Perioperative Optimization of the Cardiac Surgical Patient

Understanding the dynamics of post-surgical recovery and its predictors in resource-limited settings: a prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Post-surgical recovery time is influenced by various factors, including patient demographics, surgical details, pre-existing conditions, post-operative care, and socioeconomic status. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for improving patient outcomes. This study aims to identify significant predictors of post-surgical recovery time in a resource-limited Ethiopian hospital setting and to evaluate the variability attributable to individual patient differences and surgical team variations.

METHODS

A linear mixed model was employed to analyze data from 490 patients who underwent various surgical procedures. The analysis considered multiple predictors, including age, gender, BMI, type and duration of surgery, comorbidities (diabetes and hypertension), ASA scores, postoperative complications, pain management strategies, physiotherapy, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and socioeconomic status. Random effects were included to account for variability at the patient and surgical team levels.

RESULTS

Significant predictors of prolonged recovery time included higher BMI, longer surgery duration, the presence of diabetes and hypertension, higher ASA scores, and major post-operative complications. Opioid pain management was associated with increased recovery time, while inpatient physiotherapy reduced recovery duration. Socioeconomic status also significantly influenced recovery time. The model fit statistics indicated a robust model, with the unstructured covariance structure providing the best fit.

CONCLUSION

The findings highlight the importance of individualized patient care and the effective management of modifiable factors such as BMI, surgery duration, and postoperative complications. Socioeconomic status emerged as a novel factor warranting further investigation. This study underscores the value of considering patient and surgical team variability in post-surgical recovery analysis, and calls for future research to explore additional predictors and alternative modeling techniques to enhance our understanding of the recovery process.

Rapid-recovery protocol for minimally invasive mitral valve repair

Background

Minimally invasive mitral valve repair (MIMVR), often performed within specialized care pathways, has been shown to reduce hospital length of stay and improve patient recovery. The relative value of rapid-recovery protocols as a component of care pathways, including enhanced recovery programs (ERPs), has not been well described. This study compared clinical outcomes following implementation of a new, comprehensive rapid-recovery protocol within a previously established, mature ERP for patients undergoing MIMVR.

Methods

The rapid-recovery protocol was developed and implemented by a multidisciplinary team to further optimize patient recovery within an existing ERP. The protocol was applied to 75 consecutive patients undergoing MIMVR between September 2022 and December 2023. Outcomes were compared retrospectively to 75 ERP control patients who did not receive the rapid-recovery protocol but experienced the ERP. The primary outcome was a composite of discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU) by postoperative day (POD) 1, discharge to home by POD 4, and no all-cause hospital readmission by 30 days.

Results

Baseline characteristics were similar in the 2 groups. Patients in the rapid-recovery group achieved the primary composite outcome significantly more often compared to the control group (60% vs 40%, respectively). There was no between-group difference in postoperative complications. Multivariable logistic regression showed that age ≤60 years was significantly associated with rapid-recovery protocol success. Clinical barriers to achieving individual components of the primary outcome were described.

Conclusions

A rapid-recovery protocol for MIMVR was associated with early ICU and hospital discharge. These benefits were safely achieved without any increase in hospital readmission, morbidity, or mortality up to 30 days postoperatively.

Preoperative bioelectrical impedance, measured phase angle, and hand-grip strength as predictors of postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Postoperative problems are a major danger for patients after heart surgery. Predicting postoperative outcomes for cardiac surgery is limited by current preoperative evaluations. Handgrip strength (HGS) testing and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) may provide extra ways to identify individuals at risk of surgical problems, enhancing risk assessment and results.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the utility of measured phase angle (PA), HGS, and bioelectrical impedance as perioperative risk markers in adult patients undergoing elective heart surgery.

METHOD

The PRISMA principles were followed in this review. We searched all available electronic databases, including the Science Direct search engine and PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Google Scholar, Scopus, and the Science Direct search engine, from their creation to the present, as well as the medRxiv pre-print site. We considered studies with adult subjects undergoing elective heart surgery who were monitored for problems after surgery and had perioperative BIA and HGS testing.

