Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs Vitamin K Antagonists in Left Ventricular Thrombi: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Comparison of embolic risk in left ventricular thrombus between nonischemic and ischemic cardiomyopathy: A nationwide database analysis

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular (LV) thrombus is not common but poses significant risks of embolic stroke or systemic embolism. However, the distinction in embolic risk between nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) and ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) remains unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In total, 2738 LV thrombus patients from the JROAD-DPC (Japanese Registry of All Cardiac and Vascular Diseases Diagnosis Procedure Combination) database were included. Among these patients, 1037 patients were analyzed, with 826 (79.7%) having ICM and 211 with NICM (20.3%). Within the NICM group, the distribution was as follows: dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM; 41.2%), takotsubo cardiomyopathy (27.0%), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (18.0%), and other causes (13.8%). The primary outcome was a composite of embolic stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) during hospitalization. The ICM and NICM groups showed no significant difference in the primary outcome (5.8% vs. 7.6%, p = 0.34). Among NICM, SSE occurred in 12.6% of patients with DCM, 7.0% with takotsubo cardiomyopathy, and 2.6% with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Multivariate logistic regression analysis for SSE revealed an odds ratio of 1.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7-2.7, p = 0.37) for NICM compared to ICM. However, DCM exhibited a higher adjusted odds ratio for SSE compared to ICM (2.6, 95% CI 1.2-6.0, p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

This nationwide shows comparable rates of embolic events between ICM and NICM in LV thrombus patients, with DCM posing a greater risk of SSE than ICM. The findings emphasize the importance of assessing the specific cause of heart disease in NICM, within LV thrombus management strategies.

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants compared with vitamin-k antagonists in the treatment of left ventricular thrombosis. A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Since the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and their comparison with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), conflicting results have been reported regarding the optimal treatment for left ventricular thrombosis (LVT).

OBJECTIVES

In this meta-analysis, we intend to comprehensively evaluate the safety and efficacy of these treatments.

METHODS

All clinical trials and cohorts that compared the efficacy or safety of VKAs with DOACs in the treatment of LVTs were systematically searched until April 15, 2023.

RESULTS

The results of 32 studies with a pooled sample size of 4213 patients were extracted for meta-analysis. DOACs, especially rivaroxaban and apixaban, cause faster resolution, lower mortality, and fewer complications (SSE and bleeding events) than VKAs in the management of LVTs.

CONCLUSION

Compared with VKAs, DOACs result in significantly faster (only rivaroxaban) and safer resolution of left ventricular thrombosis.

Elevated factor XI is associated with recurrent left ventricular thrombus of unknown origin

BACKGROUND

Elevated factor XI (FXI) has been shown to predispose to thromboembolism. We investigated whether it is associated with left ventricular thrombus (LVT) formation, its recurrence and subsequent thromboembolic events.

METHODS

In 54 patients with prior LVT of unknown origin, who stopped anticoagulation and 54 controls, we determined FXI, along with plasma clot permeability (Ks), fibrinolysis time (CLT), endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), von Willebrand factor (vWF) and fibrinolysis proteins. During follow-up, the primary endpoint involving the recurrence of LVT a symptomatic ischemic stroke or systemic embolism was recorded.

RESULTS

Elevated (>120%) FXI levels were more often observed in LVT patients when compared to the control group (14 [25.9%] vs. 6 [11.1%], p = .048) in association with the presence of active FXI. FXI correlated with age (r = .406, p = .002), Ks (r = -.542, p < .001) and CLT (r = .406, p = .002), also after adjustment for age, but not with ETP, vWF or fibrinolysis proteins. During follow-up of 77.6 ± 18.5 months the primary endpoint occurred in 17 (31.5%) LVT patients, including 11 (20.4%) recurrent LVT, and in 4 (7.4%) controls (annual incidence rate 4.9% vs. 1.1%, respectively; p = .002). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, elevated FXI was independently associated with the primary endpoint (OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.09-1.28).

