Robotic anatomical lung resections: Analysis of the learning curve

Assessment of Quality Outcomes and the Learning Curve for Robot-Assisted Anatomical Lung Resections

Background: To determine the perioperative quality assessment results and learning curves for robot-assisted anatomical lung resection. Methods: We analyzed the data of the initial 400 patients who underwent lobectomies or segmentectomies by 1 surgeon from January 2020 to November 2021. The learning curve was analyzed using cumulative sum analysis. Results: The surgical experience was divided into an initial phase (1st-40th procedures), a transition phase (41st-131st procedures), and a proficient phase (132nd procedure onward). The operative time showed a conspicuously continuous improvement over the 400 consecutive patients. After the 120th procedure, there were significant improvements in the rate of persistent air leakage (11.7% versus 3.9%; P = .003), chest tube duration (3.92 ± 1.91 versus 2.99 ± 1.31, P = .00), and postoperative hospital stay (6.22 ± 2.02 versus 4.93 ± 1.44, P = .00). Conclusions: In conclusion, 40 patients were necessary to pass the learning curve, and technical proficiency with favorable perioperative outcomes was achieved after 120-130 patients.

Complications of Robotic Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Compared to Open Thoracotomy for Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

(1) Background: Conventional open thoracotomy has been the accepted surgical treatment for resectable non-small cell lung cancer. However, newer, minimally invasive approaches, such as robotic surgery, have demonstrated similar safety and efficacy with potentially superior peri-operative outcomes. The present study aimed to quantitatively assess these outcomes through a meta-analysis. (2) Methods: A systematic review was performed using electronic databases to identify all of the relevant studies that compared robotic surgery with open thoracotomy for non-small cell lung cancer. Pooled data on the peri-operative outcomes were then meta-analyzed. (3) Results: Twenty-two studies involving 12,061 patients who underwent robotic lung resection and 92,411 patients who underwent open thoracotomy were included for analysis. Mortality rates and length of hospital stay were significantly lower in patients who underwent robotic resection. Compared to open thoracotomy, robotic surgery was also associated with significantly lower rates of overall complications, including atrial arrhythmia, post-operative blood transfusions, pneumonia and atelectasis. However, the operative times were significantly longer with robotic lung resection. (4) Conclusions: The present meta-analysis demonstrated superior post-operative morbidity and mortality outcomes with robotic lung resection compared to open thoracotomy for non-small cell lung cancer.