Spectacle prescriptions review to determine prevalence of ametropia and coverage of frequent replacement soft toric contact lenses

Optical Quality and Visual Performance With Different Toric Contact Lens Designs

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the optical quality of different toric contact lens (CL) designs and compare their on-eye visual correction performance.

METHODS

Twenty soft CL wearers aged 20 to 39 years were enrolled. Two daily disposable silicone-hydrogel toric CLs were tested: the "Eyelid Stabilized Design" (ESD-CL) and prism-ballast design (PB-CL); a spherical daily disposable silicone hydrogel CL (spherical CL) was used as a control. On-eye performance was compared for corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), astigmatism, and ocular higher-order aberrations (HOAs); astigmatism and ocular HOAs were measured with a wavefront sensor. The subjective quality of vision, rated for "blurred vision" and "double vision," lens rotation, and fitting were also compared.

RESULTS

The ESD-CLs, PB-CL, and no-CL provided better CDVA than spherical CL ( P <0.05). Compared with spherical CL and no CL, PB-CL and ESD-CLs caused significantly lesser astigmatism ( P <0.05). Coma was significantly lesser with ESD-CLs than that with PB-CL ( P <0.05); total HOAs did not differ among the four conditions. The subjective ratings for blurred and double vision were significantly lower with ESD-CLs than those with spherical CL ( P <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Toric CLs provide a better CDVA than spherical CLs. However, differences in coma and subjective symptoms may occur because of the design of toric CLs.

TFOS Lifestyle: Impact of contact lenses on the ocular surface

Several lifestyle choices made by contact lens wearers can have adverse consequences on ocular health. These include being non-adherent to contact lens care, sleeping in lenses, ill-advised purchasing options, not seeing an eyecare professional for regular aftercare visits, wearing lenses when feeling unwell, wearing lenses too soon after various forms of ophthalmic surgery, and wearing lenses when engaged in risky behaviors (e.g., when using tobacco, alcohol or recreational drugs). Those with a pre-existing compromised ocular surface may find that contact lens wear exacerbates ocular disease morbidity. Conversely, contact lenses may have various therapeutic benefits. The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic impinged upon the lifestyle of contact lens wearers, introducing challenges such as mask-associated dry eye, contact lens discomfort with increased use of digital devices, inadvertent exposure to hand sanitizers, and reduced use of lenses. Wearing contact lenses in challenging environments, such as in the presence of dust and noxious chemicals, or where there is the possibility of ocular trauma (e.g., sport or working with tools) can be problematic, although in some instances lenses can be protective. Contact lenses can be worn for sport, theatre, at high altitude, driving at night, in the military and in space, and special considerations are required when prescribing in such situations to ensure successful outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis, incorporated within the review, identified that the influence of lifestyle factors on soft contact lens dropout remains poorly understood, and is an area in need of further research. Overall, this report investigated lifestyle-related choices made by clinicians and contact lens wearers and discovered that when appropriate lifestyle choices are made, contact lens wear can enhance the quality of life of wearers.

Short-Term Fit Assessment of a Novel Daily Disposable, Toric, Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens

Purpose

The development of new contact lens materials and designs are necessary to minimise patient dropout. A lens material with water surface technology was recently developed to incorporate toric design. The on-eye stability of a toric contact lens is critical to a successful toric lens fitting. In an effort to establish if the new daily disposable verofilcon A toric silicone hydrogel lens provides fast stability for ease of fit, this study assessed the initial and short-term on-eye stability of this new lens.

Patients and Methods

Habitual full-time wearers of soft contact lenses, aged 18 or over, were enrolled and fit with the verofilcon A toric lens. Study endpoints included lens settling time, axis orientation at specific time-points within 10 minutes after insertion, lens oscillation with blink, lens movement and centration, and scribe mark visibility.

Results

Thirty-nine subjects completed the study; 67% were female and mean age was 34.1 ± 10.8 years (range 18 to 61). The majority of verofilcon A toric lenses (98.7%) settled on average within 60 seconds. Average lens orientation was 3° from six o’clock position within two minutes of insertion. The lenses showed minimal oscillation with blink; 98.7% of the eyes demonstrated ≤5° oscillation with blink. All lenses showed optimal/acceptable lens movement and centration and the scribe mark was reported as easily visible in 96% of eyes. Practitioners reported a 99% first lens fit success rate.

Conclusion

The novel verofilcon A toric lens was highly successful with the first lens, had excellent on-eye stability and good fit characteristics. These qualities make this new lens a good option for lens wearers. Furthermore, it fulfills the needs of practitioners who want a toric lens that is easy and predictable to fit.

Addressing common myths and misconceptions in soft contact lens practice

Advances in contact lens technology over the past 50 years since the commercialisation of the first soft lenses in 1971 have been incredible, with significant changes in contact lens materials, frequency of replacement, care systems and lens designs occurring. However, despite the widespread availability of contact lenses, penetration rates for those who need vision correction remain in the low single digits and many practitioners seem to hold on to concepts around the potential value of contact lenses that appear based in the dim and distant past and are certainly no longer valid today. This review addresses 10 common 'myths and misconceptions' around soft contact lenses using an evidence-based approach that can hopefully dispel some of these incorrect assumptions.

Magnitude of astigmatism - A comparison between eyes

PURPOSE

Astigmatism is a highly prevalent refractive error and while studies typically focus to describe the axis symmetry between eyes, little is known about the refractive symmetry. Therefore, this study determined the astigmatic power symmetry between eyes in a large clinic population.

METHODS

A clinical chart review was conducted at three optometric practices in the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada and subjective refraction data from 88,891 patients 14-70 years of age who presented with at least -0.25DC refractive astigmatism in at least one eye were included in the analysis. Data were obtained at these practices between January 2014 and March 2017. The overall distribution (%) and magnitude (DC) of astigmatism was determined and refractive differences between eyes were identified.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 42.1 ± 15.9 years and included 51,685 (58%) female and 37,206 (42%) male patients. In this data pool of 177,782 eyes, 10.9% required zero astigmatic correction, while 56.2% had astigmatism of -0.25 to -0.75DC. In total 23.9% of patients presented with astigmatism of at least -0.75DC in only one eye, while the other eye had 0 to -0.50DC. Overall, the difference in astigmatism between eyes was less than -0.75DC for 82.1% of astigmatic patients. For patients who presented with astigmatism of -1.00DC in the right eye, 80.8% of them had an astigmatic prescription of -1.00 ± 0.50DC in the left eye. For an astigmatic prescription of -4.00DC in the right eye, only 40.6% of patients exhibited astigmatism of -4.00DC ± 0.50DC in the left eye.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients exhibited a difference in astigmatism between eyes of less than -0.75DC, however the refractive cylinder power symmetry was significantly lower in patients with higher refractive astigmatism.