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated FXI in association with a prothrombotic state characterizes patients with prior LVT of unknown origin and predisposes to its recurrence and/or ischemic stroke during follow-up. It might be speculated that the measurement of FXI helps identify patients who could benefit from prolonged anticoagulation and FXI inhibitors in the future.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Vitamin K Antagonists for Left Ventricular Thrombus: A Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis

BACKGROUND

Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are the recommended first-line treatment for left ventricular thrombus (LVT); however, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been considered an alternative therapy.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOACs compared with VKAs therapy in patients with LVT.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were systematically searched for randomized clinical trials or cohort studies that compared DOACs versus VKAs for LVT. Risk ratios (RRs) were computed for binary endpoints, with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Statistical significance was defined as p value < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 4 randomized clinical trials and 29 cohort studies were included, with 4,450 patients assigned to either DOACs or VKAs. There was no significant difference between groups for stroke or systemic embolic (SSE) events (RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.65 to 1.07; p = 0.157), stroke (RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.48 to 1.11; p = 0.140), systemic embolic (SE) events (RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.40 to 1.17; p = 0.166), thrombus resolution (RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.11; p = 0.077), any bleeding (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.60 to 1.00; p = 0.054), clinically relevant bleeding (RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.46 to 1.03; p = 0.066), minor bleeding (RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.43 to 1.23; p = 0.234), major bleeding (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.42 to 1.80; p = 0.705), and all-cause mortality (RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.79 to 1.39; p = 0.752). Compared with VKAs, rivaroxaban significantly reduced SSE events (RR 0.35; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.91; p = 0.029) and SE events (RR 0.39; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.95; p = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

DOACs had a similar rate of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events, as well as thrombus resolution, compared to VKAs in the treatment of LVTs. Rivaroxaban therapy had a significant reduction in thromboembolic events, compared to VKAs.

Expanding Indications of Nonvitamin K Oral Anticoagulants Beyond Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Venous Thromboembolism: A Review of Emerging Clinical Evidence

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) have emerged as a new therapy for patients who need and can tolerate oral anticoagulation. DOACs were initially approved for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and treatment for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Ease of administration, no requirement of bridging with other anticoagulants, and less frequent dosing have made DOACs preferable choice for anticoagulation. Studies are showing promising results regarding use of DOACs beyond the common indications. Studies have been done to show the potential benefit of DOACs in valvular atrial fibrillation, heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, stroke, and peripheral arterial disease. Data have shown safety as well as comparable bleeding incidences with DOACs compared to vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants. Naturally interest is growing to see the use of DOACs apart from the NVAF, DVT, or PE. Authors have highlighted various study results to show the potential beneficial role of DOACs in the above-mentioned situations.

A Case of Successful Direct Oral Anticoagulant Use for the Treatment of Warfarin-Induced Vasculitis in a Patient With Left Ventricular Thrombus

Cutaneous small vessel leukocytoclastic vasculitis (LCV) is isolated to the dependent areas of the skin. LCV can be induced by pharmaceutical drugs, and management requires abrupt discontinuation of the offending drug. Warfarin is a rare medication to cause LCV, with sparse literature to date. Here, we present a case of warfarin-induced LCV, complicated by a patient's comorbid left ventricular thrombus, and successful treatment with discontinuation of warfarin and replacement with a direct oral anticoagulant (apixaban).

Trial sequential analysis of efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists against left ventricular thrombus

Meta-analysis may increase the risk of random errors. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) has been developed to adjust for these random errors. We conducted TSA on the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in left ventricular thrombus (LVT) patients in order to estimate how many additional patients should be required to draw definite conclusions. PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for articles directly comparing DOACs and VKAs for LVT in LV thrombus resolution, stroke, any thromboembolism, major bleeding, any bleeding, and all-cause death. TSA was conducted with a cumulative Z-curve, monitoring boundaries, and required sample size. A simulated trial was run and TSA estimated the sample sizes of trials needed to draw definite conclusions. Of 4749 articles, 25 studies were used for the analysis. TSA revealed the current sample size already demonstrated superiority of DOACs in LV thrombus resolution and stroke, and futility in any thromboembolism and all-cause death. Two other outcomes did not achieve the required sample size. The sample size of new trials needed to demonstrate the superiority of DOACs over VKAs was estimated 400 for any bleeding. Corresponding trials needed to demonstrate no significant differences could be estimated for major bleeding and any bleeding (n = 200 and n = 2000, respectively). Current results show that the sample size required to draw definite conclusions was not reached for two outcomes, and there was a risk of random error. Further randomized controlled trials with sample sizes estimated by TSA will work effectively to obtain valid conclusions.