RESULTS

As a result, out of the 1544 pieces of research that were discovered, eight studies were deemed suitable for inclusion in the review and supplied data from 2781 people. The findings demonstrated a substantial correlation between poor preoperative PA and a higher risk of serious postoperative morbidity, as well as prolonged hospital stays. Furthermore, poor HGS and low PA were linked to greater death rates. Additionally, there was a strong correlation found between low PA and HGS and longer stays in the ICU, as well as an increased chance of dying from all causes in a year. In conclusion these results imply that preoperative HGS and PA may be significant indicators of postoperative results and may assist in identifying patients who are more vulnerable to problems and death.

Prospective case-control study on pain intensity after the use of promethazine in patients undergoing videothoracoscopy

Objective

Effective and secure pain management following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is crucial for rapid postoperative recovery. This study evaluated analgesic and sedative effects of sufentanil and promethazine in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) post-thoracic surgery, along with potential adverse reactions.

Methods

In this prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, clinical study, 60 patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists status I-III) undergoing VATS were enrolled. The patients were randomized into experimental (Group P) or control (Group C) groups. PCIA was administered post-general anesthesia using a double-blind method. Group P received sufentanil (3 μg/kg) + promethazine (1 mg/kg) + 0.9% sodium chloride solution (100 mL total), while Group C received sufentanil (3 μg/kg) + 0.9% sodium chloride solution (100 mL total). PCIA settings included a 1-mL bolus and 15-min locking time. The primary outcomes were the visual analog scale (VAS) at rest and during coughing and sedation (Ramsay) scores at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h. The secondary outcomes were rescue drug use rate, hemodynamic parameters (mean arterial pressure and heart rate), percutaneous oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, and occurrence of adverse reactions.

Results

Group P exhibited lower resting and coughing VAS scores at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h, plus decreased incidence of nausea and vomiting within 48 h post-surgery compared with Group C (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in pruritus, sedation (Ramsay) scores, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, or respiratory rate between the two groups (p > 0.05).

Discussion

The combination of sufentanil and promethazine for postoperative intravenous analgesia could effectively reduce adverse effects such as nausea and vomiting, contributing to postoperative pain relief.

An Integrated Approach Based on Clinical Data Combined with Metabolites and Biomarkers for the Assessment of Post-Operative Complications after Cardiac Surgery

Background: Early diagnosis of post-operative complications is an urgent task, allowing timely prescribing of appropriate therapy and reducing the cost of patient treatment. The purpose of this study was to determine whether an integrated approach based on clinical data, along with metabolites and biomarkers, had greater predictive value than the models built on fewer data in the early diagnosis of post-operative complications after cardiac surgery. Methods: The study included patients (n = 62) admitted for planned cardiac surgery (coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass) with (n = 26) or without (n = 36) post-operative complications. Clinical and laboratory data on the first day after surgery were analyzed. Additionally, patients' blood samples were collected before and on the first day after surgery to determine biomarkers and metabolites. Results: Multivariate PLS-DA models, predicting the presence or absence of post-operative complications, were built using clinical data, concentrations of metabolites and biomarkers, and the entire data set (ROC-AUC = 0.80, 0.71, and 0.85, respectively). For comparison, we built univariate models using the EuroScore2 and SOFA scales, concentrations of lactate, the dynamic changes of 4-hydroxyphenyllactic acid, and the sum of three sepsis-associated metabolites (ROC-AUC = 0.54, 0.79, 0.62, 0.58, and 0.70, respectively). Conclusions: The proposed complex model using the entire dataset had the best characteristics, which confirms the expediency of searching for new predictive models based on a variety of factors.

Maximizing Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery With Enhanced Recovery (ERAS)

We convened a group of cardiac surgeons, intensivists, and anesthesiologists with extensive experience in minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) and perioperative care to identify the essential elements of a MICS program and the relationship with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS). The MICS incision should minimize tissue invasion without compromising surgical goals. MICS also requires safe management of hemodynamics and preservation of cardiac function, which we have termed myocardial management. Finally, comprehensive perioperative care through an ERAS program should be provided to allow patients to achieve optimal recovery. Therefore, we propose that MICS requires 3 elements: (1) a less invasive surgical incision (non-full sternotomy), (2) optimized myocardial management, and (3) ERAS. We contend that the full benefit of MICS can be achieved only by also utilizing an ERAS platform.

