Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Prognostic factors for recurrence and survival in a series of 67 patients treated surgically at a single center

Role of routine lymph node dissection alongside resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The global incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICCA) is soaring. Due to often delayed presentation, only a narrow spectrum of the disease is usually surgically resectable. To more accurately stage the disease, reduce recurrence, and improve overall survival, surgical teams are increasingly performing intraoperative lymph node dissection (LND) as well. This procedure has its associated morbidity, while there is no consensus or formal guidelines on its role in this setting. Hence, there is a need to better delineate the evidence for performing LND alongside surgical resection of the ICCA.

AIM

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the role of LND in improving prognostication and survival post-resection of ICCA.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search using Pubmed, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, for all studies involving LND, ICCA, and surgical resection using several keywords, Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) tags, and appropriate synonyms. All clinical studies comparing curative intent resection of ICCA with LND vs resection without LND were included, while single-arm case series, studies with insufficient data, and duplicates were excluded. We included all English-language studies from the different academic databases up till early December 2022. The primary outcome measures were set for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

This systematic review and meta-analysis included 15 studies that fulfilled the selection criteria comprising 11413 patients with surgically-resectable ICCA, of whom 6424 (56.3%) underwent hepatectomy with LND while the remainder underwent hepatectomy only. In patients who underwent LND, on average, 27.7% of the resected lymph nodes were positive for metastatic disease. Overall, the results showed that performing LND did not significantly improve OS or DFS. However, the effect of LND on OS showed a degree of variability by geographical region, in Eastern and Western countries. As LND is increasingly being performed, further time-based analysis was undertaken to identify time-dependent changes in the role of LND. An increasing adoption of LND was not associated with improved OS. Furthermore, no roles were identified for neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy or increasing lymph node retrieval in improving OS either.

CONCLUSION

LND might aid in staging, prognosticating, and deciding further management of resected ICCA, but does not improve OS and DFS and is unsuitable for high-risk patients unlikely to benefit from further treatments.

Sarcopenia Predicts Cancer Mortality in Male but Not in Female Patients Undergoing Surgery for Cholangiocellular Carcinoma

Simple Summary

Cholangiocellular adenocarcinoma is the second most common primary liver tumor. If resectable, this is the therapeutic method of choice. Unfortunately, there are insufficient prognostic markers to determine which patients benefit most from surgery and which do not. The general condition of the patient, especially their muscle mass and quality, has become more and more the focus of recent research as a possible marker for therapeutic outcome. In our study we investigated how the preoperative muscle mass of patients with cholangiocellular adenocarcinoma affects postoperative overall survival. We showed that patients with a higher preoperative muscle mass had a significantly longer survival than patients with reduced muscle mass. Furthermore, we were able to show that this is particularly relevant in men and that in women preoperative muscle mass plays a significantly less important role in postoperative survival than in men.

Abstract

Introduction: Surgery represents the only curative treatment option for patients with cholangiocarcinoma. However, complete tumor resection requires extensive surgery in many patients, and it is still debated which patients represent the ideal candidates for such therapy in terms of overall survival. Sarcopenia has been associated with an adverse outcome for various malignancies, but its role in the context of patients undergoing tumor resection for cholangiocellular adenocarcinoma (CCA) is only poorly understood. Here, we evaluated the role of sarcopenia in the outcome of CCA patients undergoing radical tumor resection. Methods: Pre-operative CT scans were used to assess the skeletal muscle index (L3SMI) as well as the psoas muscle index (L3PMI) in n = 76 patients receiving curative intended surgery for CCA. L3SMI and L3PMI were correlated with clinical and laboratory markers. Results: Patients with a skeletal muscle index or psoas muscle index above an established ideal cut-off (54.26 and 1.685 cm²/m²) showed a significantly better overall survival in Kaplan–Meier Curve analyses (L3SMI: 1814 days (95% CI: 520–3108) vs. 467 days (95% CI: 225–709) days; log rank X²(1) = 7.18, p = 0.007; L3PMI: 608 days (95% CI: 297–919) vs. 87 days (95% CI: 33–141), log rank X²(1) = 18.71; p < 0.001). Notably, these findings, especially for L3PMI, were confirmed in univariate (L3SMI: HR 0.962 (0.936–0.989); p = 0.006; L3PMI: HR 0.529 (0.366–0.766); p ≤ 0.001) and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Further analyses revealed that the prognostic value of both L3SMI and L3PMI was restricted to male patients, while in female patients survival was independent of the individual muscle mass. Conclusion: Measurement of muscle mass from preoperative CT scans represents an easily obtainable tool to estimate patient prognosis following curative surgery. The prognostic value was restricted to male patients, while in female patients these parameters did not reflect the patient outcome.