Evaluation of the usefulness of the Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications

Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy in a Prospective Cohort of 52 Patients with Parkinson's Disease: A Possible Critical Role of Age and Lesion Volume for Predicting Tremor Relapse

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) thalamotomy of ventral intermediate (Vim) nucleus is useful to treat drug-resistant tremor-dominant Parkinson's disease (TdPD), but tremor relapse may occur. Predictors of relapse have been poorly investigated so far.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of clinico-demographic, procedural, and neuroradiological variables in determining clinical response, relapse, and adverse events (AEs) in TdPD after MRgFUS Vim-thalamotomy.

METHODS

Fifty-two TdPD patients who consecutively underwent unilateral MRgFUS Vim-thalamotomy were prospectively evaluated at baseline and after 24 hours, 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months using MDS-UPDRS-III in off and on medication conditions. AEs were collected at each evaluation. Lesion volume was calculated at 24-hour magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients with tremor improvement <30% in off medication were considered nonresponders (when detected after 24 hours) or relapsers (if detected from 1-month visit onward).

RESULTS

All patients showed tremor improvement >30% at 24 hours. Tremor relapse occurred in 12 patients (23%), exclusively during the first month after thalamotomy. Relapse was associated with younger age (P = 0.030) and smaller lesion volume (P = 0.030). At 1 month, 22 patients (42%) had AEs; at 6 and 12 months, AEs persisted in 19% and 6% of cases. AEs at 6 months were associated with larger lesions (P = 0.018). All AEs were mild.

CONCLUSIONS

MRgFUS Vim-thalamotomy is effective in treating tremor in TdPD. Relapse is associated with younger age and smaller lesion volume, but larger lesions make AEs more likely to persist. We suggest that a lesion volume between 145 and 220 mm3 on T1-weighted MRI may be the therapeutic window that ensures tremor control without long-lasting AEs. © 2025 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Impairment of perioperative activities of daily living is associated with poor prognosis following pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

It has reported that the prevalence of frailty in patients with pancreatic cancer is 45%. The number of patients with pancreatic cancer is increasing, and within this cohort, patients often suffer from impaired activities of daily living (ADLs). This study aimed to examine the association between perioperative Barthel Index (BI) scores, a validated measure of ADLs, and survival outcomes after pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

We analyzed the data of 201 patients who underwent pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer between 2010 and 2020. Preoperative and postoperative ADLs were assessed using the BI (range: 0-100; higher scores indicated greater independence). A preoperative or postoperative BI score ≤ 85 was defined as an impairment of perioperative ADLs. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) after adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Among the 201 patients, 14 (7.0%) had a preoperative BI score ≤ 85 and 50 (25%) had a postoperative BI score ≤ 85. Impairment of perioperative ADLs was independently associated with shorter overall survival (multivariable HR: 2.66, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.75-4.03, P < 0.001), cancer-specific survival (multivariable HR: 2.64, 95%CI: 1.15-4.25, P < 0.001), and recurrence-free survival (multivariable HR: 1.94, 95%CI: 1.08-3.50, P = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

Impairment of perioperative ADLs is associated with poor prognosis following pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. The maintenance and improvement of perioperative ADLs could play an important role in providing favorable long-term outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Esophageal surgical Apgar score (eSAS): A predictor for postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy and esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

The surgical Apgar score (SAS) quantifying three intraoperative indexes has been confirmed to be significantly associated with postoperative morbidity and prognosis in many surgical specialties. However, there are great limitations in its application for esophageal cancer (EC). This study aimed to assess the predictive capability of esophagectomy SAS (eSAS) in determining postoperative morbidity and overall survival (OS) in EC patients who had undergone neoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective evaluation was conducted on a cohort of 221 patients in which surgery- and tumor-related data were extracted and analyzed. Major morbidity was defined as complications meeting the criteria of Clavien-Dindo classification III or higher during hospitalization. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify potential risk factors for major morbidity. Kaplan-Meier analysis was utilized to calculate the OS and relapse-free survival (RFS).

RESULTS

The results exhibited that eSAS demonstrated potential predictive value for postoperative morbidity with an optimal cutoff value of 6. The eSAS and diabetes mellitus were two independent risk factors for the major morbidity; however, no correlation between the eSAS and the OS or RFS was detected.

CONCLUSION

The eSAS could be used as a predictor of major morbidity, while it was not correlated with OS and RFS.