Clinical Outcomes of Anticoagulant Therapy in COVID-19 Patients with Pre-Existing Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Review

The COVID-19 infection caused by SARS-CoV-2 is a healthcare crisis that has led to unparalleled disruption and has impacted healthcare services, leading to significant morbidity and mortality in the worldwide population. Insufficient data on the management of COVID-19 complications such as hypercoagulability and the controversy about the benefits of anticoagulant therapy are major challenges encountered by clinicians, especially for patients with pre-existing cardiovascular diseases (CVD), and are still debatable. Therefore, we endeavored to conduct a systematic review to assess the clinical outcomes of prior anticoagulant therapy in patients with COVID-19 having pre-existing CVD. Electronic searches of the PubMed database and EBSCO Information Services were carried out, and all relevant articles were employed. Seven articles with data from 21,989 subjects were included. Despite the promised clinical outcomes of anticoagulant therapy, the results of the current systematic review indicated insignificant improvements in the reduction of mortality rate or ICU admission among patients with COVID-19 having pre-existing CVD. Furthermore, direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) were favored over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) due to better action and less side effects. In conclusion, the findings are controversial as we did not statistically analyze the results. The data showed inconsistent information with no clear effect of anticoagulant use before patient hospitalization or decreasing COVID-19 severity, particularly in those with CVD. Further studies including randomized controlled trials are required to describe the best course as well as optimal dose of anticoagulant use in the treatment of patients with COVID-19, particularly those with comorbidities such as CVD.

Trends in Off-Label Indications of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Despite optimal antiplatelet therapy recommendation after ischemic events, recurrent thrombotic complications rate remains high. The recurrent events maybe in part due to increased thrombin levels during ACS which may underscore the need for an additional anticoagulation therapy. Given the advantages of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) over warfarin, they have the potential to prevent thrombus formation, in the presence or absence of atrial fibrillation, but at the cost of increased risk of bleeding. NOACs have also shown a promising efficacy in managing left ventricular thrombus and a potential benefit in avoiding stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary revascularization. Taken as a whole, NOACs are increasingly used for off-licence indications, and continue to evolve as essential therapy in preventing and treating thrombotic events. Herein, this review discusses NOACs off-label indications in the setting of ischemic coronary disease.

A prediction model for left ventricular thrombus persistence/recurrence: based on a prospective study and a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

It remains unknown whether anticoagulation for persistent left ventricular (LV) thrombus should be continued indefinitely. Identifying patients with a high risk of thrombus unresolved may be helpful to determine the optimum anticoagulation duration. This study aimed to develop a prediction model to forecast thrombus persistence or recurrence in patients with LV thrombus.

METHODS

We enrolled patients prospectively from 2020 to 2022 and retrospectively from 2013 to 2019 at the National Center of Cardiovascular Diseases of China. The two cohorts were then combined to derive predictive models of thrombus persistence/recurrence. The primary study comprised patients who received systemic oral anticoagulants and had imaging records available at the end of a 3-month follow-up period. The Lasso regression algorithm and the logistic regression were performed to select independent predictors. The calibration curve was generated and a nomogram risk prediction model was applied as a risk stratification tool.