Closing the care gap: combining enhanced recovery with minimally invasive valve surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients with advanced age and frailty require interventions for structural heart disease at an increasing rate. These patients typically experience higher rates of postoperative morbidity, mortality and prolonged hospital length of stay, loss of independence as well as associated increased costs to the healthcare system. Therefore, it is becoming critically important to raise awareness and develop strategies to improve clinical outcomes in the contemporary, high-risk patient population undergoing cardiacprocedures.

RECENT FINDINGS

Percutaneous options for structural heart disease have dramatically improved the therapeutic options for some older, frail, high-risk patients; however, others may still require cardiac surgery. Minimally invasive techniques can reduce some of the physiologic burden experienced by patients undergoing surgery and improve recovery. Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery (ERAS Cardiac) is a comprehensive, interdisciplinary, evidence-based approach to perioperative care. It has been shown to improve recovery and patient satisfaction while reducing complications and length of stay.

SUMMARY

Combining minimally invasive cardiac surgery with enhanced recovery protocols may result in improved patient outcomes for a patient population at high risk of morbidity and mortality following cardiac surgery.

Associations of Inflammatory Biomarkers With the Risk of Morbidity and Mortality After Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although inflammatory biomarkers have been associated with cardiovascular events in nonsurgical settings, these associations have not been systematically addressed in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. This review aimed to evaluate the relationships of inflammatory markers with mortality and adverse cardiovascular events in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, and Central databases were systematically searched for studies reporting pre- or postoperative levels of inflammatory biomarkers in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Outcomes of interest were postoperative mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, congestive heart failure, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Studies reporting multivariable adjusted risk estimates were included. Risk estimates were pooled with the use of random-effects models and reported as summary odds ratios (ORs).

RESULTS

Among 14,465 citations identified, 29 studies including 29,401 participants met the eligibility criteria. The average follow-up time after surgery was 31 months. Preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.60-2.20; I2 = 19%; 11 studies) and MACE (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.34-2.24; I2 = 0%; 3 studies). CRP levels measured on postoperative day 6 (OR 7.4, 95% CI 2.90-18.88, 1 study) and day 10 (OR 11.8, 95% CI 3.50-39.78, 1 study) were associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality. Less, but overall similar, information was available for other inflammatory biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large meta-analysis, inflammatory biomarkers measured before or after cardiac surgery were associated with mortality and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Preoperative optimization and rapid discharge after coronary artery bypass grafting

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review discusses current guidelines and evidence-based care for the preoperative optimization of patients who are undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and for enabling rapid discharge after surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Since the Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery Society (ERAS Cardiac) issued guidelines for perioperative care, in 2019, there has been a significant body of research that has added to and provided further guidance regarding preoperative optimization and accelerated recovery after CABG.

SUMMARY

A review of the current literature provides a framework for a pragmatic approach to preoperative optimization, utilizing the time from referral to surgery to mitigate multiple aspects of the patient condition, leading to improved patient outcomes and reduced length of stay and cost to the healthcare system.

Comparison of Two Techniques Performing the Supine-to-Sitting Postural Change in Patients with Sternotomy

Patients with sternotomy are advised to follow sternal precautions to avoid the risk of sternal complications. However, there are no standard recommendations, in particular to perform the supine-to-sitting postural change, where sternal asymmetrical force may be applied. The aim of this study was to compare the rotational movement and the use of a tied rope (individual device for supine-to-sitting, "IDSS") to perform the supine-to-sitting postural change. A total of 92 patients (26% female) admitted to a rehabilitative post-surgery ward with sternotomy were assessed for sternal instability. Levels of pain and perceived effort during the two modalities of postural change and at rest were assessed. Patients reported higher values of pain and perceived effort (both p < 0.0005) during rotational movement with respect to the use of the IDSS. Moreover, patients with sternal instability (14%) and female patients with macromastia (25%) reported higher pain than those stable or without macromastia (both p < 0.05). No other risk factors were associated with pain. Thus, the IDSS seems to reduce the levels of pain and perceived effort during the supine-to-sitting postural change. Future studies with quantitative assessments are required to suggest the adoption of this technique, mostly in patients with high levels of pain or with sternal instability.