Spherical nanoparticles can be used as non-penetrating tracers to determine the extra-particle void volume in packed-bed chromatography columns

The use of predictive models to develop chromatography-based purification processes

Chromatography is the workhorse of biopharmaceutical downstream processing because it can selectively enrich a target product while removing impurities from complex feed streams. This is achieved by exploiting differences in molecular properties, such as size, charge and hydrophobicity (alone or in different combinations). Accordingly, many parameters must be tested during process development in order to maximize product purity and recovery, including resin and ligand types, conductivity, pH, gradient profiles, and the sequence of separation operations. The number of possible experimental conditions quickly becomes unmanageable. Although the range of suitable conditions can be narrowed based on experience, the time and cost of the work remain high even when using high-throughput laboratory automation. In contrast, chromatography modeling using inexpensive, parallelized computer hardware can provide expert knowledge, predicting conditions that achieve high purity and efficient recovery. The prediction of suitable conditions in silico reduces the number of empirical tests required and provides in-depth process understanding, which is recommended by regulatory authorities. In this article, we discuss the benefits and specific challenges of chromatography modeling. We describe the experimental characterization of chromatography devices and settings prior to modeling, such as the determination of column porosity. We also consider the challenges that must be overcome when models are set up and calibrated, including the cross-validation and verification of data-driven and hybrid (combined data-driven and mechanistic) models. This review will therefore support researchers intending to establish a chromatography modeling workflow in their laboratory.

Bayesian optimization using multiple directional objective functions allows the rapid inverse fitting of parameters for chromatography simulations

The modeling of chromatographic separations can speed up downstream process development, reducing the time to market and corresponding development costs for new products such as pharmaceuticals. However, calibrating such models by identifying suitable parameter values for mass transport and sorption is a major, time-consuming challenge that can hinder model development and improvement. We therefore designed a new approach based on Bayesian optimization (BayesOpt) and Gaussian processes that reduced the time required to compute relevant chromatography parameters by up to two orders of magnitude compared to a multistart gradient descent and a genetic algorithm. We compared the three approaches side by side to process several internal and external datasets for ion exchange chromatography (based on a steric mass action isotherm) and hydrophobic interaction chromatography (a modified version of a recently published five-parameter isotherm) as well as different input data types (gradient elution data alone vs gradient elution and breakthrough data). We found that BayesOpt computation was consistently faster than the other approaches when using either single-core or 12-cores computer processing units. The error of the BayesOpt parameter estimates was higher than that of the competing algorithms, but still two orders of magnitude less than the variability of our experimental data, indicating BayesOpts applicability for chromatography modeling. The low computational demand of BayesOpt will facilitate rapid model development and improvement even for large datasets (e.g., > 100 proteins) and increase its suitability for research laboratories or small and medium enterprises lacking access to dedicated mainframe computers.