RESULTS

A total of 172 (64 in the prospective cohort and 108 in the retrospective cohort) patients were included, with 124 patients in a training set and 48 patients in a validation set. Six predictors were incorporated into the multivariate logistic regression prediction model. The area under the receiving operating characteristic was 0.852 in the training set and 0.631 in the validation set. Patients with protuberant thrombus and higher baseline D-dimer levels had a reduced risk of persistence/recurrence (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.03-0.69, P = 0.025; OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.43-0.91, P = 0.030, separately), whereas thicker thrombus was linked to an increased rate of persistent thrombus (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.05-1.20, P = 0.002). Additionally, patients with diverse diagnoses or receiving different antiplatelet treatments had different rates of LV thrombus persistence/recurrence at 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This prediction model provides tools to forecast the occurrence of persistent/recurrent thrombus and allows the identification of characteristics associated with unresolved thrombus. To validate the model and determine the duration of anticoagulation in patients with persistent thrombus, prospective randomized trials are necessary.

An exploratory study of effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with left ventricular thrombus (R-DISSOLVE)

Evidence on the treatment for left ventricular (LV) thrombus is limited and mainly derives from retrospective studies. The aim of R-DISSOLVE was to explore the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with LV thrombus. R-DISSOLVE was a prospective, interventional, single-arm study, conducted from Oct 2020 to June 2022 at Fuwai Hospital, China. Patients with a history of LV thrombus < 3 months and with systemic anticoagulation therapy < 1 month were included. The thrombus was quantitatively confirmed by contrast-enhanced echocardiography (CE) at baseline and follow-up visits. Eligible patients were assigned to rivaroxaban (20 mg once daily or 15 mg if creatinine clearance was between 30 and 49 mL/min) and its concentration was determined by detecting anti-Xa activity. The primary efficacy outcome was the rate of LV thrombus resolution at 12 weeks. The main safety outcome was the composite of ISTH major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. A total of 64 patients with complete CE results were analyzed for efficacy outcomes. The mean LV ejection fraction was 25.4 ± 9.0%. The dose-response curve of rivaroxaban was satisfactory based on the peak and trough plasma levels and all concentrations were in the recommended treatment range according to NOAC guidelines. The incidence rate of thrombus resolution at 6 weeks was 66.1% (41/62, 95% CI 53.0-77.7%), and of thrombus resolution or reduction was 95.2% (59/62, 95% CI 86.5-99.0%). At 12 weeks, the thrombus resolution rate was 78.1% (50/64, 95% CI 66.0-87.5%) while the rate of thrombus resolution or reduction was 95.3% (61/64, 95% CI 86.9-99.0%). The main safety outcome occurred in 4 of 75 patients (5.3%) (2 ISTH major bleeding and 2 clinically relevant non-major bleeding). In patients with LV thrombus, we reported a high thrombus resolution rate with acceptable safety by rivaroxaban, which could be a potential option for further LV thrombus treatment.Trial registration This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT04970381.

Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists for left ventricular thrombus: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim    To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) as compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in the treatment of left ventricular (LV) thrombosis.Material and methods    A search was performed in PubMed and Google Scholar for studies that compared DOAC and VKA in the treatment of LV thrombosis with respect of thromboembolic events, hemorrhagic complications, and thrombus resolution. The effect was evaluated with the odds ratio (OR) that was computed using a fixed effects model.Results    For these systematic review and meta-analysis, 19 studies were selected, including 2 randomized and 17 cohort studies. The articles included into these systematic review and meta-analysis, were published from 2018 through 2021. In total, 2970 patients (mean age, 58.8 лет; 1879 (61.2 %) men) with LV thrombus were included into the meta-analysis. Mean follow-up duration was 17.9 months. The meta-analysis showed no significant difference between DOAC and VKA in the incidence of the study outcomes: thromboembolic events (OR, 0.86; 95 % CI: 0.67-1.10; р=0.22), hemorrhagic complications (OR, 0.77; 95 % CI: 0.55-1.07; р=0.12), thrombus resolution (OR, 0.96; 95 % CI: 0.76-1.22; р=0.77). In a subgroup analysis, rivaroxaban compared to VKA significantly (79%) reduced the risk of thromboembolic complications (OR, 0.21; 95 % CI: 0.05-0.83; р=0.03) with no significant differences in hemorrhagic events (OR, 0.60; 95 % CI: 0.21-1.71; р=0.34) or thrombus resolution (OR, 1.44; 95 % CI: 0.83-1.31; р=0.20). The apixaban treatment group had significantly more (4.88 times) cases of thrombus resolution than the VKA treatment group (OR, 4.88; 95 % CI: 1.37-17.30; р=0.01); for apixaban, data on hemorrhagic and thromboembolic complications were not available.Conclusions    The therapeutic efficacy and side effects of the DOAC treatment for LV thrombosis were similar to those of VKA with respect of thromboembolic events, hemorrhage, and thrombus resolution.

