors resulting from a weakened solvophobic interaction and modifier competitive adsorption. The retention behaviors were successfully deconvoluted for each contribution as a function of the modifier concentration by using the fitted parameters. The effects of both contributions on the retention behaviors were enhanced for the solutes with aromatic groups. The standard Gibbs energy change _SL^o of benzene adsorption was found to depend linearly on the number of modifier molecules present but independent of modifier identity. For the solutes associated with hydrogen-bonding groups, the degree of reduction in the solvophobic interactions was considerably reduced. Hence, the relative contributions of both mechanisms to solute retention depend greatly on the solute structure. Perturbation method was performed to investigate the modifier adsorption mechanisms. The results show that the standard Gibbs energy change _SL^o for the first-layer adsorption of modifiers changed linearly with the carbon number of modifier molecule. These results demonstrated that the proposed model can offer a physically consistent quantitative description of retention when solvent composition is varied.