Left Ventricular Thrombosis: Current Perspective and Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants

Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is a serious risk factor for systemic embolism development. Despite the evident danger of this condition, current guidelines describe management of patients with this potentially fatal complication very briefly. LVT can complicate myocardial infarction where its incidence is around 10%, as well as various forms of cardiomyopathies and novel coronavirus infection. According to clinical guidelines vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) should be used as treatment of choice for thrombus resolution. However, experts point out that this therapy lacks necessary evidential base and bears certain difficulties because of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamical properties of VKAs. These drawbacks are absent in direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), the possibility of using which in LVT is being actively studied. As for now, published results of 3 randomised clinical trials have demonstrated similar safety and efficacy profiles of DOACs and VKAs. Similarly, the majority of retrospective cohort studies did not observe significant differences between two groups, where some of them have shown superiority of DOACs especially in terms of earlier thrombus resolution. Nevertheless, some studies have found DOACs ineffective and even potentially unsafe regarding systemic embolism. Existing data does not allow to form an unambiguous conclusion about the equivalence of DOACs and VKAs for LVT resolution. Large randomised clinical trials are needed to determine efficacy and safety of such treatment in these patients.

Apixaban in Patients with Post-Myocardial Infarction Left Ventricular Thrombus: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background

Direct oral anticoagulants are frequently used to treat post-myocardial infarction (MI) left ventricular thrombus (LVT). This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of use of apixaban, compared to the standard warfarin therapy, in post-MI LVT.

Methods

This open-label, randomized controlled trial included patients with post-acute or recent anterior wall MI with transthoracic echocardiography-confirmed LVT. Patients were randomized to receive either apixaban 5 mg twice daily or warfarin to achieve an international normalized ratio of 2-3, in addition to dual antiplatelet therapy. The primary endpoint was LVT resolution at 3 months, with a noninferiority margin of 95% for apixaban compared to warfarin. The secondary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) or any relevant bleeding according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) classification.

Results

Fifty patients were enrolled from 3 centres. The use of dual or single antiplatelet agents was similar in the 2 groups. The number of 1-, 3-, and 6-month LVT resolutions were 10 (40.0%), 19 (76.0%), and 23 (92.0%) in the apixaban group, and 14 (56%), 20 (80.0%), and 24 (96.0%) in the warfarin group, respectively, without significant differences (P < 0.036 for noninferiority at 3 months). Patients taking warfarin required longer hospital stays and more outpatient visits. Multivariate adjustment analysis revealed left ventricular aneurysm, larger baseline LVT area and lower left ventricular ejection fraction to be independent predictors of LVT persistence at 3 months. No MACE occurred in either group; 1 BARC-2 bleeding event occurred with warfarin.

Conclusions

Apixaban was not inferior to warfarin in the resolution of post-MI LVT.

Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in the treatment of left ventricular thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Evidence about the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with left ventricular thrombosis (LVT) are emerging. The aim of our study was to provide a comprehensive synthesis of the available evidence concerning the clinical effects of DOACs versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in LVT treatment.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Systematic search of studies evaluating DOACs versus VKAs use in patients with LVT was performed on May 11^th, 2021. Data were pooled by meta-analysis using a random-effects model. Odds ratios (OR) with relative 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as measures of effect estimates. The primary efficacy and safety endpoint were ischemic stroke and any bleeding, respectively. Secondary endpoints were LVT resolution, systemic embolism, major bleeding, hemorrhagic stroke, and all cause death.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Twenty studies were included in the meta-analysis: 1,391 patients were treated with DOACs and 1,534 with VKAs. A significant reduction in the risk of ischemic stroke (OR 0.67, 95% CI, 0.45-0.98, P=0.048, number needed to treat to benefit [NNTB] 22 [95% CI 15-43]) and any bleeding (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.46-0.89, P=0.009, NNTB 26 [95% CI 16-80]) was observed with DOACs compared to VKAs. No statistically significant difference was observed among the two treatment arms for the secondary endpoints.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to VKAs, DOACs are associated with a reduced risk of ischemic stroke and bleeding. In light of these findings, and the practical advantages of DOACs, additional large scale randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the benefits of DOACs in patients with LVT.

Management of Patients at Risk for and With Left Ventricular Thrombus: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Despite the many advances in cardiovascular medicine, decisions concerning the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of left ventricular (LV) thrombus often remain challenging. There are only limited organizational guideline recommendations with regard to LV thrombus. Furthermore, management issues in current practice are increasingly complex, including concerns about adding oral anticoagulant therapy to dual antiplatelet therapy, the availability of direct oral anticoagulants as a potential alternative option to traditional vitamin K antagonists, and the use of diagnostic modalities such as cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, which has greater sensitivity for LV thrombus detection than echocardiography. Therefore, this American Heart Association scientific statement was commissioned with the goals of addressing 8 key clinical management questions related to LV thrombus, including the prevention and treatment after myocardial infarction, prevention and treatment in dilated cardiomyopathy, management of mural (laminated) thrombus, imaging of LV thrombus, direct oral anticoagulants as an alternative to warfarin, treatments other than oral anticoagulants for LV thrombus (eg, dual antiplatelet therapy, fibrinolysis, surgical excision), and the approach to persistent LV thrombus despite anticoagulation therapy. Practical management suggestions in the form of text, tables, and flow diagrams based on careful and critical review of actual study data as formulated by this multidisciplinary writing committee are given.

Systematic review of efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists in left ventricular thrombus

AIMS

Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) increases the risk of thrombotic events and mortality. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) used to treat LVT have several known risks, as a result of which direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use has recently increased. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DOACs and VKAs in treating LVT.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library trials, and Web of Science databases for studies published before 19 April 2022, involving DOAC versus VKA treatment for patients with LVT. This meta-analysis comprised 21 studies (total patients, n = 3172; DOAC group, n = 888; VKA group, n = 2284). A statistically significant reduction in bleeding events was observed in patients on DOACs vs. those on VKAs (risk ratio (RR) = 0.73, P = 0.004). Patients on DOACs residing in North American and European regions and those with ischaemic heart disease (IHD) had a significantly lower risk of bleeding events than patients residing in other regions or those with a different LVT aetiology, respectively (RR = 0.78, P = 0.04; RR = 0.38, P = 0.02; and RR = 0.63, P = 0.009). A statistically significant reduction in stroke in patients on DOACs versus VKAs (RR = 0.72, P = 0.03) was observed, and patients on DOACs residing in North America and those with IHD had a significantly lower risk of stroke (RR = 0.73, P = 0.04, and RR = 0.61, P = 0.03, respectively). Compared with VKAs, DOACs are statistically associated with an increase in LVT resolution at 1 month (RR = 1.96, P = 0.008). No statistical between-group difference in all-cause mortality (RR = 0.72, P = 0.05), systemic embolism (RR = 0.87, P = 0.74), stroke or systemic embolism (RR = 0.90, P = 0.50), and LVT resolution at the end of follow-up (RR = 1.06, P = 0.13) was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with VKAs, DOACs significantly reduce the risk of bleeding events and stroke in LVT patients, but mortality was similar in both groups. The advantages are apparent not only in patients belonging to the predominantly white residential areas such as North American and European regions but also in patients with LVT due to IHD. DOACs show promising effects in treating LVT compared with VKAs.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Vitamin K Antagonists for the Treatment of Left Ventricular Thrombosis: A Meta-Analysis

Background

Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have been recommended as first-line anticoagulants for patients with left ventricular thrombosis (LVT). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are used as an alternative to the standard of care in anticoagulation. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of VKAs and DOACs in the treatment of patients with LVT.

Materials and Methods

Studies were identified by searching the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase. The main outcomes included stroke or systemic embolism (SSE), thrombus resolution, and bleeding events. The pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was estimated with fixed effect or random effect models.

Results

Seventeen studies were included. Pooled estimate showed that DOACs had comparable efficacy in prevention of SSE (RR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.80, 1.16; p = 0.677) and thrombus resolution as compared with VKAs (RR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.97, 1.18; p = 0.193). DOACs significantly decreased the risk of stroke in patients with LVT (RR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.47, 1.00; p = 0.048). However, this effect was not observed in the sensitive analysis by high-quality studies (RR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.47, 1.02; p = 0.06). In terms of safety outcomes, DOACs had similar risk of bleeding events (RR = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.80, 1.57; p = 0.386) and clinically relevant bleeding events (RR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.23, 1.03; p = 0.060). Meta-regression analysis demonstrated that none of the variables (study design, concomitant antiplatelet medication, duration of follow-up, primary cause of LVT, sample size, types of DOACs) had an impact on the risk of SSE, thrombus resolution and bleeding events. Subgroup analysis based on the use of antiplatelet and treatment switching revealed that there were no significant differences among patients with different treatment regimens.

Conclusions

Based on the present evidence, both DOACs and VKA offered similar effective and safe outcomes in patients with LVT.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in the Treatment of Left Ventricular Thrombi

Left ventricular thrombi form due to the presence of Virchow's triad in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. This complication increases the incidence of systemic embolization, hence anticoagulation is recommended to decrease this risk. Up to the present time, vitamin K antagonists are recommended by all societal guidelines for patients with left ventricular thrombi. Recently, several studies have investigated the role of different anticoagulants and yielded promising outcomes. This opinion article focuses on the evidence supporting vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants in patients with left ventricular thrombi.

Efficacy and safety of direct-acting oral anticoagulants compared to vitamin K antagonists in COVID-19 outpatients with cardiometabolic diseases

BACKGROUND

It remains uncertain if prior use of oral anticoagulants (OACs) in COVID-19 outpatients with multimorbidity impacts prognosis, especially if cardiometabolic diseases are present. Clinical outcomes 30-days after COVID-19 diagnosis were compared between outpatients with cardiometabolic disease receiving vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or direct-acting OAC (DOAC) therapy at time of COVID-19 diagnosis.

METHODS

A study was conducted using TriNetX, a global federated health research network. Adult outpatients with cardiometabolic disease (i.e. diabetes mellitus and any disease of the circulatory system) treated with VKAs or DOACs at time of COVID-19 diagnosis between 20-Jan-2020 and 15-Feb-2021 were included. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance cohorts receiving VKAs and DOACs. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission/mechanical ventilation (MV) necessity, intracranial haemorrhage (ICH)/gastrointestinal bleeding, and the composite of any arterial or venous thrombotic event(s) at 30-days after COVID-19 diagnosis.

RESULTS

2275 patients were included. After PSM, 1270 patients remained in the study (635 on VKAs; 635 on DOACs). VKA-treated patients had similar risks and 30-day event-free survival than patients on DOACs regarding all-cause mortality, ICU admission/MV necessity, and ICH/gastrointestinal bleeding. The risk of any arterial or venous thrombotic event was 43% higher in the VKA cohort (hazard ratio 1.43, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.98; Log-Rank test p = 0.029).

CONCLUSION

In COVID-19 outpatients with cardiometabolic diseases, prior use of DOAC therapy compared to VKA therapy at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis demonstrated lower risk of arterial or venous thrombotic outcomes, without increasing the risk of bleeding.